Proto-Shaman
08-07-2014, 06:38 PM
How you would respond to a paper featured in the current Dienekes selection, which concluded that Turkic language in the present day Turkey was not brought from the East, as many other Turkic languages in the world?
Here is the answer:
"The recent infamous (and failed) attempt to discredit the mutation rate constants. An overview of Busby et al (2011) article in Proc. of the Royal Soc. (B) and Dienekes Pontikos “essay” in his Anthropology Blog. Anatole A. Klyosov." pp. 1831-1893 (http://aklyosov.home.comcast.net/~aklyosov/Vestnik_4_09.pdf).
http://aklyosov.home.comcast.net/~aklyosov/Vestnik_4_09.pdf
Those people still cannot get that they talk on the contemporary "Turkic languages", which linguists date by the first millenium AD, and Klyosov talks on Proto-Turkic languages of ancient R1b1 many thousand years ago. :D:lightbul:
Here is the answer:
"The recent infamous (and failed) attempt to discredit the mutation rate constants. An overview of Busby et al (2011) article in Proc. of the Royal Soc. (B) and Dienekes Pontikos “essay” in his Anthropology Blog. Anatole A. Klyosov." pp. 1831-1893 (http://aklyosov.home.comcast.net/~aklyosov/Vestnik_4_09.pdf).
http://aklyosov.home.comcast.net/~aklyosov/Vestnik_4_09.pdf
Those people still cannot get that they talk on the contemporary "Turkic languages", which linguists date by the first millenium AD, and Klyosov talks on Proto-Turkic languages of ancient R1b1 many thousand years ago. :D:lightbul: