Unome
05-21-2014, 07:18 PM
Beautiful women have very innate value in life, just from being born.
It's the same as being born financially wealthy with $1mil in your bank account from birth. Males have little or no innate value in life. Males have to work for it. This is made most obvious by prostitution (the oldest profession in biological existence). Women can straight-up sell their sex for money. But I want to make another, more interesting point here. Women don't just sell their sex (innate value) for money… that is just the beginning the value of sex. Instead a beautiful woman can sell her beauty/sex for all other positive human traits. For example a beautiful woman can seduce a strong, muscular, tall man for his athleticism and strength. She can seduce a wealthy rich man for his money. She can seduce a funny guy for his cleverness and wittiness. She can seduce a handsome man for his charisma and good looks. She can seduce an intelligent man for his smarts and brains.
This last point brings me to the common stereotype of "the dumb blonde". Blonde women quite frankly don't need to be intelligence. As common and typical with women, women only really "need" to be beautiful and sexually inviting. That is it, nothing more required. Once a woman is sexually inviting then she trades her sexuality for other genetically potent traits (such as strength, wealth, wit, charm, smarts, etc.) So beautiful blonde women do not need to be "smart" at all.
Instead men are smart for women. Men are strong for women. Men are rich for women. Men are charismatic, outgoing, and extroverted for women. All these "positive" human traits are traded for women's sexuality.
Women don't need to "be" anything. Because men already compensate any lack on behalf of women, for sex.
This is how "Evolution" works. Women select for positive (genetic) traits which they lack. And if a woman is beautiful then she can trade for any trait she wants to, and is drawn toward.
This is the "Sexual selection" mechanism of evolution. It is not "genetic mutation" that drives evolution. It actually is female sexual preference of rare male types, which balance out any genetic deficiency within her. For example if a woman is average looking, or ugly, then she will pay a steep price in an inverse way to have sex with a handsome man. And this balances-out the sexual equation. Because beautiful women are rare. Average looking women are common. And uglier women are also common (bottom 50% of humanity). So ugly women have to compensate, in order to have the same sexual tradeoffs as beautiful women. But at the very least, even an ugly woman has innate sexual value (worth) in life, whereas men/males do not.
It's the same as being born financially wealthy with $1mil in your bank account from birth. Males have little or no innate value in life. Males have to work for it. This is made most obvious by prostitution (the oldest profession in biological existence). Women can straight-up sell their sex for money. But I want to make another, more interesting point here. Women don't just sell their sex (innate value) for money… that is just the beginning the value of sex. Instead a beautiful woman can sell her beauty/sex for all other positive human traits. For example a beautiful woman can seduce a strong, muscular, tall man for his athleticism and strength. She can seduce a wealthy rich man for his money. She can seduce a funny guy for his cleverness and wittiness. She can seduce a handsome man for his charisma and good looks. She can seduce an intelligent man for his smarts and brains.
This last point brings me to the common stereotype of "the dumb blonde". Blonde women quite frankly don't need to be intelligence. As common and typical with women, women only really "need" to be beautiful and sexually inviting. That is it, nothing more required. Once a woman is sexually inviting then she trades her sexuality for other genetically potent traits (such as strength, wealth, wit, charm, smarts, etc.) So beautiful blonde women do not need to be "smart" at all.
Instead men are smart for women. Men are strong for women. Men are rich for women. Men are charismatic, outgoing, and extroverted for women. All these "positive" human traits are traded for women's sexuality.
Women don't need to "be" anything. Because men already compensate any lack on behalf of women, for sex.
This is how "Evolution" works. Women select for positive (genetic) traits which they lack. And if a woman is beautiful then she can trade for any trait she wants to, and is drawn toward.
This is the "Sexual selection" mechanism of evolution. It is not "genetic mutation" that drives evolution. It actually is female sexual preference of rare male types, which balance out any genetic deficiency within her. For example if a woman is average looking, or ugly, then she will pay a steep price in an inverse way to have sex with a handsome man. And this balances-out the sexual equation. Because beautiful women are rare. Average looking women are common. And uglier women are also common (bottom 50% of humanity). So ugly women have to compensate, in order to have the same sexual tradeoffs as beautiful women. But at the very least, even an ugly woman has innate sexual value (worth) in life, whereas men/males do not.