G-spot 'doesn't exist', claim scientists after location hunt

[Loki]

G-spot 'doesn't exist', claim scientists after location hunt (http://www.metro.co.uk/lifestyle/807889-g-spot-doesnt-exist-claim-scientists)

Bad news, girls – after years of debate and search for its precise location, researchers have concluded that G-spot does not actually exist.

http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/05/article-1262698341321-07C37663000005DC-34866_636x300.jpg

The elusive erogenous zone said to exist in some women and denied to others may just be a myth encouraged by magazines and sex therapists, according to a team of British scientists.

The King's College London team interviewed 1,800 women and found no proof of it.

All of the women were pairs of identical or non-identical twins. Identical twins share all their genes, while non-identical pairs share 50 per cent of theirs.

If one identical twin reported having a G-spot, this would make it far more likely that her sister would say the same.

But this pattern failed to emerge, suggesting the G-spot is a matter of the woman’s subjective opinion.

Professor Tim Spector, co-author of the study, told The Times: "Women may argue that having a G-spot is due to diet or exercise, but in fact it is virtually impossible to find real traits.”

“This is by far the biggest study ever carried out and it shows fairly conclusively that the idea of a G-spot is subjective.”

Colleague Andrea Burri claimed she wanted to remove feelings of “inadequacy or underachievement” that women who feared they lacked a G-spot might feel.

"It is rather irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too."

The G-Spot, was named in honour of the German gynaecologist Ernst Gräfenberg who described it over 50 years ago and is said to sit in the front wall of the vagina.

Sexologist Beverley Whipple who helped popularise the G-spot idea said the work was "flawed" claiming researchers had failed to take into account the experiences of lesbian or bisexual women and different love-making techniques.

[December]

Poll material :D

Hm... Better not. :P

[Absinthe]

Why not? :D Make sure to make votes public :p

[Jarl]

Of course it does not exist! A G-spot??? What the hell would that be?!

[Loki]

Why not? :D Make sure to make votes public :p

Poll added then. :D

[December]

I gotta learn to be quiet! :D

Hm... I'd chose "I don't know"...

[Absinthe]

And I thought this poll was addressed to women only? :D :o

[December]

Professor Tim Spector, co-author of the study,

"Professor Tim Spector, female body inspector"...

Sorry! Couldn't resist! :D but the man has a really curious name for his job. Kind of a Doctor Love, but kinky and all...

[Liffrea]

The King's College London team interviewed 1,800 women and found no proof of it.

This is just to easy……

[Eldritch]

And I thought this poll was addressed to women only? :D :o

I'm a man and I can tell you from experience it does exist -- for some women at least. For others it seems not to, or perhaps more likely it's in some inaccessible location.

[Jarl]

I'm a man and I can tell you from experience it does exist -- for some women at least. For others it seems not to, or perhaps more likely it's in some inaccessible location.

I think you are grossly underestimating womens' acting skills ;)

[Jarl]

I mean what the hell???


The Gräfenberg Spot, or G-Spot, is a term used to describe the bean-shaped[1] area of the vagina that many women report to contain an erogenous zone which when stimulated can lead to high levels of sexual arousal and powerful orgasms.[2] It is typically located one to three inches up the front (anterior) vaginal wall between the vagina opening and the urethra.

Nonsense! It is like with the so called "female ejaculation":


Links between G-Spot sensitivity and female ejaculation have led to the idea that non-urine female ejaculate might originate from the female paraurethral glands, or Skene's gland: in a study by Tepper et al., tissue from 18 patients was examined and 15 showed prostate-specific antigens.[18]

A bunch of moronic lies for insatiable elderly perverts.


The Gräfenberg Spot, or G-Spot, is a term used to describe the area of the vagina that might contain an erogenous zone which when stimulated can lead to...

blah blah

[Svanhild]

I'm a man and I can tell you from experience it does exist -- for some women at least. For others it seems not to, or perhaps more likely it's in some inaccessible location.
It's all about arousal, vivid imagination and erogenous areas. The notorious G-spot is a combination of all three aspects: It works in the mind and every mind thinks and feels different.
I can't believe that scientists wasted tax money on finding a self-evident nonexistent organ. :blink:

[Jarl]

A study using ultrasound found women who report having vaginal orgasms do have thicker tissue in the G-Spot region, but this could be an extension of the clitoris rather than a separate structure.

:confused:


About 56% of women, who tend to be younger and more sexually active, report having a G-Spot.

Sure! And 50% report having nipple orgasms or 10 orgasms in a row non-stop... and whatever you can think of to make yourself look like a sex-goddess ;)


Sexual psychologists are concerned women may label themselves "dysfunctional" if they cannot find a G-Spot,[4] and women have had plastic surgery done to enhance G-Spot sensitivity.

Hahaha! Poor women! Its like rubbing lotions in order to make their breasts larger or decrease the size of their buttocks.


The largest study to date on the G-Spot found its existence unproven and subjective among women.[5]

Scientific examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings.[13] A recent study of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density.[15]

And this is a fact.


G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods: for instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples.[13]

The existence of the G-Spot was denounced by a team at King's College London in late 2009. They acquired the largest sample size to date of 1,800 women – who are pairs of twins – and found they did not report a similar G-Spot, suggesting its existence is subjective.[17] Study co-author Dr. Andrea Burri believes: "It is irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too."[5]

G-spot advocate Dr. Whipple:


...dismissed the findings pointing out twins have different sexual partners and techniques, and the study did not properly account for lesbian or bisexual women.[17]

lol! :rolleyes:

[Eldritch]

It's all about arousal, vivid imagination and erogenous areas. The notorious G-spot is a combination of all three aspects: It works in the mind and every mind thinks and feels different.
I can't believe that scientists wasted tax money on finding a self-evident nonexistent organ. :blink:

Too bad they didn't get women with doctor fantasies or medical fetishes for this study then. ;)

[Jarl]

Here is the truth behind the G-spot business:


Sexual psychologists are concerned about the promotion of the G-Spot, as it leads to women who do not have one feeling "dysfunctional".

You conduct bullshit surveys and gather "anecdotal evidence" which makes 99.9% normal women feel "dysfunctional" and then....


A Beverly Hills cosmetic surgeon, Dr. David Matlock, has pioneered G-Spot Amplification (brand name G-SHOT); sometimes resulting in a zone so sensitive orgasms are induced while driving on bumpy roads.[17] This is accomplished by injecting human engineered collagen into the G-Spot region making it larger and easier to stimulate.[26]

:rofl::rotfl

[Jarl]

LOL! I propose... they started injecting collagen into their brains and eyes to think and see sharper! ;)

[Fortis in Arduis]

A Beverly Hills cosmetic surgeon, Dr. David Matlock, has pioneered G-Spot Amplification (brand name G-SHOT); sometimes resulting in a zone so sensitive orgasms are induced while driving on bumpy roads.[17] This is accomplished by injecting human engineered collagen into the G-Spot region making it larger and easier to stimulate.[26]

Actually, my BOTOX-ician also offers this service and she is trained in the surgical specialty of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and is a member of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

She would know if anyone does.

[Jarl]

Woot? She's offering collagen injections into vaginal submucosa, saying it ensures better stimulation and orgasms???? :-o


Actually, my BOTOX-ician...

Erm... right! :D

[Hrolf Kraki]

Bullshit. I just saw on Dr. Oz the other day (my mom watches the show) a short lecture on the G-spot. He showed where it was and what it felt like to the touch (resembles soft palate). On another show I heard that achieving an orgasm (female) does have a little to do with genetics.

I think these scientists are just bad lovers and want to find an excuse. :p

[Jarl]

He showed where it was and what it felt like to the touch (resembles soft palate).

Frankly, I think there is not a lot in a woman's vagina that feels or resembles a hard palate, or teeth...



I hope... :icon_ask:

[anonymaus]

As I mentioned in a previous thread (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11553), these scientists should get out of the lab and do some field work. Bring goggles and a dental dam.

I really despise "news" items like this; there are enough bullshit attacks on female sexuality as is. They needn't be compounded with "studies" which have a patina of legitimacy, but nothing underneath.

[Thulsa Doom]

This is just to easy……

Don´t do it. Resist the temptation, son. :tape::D

[Majar]

It is real, but it isn't as depicted in pop culture. It isn't a magic button that sets of an instant :eek3:explosion:eek3: upon being touched. :p

[Brynhild]

http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Funny/G-spot.jpg

[jerney]

Anyone who says it doesn't exist has never had good sex.

[Hrolf Kraki]

Frankly, I think there is not a lot in a woman's vagina that feels or resembles a hard palate, or teeth...



I hope... :icon_ask:

Soft palate. That's what I thought he said. Maybe he meant the texture. I don't know.

[Hrolf Kraki]

It is real, but it isn't as depicted in pop culture. It isn't a magic button that sets of an instant :eek3:explosion:eek3: upon being touched. :p

I see..

Well now that just sounds too damn complicated!

[Jarl]

Haha! Predict the unpredictable (women)!


Stage 1


Sure! And 50% report having nipple orgasms or 10 orgasms in a row non-stop... and whatever you can think of to make yourself look like a sex-goddess ;)

;)



Stage 2


Anyone who says it doesn't exist has never had good sex.

;) ;) ;)




P.S.

Jerney, I think you watch too much porn (and I know you do!) :P

[Svanhild]

Anyone who says it doesn't exist has never had good sex.
Veto: If you can't have good sex without utilizing the imaginary G-spot you don't have good sex at all. :wink Sex is so much more than the mere satisfaction of only one single pleasure center between our legs.

[Artur]

Anyone who says it doesn't exist has never had good sex.

most women I know says they achieve orgasm because of the clitoris and that inside the vagina they don't feel much pleasure. :confused:

[Jamt]

It’s kind of un-manly to worry about the G-spot and being un-Viking is no way to give a woman satisfaction. Not that that is my premier goal when having intercourse.

[Jarl]

It’s kind of un-manly to worry about the G-spot and being un-Viking is no way to give a woman satisfaction. Not that that is my premier goal when having intercourse.

Viking-like? This bs is for old uneducated pervertidos! ;)

[SuuT]

most women I know says they achieve orgasm because of the clitoris and that inside the vagina they don't feel much pleasure. :confused:

Clitoral vs. Vaginal orgasm: Two different things (but can happen at once).

[Jamt]

Viking-like? This bs is for old uneducated pervertidos! ;)

To be un-Viking is something very real in this time and age and hopefully for you, you will learn it’s not a very prosperous and lucky way to live your life. Nothing old and pervert about it. It’s looking for G-spots that might be that.

[Jarl]

It’s looking for G-spots that might be that.


:sherlock:

[Tony]

most women I know says they achieve orgasm because of the clitoris and that inside the vagina they don't feel much pleasure. :confused:
That's intersting , once a female friend of mine told me half serious half joking that , as she had a a fully and ipersensitive g-spot just located on her clit and she knew that perfectly (she's a very progressive womand , not shy at all) we males should be made differently , with a sort of horn attached on our penis so as to be able to "trill" their clitoris. :rolleyes:

From an evolutionary point of view it sounds bizarre how this g-spot is supposed to be located not into the vaginal area but outside , where the male's organ can't go during a normal penetration.

In my view it's s thing in progress , women's body is still on evolution so some may have it , more or less sensitive , and others not at all.

[Cail]

we males should be made differently , with a sort of horn attached on our penis so as to be able to "trill" their clitoris. :rolleyes:

http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/Gabbo82/USETHEFORCE.png

[Artur]

I was talking to a woman a while back and she said that while we(men) like to penetrate deeply into the cervix, they like to have the outside of the vagina stimulated. She said her pleasure is totally on the clitoris and that this g-spot idea is a myth.

I didn't and won't vote and reckon that our male opinion is worthless. Only the female users would give usefull answers on it.

[Fortis in Arduis]

*** VAGINA ***
:pound:

[SuuT]

^Never mind him, Folks - he received a side order of Tourettes with his Aspbergers.

[Fortis in Arduis]

^Never mind him, Folks - he received a side order of Tourettes with his Aspbergers.

This is true but the good Austrian doctor, who identified us fussy folk, was called Hans Asperger.

It is not so compulsive when I am in company, but I might be walking round the house and suddenly something will pop into my mind and I will feel the need to issue an expletive, which is usually 'c***' or 'slag'.

Vagina, vagina, vagina, vagina, vagina... :coffee:

[December]

"Professor Tim Spector, female body inspector"...

Sorry! Couldn't resist! :D but the man has a really curious name for his job. Kind of a Doctor Love, but kinky and all...


Clitoral vs. Vaginal orgasm: Two different things (but can happen at once).

I think... well... studying clitoral orgasm is not a job for Professor T'im Spector.

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3576&stc=1&d=1263239979

...

Sorry... I had to. :D

[Hrolf Kraki]

To be un-Viking is something very real in this time and age and hopefully for you, you will learn it’s not a very prosperous and lucky way to live your life. Nothing old and pervert about it. It’s looking for G-spots that might be that.


Are you saying that trying to find a woman's G-spot is perverted?

[Murphy]

This is just proof that scientists are poor in bed.

Regards,
The Papist.

[Svanhild]

This is just proof that scientists are poor in bed.

Regards,
The Papist.
Listen to this! The conservative catholic clergy talks about sexual stimulation. Do you have other fresh informations in respect of sexual facets from the halls of lust and pleasure, the Vatican? :wink

[Jarl]

Are you saying that trying to find a woman's G-spot is perverted?

No. He said clearly "nothing old and perverted about it"....


BUT


He also said "not a very prosperous and lucky way to live your life"...



I'm thus assuming, he meant it's a waste of time. And I agree. You can't search for something which nobody knows what it is ;)

[Hrolf Kraki]

No. He said clearly "nothing old and perverted about it"....


BUT


He also said "not a very prosperous and lucky way to live your life"...



I'm thus assuming, he meant it's a waste of time. And I agree. You can't search for something which nobody knows what it is ;)

Its location is not unknown. I've heard medical doctors describe the location and point it out on a chart of the human anatomy. Not prosperous to please a woman? Hmm.... I guess that depends on what you want to achieve.

[Beorn]

Nonsense! It is like with the so called "female ejaculation":

Are you suggesting women can't ejaculate?

Anyway, to the topic of if there is or isn't a G-spot, it really shouldn't matter. A good lover will place your fingers or tongue to the spot she/he finds creates the greatest sensation of ecstasy.
Whether you wish to name it is another thing altogether.

[Svarog]

What's that? Can you eat it?

xD

Does this poll question opens the discussion of it's own? :embarrassed