PDA

View Full Version : Irish Holocaust website



Oisín
01-10-2009, 02:20 AM
The truth about the Irish 'potato famine'.


Irish Holocaust (http://www.irishholocaust.org/)


Irishmen and Irishwomen!
Read this site and weep. Weep for the agonies and deaths of your people at the hands of genocidists. The authorities who imposed the curriculum, the teachers and professors who funnelled it into you, have carefully kept you uninformed as to which British regiment, or that any regiment, murdered your people. Until now, that information was kept from you. You had no access to it. You do now - you read it on your computer screen! Commit the regiment's name to memory.

http://www.irishholocaust.org/1024-map.gif/1024-map-full.jpg

Beorn
01-10-2009, 11:18 AM
Good site. Good to educate yourself upon the issue, but, I have heard a few Irishman saying the site is not to be wholly trusted.

I'll let another briefly sum up why:


I would caution anyone from using the Irishholocaust site. It's completely unreliable. Notice the exaggerated death totals and transparent attempt to link the famine to the Jewish holocaust, a more clearcut case of attempted genocide. No reputable historian believes the famine was a genocide.

http://forum.stirpes.net/200088-post10.html

Oisín
01-10-2009, 11:57 AM
No reputable historian believes the famine was a genocide.
Whatever it was it could have been easily prevented. A conservative estimate for the number of people the British government allowed to die is 1.5million.

Fortis in Arduis
01-14-2009, 09:09 PM
This is realpolitik:


Distributism, also known as distributionism and distributivism, is a third-way economic philosophy formulated by such Roman Catholic thinkers as G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc to apply the principles of Catholic Social Teaching articulated by the Roman Catholic Church, especially in Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Rerum Novarum[1] and more expansively explained by Pope Pius XI's encyclical Quadragesimo Anno[2] According to distributism, the ownership of the means of production should be spread as widely as possible among the general populace, rather than being centralized under the control of the state (indirect socialism) or a few large businesses or wealthy private individuals (capitalism). A summary of distributism is found in Chesterton's statement: "Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists."[3]

Essentially, distributism distinguishes itself by its distribution of property (not to be confused with redistribution of property carried out by socialism). Distributism holds that, while socialism allows no individuals to own productive property (it all being under state, community, or workers' control), and capitalism allows only a few to own it, distributism itself seeks to ensure that most people will become owners of productive property. As Hilaire Belloc stated, the distributive state (that is, the state which has implemented distributism) contains "an agglomeration of families of varying wealth, but by far the greater number of owners of the means of production."[4] This broader distribution does not extend to all property, but only to productive property; that is, that property which produces wealth, namely, the things needed for man to survive. It includes land, tools, etc.[5]

Distributism has often been described as a third way of economic order opposing both socialism and capitalism. However, some have seen it more as an aspiration, which has been successfully realised in the short term by commitment to the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity (these being built into financially independent local co-operatives and family owned, small businesses).



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism

This is what the BNP base their economic plan on.

Cenél nEógain
02-02-2009, 01:12 PM
Good site. Good to educate yourself upon the issue, but, I have heard a few Irishman saying the site is not to be wholly trusted.

I'll let another briefly sum up why:



http://forum.stirpes.net/200088-post10.html

That posters credibility was checked the very minute he asserted the Jewish 'holocaust' as genocide. As one camp guard put it, Auschwitz was a 'five star hotel', compared to what general Europeans were going through.

In fact, the Auschwitz inmate was fed more calories per day than Wehrmacht soldiers.