Should anal sex be illegal?

[portusaus]

Mm?

[portusaus]

I believe so, anal sex is fucking gross and nobody should be allowed to do it in a civilized society.

[Manifest Destiny]

It's an effective method of birth control, so it should be legal.

[Elsa]

In b4 Mary

[Vorpal]

It's gross, yeah, but I don't care what other people do.
Making it illegal will give it this 'forbidden fruit' vibe. (ergo - there will be even more anal fucking lovers)

[portusaus]

It's an effective method of birth control, so it should be legal.

We don't need "birth control", we want births and we want happy families. It is necessary to prevent specific ethnic groups, diseases and genetic disorders from spreading, but lowering the birth rate for everyone equally is not going to help that.

[Manifest Destiny]

We don't need "birth control", we want births and we want happy families. It is necessary to prevent specific ethnic groups, diseases and genetic disorders from spreading, but lowering the birth rate for everyone equally is not going to help that.

I agree. But not everyone wants every sex act to result in pregnancy.

[Linet]

It is legal :noidea:

[Rudel]

Portusaus should found a feudal state around his garden, where buttsex and brown people are forbidden.

[Graham]

How would one be able to police such a matter?

[albosomething]

as long as it is within a marriage no it should not be illegal

[ramon]

How do you plan on making it illegal? How would you enforce it? Put cameras in every room of every person's house?

[Longbowman]

How would one be able to police such a matter?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

[albosomething]

How do you plan on making it illegal? How would you enforce it? Put cameras in every room of every person's house?

or check each womans asshole if they are loose or not , or if they can shit properly

[ramon]

or check each womans asshole if they are loose or not , or if they can shit properly
You are such a charmer.

[Vorpal]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCsMKypvmB0

[Manifest Destiny]

How do you plan on making it illegal? How would you enforce it? Put cameras in every room of every person's house?

Just one camera. In each citizen's butthole.

[Longbowman]

Like most of your ideas, this is ridiculous, unjust, and impractical.

It is ridiculous because the rationale is born of hatred rather than logic, it is unjust because awkward though you may find anal sex to be, there is no reason to impact negatively on private lives when they have no effect on those of others, and it is impractical for obvious reasons of policing.

No heterosexuals have anal sex to the exclusion of coitus, so you're just depriving them of a means of pleasure, and homosexual couples that practise anal sex aren't going to have kids biologically anyway, so it won't even achieve anything, except maybe avoid a couple of anus-related injuries. If you're going to persecute homosexuals, just ban homosexuality (well. Actually, don't, but you see what I'm saying) instead of fiddling around with the intricacies of what you perceive to probably be their sex life.

[Steve-O]

Kinda. It spreads HIV way faster than conventional sex, which is why gay people have it most

[portusaus]

How do you plan on making it illegal? How would you enforce it? Put cameras in every room of every person's house?

Police investigations based on substantiated accusation or other valid suspicion. Lie-detecting machines, strong taboo, harsh penalties and normative sexual education. The battle against buttsex is a battle that can be won.

[Manifest Destiny]

Kinda. It spreads HIV way faster than conventional sex, which is why gay people have it most

Actually, I think the HIV/AIDS rate amongst gays is largely because they tend to be far more promiscuous.

[Graus]

What happens between consenting adults is their business. Keep the state out of our bedrooms.

[Graham]

Just one camera. In each citizen's butthole.

lol, Sorry I laughed for the childish humour. .

[Longbowman]

I don't get it, Portu. You don't like state interference when we're forcing Jewish propaganda down your throat, but you're fine with it when it's forcing homophobic propaganda down your throat? If you're ok with the methodology, loosen up and let us force ourselves down your throat.

[Linet]

My favorite thing in such threads is to see how many peopel are watching it :heh:
I love especially the fact that most of them make sure to come as guests :spy:

[Paluga]

Police investigations based on substantiated accusation or other valid suspicion. Lie-detecting machines, strong taboo, harsh penalties and normative sexual education. The battle against buttsex is a battle that can be won.

Don't know if trolling or just theapricity.

[Manifest Destiny]

lol, Sorry I laughed for the childish humour. .

The selfies in the Members' Pictures Thread will be a lot more interesting.

[ramon]

Police investigations based on substantiated accusation or other valid suspicion. Lie-detecting machines, strong taboo, harsh penalties and normative sexual education. The battle against buttsex is a battle that can be won.
I remember you now! The teenager who is obsessed with gays and every post is about his hatred for gays etc etc. Ya vale.

[Longbowman]

I remember you now! The teenager who is obsessed with gays and every post is about his hatred for gays etc etc. Ya vale.

Portusaus is not that one-dimensional. He also hates Jews and blacks.

[cally]

Who the hell is gonna check? Just live and let live :o

[portusaus]

I don't get it, Portu. You don't like state interference when we're forcing Jewish propaganda down your throat, but you're fine with it when it's forcing homophobic propaganda down your throat? If you're ok with the methodology, loosen up and let us force ourselves down your throat.

I detest statism when the state is malevolent, but a truly good state should be as powerful as it can physically propel itself. Crimes against nature should be prohibited for the same reasons that crimes against others such as assault and murder are prohibited; for the greater good and for glory.

[Longbowman]

I detest statism when the state is malevolent, but a truly good state should be as powerful as it can physically propel itself. Crimes against nature should be prohibited for the same reasons that crimes against others such as assault and murder are prohibited; for the greater good and for glory.

Natch, I was just teasing.

[Manifest Destiny]

Who the hell is gonna check? Just live and let live :o

A new government agency would have to be created. That means more employment opportunities.

[cally]

OP are you suggesting anal inspections?

[Cleitus]

Its a perversion and im against it yes.

[Longbowman]

OP are you suggesting anal inspections?

If it does involve anal inspections, I suggest it be enforced.

[Steve-O]

Actually, I think the HIV/AIDS rate amongst gays is largely because they tend to be far more promiscuous.

Not really. If you have unprotected vaginal sex with an HIV positive women, there is only a 1/2,500 chance of getting it. You could be a gay virgin but you are automatically at a much higher risk of acquiring it than a hetero. Also gays are a minority, which puts them in a smaller sexual network.

http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmission-risk-during-anal-sex-18-times-higher-than-during-vaginal-sex/page/1446187/

[Manifest Destiny]

Not really. If you have unprotected vaginal sex with an HIV positive women, there is only a 1/2,500 chance of getting it. You could be a gay virgin but you are automatically at a much higher risk of acquiring it than a hetero. Also gays are a minority, which puts them in a smaller sexual network.

http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmission-risk-during-anal-sex-18-times-higher-than-during-vaginal-sex/page/1446187/

Which would be irrelevant if they weren't fucking every other gay guy they met.

[portusaus]

OP are you suggesting anal inspections?

That would require an increase of law enforcement budgets due to the increase in pay officers would be demanding. :laugh: No, rather the same methods that are employed for enforcement of statutory rape laws would do. It is possible to prove that one party is guilty of violating the other, even if both parties are trying to hide the fact. The penalties should be the same for both partners though, provided the act was consensual.

[cally]

That would require an increase of law enforcement budgets due to the increase in pay officers would be demanding. :laugh: No, rather the same methods that are employed for enforcement of statutory rape laws would do. It is possible to prove that one party is guilty of violating the other, even if both parties are trying to hide the fact. The penalties should be the same for both partners though, provided the act was consensual.
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11/117031/3783720-lol.gif

I can't with this forum xD

[Manifest Destiny]

That would require an increase of law enforcement budgets due to the increase in pay officers would be demanding. :laugh: No, rather the same methods that are employed for enforcement of statutory rape laws would do. It is possible to prove that one party is guilty of violating the other, even if both parties are trying to hide the fact. The penalties should be the same for both partners though, provided the act was consensual.

But how do you prove that people are buttfucking without ass inspections?

[Vorpal]

Its a perversion and im against it yes.

Oh man, you seemed to enjoy it last time. Maybe my weapon is just too thick...

[Cleitus]

Oh man, you seemed to enjoy it last time. Maybe my weapon is just too thick...

No, not really your Mom was crying all the time it pissed me off.

[Also]

It is a sort of perversion. But I don't know if it should be illegal.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

First anal than vaginal sex, does this actually makes any sense??? :tsk:

Nobody should be forced to follow sex rules unless come from porn industry with more protection reinforcement laws to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS also other infection diseases.

[Vorpal]

No, not really your Mom was crying all the time it pissed me off.

She was crying cuz she realized you weren't enjoying the stimilation I gave you, it's called SYMPATHY.

[Cleitus]

She was crying cuz she realized you weren't enjoying the stimilation I gave you, it's called SYMPATHY.
It was her idea to get it this way, but the dirty Whore didnt want to listen, i had to punish her.

[Vorpal]

It was her idea to get it this way but the dirty Whore didnt want to listen, i had to punish her.

Dirty whore but with capital letter, I'm glad you know your place. :D

[Cleitus]

Dirty whore but with capital letter, I'm glad you know your place. :D
Look you did wrote stimilation :picard1:

[portusaus]

First anal than vaginal sex, does this actually makes any sense??? :tsk:

Nobody should be forced to follow sex rules unless come from porn industry with more protection reinforcement laws to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS also other infection diseases.

Pornography, and homosexuality for that matter, should be banned as well. But let's leave that for another thread.

As for HIV, I believe it is a much scarier threat than most people are aware of and should be mitigated by mass-deportations and national quarantine (like, closed borders). No other method is reliable enough, IMO.

The point is that "anal sex" is not a legitimate expression of sexuality. It's something bonobos with downs would do in their spare time. Not something civilized and progressed humans should be doing, or letting happen within their communities.

[Vorpal]

Look you did wrote stimilation :picard1:
:D
You understood me anyway, which means you are a dirty boi, aren't you?

[Oneeye]

Let's ban it. We'll form a secret anal police task force.

[Steve-O]

Which would be irrelevant if they weren't fucking every other gay guy they met.

Well if you're gay you're kinda only gonna fuck gay guys lol. I don't know how ridiculously promiscuous they are but the point is that if a gay guy was as promiscuous as you for example, he'd be in much worse shape.

[solaris]

http://smiliestation.de/smileys/Sex/46.gif

[JoeyGee8688]

Think of all the gubbmint jobs enforcing that law would create. Increase the public sector, decrease the private sector (under guise of tackling unemployment, of course). The bureaucrats here in the good ol' USofA would love that idea, lefties though they be. Uncle Sambo and his ilk don't need anymore ideas:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZCEq8jy5-M

Frankly, I believe it is technically illegal in the States, or at least here in S.C., but doubtful that any agency enforces it fervently:


In 1994, South Carolina enacted a sex offense registry law.34 Registration with the county sheriff became required for all persons convicted, in South Carolina or elsewhere, of any of a list of sex offenses, including buggery.35 This law even covers registrants who leave the state.36

http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/south_carolina.htm

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Pornography, and homosexuality for that matter, should be banned as well. But let's leave that for another thread.

As for HIV, I believe it is a much scarier threat than most people are aware of and should be mitigated by mass-deportations and national quarantine (like, closed borders). No other method is reliable enough, IMO.

The point is that "anal sex" is not a legitimate expression of sexuality. It's something bonobos with downs would do in their spare time. Not something civilized and progressed humans should be doing, or letting happen within their communities.

Agreed in first sentence, partially agreed on second, disagreed on third you like traditionalism but anal sex was part of sexual act from ancient times hence part of human evolution which we carry on this habit likewise other primates did.....Its just weird to change or say we shouldn't be doing.

[Han Cholo]

Indifferent. I would still want to venture inside my girlfriend's little hole regardless if legal or illegal if I feel like it. Much like I consume certain illegal drugs time to time now.

[portusaus]

bump

[arcticwolf]

I don't agree with you much, but I do agree the practice is nasty, but said that I wouldn't make it illegal. If that's what two consenting adults want to do in the privacy of their bedroom, so be it.

As I said, the practice though is something that turns me off personally. There is a reason nature designed butthole for one way traffic, but whatever. :D

[Annihilus]

Mm?

wtf,

nothing better than sucking on your gf's ass you dumb fuck

[arcticwolf]

wtf,

nothing better than sucking on your gf's ass you dumb fuck

I'll chance being called dumb fuck, for fucks sake.

Do you mean anus or butt cheeks, I'm obviously a dumb fuck, but I am not clear on what you just wrote. Could you please, pretty please with a cherry (no pun) on top clarify? TIA!

[armenianbodyhair]

No. What is done between consensual adults in their private residence is no one else's business but theirs.

[Black Wolf]

No. What is done between consensual adults in their private residence is no one else's business but theirs.

This.

[Dandelion]

Let's ban it. We'll form a secret anal police task force.

Cameras should be installed in every room every house, especially in the bed room and inspectors must check upon everyone 24/7.

http://southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com/images/shows/south-park/clip-thumbnails/season-16/1601/south-park-s16e01c12-security-breach-16x9.jpg

[Also]

Ban anal sex! Keep rectums safe! Everyone deserves a healthy anus!

[arcticwolf]

This.

Brown nose! lol

You ain't getting any! :laugh:

[Annihilus]

I'll chance being called dumb fuck, for fucks sake.

Do you mean anus or butt cheeks, I'm obviously a dumb fuck, but I am not clear on what you just wrote. Could you please, pretty please with a cherry (no pun) on top clarify? TIA!

I didn't quote you, but let me say this if you have a women, you kiss her on the mouth, and you kiss her on the ass,'

yes, the anus duh

[arcticwolf]

I didn't quote you, but let me say this if you have a women, you kiss her on the mouth, and you kiss her on the ass,'

yes, the anus duh

I know you didn't, I am not attacking your take on it, but you need to keep in mind that not everybody is of the same opinion, or likes the same things.
If you like sucking on a woman's anus, knock yourself out!

I do not find it as appealing or esthetic as you do.

But I ain't anus Gestapo, go for it! :thumb001:

[LightHouse89]

Yes it is sodomy. Sodomy is Sodomy.

[LightHouse89]

Cameras should be installed in every room every house, especially in the bed room and inspectors must check upon everyone 24/7.

http://southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com/images/shows/south-park/clip-thumbnails/season-16/1601/south-park-s16e01c12-security-breach-16x9.jpg

Maybe? like in Britain.

[nose]

wow you are so edgy O:

[LightHouse89]

Sodomy is a sin and degenerate behavior. Sodomy is for homosexuals.

[portusaus]

No. What is done between consensual adults in their private residence is no one else's business but theirs.

Why? Consenting adults can still do things that are wrong, like burglars and arsonists. Why stop at criminalizing offenses against others, while offenses against nature can be just as vile or worse? To me, that is a foolish blanket ruling. A couple should be able to do whatever the hell they want with each other, but buggery? Fuck that, it should be illegal. There are standards and that stoops below them.

[vibrant_]

No but I think it's gross.

[Nehellenia]

Why do some guys feel the need to explore the out hole? Straight guys i mean... logic? D:

[LightHouse89]

Why do some guys feel the need to explore the out hole? Straight guys i mean... logic? D:

I prefer pleasuring a woman using the natural and more appropriate areas. Think about it the receptors in both private areas enjoy meeting one another. So to me that is nature.

[LightHouse89]

If a woman told e to stick to stick it in her ass I would put my prick back in my pants and walk away and never speak to her again.

[portusaus]

Why do some guys feel the need to explore the out hole? Straight guys i mean... logic? D:

I hypothesize that it was inserted into pop culture (no pun intended), similarly in method to many leftist ideas for the purpose of causing sexual deviancy and a depraved society in general. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the KGB did it. Hollywood movies and such depict buggery as 'the Holy Grail of sex' and the dumb masses eat it up, convincing themselves that they actually want to do it. I don't believe that it is a legitimate expression of sexuality, but a perversion, which was spawned of a seed planted by insidious minds.

[Dictator]

My answer is another question: Should we jail bandits?

[Rudel]

Sodomy is a sin and degenerate behavior. Sodomy is for homosexuals.
No, being homosexual is for homosexuals.

Buttfucking a girl doesn't make you gay, it makes you a buttfucker.


I prefer pleasuring a woman using the natural and more appropriate areas. Think about it the receptors in both private areas enjoy meeting one another. So to me that is nature.
If the nerve endings in the rectal area didn't enjoy receiving dicks, people wouldn't put them there.

[LightHouse89]

No, being homosexual is for homosexuals.

Buttfucking a girl doesn't make you gay, it makes you a buttfucker.


If the nerve endings in the rectal area didn't enjoy receiving dicks, people wouldn't put them there.

Your a savage old worlder following a heretical system of government and mostly likely one who supports it. Your a Sodomite!

[Fortis in Arduis]

Yes, along with "strapodictomy". looooool :lol:

[interes]

Anal sex is the beast sex in the world

[Gaston]

People who are afraid of anal sex may not have a clear assholes.



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Wiki-pegging.png

[Lusos]

It's a personal choice (Just like Religion)And It should be left for each Individual to choose.

That's today's problem.Everyone want's to tell everyone what and what not to do.

[Lusos]

People who are afraid of anal sex may not have a clear assholes.



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Wiki-pegging.png

That's Gay

[Kiyant]

Why should another form of sex be banned?
Typical porto Thread

[portusaus]

Why should another form of sex be banned?
Typical porto Thread

It's not "another form of sex". There are no "alternate forms of sex". The anus is for excretion, not intercourse. It's a one-way street. Attempting to insert things, whether small things or even a whole penis, is going to cause ripping and tearing. Dysgenics has rendered the masses stupid, and Jew-propaganda teaches them that anuses can somehow be fucked, so there are an awful lot of degenerates actually buggering. Fucking Sidmund Freud. This must be banned, to prevent it from happening anymore. Civilization and buggery are not compatible.

[Dictator]

It would be cool if there was some kind of jail for them. A.R.S.E (Area of Righteous Sex Education) :P

[The Illyrian Warrior]

It's not "another form of sex". There are no "alternate forms of sex". The anus is for excretion, not intercourse. It's a one-way street. Attempting to insert things, whether small things or even a whole penis, is going to cause ripping and tearing. Dysgenics has rendered the masses stupid, and Jew-propaganda teaches them that anuses can somehow be fucked, so there are an awful lot of degenerates actually buggering. Fucking Sidmund Freud. This must be banned, to prevent it from happening anymore. Civilization and buggery are not compatible.

Lol, Jews definitely aren't responsible for anal sex rather natural human desire something which neither the Jews can teach us to or not to do it....I think your point here is, people should impose one form of sex for breeding purposes, if so are you willing to get rid of safe sex hence preservatives aswell?

[Mortimer]

i find it gross too but i find oral sex also gross, but i dont think it should be forbidden. it should be legal and choice

[Vorpal]

AHAHAHA, ORAL IS WONDERFUL
ORAL SEX GROSS, NO SHIT :cool:

[Fear Fiain]

Police investigations based on substantiated accusation or other valid suspicion. Lie-detecting machines, strong taboo, harsh penalties and normative sexual education. The battle against buttsex is a battle that can be won.

sigging that.

[Yaroslav]

Yes

[TheBlondeSalad]

Weird. I've always assumed that most men really really loved anal sex cus it feels tighter than the vag and the naughtiness turns them on :eek:

Anyway, it shouldn't be illegal but yea I do agree, it's freaking disgusting.

Nice tags :coffee:

[Vorpal]

Weird. I've always assumed that most men really really loved anal sex cus it feels tighter than the vag and the naughtiness turns them on :eek:

Anyway, it shouldn't be illegal but yea I do agree, it's freaking disgusting.

Nice tags :coffee:

lolwat

[Caismeachd]

No but it's overrated.

[Longbowman]

It's not "another form of sex". There are no "alternate forms of sex". The anus is for excretion, not intercourse. It's a one-way street. Attempting to insert things, whether small things or even a whole penis, is going to cause ripping and tearing. Dysgenics has rendered the masses stupid, and Jew-propaganda teaches them that anuses can somehow be fucked, so there are an awful lot of degenerates actually buggering. Fucking Sidmund Freud. This must be banned, to prevent it from happening anymore. Civilization and buggery are not compatible.

http://1-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/q/image/1365/88/1365888302589.jpg

[portusaus]

Lol, Jews definitely aren't responsible for anal sex rather natural human desire something which neither the Jews can teach us to or not to do it....I think your point here is, people should impose one form of sex for breeding purposes, if so are you willing to get rid of safe sex hence preservatives aswell?

I don't believe that we have an innate desire to penetrate anus, nor do women have an innate desire to have their anuses penetrated. There is no biological reason for the strange behavior, and normally I believe that people are extremely averse to the idea (for good reason, hygiene and safety!). As I said, buggery is something one would expect from bonobos with downs syndrome, not civilized Europeans. Perhaps buggery has pieced the culture of the Balkans because of buggering Turks, I don't know, but I can assure you that in the west there was little to no buggery prior to the usurping of mainstream psychology by leftists.

[Also]

No, being homosexual is for homosexuals.

Buttfucking a girl doesn't make you gay, it makes you a buttfucker.


If the nerve endings in the rectal area didn't enjoy receiving dicks, people wouldn't put them there.

It doesn't make one homosexual. But it is a sin regardless.

[Linebacker]

Anal sex is great.it's like the tightest hole you can ever stuff it into.Some girls don't want to have it but other take it like pornstars.Anyway,you should try some before saying it should be illegal.That will change your mind.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

I don't believe that we have an innate desire to penetrate anus, nor do women have an innate desire to have their anuses penetrated. There is no biological reason for the strange behavior, and normally I believe that people are extremely averse to the idea (for good reason, hygiene and safety!). As I said, buggery is something one would expect from bonobos with downs syndrome, not civilized Europeans. Perhaps buggery has pieced the culture of the Balkans because of buggering Turks, I don't know, but I can assure you that in the west there was little to no buggery prior to the usurping of mainstream psychology by leftists.

For me its biological apart from homosexuality which I strongly condemn, anal sex between opposite poles however is natural and has nothing to do with culture, history rather individual preferences whereas about hygiene I do agree to certain extent since you never know for sure the risk you're exposing too but risk from vaginal sex exist also.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Weird. I've always assumed that most men really really loved anal sex cus it feels tighter than the vag and the naughtiness turns them on :eek:

Anyway, it shouldn't be illegal but yea I do agree, it's freaking disgusting.

Nice tags :coffee:

I think you shall give a try, YOLO. ;)

[Vorpal]

Anal sex is great.it's like the tightest hole you can ever stuff it into.Some girls don't want to have it but other take it like pornstars.Anyway,you should try some before saying it should be illegal.That will change your mind.

What if your dick is too thick and it gives your partner only pain?
Never had such problem? :D

[ЛыSSый]

legal/illegal... gigig. excuse me, but who can forbid topicstarter (or anyone, who read it) be fucked in ass, if it want?

[Linebacker]

What if your dick is too thick and it gives your partner only pain?
Never had such problem? :D

Well you don't know how it works.With some lube and a few pushes her anus gets stretched and it becomes easier.But at the end you have. to convince your girl to be comfortable to do it with you,and that is something Im good at.

[Vorpal]

Well you don't know how it works.With some lube and a few pushes her anus gets stretched and it becomes easier.But at the end you have. to convince your girl to be comfortable to do it with you,and that is something Im good at.

Nah man, we had to practice it for few days until it actually became normal and painless, lube helped a lot.

[Linebacker]

Nah man, we had to practice it for few days until it actually became normal and painless, lube helped a lot.

So you have "came in through the fire exit" too eh?

Did she scream and grabbed the bed? :D

[Vorpal]

So you have "came in through the fire exit" too eh?

Did she scream and grabbed the bed? :D

Sure, lol, it was fun.

[Longbowman]

So you have "came in through the fire exit" too eh?

Did she scream and grabbed the bed? :D

I found it unpleasant. But I imagine it would be a different experience if I were the penetrator :rolleyes:

Nah, did it once, wasn't so hot.

[Vorpal]

lel

[Minesweeper]

If Big Brother says so, it should be. Freedom is slavery.

[PolishAmerican190]

Let's plug all assholes!

[legolasbozo]

Portaus you should be muslim then, it is "haram" in sunni section :)

[Dandelion]

If Big Brother says so, it should be. Freedom is slavery.

Yeah, let's forbid sex entirely, like in Orwell's 1984. ;)

[Fortis in Arduis]

Yeah, let's forbid sex entirely, like in Orwell's 1984. ;)

I cannot say what I want to say here.

Really. I just cannot. :shrug:

[Dandelion]

I cannot say what I want to say here.

Really. I just cannot. :shrug:

Great minds think alike, I guess. ;)

[Vorpal]

I cannot say what I want to say here.

Really. I just cannot. :shrug:

You literally can't. :D

[Minesweeper]

Yeah, let's forbid sex entirely, like in Orwell's 1984. ;)

I believe we have potential members of anti-sex league here. :D

[Longbowman]

Let's plug all assholes!

Yes! With our penises!

Am I doing it right?

[PolishAmerican190]

Yes! With our penises!

Am I doing it right?

By George I think you got it!

[Fortis in Arduis]

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

There is nothing wrong with being a totally-owned slut.

THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING A TOTALLY-OWNED SLUT.

Read, and repeat, and everything will be fine. :angel

[Arianiti]

Portaus you should be muslim then, it is "haram" in sunni section :)

Not only anal but also oral.

I do not practice it so I am against, but I voted No by mistake. :(

[Dandelion]

I didn't know some people don't like oral sex. We learn new things every day.

[Arianiti]

I didn't know some people don't like oral sex. We learn new things every day.

:lol:

You worry too much man. I didn't know that oral sex is forbidden before couple of days ago. But new rules every day. :P

[LightHouse89]

I am telling you they are not....they are mostly al mixed race people. they behave like it too. they are a pervert race. I am tired of them taking over our cities in the north east and their crime. Most criminals have negro dna here.

[Incal]

OP

http://i.imgur.com/5F3KgNf.jpg

[LightHouse89]

sodomy is sodomy.

[Rudel]

sodomy is sodomy.
Thank you for making that clear, I wasn't quite sure yet.

[LightHouse89]

Thank you for making that clear, I wasn't quite sure yet.

Be silent subhuman Gaul.

[portusaus]

Yeah, let's forbid sex entirely, like in Orwell's 1984. ;)

No, you're strawmanning. Buggery is an offense, not a sexual act. The moment an anus is pierced is the moment that sex is no longer happening, but instead abuse of the body and of sexuality.

[Also]

portusaus has the sensibility to see there is something wrong and disordered with anal sex.

[Jackson]

How would one be able to police such a matter?

"No officer, he's just bow-legged!"

[Fortis in Arduis]

portusaus has the sensibility to see there is something wrong and disordered with anal sex.

L.O.L. . . . :biggrin:

You make it sound so appealing to a virgin like myself. :rolleyes:

:lmao















Sad, sad, sad, sad, pathetic wankers! :pound:

[zhaoyun]

Frankly, what two men do in the privacy of their own home is their own business as long as it is not harming or affecting me.

I won't ever be involved in gay sex, it doesn't mean I have the right to dictate my preferences on others.

For example, I don't like ham sandwiches, I prefer turkey sandwiches, do I have a right to tell everyone else in line that they can't have a ham sandwich because I don't like it?

[Fortis in Arduis]

Frankly, what two men do in the privacy of their own home is their own business as long as it is not harming or affecting me.

I won't ever be involved in gay sex, it doesn't mean I have the right to dictate my preferences on others.

For example, I don't like ham sandwiches, I prefer turkey sandwiches, do I have a right to tell everyone else in line that they can't have a ham sandwich because I don't like it?

It should not even come up. It is so irrelevant.


At the beginning of Stephen Fry: Out There, a two-part BBC special about gay people and the trouble people have accepting them, Fry explains his interest with the detached air of an amused academic. Isn't homophobia absurd, he says – "It's as if you met someone who spent all their life trying to get rid of red telephones."

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/tv-review-stephen-fry-out-there-bbc2-8879923.html

That is exactly how absurd it is, to me at least, but there are many elements.

Ridiculous anal fears. I mean, how many times has a huge poo passed without too much of a problem? You think that your dick is bigger than that? Dream on.

Homophobia. If I have anal with a women, am I "gay"? Er... no, you retard. Work it out with your finger...

Homophobia. Homosexuality is not natural... unless one is actually homosexual, in which case, it really is.

Homophobia, again: "Gay men have anal sex, it is gross." Actually, no, not all homosexual men have anal sex, and your fears about anal are unfounded, anyway. Ridiculous. Please grow up.

I could continue, but unlike many of the "concerned", this is not my main area of interest. :swl

I am for free speech, but I just cannot believe the dullards who get into this anal discussion about anal.

[Also]

L.O.L. . . . :biggrin:

You make it sound so appealing to a virgin like myself. :rolleyes:

:lmao















Sad, sad, sad, sad, pathetic wankers! :pound:

I wasn't hoping to be appealing, particullarly to you who I don't even know or heard of, but he gets somethings right. I don't feel emotionally repulsed and grossed by the simple idea of anal sex like portusaus, and I am not saying this because it benefits me, but from a logical point I view I must agree he is right. There simply is something tainted and disordered about it, it takes what could be a healthy and natural sexual relation to an improper stimulation between a penis and an anus, an anus is not a vagina, it is not made for penetration, it is not naturally lubrified, it is not as elastic as a vagina, it is dirty and most often will contain fecal dirty, it can more easily harm the rectum tissue and even bring urinary and fecal problems, also it increases a lot the chance of transmiting sexual diseases, and finally anal sex completely frustrates the main objective of sex which is reproduction.

So it doesn't surprise me sodomy, including between man and woman, has been outlawed in many different places throught the times. It is the natural human knowledge about the order of the nature speaking. People were not simply picking on this for no reason, maybe the penalties were exaggerated, but they were right in the idea this is wrong.

People should be discouraged into engaging in any forms of anal penetration in my opinion.

[Steve-O]

Yes, ban anal sex so it becomes more popular. Clever indeed OP.

[Fortis in Arduis]

I wasn't hoping to be appealing, particullarly to you who I don't even know or heard of, but he gets somethings right. I don't feel emotionally repulsed and grossed by the simple idea of anal sex like portusaus, and I am not saying this because it benefits me, but from a logical point I view I must agree he is right. There simply is something tainted and disordered about it, it takes what could be a healthy and natural sexual relation to an improper stimulation between a penis and an anus, an anus is not a vagina, it is not made for penetration, it is not naturally lubrified, it is not as elastic as a vagina, it is dirty and most often will contain fecal dirty, it can more easily harm the rectum tissue and even bring urinary and fecal problems, also it increases a lot the chance of transmiting sexual diseases, and finally anal sex completely frustrates the main objective of sex which is reproduction.

So it doesn't surprise me sodomy, including between man and woman, has been outlawed in many different places throught the times. It is the natural human knowledge about the order of the nature speaking. People were not simply picking on this for no reason, maybe the penalties were exaggerated, but they were right in the idea this is wrong.

People should be discouraged into engaging in any forms of anal penetration in my opinion.

Too late, I have rated this thread as "excellent!", and I am McLovin' it. ;)

The problem that we have with all forms of sex, as humans, is that they can be very compelling, lots of fun, and we might choose to act upon our base impulses without regard for our health, or emotional well-being.

My opinion is that anal sex is a very personal and private matter, and something that one would not want to be doing with anyone other than someone whom one might be very close to. Yes, I am judging people who approach it more casually. However, if it were not so pleasurable, we would not be meant to do it, if we so choose.

To expand on the problem, anal sex can be particularly pleasurable, it has something about it, probably connected to the root chakra, which makes it very powerful in raising sex energy. I know that some of the religious and continent would regard sex as being purely intended towards reproduction, but for many people it is something more than, or different from, that. Not just reproduction, or not reproduction at all, but something special nonetheless.

[portusaus]

Frankly, what two men do in the privacy of their own home is their own business as long as it is not harming or affecting me.

I won't ever be involved in gay sex, it doesn't mean I have the right to dictate my preferences on others.

For example, I don't like ham sandwiches, I prefer turkey sandwiches, do I have a right to tell everyone else in line that they can't have a ham sandwich because I don't like it?

This thread is not about "homosexuality", it is about buggery. Buggery in all forms is not acceptable from a dignified standpoint.

Ham sandwiches and turkey sandwiches are healthy. Putting things in an out hole is not.


It should not even come up. It is so irrelevant.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/tv-review-stephen-fry-out-there-bbc2-8879923.html

That is exactly how absurd it is, to me at least, but there are many elements.

Ridiculous anal fears. I mean, how many times has a huge poo passed without too much of a problem? You think that your dick is bigger than that? Dream on.

Homophobia. If I have anal with a women, am I "gay"? Er... no, you retard. Work it out with your finger...

Homophobia. Homosexuality is not natural... unless one is actually homosexual, in which case, it really is.

Homophobia, again: "Gay men have anal sex, it is gross." Actually, no, not all homosexual men have anal sex, and your fears about anal are unfounded, anyway. Ridiculous. Please grow up.

I could continue, but unlike many of the "concerned", this is not my main area of interest. :swl

I am for free speech, but I just cannot believe the dullards who get into this anal discussion about anal.

Ugh, well, the anus has evolved for millions of years excreting waste. It is equipped for that purpose, solely. Not penetration, which causes damage.

It is obviously not 'homosexual' to stick it in a woman's butthole. But it's fucking weird, and must hurt like hell for her.

"Sexual orientation" does not exist, and I'll leave it at that.

[Also]

The problem that we have with all forms of sex, as humans, is that they can be very compelling, lots of fun, and we might choose to act upon our base impulses without regard for our health, or emotional well-being.

That we can is obvious, the question is wheter we should. It is never reasonable to "act upon our base impulses without regard for our health, or emotional well-being" for obvious reasons. I take that you recognize the potential harm involving anal sex by the things I mentioned by this reply.



My opinion is that anal sex is a very personal and private matter, and something that one would not want to be doing with anyone other than someone whom one might be very close to. Yes, I am judging people who approach it more casually. However, if it were not so pleasurable, we would not be meant to do it, if we so choose.

In this case I don't think you will care about my judgements on anal sex since you not merely judge actions themselves but individuals too. Anal sex is not really sex but someone using someone's else anus to masturbate and the other stimulating his anus with someone's else penis. It is disordered or depraved at least, and I don't say that because I become automically disgusted by the idea like portusaus do.



To expand on the problem, anal sex can be particularly pleasurable, it has something about it, probably connected to the root chakra, which makes it very powerful in raising sex energy. I know that some of the religious and continent would regard sex as being purely intended towards reproduction, but for many people it is something more than, or different from, that. Not just reproduction, or not reproduction at all, but something special nonetheless.

Well, we never argue wheter something should be lawful or if it is okay or not based on the fact they are pleasurable, many things are pleasurable for certain people but nonetheless we don't want people doing them and in certain cases we do outlaw them.

Most things are not reducible to pleasure, you talk a lot about pleasure, you seem to be even willing to risk your healthy and well-being for pleasure, I hope you can overcome this hedonistic mentality and value more your body and yourself.

[Also]

From the Medical Institute For Sexual Health:


Anal Sex: A Dangerous Trend

Anal sex has historically been taboo in many cultures. However, numerous studies show that the practice of anal sex is on the rise. Why has there been a rise in this risky alternate sexual practice? We live in a sexualized culture which teaches that sexual experimentation is one of the best ways to achieve sexual satisfaction. Dr. Debby Herbenick argues in her book, Good in Bed Guide to Anal Pleasuring, that anal sex “is a way to explore and act out new fantasies with [your] lover.”[1] However, this common justification of anal sex is faulty and superficial because it is very damaging to your health and quite possibly life threatening.

Let’s check out a few of the major risks:

General health risks:

Unlike the vagina, the tissues of the anus are not stretchy. This means that the anus can easily tear, which puts the receiving partner in danger of anal abscesses, hemorrhoids, or fissures (a very large tear).
Anal sex can weaken your muscles down there, which makes it hard to hold feces.
The anus is full of bacteria. Consequently, the giving partner is especially prone to infections.
Pregnancy:

You cannot get pregnant from the act alone. However, semen could still leak into the vagina and impregnate the woman.
STDs:

The fragile nature of the anal tissue makes it easier for STDs to enter into the bloodstream.
Unprotected anal sex is one of the primary ways in which HIV is spread. If you don’t already know, HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) can eventually lead to AIDS!
Recent studies have linked anal sex to anal cancer. HPV (Human Papillomavirus) is closely associated with anal cancer, which is frequently spread through anal sex.
The use of a latex condom certainly lowers the chances of contracting an STD. However, even perfect condom use does not completely eliminate the risk of STDs. In fact, the condom is more susceptible to leakage, breakage, and slippage during anal intercourse.
Anal sex is clearly a dangerous form of sexual activity. It may be tempting to engage in anal sex with the notion that it does not affect one’s virginal status in the traditional meaning of the term virgin (ie someone who has not had penile-vaginal intercourse); however, ANAL SEX IS SEX. Therefore, you still face all of the detrimental emotional and health consequences of having sex outside of a lifelong, monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner.

https://www.medinstitute.org/2012/06/anal-sex-a-dangerous-trend-3-2/

[LightHouse89]

Sodomy is a sin.

[Also]

portusaus, you must propose a penalty for those who willfully engage in anal sex.

[Leon_C]

Yes, and I think perpetrators should be thoroughly penalised.

[Leon_C]

In the butt.

[portusaus]

portusaus, you must propose a penalty for those who willfully engage in anal sex.

A public condemnation in the town square, and perhaps encouragement to throw rotten fruits for repeat offenders. People would be far more reluctant to bugger if everyone would know what they've done if caught. The punishment does not have to disrupt their well-being, but it should be sufficient to deter most from committing the crime. Humiliation would fulfill that purpose.

[LightHouse89]

A public condemnation in the town square, and perhaps encouragement to throw rotten fruits for repeat offenders. People would be far more reluctant to bugger if everyone would know what they've done if caught. The punishment does not have to disrupt their well-being, but it should be sufficient to deter most from committing the crime. Humiliation would fulfill that purpose.

I would be that one nut in the background screaming 'Allah Snackbar'! just for theatrics. I think it sounds funny.

[1stLightHorse]

Yes, ban anal sex so it becomes more popular. Clever indeed OP.

This says more about the dysgenic state of humankind more than anything else.

"If anyone tells us not to do something, it's going to spark our interest and we're going to start doing it even if it's completely detrimental to us".

This is one of the major problems with the species. Compliance to order (not just law) is essential for the thriving of any species. Existing is for animals and lesser beings. Humans are here to thrive. Either move forward or rot and die with the sodomites, drug addicts and obese scum that seemingly cannot abstain from something so detrimental it carries the threat of serious disease or worse.

[LightHouse89]

This says more about the dysgenic state of humankind more than anything else.

"If anyone tells us not to do something, it's going to spark our interest and we're going to start doing it even if it's completely detrimental to us".

This is one of the major problems with the species. Compliance to order (not just law) is essential for the thriving of any species. Existing is for animals and lesser beings. Humans are here to thrive. Either move forward or rot and die with the sodomites, drug addicts and obese scum that seemingly cannot abstain from something so detrimental it carries the threat of serious disease or worse.

I think as a whole the west is deteriorating morally, spiritually, physically etc...... once it gets worse and worse economically and physically we will either adapt and become more socially conservative or maybe we will be wiped out by a disease or nuclear war. I think of the stupidity of globalization and compare it to the 16002-1700s with millions of native americans who were wiped out just by foreign diseases alone......I can envision this is the future of Western Europe and North America.....and in a way its God's will.

[Fortis in Arduis]

That we can is obvious, the question is wheter we should. It is never reasonable to "act upon our base impulses without regard for our health, or emotional well-being" for obvious reasons. I take that you recognize the potential harm involving anal sex by the things I mentioned by this reply.

I am skeptical about getting drawn into this, and discussing matters which are of such minor importance. Nevertheless, I shall try to be as courteous as possible about all of this.

No-one ever said to me: "Watch out for the anal! You might develop a fissure!" Nor do know of anyone who has ever had any trouble with anal, once they knew how to do it.

Frankly, the mouth is dirtier than the bottom and contains nastier bacteria. I am assuming that you have heard this before. Yes, it is true. This does not mean that I shall be giving up kissing. Life has risks.




In this case I don't think you will care about my judgements on anal sex since you not merely judge actions themselves but individuals too. Anal sex is not really sex but someone using someone's else anus to masturbate and the other stimulating his anus with someone's else penis. It is disordered or depraved at least, and I don't say that because I become automically disgusted by the idea like portusaus do.

Masturbation is not sex. Right. :rolleyes: What this smells like to me is the justification of the reproductive ethos of certain Christian groupules, I just made that word up to describe whatever 'groupule' it is you belong to, the one that told you all the rules you try to follow.


Well, we never argue wheter something should be lawful or if it is okay or not based on the fact they are pleasurable, many things are pleasurable for certain people but nonetheless we don't want people doing them and in certain cases we do outlaw them.

Vices and virtues; they are not the same for everyone.


Most things are not reducible to pleasure, you talk a lot about pleasure, you seem to be even willing to risk your healthy and well-being for pleasure, I hope you can overcome this hedonistic mentality and value more your body and yourself.

I am not someone who considers pleasure to be the purpose of life, and I am not a hedonist to any unusual extent, at least I do not think so...

[Longbowman]

A public condemnation in the town square, and perhaps encouragement to throw rotten fruits for repeat offenders. People would be far more reluctant to bugger if everyone would know what they've done if caught. The punishment does not have to disrupt their well-being, but it should be sufficient to deter most from committing the crime. Humiliation would fulfill that purpose.

Most people, certainly in my part of the world, would be reluctant to attend such a punishment. What is this, 1827? We don't have that sort of town activity. You're a very primitive person, really. You have no empathy. I pity you and those around you.

[ЛыSSый]

minute of humour. The ukrainian "neonazy" (totalitarian destructive religious group in a fact):
- does anybody use ne?
- no, its a bullshit

https://pp.vk.me/c540105/c614618/v614618830/daa0/x06nEEXVPJ4.jpg

[Also]

I am skeptical about getting drawn into this, and discussing matters which are of such minor importance. Nevertheless, I shall try to be as courteous as possible about all of this.

No-one ever said to me: "Watch out for the anal! You might develop a fissure!" Nor do know of anyone who has ever had any trouble with anal, once they knew how to do it.

Frankly, the mouth is dirtier than the bottom and contains nastier bacteria. I am assuming that you have heard this before. Yes, it is true. This does not mean that I shall be giving up kissing. Life has risks.

The dangers of anal sex are well reported in the medical field, I even posted a link from the Medical Institute For Sexual Health about that, simply the anus is not made for penetration. I am not aware of any comparable danger that involves kissing but if I become aware I wouldn't take it so much as an approval of anal sex but more like a warn that we should be more careful with kissing. Surely it is possible in principle to get some diseases by kissing like it is possible to get diseases by sitting next to a sick person in a train, but anal sex is much more harmful and degrading to human dignity. Anal sex is merely a reflex of a disordered lust, two gay men who deliberatelly degrades each others rectums and put them in a fragile position, more prone to deadly diseases and a list of healthy problems can't really love each other if they are aware of what they are doing, if they loved each other they would want what is best for each of them. But they make themselves and each other tools to satisfy disordered lusts and degrade them.




Masturbation is not sex. Right. :rolleyes: What this smells like to me is the justification of the reproductive ethos of certain Christian groupules, I just made that word up to describe whatever 'groupule' it is you belong to, the one that told you all the rules you try to follow.

It is pretty much a Christian ethos.




Vices and virtues; they are not the same for everyone.



I am not someone who considers pleasure to be the purpose of life, and I am not a hedonist to any unusual extent, at least I do not think so...


Your argumentation is similar to heavy drug addicts, yolo people or very promiscuous people who have sex with a lot people: let's not think too much about the risks and let's enjoy the moment, I am going where the moment takes me, I don't need to plan further but only look at the present, whatever is pleasing must be good, because I am akin to a beast without reason.

Why do you think gay men have a considerably lower life expectancy?

[Manifest Destiny]

Why? Consenting adults can still do things that are wrong, like burglars and arsonists. Why stop at criminalizing offenses against others, while offenses against nature can be just as vile or worse? To me, that is a foolish blanket ruling. A couple should be able to do whatever the hell they want with each other, but buggery? Fuck that, it should be illegal. There are standards and that stoops below them.

Burglary and arson involve the non-consenting, so that argument doesn't really work.

Anyway; I'm opposed to government regulation of the sex lives of consenting adults, just as a matter of principle. But, from the standpoint of practicality, outlawing buttsex is destined to be a failure. The only way such a law could be enforced is either putting CCTV cameras everywhere (on both public and private property) or forcing citizens to endure medical inspections several times per week to check for signs of anal sex. Most people would tire of this nonsense fairly quickly (and that's not even getting into the incredible financial and human resources that would be required to create and maintain this Butthole Gestapo you're advocating).

[arcticwolf]

Most people, certainly in my part of the world, would be reluctant to attend such a punishment. What is this, 1827? We don't have that sort of town activity. You're a very primitive person, really. You have no empathy. I pity you and those around you.

That's the thing with psychopaths, they have no empathy, they have no clue what it is, I mean they "know" theoretically, but have no clue. Most live normal, ptoductive lives, but are awkward in social circumstances, and can't understand why the rest of us just do not get it.

They consider their deficiency a strength. Well you wouldn't scold a toddler for not understanding calculus, same principle here. What you are doing here is an excercise in futility my friend.

[Fortis in Arduis]

Anal sex is merely a reflex of a disordered lust, two gay men who deliberatelly degrades each others rectums and put them in a fragile position, more prone to deadly diseases and a list of healthy problems can't really love each other if they are aware of what they are doing, if they loved each other they would want what is best for each of them. But they make themselves and each other tools to satisfy disordered lusts and degrade them.

You are not to know, of course, but anal sex is practised by heterosexual men.

Some heterosexual men like having something up there and many enjoy having anal sex with women, so your argument is invalid.

For some reason we were created with an anal erogenous zone. Actually, I think that I know why: Anal sex.

Homosexual men might have a lower life expectancy because they have fewer responsibilities than non-homosexual men and are therefore more able to take risks.

[Also]

You are not to know, of course, but anal sex is practised by heterosexual men.

Some heterosexual men like having something up there and many enjoy having anal sex with women, so your argument is invalid.

This does not invalidate what I said. Even if only homosexual men practiced anal sex it wouldn't invalidate what I said, there is just no connection. But although I specifically mentioned gay men what I said is also valid for man-woman couples.

If a man likes having something up there I wouldn't call him straight, he is gay or bi at least. But I am aware in liberal circles a man can stuff a plastic penis in his ass "out of curiosity" and still be considered 100% straight. I rather not discuss that.



For some reason we were created with an anal erogenous zone. Actually, I think that I know why: Anal sex.

For some reason anal sex comes with a lot more risks than vaginal sex, some of them possibly deadly, must be because the anus was not made for sex any more than a vagina was to made to poop. The fact that some people get pleasure out of it doesn't mean they should be having a penis thrusted inside their anus and that is the purpose of the anus. Pretty much all parts of the human body can be stimulated to different degrees, the anus just happens to be close to the prostate for the men and the vagina for the woman so the ending nerves can be stimulated, that and the psychological factor of dominance/submission that excites some people.



Homosexual men might have a lower life expectancy because they have fewer responsibilities than non-homosexual men and are therefore more able to take risks.

Lol, at this. Wild imagination there. It has a lot to do with their life-style and higher promiscuity, and anal sex is a huge part of it since if highly increases the potential to spread STD's. Since it is more than clear that anal sex is much more dangerous than vaginal sex and that gay men engage in anal sex much more often than straight couples on average, why would anyone be so quick to dismiss any relation?

[Fortis in Arduis]

Lust itself is the sin, rather than the acts deriving thereof, and honestly, if a man and his wife decide that they want to have anal sex, what is the issue? It is between themselves.

Obviously, heterosexual men can enjoy being penetrated, and many do.

You seem to want to prevent anything but heterosexual activity leading towards procreation. This is just the obvious result of Roman Catholic reproductive ethos, which has lead to untold millions of, oh, brown useless babies in the world.

Why do you purport to care so much about the well-being and lifestyles of the 1% homosexual minority?

[rhiannon]

While I find anal sex to be totally vile and disgusting, it is not my place to tell other consenting adults what they can and cannot do in the bedroom. All I can hope for is that they at least use common sense and be safe about it.

[LightHouse89]

Sodomy is sodomy and it is a sin :rolleyes:

[LightHouse89]

While I find anal sex to be totally vile and disgusting, it is not my place to tell other consenting adults what they can and cannot do in the bedroom. All I can hope for is that they at least use common sense and be safe about it.

Its the wrong hole.....anyone that practices is deserves an STD....thats God's way of punishing the perverts.

[rhiannon]

Its the wrong hole.....anyone that practices is deserves an STD....thats God's way of punishing the perverts.You can always make me laugh, Norman :)

Eh. I really don't care what other people do.....as long as they are consenting grownups. God knows people can certainly get off on some weird-ass shit:laugh:

[Queen B]

While I find anal sex to be totally vile and disgusting, it is not my place to tell other consenting adults what they can and cannot do in the bedroom. All I can hope for is that they at least use common sense and be safe about it.
This.

[LightHouse89]

This.

Have you tried it? If a woman told me to put it there then I would lose all respect for them right then and there it just seems nasty to me and unclean.....let alone sodomy. Sodomizing is not pleasant.

[Queen B]

Have you tried it? If a woman told me to put it there then I would lose all respect for them right then and there it just seems nasty to me and unclean.....let alone sodomy. Sodomizing is not pleasant.
No I haven't.
I find it disgusting. As a friend says ''made for exports - only''.
But if other people don't have problem, then why should I have, with what they do with their ass ?

[LightHouse89]

No I haven't.
I find it disgusting. As a friend says ''made for exports - only''.
But if other people don't have problem, then why should I have, with what they do with their ass ?

I think it should not be shown to impressionable minds..... then the practice would stop except with homosexuals.

[Also]

Lust itself is the sin, rather than the acts deriving thereof,

This is incorrect, you have a misconception of how the Church regard these issues. Involutarily feeling a desire is not a sin itself, to sin it requires willfuness of action or thought.
So, simply having an involutary homosexual inclination or whatever is not a sin itself. It only becomes a sin when you consciously engage in something wrong or deliberately put yourself in a situation where you are more likely to do so.


and honestly, if a man and his wife decide that they want to have anal sex, what is the issue? It is between themselves.

Obviously, heterosexual men can enjoy being penetrated, and many do.

Anal sex is a risky type of behaviour with possible life-long consequences, seeking body pleasure above mental, physical and spiritual healthy, specially through a disordered mean is a form of depravity. What I said in this topic is that people should be discouraged into engaging in any forms of anal sex, I didn't categorically said that it should be outlawed but I don't consider that possibility absurd.



You seem to want to prevent anything but heterosexual activity leading towards procreation. This is just the obvious result of Roman Catholic reproductive ethos, which has lead to untold millions of, oh, brown useless babies in the world.

Why do you purport to care so much about the well-being and lifestyles of the 1% homosexual minority?

This part is so foolish you would have looked better without saying it. Those brown babies and men are not useless, they are worthy people like everyone else and most of them are nice people irregardless of social class and level of scholarity. And I am suspicious they would have happened even if the Spanish and Portuguese were Protestants.

However even from a rightish "white nationalist" point of view the Roman Catholic sexual ethics is favourable because it would increase the number of white women pregnants and diminishes abortion occurences, aswell as diminishing divorces and maximizing the natural family structure in which children are best raised.

As far as I know homosexuals are a minority but well-above 1%, and second as you said yourself anal sex does not concern only homosexual but heterosexual couples aswell. And I don't think I care excessively about this. I was just taking a side on this issue and I said "portusaus has the sensibility to see there is something wrong and disordered with anal sex." then you quoted me calling me a 'pathetic wanker' which led me to explain further my views.

Maybe the question to be asked is why do you care so much about what I and others think to the point of gratuitously calling us 'pathetic wankers'?
The second question would be: Why do you, who says to judge other people who approach anal sex more casually throw judgments at some of us simply for our opinions on anal sex?
And the third question is: Why do you talk about brown babies in such a derrogatory manner given that you are not in position to judge them and how useful they are, and yourself is mixed with gypsies?

[Fortis in Arduis]

This is incorrect, you have a misconception of how the Church regard these issues. Involutarily feeling a desire is not a sin itself, to sin it requires willfuness of action or thought.
So, simply having an involutary homosexual inclination or whatever is not a sin itself. It only becomes a sin when you consciously engage in something wrong or deliberately put yourself in a situation where you are more likely to do so.

According to what I was taught by strict celibate non-Christians, lust itself is the sin. This is why tantric sex might be regarded as unsinful, as it is a means to harness and control lust.


Anal sex is a risky type of behaviour with possible life-long consequences, seeking body pleasure above mental, physical and spiritual healthy, specially through a disordered mean is a form of depravity. What I said in this topic is that people should be discouraged into engaging in any forms of anal sex, I didn't categorically said that it should be outlawed but I don't consider that possibility absurd.

Fine. I do understand the story that heterosexual monogamy and sexual continence is some sort of societal ideal. It is also a marvellous means of social control. Make people feel guilty about sex, and then you have them, by the balls. My father is clergyman, and he warned me about this technique, often used by Christians on campuses.


This part is so foolish you would have looked better without saying it. Those brown babies and men are not useless, they are worthy people like everyone else and most of them are nice people irregardless of social class and level of scholarity. And I am suspicious they would have happened even if the Spanish and Portuguese were Protestants.

I see a world that has been destroyed by Christian and other egalitarian influences, like Islam. Missionaries messed Africa right up. It could have been a white continent.


However even from a rightish "white nationalist" point of view the Roman Catholic sexual ethics is favourable because it would increase the number of white women pregnants and diminishes abortion occurences, aswell as diminishing divorces and maximizing the natural family structure in which children are best raised.

I understand that.


As far as I know homosexuals are a minority but well-above 1%, and second as you said yourself anal sex does not concern only homosexual but heterosexual couples aswell. And I don't think I care excessively about this. I was just taking a side on this issue and I said "portusaus has the sensibility to see there is something wrong and disordered with anal sex." then you quoted me calling me a 'pathetic wanker' which led me to explain further my views.

Yes.


Maybe the question to be asked is why do you care so much about what I and others think to the point of gratuitously calling us 'pathetic wankers'?

Sodomy, in the Biblical sense, includes oral sex and probably much more. Are you railing against that, also, or is it just the buttsecks that troubles you? Silly, silly, silly.



The second question would be: Why do you, who says to judge other people who approach anal sex more casually throw judgments at some of us simply for our opinions on anal sex?

Let us start with: You know so little about it, so how can you knock it? Most of you would be lucky to have Internet sex with a melon.


And the third question is: Why do you talk about brown babies in such a derrogatory [sic] manner given that you are not in position to judge them and how useful they are, and yourself is mixed with gypsies?

I am white and British, and therefore very lucky to have been born into this body. So many unwanted children are born, and some Christians advocate mass unfettered reproduction in the turd world.

Lovely.

[Krampus]

Actually, I think the HIV/AIDS rate amongst gays is largely because they tend to be far more promiscuous.

I thought they just got it more because they're homos

[Dictator]

Lust itself is the sin, rather than the acts deriving thereof, and honestly, if a man and his wife decide that they want to have anal sex, what is the issue? It is between themselves.

Obviously, heterosexual men can enjoy being penetrated, and many do.

You seem to want to prevent anything but heterosexual activity leading towards procreation. This is just the obvious result of Roman Catholic reproductive ethos, which has lead to untold millions of, oh, brown useless babies in the world.

Why do you purport to care so much about the well-being and lifestyles of the 1% homosexual minority?

This isn't cool, Fortis.

[ЛыSSый]

19 pages in 4 days. Are anal sex really so important for western civilisation?

[Fortis in Arduis]

I thought they just got it more because they're homos

It started out as a homosexual disease, because, yes, anal is more risky, and the culture was very much one of hedonism and promiscuity then, but that has changed.

It is growing more in the heterosexual population, because heterosexuals now and still have lots and lots of unprotected casual sex, especially in Africa, thanks to ignorance. :love:

The only homosexual I know with HIV caught it in 1984, and he is alive and well today.


This isn't cool, Fortis.

My mondialist tendencies died when I realised just how much foreigners (racial and geographical) hate me, and how racist and useless they mostly are.

[Also]

According to what I was taught by strict celibate non-Christians, lust itself is the sin. This is why tantric sex might be regarded as unsinful, as it is a means to harness and control lust.

I don't know to who you've been talking to or if you are misrepresenting what you've been told, but a person cannot be morally accountable for something completely involuntary. More important, I doubt any sort of Christian would tell you that "the acts deriving of lust are not sinful themselves".




Fine. I do understand the story that heterosexual monogamy and sexual continence is some sort of societal ideal. It is also a marvellous means of social control. Make people feel guilty about sex, and then you have them, by the balls. My father is clergyman, and he warned me about this technique, often used by Christians on campuses.

It's an ideal yes. I don't want to "have" anyone, I am just explaining somethings. High moral standards always bother a lot of people, because we are supposed to recognize our own flaws and leave the things that are inappropriate, it requires us to be humble and even lower ourselves, but what we most often do is attack higher standards and lower it down to reconciliate them with our vices, because it is easier. The main reason why people reject Christian sexual ethics is not because it has been tried and left wanting, far from that, but because it is considered difficult and "incovenient" to say people should change their values.



I see a world that has been destroyed by Christian and other egalitarian influences, like Islam. Missionaries messed Africa right up. It could have been a white continent.


Christianity is a gift to the world, but I think it is too much off-topic to discuss that. I also don't understand the desire to make Africa a white continent.



Sodomy, in the Biblical sense, includes oral sex and probably much more. Are you railing against that, also, or is it just the buttsecks that troubles you? Silly, silly, silly.

Oral sex is not the relevant to this topic, that's why you don't see me talking about it in any light.



Let us start with: You know so little about it, so how can you knock it? Most of you would be lucky to have Internet sex with a melon.

I know the risks, the harm and how it works. I don't need to experience it myself to acknowledge reasons to oppose it. Just like I don't need to smoke crack to have an opinion on that.

I don't have any sexual interests in melons, so I am fine the the remote possibility of having internet sex with melons. Anyway, I feel this is an ad hominem and an unclassy commentary.




I am white and British, and therefore very lucky to have been born into this body. So many unwanted children are born, and some Christians advocate mass unfettered reproduction in the turd world.

Lovely.

'White' is how you personally identify yourself, on the light you have gypsy ancestry some people would expect you to refrain from racist remarks, but regardless of your ancestry you shouldn't say brown babies are useless. People are not tools to be considered useful or useless like that.

Christians do not advocate mass unfettered reproduction, they advocate natural means of family planning and reject abortion which is not the same as "breed as much as possible". Family planning when done within the requirements of the faith is valid and often even encouraged.

[Fortis in Arduis]

http://heidicullinan.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/titan-full-body-condoms-are-the-way-to-go-11417-1246478803-0.jpg

I shall post something serious later.

[Fortis in Arduis]

I don't know to who you've been talking to or if you are misrepresenting what you've been told, but a person cannot be morally accountable for something completely involuntary. More important, I doubt any sort of Christian would tell you that "the acts deriving of lust are not sinful themselves".

Who mentioned moral accountability? Lust is a mistake, also known as a sin, and lust can be controlled with the mind. I have been largely celibate for many years, certainly the last five, and it is easy because I tend to adhere to a mild vegetarian saatvic diet. I am now thinking of switching to a Jaina-style diet to take things to the next level. Did you teachers not tell you that meat, fish, eggs, onion, garlic, mushrooms inflame lust? If you desire purity, you have been chasing your tail without this scientific knowledge.


It's an ideal yes. I don't want to "have" anyone, I am just explaining somethings. High moral standards always bother a lot of people, because we are supposed to recognize our own flaws and leave the things that are inappropriate, it requires us to be humble and even lower ourselves, but what we most often do is attack higher standards and lower it down to reconciliate them with our vices, because it is easier. The main reason why people reject Christian sexual ethics is not because it has been tried and left wanting, far from that, but because it is considered difficult and "incovenient" to say people should change their values.

My father is a theologian and a Cambridge don. Thank you for your kind advice, but...


Christianity is a gift to the world, but I think it is too much off-topic to discuss that. I also don't understand the desire to make Africa a white continent.

The 'know thyself' message of Christianity is common to most religions. What is lacking is clear knowledge of the nature of the soul. No Christian ever told me that I was an eternal soul, and that my body was just a vehicle for that atma. Such a liberating truth, so lacking within the Christian milleux.


Oral sex is not the relevant to this topic, that's why you don't see me talking about it in any light.

Well, you had better not be getting any. That is all I am going to say. :)


I know the risks, the harm and how it works. I don't need to experience it myself to acknowledge reasons to oppose it. Just like I don't need to smoke crack to have an opinion on that.

Of course not. I have not eaten flesh for twenty-five years. You know that eating meat lowers your life expectancy, do you not? I am assuming that you do eat flesh because you seem a bit torpid. Life is all about living the longest, and breathing the most oxygen and being an asshole as much as possible. Sorry, I missionise... :(

YOU ARE GONNA DIE YOUNG! :evil


I don't have any sexual interests in melons, so I am fine the the remote possibility of having internet sex with melons. Anyway, I feel this is an ad hominem and an unclassy commentary.

Yes, because it is always the lonely fuglies who bring up this stupid topic.


'White' is how you personally identify yourself, on the light you have gypsy ancestry some people would expect you to refrain from racist remarks, but regardless of your ancestry you shouldn't say brown babies are useless. People are not tools to be considered useful or useless like that.

How frightfully virtuous and Christian of you. Yuk. :puke: Cecil Rhodes was homosexual, and the Christians ruined his venerable project. This is war, and we all need to wake up!


Christians do not advocate mass unfettered reproduction, they advocate natural means of family planning and reject abortion which is not the same as "breed as much as possible". Family planning when done within the requirements of the faith is valid and often even encouraged.

Oh, but they do, because this is what happens with contraception is disallowed.

[Also]

Who mentioned moral accountability? Lust is a mistake, also known as a sin, and lust can be controlled with the mind. I have been largely celibate for many years, certainly the last five, and it is easy because I tend to adhere to a mild vegetarian saatvic diet. I am now thinking of switching to a Jaina-style diet to take things to the next level. Did you teachers not tell you that meat, fish, eggs, onion, garlic, mushrooms inflame lust? If you desire purity, you have been chasing your tail without this scientific knowledge.

To sin you must have had the option to choose at some point. You cannot commit a sin without being morally accountable for it. I don't know how to be more clear than I've already been.

It's obvious that you are influenced by non-Christians oriental religions in your sayings. I don't know what you have been eating but your last posts were seriously pretty inflamatory, so you might want to make a change in your diet.

About eating that or not eating that:

"“And seek ye not what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubting mind. For all these things do the nations of the world seek after, and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these things. But rather seek ye the Kingdom of God, and all these things shall be added unto you." - Luke 12:29-31

Disordered desires comes from the soul, external factors can at best intensify them.



My father is a theologian and a Cambridge don. Thank you for your kind advice, but...

Lol, a "my father argument". I thought this kind of thing only happened in american movies. Both my parents are Phd physicists (although not in pure physics) but that doesn't mean I actually have a clue on their specific field of knowledge. And of course that kind of comment adds nothing.



The 'know thyself' message of Christianity is common to most religions. What is lacking is clear knowledge of the nature of the soul. No Christian ever told me that I was an eternal soul, and that my body was just a vehicle for that atma. Such a liberating truth, so lacking within the Christian milleux.


The message of Christianity serves to bring people closer to God and safeguard the eternal well-being of their soul. Nothing more important than that.



Well, you had better not be getting any. That is all I am going to say. :)

Don't worry about that. Remember that I would be luck to have internet sex with a melon.



Of course not. I have not eaten flesh for twenty-five years. You know that eating meat lowers your life expectancy, do you not? I am assuming that you do eat flesh because you seem a bit torpid. Life is all about living the longest, and breathing the most oxygen and being an asshole as much as possible. Sorry, I missionise... :(

YOU ARE GONNA DIE YOUNG! :evil

Eating meat is not a sin and is not intrinsically disordered, although people can abstain periodically or even once-and-for-all from eating meat as a form of penitence. Life is about seeking God, love and the high things.

Dying young or old is not my fear, even saints can die young or old, but deliberatelly engaging in risky and harmful actions for insufficient reasons is always bad.



Yes, because it is always the lonely fuglies who bring up this stupid topic.

Even if I was lonely, fat and ugly this wouldn't have any relevance to my arguments. It could be that I am lonely, fat and ugly but I am still right.


Oh, but they do, because this is what happens with contraception is disallowed.

Every conceived child is a worthy person but we don't advocate people to have as many children as it is possible, but if they want this is perfectly fine :), you will rarely see a Christian couple who does not make use of contraception with 5 or more kids. People who have more children than they can take care of have them as a result of being irresponsible, not of being Christians, if they have a lot of children and they take care of them all then may God bless them.

[LightHouse89]

I think sex should be limited to once a year and everyone should pray the rest of the time.

[portusaus]

I think sex should be limited to once a year and everyone should pray the rest of the time.

Naw, healthy sex is good and Europeans should be having a lot of it without protection. We need lots and lots of babies. Any corruptions of natural sexuality, however (such as buggery & queerism), must be resisted. Promiscuity also sucks but at least for now we should be 'lax on it because it can cause more white births.

[Aredhel]

No, whatever two adults make consensually is nobody's business

[random]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9OO0S5w2k

[Lurker]

How would one be able to police such a matter?

With a Big Brother like government program, with the government watching every move of every person on every room and millions of government employees watching those monitors, looking to see if people are trying to have illegal anal sex. In the end, half of the population will be employed by the government as anal sex blockers.

Or they could just outlaw KY and products like that.

But I think Portusaus will go with my first idea, it's more wasteful.

[Fortis in Arduis]

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6208/6023011924_fa7d3d2146_m.jpg

:shrug:

Jesus declared that God can destroy man's psuche, or "soul" (Matthew:10:28).

The biggest bullshit.

[Dictator]

This video is compatible with this thread.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMlLKM-A_tw

[Manifest Destiny]

Have you tried it? If a woman told me to put it there then I would lose all respect for them right then and there it just seems nasty to me and unclean.....let alone sodomy. Sodomizing is not pleasant.


http://youtu.be/XKE3dIrRIbg

[curupira]

No.

[Ice]

wtf,

nothing better than sucking on your gf's ass you dumb fuck

Lol, you can do some crazy things when you are horny/drunk but this is too extreme for me. You like it too when she farts? I assume you're giving head too. I like getting a blowjob(especially if she has a tongue piercing) but me giving head.. noway,it's too feminine and i'm not a goat :D

I finger my gf (or person i have sex with :D) sometimes. If she's clean.

btw, anal sex is gross but it happens and you can't just prohibit it. Women should have right to complain about it though.

[Leadchucker]

What happens between consenting adults is their business. Keep the state out of our bedrooms.

Exactly. By saying its' illegal, or should be, it's automatically implied there's a law against it and the law is instated and enforced by the government and their agents. Whether you participate or not in anal sex is your choice, not the choice of the FBI, the local coppers, MI-6, FSB or any other goon squad.

[portusaus]

bump

[Ars Moriendi]

I'm not telling you to stop smoking your stinky leaf, don't tell me to stop playing with girl's behinds.

[Beit El]

There is no rational argument against it. So no.

[interes]

anal sex and pegging is nice

[Linebacker]

Who the hell bumped this.

[Gustave H]

No. Why do you care what others do in the privacy of their bedrooms? Utterly pointless threads should be illegal.

[portusaus]

I'm not telling you to stop smoking your stinky leaf, don't tell me to stop playing with girl's behinds.

The leaves are seldom smoked- rather, "pungent buds".


There is no rational argument against it. So no.

Yes, there is. It is wrong, because it is against naturally intended functions and causes harm. Physical and psychological. Moral.


Who the hell bumped this.

me

The Good Word must get out.


No. Why do you care what others do in the privacy of their bedrooms? Utterly pointless threads should be illegal.

hippee bullocks

[Gustave H]

The leaves are seldom smoked- rather, "pungent buds".



Yes, there is. It is wrong, because it is against naturally intended functions and causes harm. Physical and psychological. Moral.



me

The Good Word must get out.



hippee bullocks
Yeah. National Socialist "hippee". Who needs logic?! :thumb001:

[Wadaad]

It is legal :noidea:

Greeks gonna greek...

[Harley]

No, whatever two adults make consensually is nobody's business
This ^.


http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6208/6023011924_fa7d3d2146_m.jpg

:shrug:

Jesus declared that God can destroy man's psuche, or "soul" (Matthew:10:28).

The biggest bullshit.
I am afraid of anyone that I elevate to be like god(Gen 3:5; Gen 4:22) in my life that would not only kill me inside, but wreck my butthole in the process.

This book and its figurative language is ripe to be taken apart, one seed at a time, and digested.

[Longbowman]

Yes, there is. It is wrong, because it is against naturally intended functions and causes harm. Physical and psychological. Moral.

Elaborate.

[mikhail]

I think someone spent a bit too much time in prison.

[ewort2]

If existing laws against pornography - where they exist - were enforced and new ones implemented and enforced, it seems like the whole thing would be eliminated. I am guessing that most people get the idea to do it by watching porn.

You could use the health care system to enforce it; require people to get STD testing if they report it and allow people who engage in risky sexual behaviors to be charged higher premiums. It would be a fine in everything but name. If they don't report it, and they present with an injury or complaint related to it, it can be grounds for policy cancellation.

I am not necessarily saying that this is what I think should happen, but it seems like a reasonably effective enforcement mechanism.


Pornography, and homosexuality for that matter, should be banned as well. But let's leave that for another thread.

As for HIV, I believe it is a much scarier threat than most people are aware of and should be mitigated by mass-deportations and national quarantine (like, closed borders). No other method is reliable enough, IMO.

The point is that "anal sex" is not a legitimate expression of sexuality. It's something bonobos with downs would do in their spare time. Not something civilized and progressed humans should be doing, or letting happen within their communities.

[Han Cholo]

One of many portusaus' examples of applied elevated white intelligence. All this thread can be resumed with the aphorism "ban anal sex because it hurts my swarthy half-portuguese ass". These are the words of a genius.

[Fear Fiain]

ban anal sex that way there will be no more greek children born.

inb4 linet tries to kill me.

[ewort2]

I wouldn't go that far. I think that someone can make a well-reasoned argument that public acceptance of certain sexual acts is a net negative for society because unlinks sexual activity from procreation and family formation.


One of many portusaus' examples of applied elevated white intelligence. All this thread can be resumed with the aphorism "ban anal sex because it hurts my swarthy half-portuguese ass". These are the words of a genius.

[alfieb]

I can see why females would say no.
I can see why Muslims would say no.
I could see why homophobes would say no.

But for anyone else who voted 'no', you're just an idiot.

It's none of my business what kind of sex two consenting adults want to have.

[FeederOfRavens]

Booties are for grabbing not sticking.

[portusaus]

I can see why females would say no.
I can see why Muslims would say no.
I could see why homophobes would say no.

But for anyone else who voted 'no', you're just an idiot.

It's none of my business what kind of sex two consenting adults want to have.

You mean, "yes"?

And do you even hate fags?

[Longbowman]

You mean, "yes"?

And do you even hate fags?

Hated is for barbarians and primitive folk. Find your inner peace, brother. Open your arms and embrace the world.

[LightHouse89]

Hated is for barbarians and primitive folk. Find your inner peace, brother. Open your arms and embrace the world.

No thanks. I would rather be primitive and barbaric.

[Longbowman]

No thanks. I would rather be primitive and barbaric.

Love and you will be loved, my friend. Let's all go to Portusaus' and have a hug session and share a joint.

[LightHouse89]

the poop hole is meant for turd to come out of. plain and simple. if a woman told me to stick it in her ass,....I probably would but pull out when I was done and nut on her face to disgrace her.

[LightHouse89]

Love and you will be loved, my friend. Let's all go to Portusaus' and have a hug session and share a joint.

I dont smoke weed. I am not interested in hippy gatherings.

[portusaus]

:rotfl

[portusaus]

I dont smoke weed. I am not interested in hippy gatherings.

You should though

[Longbowman]

the poop hole is meant for turd to come out of. plain and simple. if a woman told me to stick it in her ass,....I probably would but pull out when I was done and nut on her face to disgrace her.

Turd goes out, rectal thermometers and suppositories go in. Why not some genitals? Would it make you feel any better if the genitals also cured your gastroenteritis?

[portusaus]

Turd goes out, rectal thermometers and suppositories go in. Why not some genitals? Would it make you feel any better if the genitals also cured your gastroenteritis?

NOTHING should EVER go in unless it could save a patient's life and the patient is put completely under!!

[Longbowman]

NOTHING should EVER go in unless it could save a patient's life and the patient is put completely under!!

You sound like one of those ultra-feminists who think midwifery constitutes 'birth rape.'

Sometimes medical stuff has to go in your bum. Had a bad experience? Did your mum take your temperature anally until you were 14? Wanna talk about it, champ? How did it make you feel? It's OK if you were aroused, this is a safe space.

[portusaus]

You sound like one of those ultra-feminists who think midwifery constitutes 'birth rape.'

Sometimes medical stuff has to go in your bum. Had a bad experience? Did your mum take your temperature anally until you were 14? Wanna talk about it, champ? How did it make you feel? It's OK if you were aroused, this is a safe space.

That's fucking horrible! Your Jew is showing.

[LightHouse89]

You should though

i use to in high school, i didnt like it. I like beer and wine more.

[LightHouse89]

Turd goes out, rectal thermometers and suppositories go in. Why not some genitals? Would it make you feel any better if the genitals also cured your gastroenteritis?

abomination. this is what happens when they take religion out of school.

[Longbowman]

That's fucking horrible! Your Jew is showing.

Your SSA is showing ;)

But in all seriousness, medical professionals know what they're doing. Suppositories are necessary. Otherwise they wouldn't be used.

[portusaus]

i use to in high school, i didnt like it. I like beer and wine more.

Alcohol is for acute intoxication with friends, weed for maintaining a perma-stone / escaping the demon that calls himself "sobriety".

[Longbowman]

abomination. this is what happens when they take religion out of school.

I laughed so hard at this.

Religion doesn't prohibit suppositories or rectal thermometers. In fact both were a lot more common a few decades ago.

Did you know maids used to masturbate their (young) masters to get them to sleep until the early 1700s in England?

[LightHouse89]

I laughed so hard at this.

Religion doesn't prohibit suppositories or rectal thermometers. In fact both were a lot more common a few decades ago.

Did you know maids used to masturbate their (young) masters to get them to sleep until the early 1700s in England?

its always been viewed as disgraceful here.....we are puritans what can I say. we take religion very seriously.

[Han Cholo]

You should though

Only if you try anal sex first.

[portusaus]

Only if you try anal sex first.

Lame, no analogy (no pun intended) can be drawn. Cannabis is healthful and a probable necessity to survive the coming fire, whereas buggery destroys the excretory tract and kills the soul.

[Han Cholo]

Lame, no analogy (no pun intended) can be drawn. Cannabis is healthful and a probable necessity to survive the coming fire, whereas buggery destroys the excretory tract and kills the soul.

I like Marijuana, I like anal sex. I have common sense.

[Immortal Technique]

Portu are you a ginger?

[Immortal Technique]

Damn you sound tired..owd poison eatin yo self inside,try some chewing gum or something

[portusaus]

I like Marijuana, I like anal sex. I have common sense.

Contradictory!

You are a shameful hedonist.


Portu are you a ginger?

Nah, mostly dark brown with some stray blond hairs / yellowness in the light.

[Immortal Technique]

hahahhahahahahahahahaha

[Han Cholo]

Contradictory!

You are a shameful hedonist.



Nah, mostly dark brown with some stray blond hairs / yellowness in the light.

Girls like it, you should try it sometime (but not if you are in prison) Do you know they have erogenous spots there?

[mikhail]

I think portu was anally raped by a giant black man in prison. It would explain the majority of his behaviour.

[Leo Iscariot]

Only if I can get tomatoes outlawed too. I fucking hate tomatoes, therefore I don't think anybody else should have tomatoes.

[portusaus]

Only if I can get tomatoes outlawed too. I fucking hate tomatoes, therefore I don't think anybody else should have tomatoes.

You are insane! Tomatoes are delicious, a staple food for the civilized.

[Leo Iscariot]

You are insane! Tomatoes are delicious, a staple food for the civilized.

I'll have all you damn tomato-eaters murdered yet!

[portusaus]

I'll have all you damn tomato-eaters murdered yet!

If you're trying to make a point, then you are failing to do so for your reasoning is poor. Tomatoes do not harm people, sure they are a nightshade veg but they have numerous health benefits.

[Leo Iscariot]

If you're trying to make a point, then you are failing to do so for your reasoning is poor. Tomatoes do not harm people, sure they are a nightshade veg but they have numerous health benefits.

Not really. If 2 consenting adults 100 mi/km away want to make butt love, then how does that effect you?

[portusaus]

Not really. If 2 consenting adults 100 mi/km away want to make butt love, then how does that effect you?

It harms them.

Say you have a child, and they are trying to stab themself in the face with a fork. You're going to stop them so they don't get hurt, not let them do it because "freedom" or some other hippy bullcrap you speel.

[Leo Iscariot]

It harms them.

Say you have a child, and they are trying to stab themself in the face with a fork. You're going to stop them so they don't get hurt, not let them do it because "freedom" or some other hippy bullcrap you speel.

On what planet does sex equate to stabbing yourself with a fork? :lol:

Anal sex doesn't carry any more danger than 'traditional' sex, aside from std's getting transmitted easier, but that's why you wear a condom. FFS, 9th grade Sex ed should have covered this.

[portusaus]

On what planet does sex equate to stabbing yourself with a fork? :lol:

Anal sex doesn't carry any more danger than 'traditional' sex, aside from std's getting transmitted easier, but that's why you wear a condom. FFS, 9th grade Sex ed should have covered this.

If American sex ed is teaching kids to bugger, then damnned be this land.

[Leo Iscariot]

If American sex ed is teaching kids to bugger, then damnned be this land.

It's this kind of puritanical retardation that makes us a laughing stock. This is why I say that the US is gonna end up like Japan one day, so sexually repressed that people are gonna develop fetishes for pre-teen cartoon characters and squids.

[portusaus]

It's this kind of puritanical retardation that makes us a laughing stock. This is why I say that the US is gonna end up like Japan one day, so sexually repressed that people are gonna develop fetishes for pre-teen cartoon characters and squids.

Buggery is not a legitimate expression of sexuality; it is not "Puritanical" to oppose violation of the body- noone was granted the gift of life so that they may defile their form or that of another.

Squids are a big part of their culture, and the whole "weird Japan" thing descanted on the internet is due to the actions of the KGB and similar organizations fucking with Japan for fighting alongside the other Axis forces. They covertly demoralize wherever they have influence and the conditions imposed on Japan after the war basically prevent any action against it.

[Leo Iscariot]

Buggery is not a legitimate expression of sexuality; it is not "Puritanical" to oppose violation of the body- noone was granted the gift of life so that they may defile their form or that of another.

"Violation"/"defilement" by what standards? It is exactly Puritanical to be pushing this kind of ignorance. If your not big on anal sex, that's one thing. Hell, I'm not all that big on it either tbt. But to want to outlaw it because you don't like it, or because of wide-spread false information? I didn't know this insanity still existed outside of Uganda and Islamic states.

[Alessio]

How is it even possible to control such a law and to convict someone of practising an anal-act violation ?

[portusaus]

How is it even possible to control such a law and to convict someone of practising an anal-act violation ?

If someone is accused with reasonable suspicion, then they should be tried in a court of law in which a jury shall determine their fate. Ultimately, the jury will determine whether or not the act genuinely occurred. If evidence presented as well as testimonials proves the crime or earns the harsh judgement of the jurors then some bad buggerer is going to rot in a cell for a long time.

[Ctwentysevenj]

If you forgot the condom, you have plan B. You use the other hole:D

[Merida]

What consenting adults do behind closed doors is their own business.

[Ctwentysevenj]

What consenting adults do behind closed doors is their own business.

True. Anal is nothing, compared to other even more extreme fetishes, like scat. I knew an bisexual chick of Austrian background whom was into that. She liked to be watched while it came out! :thumb001:

[Alessio]

The anti-gay community wasn't enough for you apparently ;)


Mm?