PDA

View Full Version : NATO's true misson



Proto-Shaman
01-25-2015, 09:30 PM
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/d/d0/Nato.gif/revision/latest?cb=20100916222939

Debate!

Methmatician
01-26-2015, 12:11 AM
http://mycatbirdseat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/tin-foil-hat.jpg

Loki
01-26-2015, 12:12 AM
Chaos.

LightHouse89
01-26-2015, 12:13 AM
NATO is an abomination. It should disappear as the cold war is over.

Cristiano viejo
01-26-2015, 12:16 AM
NATO Nazis? what joke is that? NATO is anti-Europe.

Borna
01-26-2015, 12:24 AM
It is complete insult to every brave Wehrmacht soldier to be compared to modern NATO terrorists.

Nebuchadnezzar
01-26-2015, 12:27 AM
War in the 21st century is very expansive.... and non of the small-euro countries can afford it on their own...

Thus NATO.

Plain & Simple...

Proxy-Wars..... these are the wars of the future, as we see it in Ukraine,Syria,Iraq & Yemen

Ballist
01-26-2015, 12:35 AM
Easy, to bring Russia to its knees and destroy it. Or at least do something that would not be beneficial to Russia, but the member countries. What Neb said, too.

wvwvw
01-26-2015, 12:41 AM
To bring democracy to the less evolved peoples of the world

http://lowres.cartoonstock.com/politics-capitalism-capitalists-serbia-ukraine-border-atan908_low.jpg

http://www.funiacs.com/poze/mare/_NATO_1142976669.JPG

Loki
01-26-2015, 12:44 AM
NATO is an abomination. It should disappear as the cold war is over.

^ 100%

Atvend
01-26-2015, 12:54 AM
http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/hey-kids-wanna-buy-some-democracy.jpg

Methmatician
01-26-2015, 01:03 AM
Easy, to bring Russia to its knees and destroy it.
NATO ultimately wants Russia to join them and at one point Putin was seriously interested. But I think now Putin sees that he can use NATO and the West as a bogeyman for his own benefit.

Ballist
01-26-2015, 01:05 AM
NATO ultimately wants Russia to join them and at one point Putin was seriously interested. But I think now Putin sees that he can use NATO and the West as a bogeyman for his own benefit.

I highly doubt that. I think he said that to get NATO loosened up. Really wish they did though.

Methmatician
01-26-2015, 01:28 AM
I highly doubt that. I think he said that to get NATO loosened up. Really wish they did though.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=20000306&id=O1hIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ah8EAAAAIBAJ&pg=5738,2522991

Ballist
01-26-2015, 01:31 AM
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=20000306&id=O1hIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ah8EAAAAIBAJ&pg=5738,2522991

Yeah, Ik he said it but he probably said it just to get NATO excited and lay off.

armenianbodyhair
01-26-2015, 01:32 AM
Thanks for my signature

LightHouse89
01-26-2015, 01:34 AM
War in the 21st century is very expansive.... and non of the small-euro countries can afford it on their own...

Thus NATO.

Plain & Simple...

Proxy-Wars..... these are the wars of the future, as we see it in Ukraine,Syria,Iraq & Yemen

It feels so ignoble to be apart of NATO and the UN.

Methmatician
01-26-2015, 01:54 AM
Putin is right not to trust NATO. It would be a restriction on Russia's ability to achieve its own goals. The smaller NATO nations have no actual goals on the international stage; they're irrelevant. Russia would be a secondary power under NATO answering to others. This shouldn't be seen as me approving of Russian foreign policies. It's more like me calling it as it is.
I think most people are aware of that but I would still like to see the US and Russia be on the same side one day.

Borna
01-26-2015, 02:38 AM
If it was Croatians and not Serbians looking down the barrel of a Nazi gun they would no longer have your esteem. For once I wish people would be objective instead of claiming something is good only because it benefited them or their own and would just as quickly claim it was horrible if the roles were reversed. Human nature, you disgust me.

Hm ? This has nothing to do with Croatia. There was a time to pick Allies, Serbs failed.

Dragoon
01-26-2015, 09:26 PM
My thoughts on NATO...

First of all this organization should have fallen when the Warsaw Pact fell.
NATO today seeks to control the world via military means. So one of their main targets is Russia.

I'll be honest and say NATO doesnt really care for member countries like Poland so long as it is used as a shield to defend US and UK.
What this means is if another war were to break out Eastern and Central Europe (primarely Slavs and Germans) would be dying (sound familiar?).

Europe needs to quit NATO, create its own alliance or alliances, slightly increase military budget if necessary and stop taking orders from America (the dominant figure of NATO).

In recent years its NATO members who have been the biggest warmongers on this planet. This has too stop. Why?
Innocent people are being killed, the world gets angry with certain countries like US, UK, France and us white people in general. This creates more conflict.
Additionally these wars create mass immigrants and refugees which all spill into Europe. Isnt one of the main problem in Europe mass immigration? I think so.
Several steps must be taken 1)Stop wars 2)Stop immigration 3)Gain some indepedance from Washington/New York.

Empecinado
01-26-2015, 09:38 PM
NAT0 is the military branch to reach a world control. They are against all countries that go against their plans of global dominance.

Darth Revan
01-26-2015, 11:02 PM
I think most people are aware of that but I would still like to see the US and Russia be on the same side one day.

Such a naive and pathetic mind. Only useful to understand the childish dreaminess inside every idealist.

Russia and the US will never be on the same side, so long as their current forms endure. Russia (or the US theoretically) would have to become something else entirely, for this to happen.
And if it were to, rest assured, a lower majority tool won't precisely exact any benefit.

LightHouse89
01-27-2015, 01:08 AM
Such a naive and pathetic mind. Only useful to understand the childish dreaminess inside every idealist.

Russia and the US will never be on the same side, so long as their current forms endure. Russia (or the US theoretically) would have to become something else entirely, for this to happen.
And if it were to, rest assured, a lower majority tool won't precisely exact any benefit.

I can assure you America wont be a country in 100 years. I pray to God this satanic Masonic abomination disappears and a new nation arises on the ideas of its founders however far less democratic and less active in the world other than economically and with trade [enough to ensure we have some influence] but not all influence everywhere. I think it is pure insanity that people here literally believe we should be so incensed and concerned about the affairs of others. My forefathers did not create this country with that mind set. This developed much later on when Free Masonry and Plutocrats became the politicians . The Civil War was over this and this is why the real Americans broke away from the DC Plutocratic republic of America. The war was no over simple rights to own slaves or bullshit like that it was over who had power here. Europe supported the North [with the exception of the UK].

LightHouse89
01-27-2015, 01:09 AM
My thoughts on NATO...

First of all this organization should have fallen when the Warsaw Pact fell.
NATO today seeks to control the world via military means. So one of their main targets is Russia.

I'll be honest and say NATO doesnt really care for member countries like Poland so long as it is used as a shield to defend US and UK.
What this means is if another war were to break out Eastern and Central Europe (primarely Slavs and Germans) would be dying (sound familiar?).

Europe needs to quit NATO, create its own alliance or alliances, slightly increase military budget if necessary and stop taking orders from America (the dominant figure of NATO).

In recent years its NATO members who have been the biggest warmongers on this planet. This has too stop. Why?
Innocent people are being killed, the world gets angry with certain countries like US, UK, France and us white people in general. This creates more conflict.
Additionally these wars create mass immigrants and refugees which all spill into Europe. Isnt one of the main problem in Europe mass immigration? I think so.
Several steps must be taken 1)Stop wars 2)Stop immigration 3)Gain some indepedance from Washington/New York.

Believe me being in NATO, the UN and involved in the world isn't helping us either. This isn't our country anymore and we are being exterminated through unnatural means. I would rather be killed and my land stolen than have what is happening to us right now.

Böri
01-29-2015, 06:59 PM
Russia+ China already have NATO level military power if not more. If they take India with them this even stronger. Today this is difficult to define NATO mission. Especially Turkey mission in NATO is good question.

Fantomas
05-22-2015, 09:09 AM
NATO mission is very clear today. Current western system of security has been created to avoid big wars. And for the time being it works. Surely many powers in the world (like Islamists, Commies, China, Russia etc) don't like this state of affairs. Now they too weak for open confrontation against West, but it maybe will not be a long. So NATO has to be a stronger and more aggressive in the future.

Proto-Shaman
05-22-2015, 09:24 AM
Nato-(EUSA)-Expansion during the last 25 years:
http://media.rotefahne.eu/2014/09/Expansion-NATO-2014.jpg
http://www1.xup.to/exec/ximg.php?fid=13835018
Don't you think it's enough now?

Fantomas
05-22-2015, 10:05 AM
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll171/Fantomas305/Maps/Expansion-NATO-2014_zps9pxamoni.jpg (http://s288.photobucket.com/user/Fantomas305/media/Maps/Expansion-NATO-2014_zps9pxamoni.jpg.html)

Not bad scenario, to resist Asian commies in the future, West need natural resources and territory. On the other hand, Slavs of Russia to survive will have join NATO.

Prisoner Of Ice
05-22-2015, 10:06 AM
Nato's main mission is to destroy the white race.

Thunder_shock
05-22-2015, 04:38 PM
Nato managed to muster the politically and militarily unite the European world under an umbrella something that the fascists didn't come close to achieving.

StormBringer
05-22-2015, 04:43 PM
NATO's true mission
Stealing our clay.

velikaslava123
05-22-2015, 04:52 PM
"The first NATO Secretary General, Lord Ismay, stated in 1949 that the organization's goal was "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down."
Reigns true to this day, simple as that.

Brianna
05-23-2015, 06:05 AM
It's the military arm of corporations and politicians who want global or regional economic and political hegemony.