PDA

View Full Version : Belarus - Government tightens grip on Internet



W. R.
01-07-2010, 09:18 AM
Government tightens grip on Internet

Published on 6 January 2010

Reporters Without Borders is worried about the government’s plans to tighten control of the Internet in a country where free expression is already restricted. President Alexander Lukashenko acknowledged on 30 December that his government is putting the final touches to a bill to this effect. The draft decree was leaked to the media on December 14, 2009. The discussions around it remain secret.

“We must emphasize our concern about this bill, which threatens online free speech and everyone’s right to express their views anonymously without fear of government repression,” Reporters Without Borders said. “After placing most of the traditional media under its control, the regime is pursuing an offensive against new media.”

The press freedom organisation added: “The president’s attempts to be reassuring cannot hide the repressive nature of this bill, which is liable to make netizens censor themselves. It should be abandoned so that Belarus is not added to the list of countries such as North Korea, China and Iran that Reporters Without Borders has identified as Enemies of the Internet.”

The bill would require all online publications to be registered and everyone going online to be identified, both in Internet cafés and at home. Internet café clients would have to show an ID document in order to go online, while Internet Service Providers (ISPs) would have to keep a record of this information and report it to the police, courts and the special agencies that monitor all news content published in Belarus.

Each website would have to register under a procedure to be defined by the cabinet and approved by the presidential office’s Centre for Operations and Analysis, which would be in charge of monitoring site content. If the site has information about Belarus, it would have to be registered under a Belarusian domain name (with the .by suffix).

Finally, ISPs would be forced to block websites deemed by government agencies to be “extremist.” This would be done without referring to any court.

President Lukashenko said on 30 December that “the government will not prevent anyone from doing anything and will ban nothing” but this cannot be reconciled with earlier statements that Internet policy would be based on the Chinese model. In practice, criticism of the regime will be targeted under a policy of “the better you monitor, the better you can pursue and repress” and prosecuting defamation will be used as a cover for the repression.

In a country where government media hold sway and independent media struggle to survive, the Internet has until now been an area of dynamic free expression with a developed blogosphere that has around 3 million participants. The August 2008 press law requiring media to be registered did not apply to the Internet. The proposed new bill would address this omission and what the government calls online “anarchy.”

In its monitoring of online freedom, Reporters Without Borders has until now classified Belarus as a country “under surveillance” because it has only one ISP (Beltelekom), because access to opposition websites is blocked during major political events and because Internet café owners are required under a February 2007 decree to alert the police about customers who visit “sensitive” sites and keep a record of all the sites visited during the previous 12 months on each computer and make it available to the police if requested.

Journalists writing for the Charter 97 opposition news website (charter97.org) received threats last July after the site posted an article about a racism case.source (http://www.rsf.org/Government-tightens-grip-on.html)

Jarl
01-07-2010, 10:03 AM
Careful Whiteruthenian... wojennaja razwiedka is watching you! ;)

Fortis in Arduis
01-07-2010, 11:49 AM
Ok, I have read bollocky bollocks about one of your traitors who would like Belarus to join the European Union, and I despite the pleas of Niemoeller (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...) I could not care less if this man were rendered down into biofuels by the regime, but I am worried for this organisation:

http://www.mfront.net/engl_index.html

Can Whiteruthenian explain what the situation is? How serious is it?

I see Belarus on the verge of going liberal, rather than further into dictatorship.

The 'hidden hand' may play a card trick in the from of George Soros or another entity, so where are the patriots?

How can a centre-right movement be a solution? This is what the Malady Front purport to be.

Jarl
01-07-2010, 12:15 PM
Can Whiteruthenian explain what the situation is? How serious is it?

I see Belarus on the verge of going liberal, rather than further into dictatorship.

The 'hidden hand' may play a card trick in the from of George Soros or another entity, so where are the patriots?

How can a centre-right movement be a solution?

You gotta be joking. There is no "going liberal" and no "hidden hand" in Belarus. What we now call "Belarus" is Russia. Militarily, economically and politically.

Fortis in Arduis
01-07-2010, 12:17 PM
You gotta be joking. There is no "going liberal" and no "hidden hand" in Belarus. What we now call "Belarus" is Russia. Militarily, economically and politically.

Ok, so now I know, but where are the nationalists?

Jarl
01-07-2010, 12:19 PM
Belarus is in a way more Russian than Russia... or perhaps I should say more Soviet than Russia ;)


Ok, so now I know, but where are the nationalists?

Nationalists??? Belarussians have yet to form a nation. They are trying to, but they seem to be doing much worse than the Ukrainians.


Apparently to many Belarussians it is a shame to speak their native tongue and to feel Berlarussian. At least thats what a politically-active Ukrainian friend of mine told me.

Fortis in Arduis
01-07-2010, 12:38 PM
Apparently, too many Belarusians think it a shame to speak their native tongue and to feel Belarusian. At least that is what a politically active Ukrainian friend of mine told me.

Well that is a problem, but there must be a way to push things in a national-democratic direction.

Perhaps the internet should tighten its grip on the government? :cool:

Really, when I look at a country like North Korea, for example, I see a perfect opportunity for co-operative economics and workplace democracy to subvert the system.

Why not Belarus? A great position to start from.

Who in Belarus is working toward these aims, rather than liberalism?

W. R.
01-07-2010, 12:43 PM
Belarus is in a way more Russian than Russia... or perhaps I should say more Soviet than Russia ;)



Nationalists??? Belarussians have yet to form a nation. They are trying to, but they seem to be doing much worse than the Ukrainians.


Apparently to many Belarussians it is a shame to speak their native tongue and to feel Berlarussian. At least thats what a politically-active Ukrainian friend of mine told me.Yes, I must confirm that there is too much truth in what you wrote, Jarl. I wrote on that topic on Stirpes, and I think I should repost some texts here. It would be interesting to discuss this topic on the Apricity also.

Though I wouldn't say that Belarus is totally subordinated to Russia at the moment.

Jarl
01-07-2010, 12:58 PM
Well that is a problem, but there must be a way to push things in a national-democratic direction.

Perhaps the internet should tighten its grip on the government? :cool:

Really, when I look at a country like North Korea, for example, I see a perfect opportunity for co-operative economics and workplace democracy to subvert the system.

Why not Belarus? A great position to start from.

Who in Belarus is working toward these aims, rather than liberalism?

:) Oh dear... It all looks well from a British perspective... But Im afraid it is worlds apart from reality. You would have to be a man of the East to understand the Eastern realities. There can't be any effective national-democratic direction in any Eastern country. Not as long as Russia is the same old USSR, yet in a different outfit. And no. Belarus is by far in the shittiest position to start from. We could as well be discussing national-democratisation and subversion of the "system" in Udmurtia or the Komi-Permyak autonomous Oblast. Its simply not going to happen.

Jarl
01-07-2010, 01:02 PM
Yes, I must confirm that there is too much truth in what you wrote, Jarl. I wrote on that topic on Stirpes, and I think I should repost some texts here. It would be interesting to discuss this topic on the Apricity also.

I think you definitely should!


Though I wouldn't say that Belarus is totally subordinated to Russia at the moment.

Not even Russia is totally subordinated to Russia, if you know what I mean ;)

W. R.
01-07-2010, 01:19 PM
Really, when I look at a country like North Korea, for example, I see a perfect opportunity for co-operative economics and workplace democracy to subvert the system.

Why not Belarus? A great position to start from.

Who in Belarus is working toward these aims, rather than liberalism?As any regime lukashism has its pluses and minuses. This regime keeps us away from the EU, for example, and for most Belarusians joining the EU is an abstract idea, thus not especially popular. Belarus is still sovereign, and Lukashenka is not a puppet of Russia.

Though this regime prevents normal building of the Belarusian nation, preserves the Soviet-style economy, which makes oppositionists heavily dependent of grants from abroad.

The best term to describe the regime is "totalitarianism-light". There is no fair elections, no independent TV, thus all the parties are in piteous condition. None of them is supported by more than 2-3% of electorate.

The only party more or less worth trusting is Conservative Christian Party (http://www.pbpf.org/index.php?&lang=en). At least the only honest party ("the decrease of the percentage of ethnic Belarusians is unacceptable"). All the others are bunch of losers who rather imitate political struggle.

So it goes.

Now you know much more about the political "life" in Belarus, Fortis in Arduis. :)

Jarl
01-07-2010, 02:13 PM
Belarus is still sovereign, and Lukashenka is not a puppet of Russia.

This I doubt. I mean how can any country be sovereign with its authorities being KGB agents and Russian military bases still present throughout its territories, while the country itself is economically totally dependent on Moscow? And has asked Moscow for 1,5 bln $ to "stabilise the economy"?

http://www.kwsm.uni.wroc.pl/pdf/rola_europy_sr_wsch/usow_geopolit_bialoruska.pdf

To be sovereign one needs at least some of these ingredients: a strong army, a strong economy, resources and independent government. Belarus seems to have none.

Fortis in Arduis
01-07-2010, 02:21 PM
One might however suggest that Belarus has more national sovereignty than any EU member state.

Jarl
01-07-2010, 02:33 PM
One might however suggest that Belarus has more national sovereignty than any EU member state.

Seriously Fortis... It has no more sovereignty than the Trans-Dniester Republic. Jus look up any, I repeat - ANY, article on recent history and politics of Belarus. All present the same view - it is a regime of ex-KGB agents which simply cannot exist without Russia.

This is wikipedia, but still a nice article on Belarus and the fathers of its "sovereignty". Read it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Belarus

W. R.
01-07-2010, 02:44 PM
This I doubt. I mean how can any country be sovereign with its authorities being KGB agents and Russian military bases still present throughout its territories, while the country itself is economically totally dependent on Moscow? And has asked Moscow for 1,5 bln $ to "stabilise the economy"?

http://www.kwsm.uni.wroc.pl/pdf/rola_europy_sr_wsch/usow_geopolit_bialoruska.pdf

To be sovereign one needs at least some of these ingredients: a strong army, a strong economy, resources and independent government. Belarus seems to have none.Then why hasn't Russia persuaded Belarus to recognise South Osetia and Abkhasia, for example? Or to introduce the Russian rouble as our currency (the idea is even older than the regime itself)? I'm just wondering.

Fortis in Arduis
01-07-2010, 02:46 PM
I will not read the article, Jarl, but I will take your word for it.

After doing some research I did also notice that the BPF had more balls about them, but what is their economic policy?

A big mystery, at least on their English pages.

This is a very decent pressure group, but not a political party, but that was how the BNP started in the UK.

Jarl
01-07-2010, 03:11 PM
Then why hasn't Russia persuaded Belarus to recognise South Osetia and Abkhasia, for example? Or to introduce the Russian rouble as our currency (the idea is even older than the regime itself)? I'm just wondering.

Noone gives a damn about puppet Osetia's recognition or bullshit Belarusian currency. This means nothing. I am talking about Lukashenko and his well-known past, about Sbierbank's loan of 4 bln US, about Gazprom's monopoly, and about strategic Russian military bases like in Hancewicze. These are rough facts that should tell you a totaly different, REAL, story.