Feminism & the illusion of parity

[Hierarchalist]

What are the roots of feminist dogma and what are its aspirations?

How can it be integrated within a general western decline and within the all-leveling, materialistic, hedonistic Modernity, producing mindlessness and entitlement?

Can feminism be traced back to natural phenomena or is it a total disconnect with nature, a logical outcome of sheltering social systems which usurp natural balances, annighilating them, and replacing them with human constructs concerning justice, fairness, equality, utopian paradises?

How does enforcing a strict code of social behavior support the illusion of parity?

[Hierarchalist]

Interesting article by Camille paglia

http://ideas.time.com/2013/12/16/its-a-mans-world-and-it-always-will-be/

[Hierarchalist]

Bump

[Hierarchalist]

Bump

[Neanderthal]

I think feminism in it's foundations was actually a pretty noble movement on which I even could adhere. I believe in equality of opportunities, but if you can't get shit done, good riddance motherfucker. There is no equality in nature, so, in essence any movement advocating equality is 'unnatural', but we are supposed to be mammals with advanced cognitive functions and a bunch of other shit like morals and compassion, so that's why i'm totally in favor of same opportunities for all, tho, I don't like someone less bright than myself, weaker, or too emotionally frail as superior of myself. I dislike the idea, I believe you must earn everything you have with hard work and dedication. There are no freebies in mother nature hommie.

[Nehellenia]

In the regards of gender supremacy, i don't regard that that what feminism is for. but the feminism movement is a belief in which women should be treated equal to men in human rights and throughout the world it is still not so.
100 years ago, women couldn't vote, they didn't work, born simply to be a mother later on.. so i find feminism extremely helpful as it is meant to better women's lives and allow them the same aspirations that men enjoy, why not?

[michelle]

Look at the Muoso women. Seemed to work just fine for them.

[Neanderthal]

Look at the Muoso women. Seemed to work just fine for them.

Oh you mean these promiscuous Chinese bitches? That's what feminists aspire for?

[michelle]

Oh you mean these promiscuous Chinese bitches? That's what feminists aspire for?

No, it was a joke. OBVIOUSLY feminists believe in gender equality. Jesus

[KidMulat]

That article was horrible.

Also why do people talk about feminism as if there were just one form of it?

[Neanderthal]

No, it was a joke. OBVIOUSLY feminists believe in gender equality. Jesus

Glad to hear that, I dislike promiscuity, be from a man or a woman. Promiscuity equates weak character, some might argue it's the natural order of things, what humans are designed for, but the same people who advocate promiscuity as natural would advocate a lot of unnatural behaviors. Quite funny actually.

[michelle]

Glad to hear that, I dislike promiscuity, be from a man or a woman. Promiscuity equates weak character, some might argue it's the natural order of things, what humans are designed for, but the same people who advocate promiscuity as natural would advocate a lot of unnatural behaviors. Quite funny actually.

Well biologically men SHOULD be promiscuous while the opposite is true for women. But we're in a social contract and we're supposed to not sleep around. I have a hard time with the concept of morality being entirely inherent after studying behavior for so long. I can't see us as anything other than animals. Smart animals, but nonetheless.

[Nehellenia]

Oh you mean these promiscuous Chinese bitches? That's what feminists aspire for?

Are the Mosuo men getting a bad deal too?

[Neanderthal]

Well biologically men SHOULD be promiscuous while the opposite is true for women. But we're in a social contract and we're supposed to not sleep around. I have a hard time with the concept of morality being entirely inherent after studying behavior for so long. I can't see us as anything other than animals. Smart animals, but nonetheless.

I agree, but at the same time I told you in my last post I dislike the way people arrange things just to favor their agendas, some things are cool as nature intended them to be, and some others are not. I don't get that. You cannot modify reality to your convenience.


Are the Mosuo men getting a bad deal too?

It depends, for me, I couldn't live like that, i'm pretty aggressive and I never liked sharing, but I suppose for more passive and receptive guy would be paradise, like for example many men nowadays don't want to work and want their partner to bring the income. I'm not against that, neither i'm in favor, it just wouldn't work for me.

[michelle]

I agree, but at the same time I told you in my last post I dislike the way people arrange things just to favor their agendas, some things are cool as nature intended them to be, and some others are not. I don't get that. You cannot modify reality to your convenience.


It depends, for me, I couldn't live like that, i'm pretty aggressive and I never liked sharing, but I suppose for more passive and receptive guy would be paradise, like for example many men nowadays don't want to work and want their partner to bring the income. I'm not against that, neither i'm in favor, it just wouldn't work for me.

I understand, but the social contract IS arranging things to fit society's agenda, which is a good thing *sometimes*. If a behavior is natural, as in men needing to get rid of their surplus sperm and thus are naturally inclined to be more promiscuous, then going against the grain to conform to a monogamous relationship is a guarantee of some outliers somewhere and for those cultures where it works for them, you'll see no natural problems arise from it. What you perceive as natural or beneficial just depends on the culture in which you grew up.

In any case, I couldn't do it either. :)

[Neanderthal]

I understand, but the social contract IS arranging things to fit society's agenda, which is a good thing *sometimes*. If a behavior is natural, as in men needing to get rid of their surplus sperm and thus are naturally inclined to be more promiscuous, then going against the grain to conform to a monogamous relationship is a guarantee of some outliers somewhere and for those cultures where it works for them, you'll see no natural problems arise from it. What you perceive as natural or beneficial just depends on the culture in which you grew up.

In any case, I couldn't do it either. :)

I agree. I don't even think there's a problem with society, I probably just came to the world in a wrong place, wrong time and with the wrong ideas. I'm still hoping to be rescued tho, hopefully someone takes me back to my planet.

[michelle]

I agree. I don't even think there's a problem with society, I probably just came to the world in a wrong place, wrong time and with the wrong ideas. I'm still hoping to be rescued tho, hopefully someone takes me back to my planet.

I see you've been listening to Bowie's Life on Mars! It's always spoken to me as well. Lol One day we'll make to our correct planets.

[Virtuous]

In the regards of gender supremacy, i don't regard that that what feminism is for. but the feminism movement is a belief in which women should be treated equal to men in human rights and throughout the world it is still not so.
100 years ago, women couldn't vote, they didn't work, born simply to be a mother later on.. so i find feminism extremely helpful as it is meant to better women's lives and allow them the same aspirations that men enjoy, why not?

A 100 years ago you say?

http://www.dhm.de/ausstellungen/lebensstationen/bilder_750/2_134.gif

http://www.germanvictims.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Gymnastic.jpg

http://justice4germans.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/girls-waving-nazi-flags-e1373156844522.jpg%3Fw%3D600%26h%3D420

http://static.safehaven.com/authors/watson/5188_a.jpg

http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/14/10/60/3181626/7/628x471.jpg

http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/5080579deab8eaf347000005-400-300/in-january-france-followed-through-with-its-threat-further-devastating-the-german-economy.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_yC3M5zHeS4A/R1K97bT7wqI/AAAAAAAAALM/VubIpW0SqtQ/s1600-R/IMG_0362.JPG

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1/1558470_597955370259948_1464909903_n.jpg

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t31/q71/s720x720/1559501_609406245781527_1350722429_o.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-7-vboSIDG8/TBeEebM8cbI/AAAAAAAAGWk/lshfdqU_lp0/s1600/german-soldiers-wehrmacht-second-world-war-pictures-003.jpg

http://isurvived.org/Pictures_iSurvived-5/Kielce_Funeral3.GIF

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LoPTdkHrjjk/SrsmIXSpsYI/AAAAAAAAFYc/6PVqNzT-M4g/s1600/danzig-massacres-1939-001.jpg

[Hierarchalist]

I think feminism in it's foundations was actually a pretty noble movement on which I even could adhere. I believe in equality of opportunities, but if you can't get shit done, good riddance motherfucker. There is no equality in nature, so, in essence any movement advocating equality is 'unnatural', but we are supposed to be mammals with advanced cognitive functions and a bunch of other shit like morals and compassion, so that's why i'm totally in favor of same opportunities for all, tho, I don't like someone less bright than myself, weaker, or too emotionally frail as superior of myself. I dislike the idea, I believe you must earn everything you have with hard work and dedication. There are no freebies in mother nature hommie.


Good points.....But what is the justification for equal opportunities?

Equal Opportunity

What does equal opportunity amounts to? It amounts to creating an artificial parity, as close to the absolute as possible, by using human intervention. This is also called uniformity.

How? by imposing a common behavioral standard, limiting the upper and lower expressions of it, thusly creating mediocrity.
So, the upper extreme is denied expression, punished for taking advantage of those beneath it or for remaining outside the social paradigm...and the lower extreme being excused or aides to rise up to at least the mediocre standard.

Affirmative action for the Negroes in America, and now this glass ceiling when it comes to gender issues is nothing more than a way of rationalizing the help the inferior must be given to raise them to the level of averageness. This is a deference to weakness. Instead of promoting superior talents and intellects and abilities, the system promotes parity, as to develop internal harmony via uniformity.

[Hierarchalist]

In the regards of gender supremacy, i don't regard that that what feminism is for. but the feminism movement is a belief in which women should be treated equal to men in human rights and throughout the world it is still not so.
100 years ago, women couldn't vote, they didn't work, born simply to be a mother later on.. so i find feminism extremely helpful as it is meant to better women's lives and allow them the same aspirations that men enjoy, why not?


Thanks for commenting..

Feminism is a branch of egalitarianism. Egalitarianism is the outcrop of Judeo Christian ethos. Bible says we're all created equal under God. In modern systems we're made equal under the State.

Equality

A Fundamental moral meaning of equality, pioneered by Jews, is the equality of masculine and feminine gender qualities. You hear this bullshit all the time when discussing gender issues. "We're different, but Equal". The very term "equal" is an absurdity, as nothing in nature is ever equal. Not even a man is equal to another. Not even twins are exactly the same...not even clones are so.

Equality would seem to implicate an ultimate trajectory of evolutionary “regression” because equal rights imply the beginning of the end of Darwinian selection.

As for women being granted voting rights & working rights, it has everything to do with Economics, not that we've reached a state of enlightenment, like all progressives would like to believe. The goal of modern systems is to promote the ideal of production/consumption...the former connected to the work-ethic (common with both communist and capitalist economic structures), the latter connected to hedonism and materialism.

If goal is to increase production, what better way to do this than promoting women in the workplace and turning them into wage slaves? How this contributes to the destruction of family in the west is another matter..

[Nehellenia]

A 100 years ago you say?

http://www.dhm.de/ausstellungen/lebensstationen/bilder_750/2_134.gif

http://www.germanvictims.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Gymnastic.jpg

http://justice4germans.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/girls-waving-nazi-flags-e1373156844522.jpg%3Fw%3D600%26h%3D420

http://static.safehaven.com/authors/watson/5188_a.jpg

http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/14/10/60/3181626/7/628x471.jpg

http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/5080579deab8eaf347000005-400-300/in-january-france-followed-through-with-its-threat-further-devastating-the-german-economy.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_yC3M5zHeS4A/R1K97bT7wqI/AAAAAAAAALM/VubIpW0SqtQ/s1600-R/IMG_0362.JPG

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1/1558470_597955370259948_1464909903_n.jpg

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t31/q71/s720x720/1559501_609406245781527_1350722429_o.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-7-vboSIDG8/TBeEebM8cbI/AAAAAAAAGWk/lshfdqU_lp0/s1600/german-soldiers-wehrmacht-second-world-war-pictures-003.jpg

http://isurvived.org/Pictures_iSurvived-5/Kielce_Funeral3.GIF

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LoPTdkHrjjk/SrsmIXSpsYI/AAAAAAAAFYc/6PVqNzT-M4g/s1600/danzig-massacres-1939-001.jpg

All those pics are less than 100 years ago and yes, the war changed a lot and set the motion, women were needed to work just as much as men were needed to.

[michelle]

Good points.....But what is the justification for equal opportunities?

Equal Opportunity

What does equal opportunity amounts to? It amounts to creating an artificial parity, as close to the absolute as possible, by using human intervention. This is also called uniformity.

How? by imposing a common behavioral standard, limiting the upper and lower expressions of it, thusly creating mediocrity.
So, the upper extreme is denied expression, punished for taking advantage of those beneath it or for remaining outside the social paradigm...and the lower extreme being excused or aides to rise up to at least the mediocre standard.

Affirmative action for the Negroes in America, and now this glass ceiling when it comes to gender issues is nothing more than a way of rationalizing the help the inferior must be given to raise them to the level of averageness. This is a deference to weakness. Instead of promoting superior talents and intellects and abilities, the system promotes parity, as to develop internal harmony via uniformity.

So I'm curious--if you believe that women are inferior, where is the appropriate place for them in society? You don't believe women should be given the same opportunities as men, so should they be confined to childbirth exclusively? What do you do with women who excel in areas that are deemed "male"?

[rhiannon]

He should tell all this to the woman doctor who walks in the room to help him when he's sick next time.
:picard2:

[Hierarchalist]

So I'm curious--if you believe that women are inferior, where is the appropriate place for them in society? You don't believe women should be given the same opportunities as men, so should they be confined to childbirth exclusively? What do you do with women who excel in areas that are deemed "male"?

Thank you for your comments ma'am...

Superior/Inferior are comparisons of one attribute or a more general comparison between one individual's totality of attributes as they relate to another and in reference to the world and the environmental conditions they coexist within and commonly percieve and interpret. In short...It depends on the context...

We may say that a cheetah is superior to a snail when comparing their speeds as survival tactics and when comparing humans we may use intelligence as the defining characteristic which sets man apart from any other organism, as a survival tactic.

It is obvious that any such consideration will hit at the very heart of human identity and so it will be fraught with emotionalism and a resistance to any judgment. It is the main reason why it is a topic off-limits to anyone not willing to risk social and cultural inclusion or a severe and angry backlash. As witnessed in this very forum.


Are men physically superior to females ? Yes. Even the feminists will agree.
Are men superior to women in abstract, analytical thinking? Yes. This is not to say that all me are this way. It means there is a higher potential.

In short, men are superior to females in certain things, while females are superior in others.

And No, I don't believe women should be confined as birthing machines. They should be allowed certain opportunities, and they should work and be educated. A woman is a man's partner and safe haven.

[Hierarchalist]

He should tell all this to the woman doctor who walks in the room to help him when he's sick next time.
:picard2:

No ma'am, you misunderstood my positions. I'm not suggesting women should be prohibited from any profession. The issue is the of lowering standards to maintain the pretense of "equality"..

[michelle]

Thank you for your comments ma'am...

Superior/Inferior are comparisons of one attribute or a more general comparison between one individual's totality of attributes as they relate to another and in reference to the world and the environmental conditions they coexist within and commonly percieve and interpret. In short...It depends on the context...

We may say that a cheetah is superior to a snail when comparing their speeds as survival tactics and when comparing humans we may use intelligence as the defining characteristic which sets man apart from any other organism, as a survival tactic.

It is obvious that any such consideration will hit at the very heart of human identity and so it will be fraught with emotionalism and a resistance to any judgment. It is the main reason why it is a topic off-limits to anyone not willing to risk social and cultural inclusion or a severe and angry backlash. As witnessed in this very forum.


Are men physically superior to females ? Yes. Even the feminists will agree.
Are men superior to women in abstract, analytical thinking? Yes. This is not to say that all me are this way. It means there is a higher potential.

In short, men are superior to females in certain things, while females are superior in others.

And No, I don't believe women should be confined as birthing machines. They should be allowed certain opportunities, and they should work and be educated. A woman is a man's partner and safe haven.

Ridiculous. You cannot be serious; especially with all of the studies proving otherwise. Women's mental capacity for analytical thinking is no different than men's.

[Hierarchalist]

Ridiculous. You cannot be serious; especially with all of the studies proving otherwise. Women's mental capacity for analytical thinking is no different than men's.

I hope you're being sarcastic...I'm still waiting for the first female genius to revolutionize human thought...the elusive female genius..she's out there....somewhere...

[dude]

Feminists come across as if they want to dominate men. I am all for equality, like if you perform the same job get paid the same, but not do less than me and get paid the same. If the ladies can not do 3 pull ups then by equality they should not be able to perform certain jobs in the military, just like I am unable to dance on stage and make other straight man buy drinks.

[michelle]

I hope you're being sarcastic...I'm still waiting for the first female genius to revolutionize human thought...the elusive female genius..she's out there....somewhere...

George Sand, Lisa Randall, Ayn Rand, Emilie Chaltelet, Hypatia, George Eliot, Marie Curie, Sofia Kovalevskaya, Mary Somerville, Emmy Noether, Lise Meitner, etc. I think you're being disingenuous here.

[rhiannon]

Same pay for the same skill set. Simple.

[rhiannon]

By the way… men are physically stronger, but not necessarily physically superior. There is a distinction between the two.

[Hierarchalist]

George Sand, Lisa Randall, Ayn Rand, Emilie Chaltelet, Hypatia, George Eliot, Marie Curie, Sofia Kovalevskaya, Mary Somerville, Emmy Noether, Lise Meitner, etc. I think you're being disingenuous here.

You forgot Oprah Winfrey & Britney Spears..lol....on a more serious note, what exactly did the women you mention revolutionize?

We'll have to wait for the next piece, written by a woman, that will revolutionize human thought and expand human horizons. Until then let us consider as 'enlightening' the Oprah Winfreys and feminist writers telling us how gender is a male invention and that a 'genuine' male washes dishes and wears an apron and, why not?, also gets pregnant.

[michelle]

You forgot Oprah Winfrey & Britney Spears..lol....on a more serious note, what exactly did the women you mention revolutionize?

We'll have to wait for the next piece, written by a woman, that will revolutionize human thought and expand human horizons. Until then let us consider as 'enlightening' the Oprah Winfreys and feminist writers telling us how gender is a male invention and that a 'genuine' male washes dishes and wears an apron and, why not?, also gets pregnant.

Whatever blows your hair back, dude.

[Hierarchalist]

Whatever blows your hair back, dude.

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/American-Psycho-Thanks.gif

[michelle]

Your welcome.

[Unome]

A 100 years ago you say?

http://www.dhm.de/ausstellungen/lebensstationen/bilder_750/2_134.gif

http://www.germanvictims.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Gymnastic.jpg

http://justice4germans.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/girls-waving-nazi-flags-e1373156844522.jpg%3Fw%3D600%26h%3D420

http://static.safehaven.com/authors/watson/5188_a.jpg

http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/14/10/60/3181626/7/628x471.jpg

http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/5080579deab8eaf347000005-400-300/in-january-france-followed-through-with-its-threat-further-devastating-the-german-economy.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_yC3M5zHeS4A/R1K97bT7wqI/AAAAAAAAALM/VubIpW0SqtQ/s1600-R/IMG_0362.JPG

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1/1558470_597955370259948_1464909903_n.jpg

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t31/q71/s720x720/1559501_609406245781527_1350722429_o.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-7-vboSIDG8/TBeEebM8cbI/AAAAAAAAGWk/lshfdqU_lp0/s1600/german-soldiers-wehrmacht-second-world-war-pictures-003.jpg

http://isurvived.org/Pictures_iSurvived-5/Kielce_Funeral3.GIF

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LoPTdkHrjjk/SrsmIXSpsYI/AAAAAAAAFYc/6PVqNzT-M4g/s1600/danzig-massacres-1939-001.jpg
/thread

[Hierarchalist]

bump

[Hierarchalist]

Uk historian David Starkey on gender quotas in British parliament


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnW3MacQ0G4

[Hierarchalist]

MRA (men's rights movement)

MRA = The male version of Feminism. Heard of it? It's an interesting social phenomena.

MRA = The Beta male retribution


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyenSX4XSZA


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhZDMUyv_4A


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41PanwpYZXM

[Hierarchalist]

Creating a "Level playing field" is a central theme in modern politics. This is the justification used for gender quotas and affirmative action.

These bleeding heart liberals and moronic conservatives neglect to consider why the playing field is not level to begin with, or if there is such a thing as a level playing field.

Does natural selection depend on level competitive grounds and idea of fair-play? How would this produce evolution? Is not the idea of fairness and justice a man made concept meant to 'correct' the genetic and environmental effects upon an unfortunate individual so as to not exclude him/her from the social and cultural unity?

[Hierarchalist]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-L6cF1uc4c

[Hierarchalist]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w

Isn't that sweet? a parody of a conversation where the males are made to sound like buffoons and the woman, the one woman, is made to sound as an above average female amongst below average males.
Then we all laugh at how absurd these generalizations all are and we leave, returning to the truths of our own cultural dogmas, knowing that there is no real difference between men and women.

It's all made up, and how foolish we look when we see ourselves in the caricatures the parody forces upon us.

[Neanderthal]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w

Isn't that sweet? a parody of a conversation where the males are made to sound like buffoons and the woman, the one woman, is made to sound as an above average female amongst below average males.
Then we all laugh at how absurd these generalizations all are and we leave, returning to the truths of our own cultural dogmas, knowing that there is no real difference between men and women.

It's all made up, and how foolish we look when we see ourselves in the caricatures the parody forces upon us.

To be honest I haven't meet many women that can discuss a subject like that. Women are very prone to fall to pseudo-scientific speech, and often they are biased by their own decision. Of course this is not the norm. I know many very bright girls, my girlfriend for example, but for average female college student it's almost impossible to discuss new ideas with them.

For example, there's this girl on my girlfriend class, friend of my girlfriend, that would sometimes chat with me on Facebook. She often post all this pseudo-intellectual propaganda, like; 'save the animals! let's all turn vegetarian!' and similar themes. I'm not quite sure how does the cognitive and deductive process function on people like this, but if you try another approach with them, they get affected by cognitive dissonance, and they get mad because they cannot understand different points of view.

She once told me: 'I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over race!', and I told her, 'well, I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over wallet and abs either.' That got her thinking quite some time. :lol:

[Hierarchalist]

To be honest I haven't meet many women that can discuss a subject like that. Women are very prone to fall to pseudo-scientific speech, and often they are biased by their own decision. Of course this is not the norm. I know many very bright girls, my girlfriend for example, but for average female college student it's almost impossible to discuss new ideas with them.

For example, there's this girl on my girlfriend class, friend of my girlfriend, that would sometimes chat with me on Facebook. She often post all this pseudo-intellectual propaganda, like; 'save the animals! let's all turn vegetarian!' and similar themes. I'm not quite sure how does the cognitive and deductive process function on people like this, but if you try another approach with them, they get affected by cognitive dissonance, and they get mad because they cannot understand different points of view.

She once told me: 'I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over race!', and I told her, 'well, I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over wallet and abs either.' That got her thinking quite some time. :lol:


Women are the simplest creatures out there. Simple is feminine.

Look at philosophy and science. What thinking dominates?

Women adapt to whatever is given. They are pragmatic in the sense that they restrict their perspective to a very small temporal space and a very linear perspective. It is why men dominate, because they have a wider event horizon. Women make do. All they see are immediate relationships as they pertain to them. This is why women don't excel in anything beyond sex and relationships. They are frivolous. That is why their passions and loyalties and loves are unpredictable and shallow.

[rob211080]

The end of western civilization was sealed as soon as women got the vote,they have simply been voting themselves a pay rise ever since.Emotions before logic.

[Hierarchalist]

The end of western civilization was sealed as soon as women got the vote,they have simply been voting themselves a pay rise ever since.Emotions before logic.

The reason feminism has become such a viable ideal is not because of its logic or transcending virtuousness but because human meddling has made it possible to control female conception and it has found alternative, more subtle methods to integrate males into the system.

[Hierarchalist]

Bump

[Hierarchalist]

Francis Parker Yockey wrote

Liberalism is an escape from hardness into softness, from masculinity into femininity, from History to herd-grazing, from reality into herbivorous dreams, from Destiny into Happiness. Nietzsche, in his last and greatest work, designated the 18th century as the century of feminism, and immediately mentioned Rousseau, the leader of the mass-escape from Reality. Feminism itself — what is it but a means of feminizing man? If it makes women man-like, it does so only by transforming man first into a creature whose only concern is with his personal economics and his relation to “society,” i.e., a woman. “Society” is the element of woman, it is static and formal, its contests are purely personal, and are free from the possibility of heroism and violence. Conversation, not action; formality, not deeds. How different is the idea of rank used in connection with a social affair, from when it is applied on a battlefield! In the field, it is fate-laden; in the salon it is vain and pompous. A war is fought for control, social contests are inspired by feminine vanity and jealousy to show that one is “better” than someone else.