PDA

View Full Version : Peak Phosphorus : A threat to the human race?



Lenny
04-26-2010, 09:17 AM
Peak Phosphorus
It's an essential, if underappreciated component
of our daily lives, and a key link in the global food
chain. And it's running out.


This is the gravest natural resource shortage you've never heard of.

From Kansas to China's Sichuan province, farmers treat their fields with phosphorus-rich fertilizer to increase the yield of their crops. What happens next, however, receives relatively little attention. Large amounts of this resource are lost from farm fields, through soil erosion and runoff, and down swirling toilets, through our urine and feces. Although seemingly mundane, this process cannot continue indefinitely. Our dwindling supply of phosphorus, a primary component underlying the growth of global agricultural production, threatens to disrupt food security across the planet during the coming century.

Without a steady supply of this resource, global agricultural production will face a bottleneck, and humankind's growing population will suffer a serious nutrition shortage.

The world's reliance on phosphorus is an unappreciated aspect of the "Green Revolution," a series of agricultural innovations that made it possible to feed the approximately 4.2 billion-person increase in the global population since 1950. This massive expansion of global agricultural production required a simultaneous increase in the supply of key resources, including water and nitrogen. Without an increase in phosphorus, however, crops would still have lacked the resources necessary to fuel a substantial increase in production, and the Green Revolution would not have gotten off the ground.

ur supply of mined phosphorus is running out. Many mines used to meet this growing demand are degrading, as they are increasingly forced to access deeper layers and extract a lower quality of phosphate-bearing rock (phosphate is the chemical form in which nearly all phosphorus is found). Some initial analyses from scientists with the Global Phosphorus Research Initiative estimate that there will not be sufficient phosphorus supplies from mining to meet agricultural demand within 30 to 40 years. Although more research is clearly needed, this is not a comforting time scale.

Nearly 90 percent of the world's estimated phosphorus reserves are found in five countries: Morocco [mostly in the disputed Western Sahara], China, South Africa, Jordan, and the USA. In comparison, the 12 countries that make up the OPEC cartel control only 75 percent of the world's oil reserves.

Link (http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/04/20/peak_phosphorus)

Lenny
04-26-2010, 09:49 AM
An interesting reader-comment from the original article:

Or gee, maybe questioning the desirability and legitimacy of the Green Revolution in the first place? Was it a good thing to have "a series of agricultural innovations that made it possible to feed the approximately 4.2 billion-person increase in the global population since 1950"? Were many of these changes really "innovations"? Maybe the Earth was never capable of adding 4.2 billion humans in such a short time span. Regardless of that tiny question, was radically imbalancing the natural ecosystem and causing all the epic damage that comes with that imbalance over the past 60 years really the right thing to do?

How about mentioning how dumping all this fertilizer on everything actually leads to diminishing returns in crops? Perhaps mentioning how sustainable farming methods not using fertilizers at all are in the long run far more productive?

lei.talk
04-26-2010, 10:37 AM
Phosphorus
It's an essential, if under-appreciated component of our daily lives, and a key link in the global food-chain.

And it's running out.

Large amounts of this resource are lost...down swirling toilets, through our urine and feces.
which is one reason why, on our (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyline_design) farm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permaculture), we recycle (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enUS281US281&q=oasis+grey+water+system&aq=0&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=oasis+grey&gs_rfai=) both (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enUS281US281&q=humanure+-decapitation&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=).

Jamt
04-26-2010, 03:24 PM
An interesting reader-comment from the original article:

Off-topic about the reader-comment: How can any sustainable farming method not use fertilizers and be productive? It does not make any sense.

lei.talk
04-26-2010, 03:29 PM
How can any sustainable farming method not use [artificial] fertilizers
and be productive? It does not make any sense.
clicking-on the url-links
in the post immediately above yours,
will explain how i have done so - for decades.

Albion
04-03-2012, 04:41 PM
which is one reason why, on our (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyline_design) farm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permaculture), we recycle (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enUS281US281&q=oasis+grey+water+system&aq=0&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=oasis+grey&gs_rfai=) both (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enUS281US281&q=humanure+-decapitation&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=).

This is similar to my thoughts on the issue as well, the using "humanure" as fertiliser.
Humanure isn't used on a large scale in the west because of the risk of pathogens being transmitted to foods but these can be largely killed by composting it.
Another potentially fertiliser that we're literally pissing away is urine. In normal, healthy people it is sterile (until it leaves the body that is). Both humanure and urine are rich in the basic N-P-K nutrients needed for healthy plant growth - Nitrogen, phosphorous and Potassium.

People seem to forget that Phosphorous occurs naturally in small quantities practically everywhere. It is rare to find it in concentrations that can be mined, but trace amounts are abundant and build up in food and animals. Basically our waste is much of the NPK nutrients we've taken in but concentrated.
If exploitable areas of phosphorous ever run out we'll need to go back to using humanure and urine, not as "night soil" but instead treated at sewage works and sterilised to be put on the land safely on a large scale. This is already done in some parts of England, apparently the resulting "cakes" as they call them contain less pathogens then most foods.

One thing to note is that humanure and urine in huge quantities could have some adverse affects. Firstly urine when used on a large scale could in effect salt the land and second, humanure could change the ph of the soil. So really it is about balance, not using too much in one place at one time.
Also there's Ammonia which we need to keep away from water courses. Well, nothing likes it really, plants get "burnt" from too much of it as well. Ammonia usually dissipates into the atmosphere after a while though, so isn't usually too much of a problem.

Ammonia is also probably why bitch urine turns grass yellow. I wouldn't be surprised if that was true for women too really.

Albion
04-03-2012, 04:55 PM
Off-topic about the reader-comment: How can any sustainable farming method not use fertilizers and be productive? It does not make any sense.

Artificial fertilisers are instead replaced by natural fertilisers. Everything has a by-product and often this is wasted.
Plants would in nature return nutrients back into the soil in some form or another - via their residues or by animal crap.

Humans have basically ruined this cycle when we harvest the plants and don't put wastes back onto the fields. Instead we often have to replace the nutrients taken out of the field with artificial fertilisers, but using sterilised sewage plant waste is much better.

The waste from sewage plants also generates methane which can be sold to gas companies.

This is the finished product, some sort of "humanure". It's probably not going to be put on suburban gardens any time soon, but many gardeners already use cow and chicken crap. Pigeon and rabbit crap are quite rich in NPK nutrients too. Urine as fertiliser probably has more going for it though, but it has to be diluted with water because of all the ammonia in it.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EpB3Gvu-_lQ/S-NE3uBtkNI/AAAAAAAACbs/QsA32ERWZJk/s1600/IMG_2465.JPG

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EpB3Gvu-_lQ/S-ND85r88BI/AAAAAAAACbk/MxBDo9P1FhE/s1600/DSCN0474.jpg


Before biosolids can be applied to farm land, or distributed to the public for home garden use, they must be vigorously tested, and meet stringent safety regulations. I take comfort in knowing that biosolids are heavily regulated. They are far more heavily regulated than manures, yard waste composts, and fertilizers.