What do you see are the differences between these...

[Ingenious]

mixes

Japanese-Mexican
http://www.lvmodels.com/client-media/veronica-becerra/veronica1.jpg
http://hapavoice.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/hapa200.png
http://i1040.photobucket.com/albums/b408/kunggpao/asian/trh.jpg
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w51/maitaikai/maface.jpg
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lv99pyU9CJ1qb7zfbo1_500.jpg




Korean-Filipina
http://i61.tinypic.com/jf84t5.png
http://i62.tinypic.com/54x26r.jpg
http://i61.tinypic.com/241nvjr.jpg

[Ingenious]

anyone??

[igo112]

...

[Ingenious]

Second is Mongoloid gradient and fits where one would expect, but 1 could have influence from every k=4 race... Amerind/Ainu are Australoid, Yakonoid have primarily Mongoloids, plus possibly ancient Polynesian or some sort of colonial (Europe and Africa minor influences). Might be found indigenous as isolate in Oceania or some minor part of New World.

What an interesting hypothesis...so 1 would have influences from all 4 major races of the world

While group 2 is just seen as mongoloid

[igo112]

...

[Ingenious]

2's "Mongoloid gradient"...not necessarily pure but very gradual cline and by phenotypes at least (some Tagalog people are more Austral-influenced and Europe's colonials intervened some there 16th century onward) but these are either nonpresent in this case, or alternatively very homogenous Koreans part dominates (seems to have turned out like Mittel Sinid overall).

(Koreans approximately here)

Sinid sub-gradient (approaches Siberid)
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/bilder/gl-northsinid.jpg
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/bilder/gl-middlesinid.jpg
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/bilder/gl-southsinid.jpg

(Tagalog approximately here)

Paleo sub-gradient (approaches Australid)
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/bilder/gl-tungid.jpg
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/bilder/gl-paleomongolid.jpg

None of them are mixed with tagalog...the Filipina input is actually visayan....and igorot

[igo112]

...

[Ingenious]

Second case yeah, and am not guessing of genotype and ancestry, but say Tagalog to describe phenotype and appearance (it is more Mongoloid of possible ethnicities I could have guessed). Beyond Tagalog, "Mongoloid gradient" is indeed less gradual, because more Australid would add another dimension of variation increasingly plus maybe more colonial. Still in this second case, it is hard for me to see this variation though, and at that point maybe consider what was suggested of homogenous Koreans dominance?
I don't know about that....but my cousin's fiance is visayan and she gets mistaken for Chinese more often then most tagalog would....it may be harder to see this variation because certain people of visayan and igorots sway towards Mongoloid more often