Felix Volkbein
05-10-2014, 04:41 AM
I was born in Costa Rica, but was raised and live in the United States. Because of that, my written and spoken Spanish is poor, but I can read it quite well, along with a few other languages. My Italian is actually a little better than my Spanish.
Costa Ricans are few and far between around here. I don't identify with the Puerto Ricans or Dominicans or any heavily Negroid people, but I do like most of the Latin Americans I meet from the other countries.
Lately I've become interested in the idea of reviving the great Amerindian cultures through a rigorous eugenics program. I think it's a tragedy how much Spain hurt that region by imposing a caste system on the natives and then importing Negroids to further poison the gene pool. Mixing with Negroids is almost always disastrous.
Sub-Saharan Africans and Australian Aborigines are the only groups that I really don't like. I admire all the other major racial and ethnic groups of the world to various degrees.
I look forward to interacting with you all!
Kamal900
05-10-2014, 05:40 AM
I was born in Costa Rica, but was raised and live in the United States. Because of that, my written and spoken Spanish is poor, but I can read it quite well, along with a few other languages. My Italian is actually a little better than my Spanish.
Costa Ricans are few and far between around here. I don't identify with the Puerto Ricans or Dominicans or any heavily Negroid people, but I do like most of the Latin Americans I meet from the other countries.
Lately I've become interested in the idea of reviving the great Amerindian cultures through a rigorous eugenics program. I think it's a tragedy how much Spain hurt that region by imposing a caste system on the natives and then importing Negroids to further poison the gene pool. Mixing with Negroids is almost always disastrous.
Sub-Saharan Africans and Australian Aborigines are the only groups that I really don't like. I admire all the other major racial and ethnic groups of the world to various degrees.
I look forward to interacting with you all!
Negroid genes tend to dominate a lot more than any other racial group. I dont understand why people tend to think that mongoloid blood dominate when it fact negroid blood completely takes over the racial phenotype of the person. A mixture between whites and natives are much more compatible than either of them are to Blacks(especially the Bantu).
Felix Volkbein
05-10-2014, 05:49 AM
Negroid genes tend to dominate a lot more than any other racial group. I dont understand why people tend to think that mongoloid blood dominate when it fact negroid blood completely takes over the racial phenotype of the person. A mixture between whites and natives are much more compatible than either of them are to Blacks(especially the Bantu).
Agreed. While I think that Europe, as the traditional homeland of the White race, should remain homogeneous and take the necessary measures against mass immigration, I don't mind the idea of Whites & Asians & Amerindians mixing in the New World.
Kamal900
05-10-2014, 05:52 AM
Agreed. While I think that Europe, as the traditional homeland of the White race, should remain homogeneous and take the necessary measures against mass immigration, I don't mind the idea of Whites & Asians & Amerindians mixing in the New World.
Are you part Amerindian? Because i know that in Costa Rica there's a lot of Castizos(25 percent Amerindian) or Harinzos(40 percent Amerindian) are living in the country.
Felix Volkbein
05-10-2014, 06:27 AM
Are you part Amerindian? Because i know that in Costa Rica there's a lot of Castizos(25 percent Amerindian) or Harinzos(40 percent Amerindian) are living in the country.
Yes, about 25-30%. I have a natural tan, but I'm also tall and thin. I grew up in an Italian neighborhood and blended in just fine.
Felix Volkbein
05-10-2014, 06:35 AM
Here is Thomas Jefferson comparing the Negro to the Amerindian. :)
The first difference which strikes us is that of colour. Whether the black of the negro resides in the reticular membrane between the skin and scarf-skin, or in the scarf-skin itself; whether it proceeds from the colour of the blood, the colour of the bile, or from that of some other secretion, the difference is fixed in nature, and is as real as if its seat and cause were better known to us. And is this difference of no importance? Is it not the foundation of a greater or less share of beauty in the two races? Are not the fine mixtures of red and white, the expressions of every passion by greater or less suffusions of colour in the one, preferable to that eternal monotony, which reigns in the countenances, that immoveable veil of black which covers all the emotions of the other race? Add to these, flowing hair, a more elegant symmetry of form, their own judgment in favour of the whites, declared by their preference of them, as uniformly as is the preference of the Oranootan for the black women over those of his own species. The circumstance of superior beauty, is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man?
[...]
A black, after hard labour through the day, will be induced by the slightest amusements to sit up till midnight, or later, though knowing he must be out with the first dawn of the morning. They are at least as brave, and more adventuresome. But this may perhaps proceed from a want of forethought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present. When present, they do not go through it with more coolness or steadiness than the whites. They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation. Their griefs are transient. Those numberless afflictions, which render it doubtful whether heaven has given life to us in mercy or in wrath, are less felt, and sooner forgotten with them. In general, their existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection. To this must be ascribed their disposition to sleep when abstracted from their diversions, and unemployed in labour. An animal whose body is at rest, and who does not reflect, must be disposed to sleep of course. Comparing them by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous. It would be unfair to follow them to Africa for this investigation. We will consider them here, on the same stage with the whites, and where the facts are not apocryphal on which a judgment is to be formed. It will be right to make great allowances for the difference of condition, of education, of conversation, of the sphere in which they move. Many millions of them have been brought to, and born in America. Most of them indeed have been confined to tillage, to their own homes, and their own society: yet many have been so situated, that they might have availed themselves of the conversation of their masters; many have been brought up to the handicraft arts, and from that circumstance have always been associated with the whites. Some have been liberally educated, and all have lived in countries where the arts and sciences are cultivated to a considerable degree, and have had before their eyes samples of the best works from abroad. The Indians, with no advantages of this kind, will often carve figures on their pipes not destitute of design and merit. They will crayon out an animal, a plant, or a country, so as to prove the existence of a germ in their minds which only wants cultivation. They astonish you with strokes of the most sublime oratory; such as prove their reason and sentiment strong, their imagination glowing and elevated. But never yet could I find that a black had uttered a thought above the level of plain narration; never see even an elementary trait of painting or sculpture. In music they are more generally gifted than the whites with accurate ears for tune and time, and they have been found capable of imagining a small catch. Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved.
[...]
The improvement of the blacks in body and mind, in the first instance of their mixture with the whites, has been observed by every one, and proves that their inferiority is not the effect merely of their condition of life. We know that among the Romans, about the Augustan age especially, the condition of their slaves was much more deplorable than that of the blacks on the continent of America. The two sexes were confined in separate apartments, because to raise a child cost the master more than to buy one. Cato, for a very restricted indulgence to his slaves in this particular, took from them a certain price. But in this country the slaves multiply as fast as the free inhabitants. Their situation and manners place the commerce between the two sexes almost without restraint.
[...]
This unfortunate difference of colour, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation of these people. Many of their advocates, while they wish to vindicate the liberty of human nature, are anxious also to preserve its dignity and beauty. Some of these, embarrassed by the question `What further is to be done with them?' join themselves in opposition with those who are actuated by sordid avarice only. Among the Romans emancipation required but one effort. The slave, when made free, might mix with, without staining the blood of his master. But with us a second is necessary, unknown to history. When freed, he is to be removed beyond the reach of mixture.
And here is H. P. Lovecraft:
Various race-stocks differ in inclinations & aptitudes, but of all of them I consider only the negro & australoid biologically inferior. Against these two a rigid colour-line ought to exist.
[...]
Of the complete biological inferiority of the negro there can be no question—he has anatomical features consistently varying from those of other stocks, & always in the direction of the lower primates. Moreover, he has never developed a civilisation of his own, despite his ample contact with the very earliest white civilisations. Compare the way the Gauls took on the highest refinements of Roman culture the moment they were absorbed into the empire, with the way the negroes remained utterly unaffected by the Egyptian culture which impinged on them for continuously for thousands of years. Equally inferior–& perhaps even more so—is the Australian black stock, which differs widely from the real negro. This race has other stigmata of primitiveness—such as great Neanderthaloid eyebrow-ridges. And it is likewise incapable of absorbing civilisation. In dealing with these two black races, there is only one sound attitude for any other race (be it Indian, Malay, Polynesian, or Mongolian) to take–& that is to prevent admixture as completely & determinedly as it can be prevented, through the establishment of a colour-line & the rigid forcing of all mixed offspring below that line. I am in accord with the most vehement & vociferous Alabaman or Mississippian on that point, & it will be found that most Northerners react similarly when it comes to a practical showdown, no matter how much abstract equalitarian nonsense they may spout as a result of the abolitionist tradition inherited from the 1850’s. If a Russian-inspired communist dictatorship ever tried to force negro equality on the U. S., there is scant question but that the descendants of Wendell Phillips, Charles Sumner, & William Lloyd Garrison would stand side by side with those of Jefferson Davis & John C. Calhoun in fighting its ultimate implications to the death.
Members of one race can fit into another only through the complete eradication of their own background-influences–& even then the adjustment will always remain uneasy & imperfect if the newcomer’s physical aspect forms a constant reminder of his outside origin. Therefore it is wise to discourage all mixtures of sharply differentiated races—though the colour-line does not need to be drawn as strictly as in the case of the negro, since we know that a dash or two of Mongolian or Indian or Hindoo or some such blood will not actually injure a white stock biologically. John Randolph of Roanoke was none the worse off for having the blood of Pocahontas in his veins, nor does any Finn or Hungarian feel like a mongrel because his stock has a remote & now almost forgotten Mongoloid strain. With the high-grade alien races we can adopt a policy of flexible common-sense—discouraging mixture whenever we can, but not clamping down the bars so ruthlessly against every individual of slightly mixed ancestry.
And no less a conservative than Oswald Spengler made explicit his admiration for Amerindian civilization:
Meantime yet another new Culture developed in Mexico. This lay so remote from the rest that no word even passed between them. All the more astonishing, therefore, is the similarity of its development to that of the Classical. No doubt the archaeologist standing before a teocalli would be horrified to think of his Doric temple in such a connexion; yet it was a thoroughly Classical trait — feebleness of the will-to-power in the matter of technics — that kept the Aztecs ill armed and so made possible their catastrophe.
For, as it happens, this is the one example of a Culture ended by violent death. It was not starved, suppressed, or thwarted, but murdered in the full glory of its unfolding, destroyed like a sunflower whose head is struck off by one passing. All these states — including a world-power and more than one federation — with an extent and resources far superior to those of the Greek and Roman states of Hannibal's day; with a comprehensive policy, a carefully ordered financial system, and a highly developed legislation; with administrative ideas and economic tradition such as the ministers of Charles V could never have imagined; with a wealth of literature in several languages, an intellectually brilliant and polite society in great cities to which the West could not show one single parallel — all this was not broken down in some desperate war, but washed out by a handful of bandits in a few years, and so entirely that the relics of the population retained not even a memory of it all. Of the giant city Tenochtitlan not a stone remains above ground. The cluster of great Mayan cities in the virgin forests of Yucatan succumbed swiftly to the attack of vegetation, and we do not know the old name of any one of them. Of the literature three books survive, but no one can read them.
The most appalling feature of the tragedy was that it was not in the least a necessity of the Western Culture that it should happen. It was a private affair of adventurers, and at the time no one in Germany, France, or England had any idea of what was taking place. This instance shows, as no other shows, that the history of humanity has no meaning whatever and that deep significances reside only in the life-courses of the separate Cultures. Their inter-relations are un- important and accidental. In this case the accident was so cruelly banal, so supremely absurd, that it would not be tolerated in the wildest farce. A few cannon and handguns began and ended the drama.
[...]
The great Maya cities sink into the same bland contentment as Roman Athens and Alexandria, but out on the horizon of the Nahua lands was developing the last of these peoples, the Aztecs — young, vigorous, barbaric, and filled with an insatiable will-to-power. In 132.5 (= the Age of Augustus) they founded Tenochtitlan, which soon became the paramount and capital city of the whole Mexican world. About 1400 military expansion began on the grand scale. Conquered regions were secured by military colonies and a
network of military roads, and a superior diplomacy kept the dependent states in check and separated. Imperial Tenochtitlan grew enormous and housed a cosmopolitan population speaking every tongue of this world-empire. The Nahua provinces were politically and militarily secure, the southward thrust was developing rapidly, and a hand was about to be laid on the Maya states; there is no telling what the course of the next centuries would have been. And suddenly — the end.
At that date the West was at a level which the Maya had already overpassed by 700; nothing short of the age of Frederick the Great would have been ripe enough to comprehend the politics of the Mayapan League, and what the Aztecs of A.D. 1500 were organizing lies for us well in the future. But that which distinguished Faustian man, even then, from the man of any other Culture was his irrepressible urge into distance. It was this, in the last resort, that killed and even annihilated the Mexican and Peruvian Culture — the unparalleled drive that was ready for service in any and every domain.
The scheme of ancient-medieval-modern history, as understood by the nineteenth century, contained only a selection of the more obvious relations. But the influence that old Chinese and Mexican history are beginning to exercise on us to-day is of a subtler and more intellectual kind. There we are sounding the last necessities of life itself. We are learning out of another life-course to know ourselves what we are, what we must be, what we shall be. It is the great school of our future. We who have history still, are making history still, find here on the extreme frontiers of historical humanity what history is.
And this is from Spengler's Hour of Decision.
We have already referred to the backgrounds of the economic catastrophe. After the revolution from below in the form of Labour-Socialism had with its weapon, the political wage, made the breach, coloured economy, headed by Russia and Japan, pressed in with the lower wage, and it is now proceeding to complete the destruction. To this must be added political-social propaganda in enormous quantities, the true Asiatic diplomacy of our day. It pervades all India and Japan. It has led in Java and Sumatra to the erection of a race front against the Dutch and the disintegration of army and navy. It pays court, all the way from Eastern Asia, to the highly gifted Indian race living from Mexico to Chile, and it inculcates for the first time in the Negroes a community-feeling that is being directed against the white ruling nations.
Han Cholo
05-10-2014, 06:37 AM
Welcome Felix. You will really enjoy this place. There are many of these real continental Latin Americans you speak of: criollos, mestizos/castizos, some from the recent waves of Europeans, etc. Lamentably not many indigenous yet to share their perspective.
Costa Ricans are few and far between around here. I don't identify with the Puerto Ricans or Dominicans or any heavily Negroid people, but I do like most of the Latin Americans I meet from the other countries.
I agree with you with this idea. I don't mind Europeans, Arabs, Pakis, Asians coming to our territory in peaceful terms, but disgenic African peoples need to be deported back to where they came from. They were brought here against their will, and they're also being retained here against our will. Mixed black peoples should be deported too so they improve the gene pool back in Africa with foreign admixture.
I do not understand your dislike of Australian aboriginals. They might seem archaic to us but they're basically a relic population which doesn't cause trouble to anyone (except maybe other Australians.)
I like Costa Rica a lot, maybe my favorite Central American nation (El Salvador and Guatemala are quite close too).
Kamal900
05-10-2014, 06:42 AM
Welcome Felix. You will really enjoy this place. There are many of these real continental Latin Americans you speak of: criollos, mestizos/castizos, some from the recent waves of Europeans, etc. Lamentably not many indigenous yet to share their perspective.
I agree with you with this idea. I don't mind Europeans, Arabs, Pakis, Asians coming to our territory in peaceful terms, but disgenic African peoples need to be deported back to where they came from. They were brought here against their will, and they're also being retained here against our will. Mixed black peoples should be deported too so they improve the gene pool back in Africa with foreign admixture.
I do not understand your dislike of Australian aboriginals. They might seem archaic to us but they're basically a relic population which doesn't cause trouble to anyone (except maybe other Australians.)
Australian Abrogines are racially Austroloid, not Negroid, and they are genetically much closer to us(Caucasians and Mongoloids) than to Negroids.
Peyrol
05-10-2014, 10:39 AM
I was born in Costa Rica, but was raised and live in the United States. Because of that, my written and spoken Spanish is poor, but I can read it quite well, along with a few other languages. My Italian is actually a little better than my Spanish.
Costa Ricans are few and far between around here. I don't identify with the Puerto Ricans or Dominicans or any heavily Negroid people, but I do like most of the Latin Americans I meet from the other countries.
Lately I've become interested in the idea of reviving the great Amerindian cultures through a rigorous eugenics program. I think it's a tragedy how much Spain hurt that region by imposing a caste system on the natives and then importing Negroids to further poison the gene pool. Mixing with Negroids is almost always disastrous.
Sub-Saharan Africans and Australian Aborigines are the only groups that I really don't like. I admire all the other major racial and ethnic groups of the world to various degrees.
I look forward to interacting with you all!
Benvenuto sul forum, amico.
Sei in grado di conversare in italiano? Interessante...di dove erano i tuoi antenati italiani?
Felix Volkbein
05-10-2014, 06:50 PM
Benvenuto sul forum, amico.
Sei in grado di conversare in italiano? Interessante...di dove erano i tuoi antenati italiani?
Si, ma il mio italiano è un po' arrugginito. Mio nonno paterno proviene dalla Toscana. Si trasferì nella Costa Rica, poi mio padre si trasferì negli Stati Uniti dopo la mia nascita. Perché la sistema scolastico qui è superiore.
Non ho potuto viaggiare in Italia. Uno di questi giorni, se tutto va bene! Amo la cultura e il cibo. :)
Peyrol
05-10-2014, 07:01 PM
Si, ma il mio italiano è un po' arrugginito. Mio nonno paterno proviene dalla Toscana. Si trasferì nella Costa Rica, poi mio padre si trasferì negli Stati Uniti dopo la mia nascita. Perché la sistema scolastico qui è superiore.
Non ho potuto viaggiare in Italia. Uno di questi giorni, se tutto va bene! Amo la cultura e il cibo. :)
Italiano più che buono, direi, giudicando da come hai scritto qui.
Sei il primo costariqueno del forum.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.