PDA

View Full Version : paedophile ring inside Buckingham Palace



Hong Key
12-23-2014, 01:23 AM
VIP paedophile ring 'abused teenage boy INSIDE Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle' (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vip-paedophile-ring-abused-teenage-4721479)

By Keir Mudie, Mark Watts - Nov 29, 2014

The boy, then just 16, told how he was the victim of “exploitation of the highest order” - the claims could now be the subject of a police investigation

http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4721360.ece/alternates/s615/I141129_172751_1776321oTextCS_73124012-1.jpg
Employer: Buckingham Palace

A teenage boy working at Buckingham Palace revealed he was groomed and sexually abused by a VIP paedophile ring there.

The lad was also assaulted at the Royal Family’s Scottish retreat Balmoral, according to shocking Home Office files, reports the Sunday People.

In a heartbreaking note, the boy – then just 16 – told how he was the victim of “exploitation of the highest order”.

The chilling claims could now be the subject of a police investigation into historic allegations of child sex abuse in the 1970s and 80s – linked to MPs and powerful figures.

The disturbing account was passed directly to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan but he ruled it was “not practical” to investigate.

Campaigning Labour MP Tom Watson said: “I’m sure the Palace will want to co-operate with any inquiry.”

A Palace spokesman said: “The Royal Household takes any allegation of this nature seriously and would act to address any specific allegations or investigate specific information.”

http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4721366.ece/alternates/s615/Balmoral-Castle.jpg
Shadow on castle: Balmoral, where staff allegedly heard the boy scream at night

The Sunday People and the investigations website Exaro have established that the Home Office file contains evidence of a letter written by the boy’s mother.

She wrote to campaigning MP Geoffrey Dickens, fearing that her son had been groomed by a paedophile ring while working at the Buckingham Palace kitchens.

The boy was 16 at the time, putting him below the age of homosexual consent which was then 21 in England.

In Scotland homosexuality was still totally illegal.

Mr Dickens said at the time: “The boy told his parents he had been sexually abused by members of the Royal Household at the Palace.

“I am concerned the Palace could be part of a chain supplying young men to paedophiles in the diplomatic service.”

The 16-year-old went to work at the Palace in the early 1970s. After a few months his family noticed he was acting strangely.

A family friend told Exaro: “Things were OK when he first joined the Palace staff.

"After a few months, things started to turn a little strange.”

After what the source described as an “incident” at Balmoral, the royal family’s Scottish home, the boy’s parents were told by a close friend who also worked at Buckingham Palace that their son was being sexually abused there.

The source added: “They got wind of this after an incident at Balmoral when he screamed in the night.”

The concerned friend, who worked for the royals at the time, immediately alerted the boy’s parents.

He told them: “This is something that you should have nothing to do with.”

Reports from the time reveal further details of the boy’s ordeal.

One says his parents discovered a handwritten note from him.

It read: “What Buckingham Palace did for me was exploitation of the highest order.”

The boy’s mother said at the time: “My son was happy and normal until he went there.

"Then he changed completely. He refused to talk to us or discuss what he was up to.”

The boy’s father also claimed that young Palace staff were lavished with expensive gifts for “entertaining men”.

He added: “In some cases Palace officials were involved.

“Afterwards, the servants got good references to take up posts abroad with wealthy employers.”

According to the Home Office files, the desperate parents wrote to Geoffrey Dickens for help.

The MP raised the mother’s concerns with the Home Secretary in 1983.

But Mr Dickens received a reply saying Leon Brittan felt it would not be practical to carry out a detailed investigation.

He wrote: “I need hardly assure you that the Royal Household is extremely concerned at these unsubstantiated allegations and it is, of course, their policy to take every step to avoid an occurrence of such as is alleged.

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4721359.ece/alternates/s615/Deputy-head-of-MI5-Peter-Hayman.jpg
Deputy: The 16-year-old was approached by notorious paedophile Sir Peter Hayman

There is nobody currently employed in the Royal Household who is under the age of 18.”

Mr Brittan indicated that her son had worked at Buckingham Palace for a year, adding: “It is extremely difficult to comment on the accuracy of the allegations in the letter.”

But an even more chilling development is contained in the files, lending weight to the claims that a paedophile VIP ring was linked to the Palace.

During his time at Buckingham Palace, the 16-year-old was approached by notorious paedophile Sir Peter Hayman and was asked to work for him in Canada, where he was ambassador.

Hayman has been identified as a member of the VIP paedophile ring operating in Westminster and is known to have had royal connections.

http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4721361.ece/alternates/s615/The-site-of-the-former-Elm-Guest-House-in-Barnes.jpg
Scandal: The site of the former Elm Guest House in Barnes

He was desperate to have the boy working for him, even writing to his parents to ask them about taking his son on as a footman. Hayman said the boy would need winter clothes.

The parents never found out how Hayman knew their son.

But the source said: “They knew there was something wrong.”

The parents were so concerned by Hayman’s approach that they attempted to stop their son working for him, the family friend explained.

Exaro has established that the boy’s parents intervened to stop him going to Canada to work for Hayman.

Mr Watson, who has led the campaign for a full-scale inquiry into claims of child sex abuse at the heart of the Establishment, said: “In light of what we now know, any allegation of sexual crimes regarding Peter Hayman should be thoroughly investigated.

“He was protected by the Establishment at the time.

“The full extent of how his conduct was covered up has not been explained.”

The parents and their son have declined to comment on the allegations.

But the revelations link Buckingham Palace to a paedophile network of MPs and powerful figures that operated over many years in the UK.

Palace officials have already been linked to the notorious brothel the Elm Guest House in South West London.

Police are investigating archives on Hayman in a bid to find his links to other Establishment paedophiles.

"An abuse survivor, known as “Nick” to protect his identity, named one of his many VIP attackers as Hayman.

Nick picked Hayman out from a collection of pictures that Exaro showed to him, placing him at abuse parties with other paedophiles.

An appendix to a review by the Home Office last year reveals one of their missing files was called: “Sir Peter Hayman (1980-81 Papers Ex-Diplomat’s Intriguing Private Life).”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vip-paedophile-ring-abused-teenage-4721479

Hong Key
12-23-2014, 01:40 AM
In Britain, Child Sex Abuse Defies Easy Stereotypes (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/world/europe/in-britain-child-sex-abuse-defies-easy-stereotypes.html?_r=0)


By KATRIN BENNHOLDOCT. 21, 2014

LONDON — First there was abuse at the hands of a popular BBC host (http://www.democracynow.org/2012/11/13/bbc_scandal_exposes_cover_up_of). There were scandals at private schools and in the church and talk of a pedophile ring in Parliament. Then there was Rotherham (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11059138/Rotherham-In-the-face-of-such-evil-who-is-the-racist-now.html): over a thousand teenagers sexually exploited as the authorities looked away.

Over the past two years, high-profile revelations of sexual abuse of children have painted a picture of Britain as a place where such abuse is not just endemic but systematically covered up — either because the perpetrators are of the very highest status or because the victims are of the very lowest.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/world/europe/in-britain-child-sex-abuse-defies-easy-stereotypes.html?_r=0

Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin
12-23-2014, 01:48 AM
this is one of the most disgusting crimes one can commit, if they were to go to a regular jail, even murderers and thieves would hate their gutts for this

Anglojew
12-23-2014, 02:19 AM
Terrible.

Loki
12-23-2014, 02:42 AM
Am I surprised? No.

Graham
01-02-2015, 03:23 PM
Breaking news in the last few minutes.. The British establishments would have covered this up & the way that the BBC are straight in with the denial. Well done. It is coming together now. Well done the USA.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629
Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.

A woman named him in documents she filed in a Florida civil case against financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of sex offences in 2008.

She claims that between 1999 and 2002 she was forced by Epstein to have sex with the prince when she was a minor.

The palace said it would not comment in detail on the legal proceedings.

But a Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: "This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party.

"As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with under age minors is categorically untrue".

The woman says she was forced to have sexual relations with the prince in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein.

Prince Andrew has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein. The pair were photographed meeting in December 2010, after the tycoon had served an 18-month prison sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution.

The prince had also visited Epstein at his Florida home over the years.

Nerdryk
01-02-2015, 03:29 PM
Why would paedophiles be interested in a 16 year old?

Fortis in Arduis
01-02-2015, 03:55 PM
Why would paedophiles be interested in a 16 year old?

Paedophiles are either fixated or regressive.

Fixated types are sick bastards interested in abusing little children, even babies. It is a paraphillia.

Regressive types might ideally prefer a sexual partner who is more in their prime, but unavailable to them and out of their league, so instead they pursue underaged post-pubescents because they can, and it is the next best thing. Less twisted, but still exploitative and abusive.

Prisoner Of Ice
01-02-2015, 04:03 PM
Breaking news in the last few minutes.. The British establishments would have covered this up & the way that the BBC are straight in with the denial. Well done. It is coming together now. Well done the USA.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629
Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.

A woman named him in documents she filed in a Florida civil case against financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of sex offences in 2008.

She claims that between 1999 and 2002 she was forced by Epstein to have sex with the prince when she was a minor.

The palace said it would not comment in detail on the legal proceedings.

But a Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: "This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party.

"As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with under age minors is categorically untrue".

The woman says she was forced to have sexual relations with the prince in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein.

Prince Andrew has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein. The pair were photographed meeting in December 2010, after the tycoon had served an 18-month prison sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution.

The prince had also visited Epstein at his Florida home over the years.

That can't be right it's a woman.

Nerdryk
01-02-2015, 04:13 PM
Paedophiles are either fixated or regressive.

Fixated types are sick bastards interested in abusing little children, even babies. It is a paraphillia.

Regressive types might ideally prefer a sexual partner who is more in their prime, but unavailable to them and out of their league, so instead they pursue underaged post-pubescents because they can, and it is the next best thing. Less twisted, but still exploitative and abusive.

Oh, I agree they're unpleasant people, but I think terrible stories should speak for themselves. The fact that the general public don't know what ephebephilia is doesn't mean it should be called something more familiar for the sake of priming the reader for the desired outrage. I'm left not knowing whether the boy was raped or he had consensual sex and the extent of the abuse was simply that it was considered underage sex at the time. I'm not defending them. I just don't like being manipulated into concluding what the paper wants me to conclude based on the vagueries of language employed.

Sacrificed Ram
01-02-2015, 05:56 PM
This People still confuse PAEDOPHILIA with Children Sexual Abuse.

Just something around from 2% to 10 of Children Sexual Abuse are made by paedophiles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Prevalence_and_child_molestation

Thus there isn't a better person to entrust your child than a paedophile.

Chrissi
01-02-2015, 06:26 PM
Why would paedophiles be interested in a 16 year old?

What does it matter a minor is a minor. Sick either way.

Nerdryk
01-02-2015, 06:31 PM
What does it matter a minor is a minor. Sick either way.

Brutally raping a two year old isn't the same as having consensual sex with a 16 year old (which is legal in the UK and pretty much all of Europe now anyway).

Graham
01-03-2015, 11:39 AM
Ah the Brit Media. They are in a flurry, just as I thought they'd be. :rolleyes:;)


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6bRQAgIIAAHCbe.png:large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6YcaH3IYAAWWS8.jpg:large