What female sexual behaviour do you dislike more?

[Darth Revan]

Simple poll about people's opinions over sexual behaviour. Which one can you tolerate/respect more?
Nothing more to it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Behaviour 1: The woman sleeps around out of boredom, or 'to have fun' every 2 weekends or so. Racks up 20, 30, 50 sexual partners by the time she's 30.

Behaviour 2: The woman's count is 3 or 4 men. All of them she slept with to get something out of them.
1- The teacher in high school that passed her in math, because she would have never done so on her own.
2- The branch manager who promoted her at work.
3- The real estate agent who cut her an incredibly good deal on her flat.
4- Most recently, got in the pants of an executive from corporate who came to visit her office. She pleased him enough, and so he gave her the branch manager position (firing guy number 2).


----

Vote.

[leisitox]

Pondering, I say Behaviour 2.
The Behaviour 1 girl is just plain "bored", average slut, nothing out of the ordinary.
But the former is just a coward who gets everything by hotness and deceiving, rotten at most.

[Marusya]

Gosh, I can't vote here. I wouldn't/don't tolerate any of those behaviors, for myself or others. I think all those described behaviors are disturbing. Maybe it was fun watching Samantha on "Sex in the City" get down and dirty with every penis that caught her fancy, but in real life, just no.

[Darth Revan]

Pondering, I say Behaviour 2.
The Behaviour 1 girl is just plain "bored", average slut, nothing out of the ordinary.
But the former is just a coward who gets everything by hotness and deceiving, rotten at most.

Correct, while technically looking it less, behaviour 2 is more devious and sly. As you see, she even got one of her former lovers fired to rank up.

[HillY35]

"Forgiveness is the key to every door."

With such bitterness, the creator of this thread aint getting laid anytime soon-

[Iltirbas]

First woman is a person who lets her more basic instincts dictate her life (when it comes to intimate relationships at least); the second one is a cunning being willing to use her body in order to manipulate men and obtain a personal profit that goes beyond said man-woman relationship to the point of harming a third person (like the guy who lost his job in the example you provide). So #1 behaviour is less despicable to me.

[Unome]

I will chase girls who are either 0-count or more than 7. I want a prude or a slut, but not a girl in-between who is confused about what she is or who she wants in her life.

Avoid girls with a 1-6 partner count.

[Darth Revan]

"Forgiveness is the key to every door."

With such bitterness, the creator of this thread aint getting laid anytime soon-

Absolutely.
More e-psychologists finding the hidden meanings of threads.

[Skerdilaid]

I would tolerate them until I unload.

[HillY35]

Absolutely.
More e-psychologists finding the hidden meanings of threads.

Putting that garbage out there aint all that cool for a forum, man. You ought to find a more direct way to make your point, rather than have many people believing that are such decrepid opinions as the one you typed out.

[zhaoyun]

Neither one is very desirable. But I would say that Number two is worse because it is a person who is intentionally manipulative. Whereas Number one is just promiscuous, but may not be a bad person.

[Kastrioti1443]

The same animal stage both of the types, bit the 1st one is just more disgusting and more animalistic especially considering the number of partners.

Both products and jewels of post WW1 Europe and ''Western world'' in general. The jews have won.

[Linebacker]

Why is this important and why should anyone care.Most guys out there including myself are usually benefactors of behavior 1 and thank the lawd it exists.

Behavior 2 is more like a beta man thing,where he gets a woman because of his money and position,when he actually can't get one with his looks and character,yet still,nobody cares about that one either.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

Refusing to have the sex with me.

[Wadaad]

The worst is when the fun party girl wants to settle down so she becomes the scheming....

(voted 2 but meant i tolerate schemers less, atleast party girls are sincere)

[Darth Revan]

Putting that garbage out there aint all that cool for a forum, man. You ought to find a more direct way to make your point, rather than have many people believing that are such decrepid opinions as the one you typed out.

And what is my point?
I wanted to compare opinions about a semi-trivial topic. What did I do wrong?

[Darth Revan]

Neither one is very desirable. But I would say that Number two is worse because it is a person who is intentionally manipulative. Whereas Number one is just promiscuous, but may not be a bad person.

but you still voted for number 2 being more tolerable to you :laugh:

[Darth Revan]

Why is this important and why should anyone care.Most guys out there including myself are usually benefactors of behavior 1 and thank the lawd it exists.

Behavior 2 is more like a beta man thing,where he gets a woman because of his money and position,when he actually can't get one with his looks and character,yet still,nobody cares about that one either.

It's just to compare opinions from people.
How their morality, point of view, insight reflects in the way they assess female sexuality.

[Atvend]

Behaviour 1 is simply pointless degeneracy which I find intolerable. She is achieving nothing, other than telling everyone that she is a low quality female and fucking her life up.

Behaviour 2, while still degeneracy, at least has a purpose and she is achieving something, which I find despicable but also respectable. She displays some level of intelligence and skill at dealing with life. In this case I blame the idiot men for being made complete fools and resorting to being simple tools for her.

[de Burgh II]

Scratch that, both are nothing more than seductive manipulators who lives a very vain, self destructive lifestyle who is not worth it in the end. Simply a cunning, promiscuous manipulator who either has a monetary motive or is simply a self serving, deluded narcissist at best.

So none of the choices above.

[zhaoyun]

but you still voted for number 2 being more tolerable to you :laugh:

Sorry, that was a misvote. I vote for One.

[щрбл]

What a silly question. Everybody is free to do whatever they want with their body as long as it hurts nobody else. It's none of my business to know who sleeps with who. :)

[Prisoner Of Ice]

What a silly question. Everybody is free to do whatever they want with their body as long as it hurts nobody else. It's none of my business to know who sleeps with who. :)

:rolleyes:

Really, it's none of your business what behavior the girl you want to date/marry has had? You would not reject a literal prostitute for marriage?

[N1019]

I should have voted 1, not 2...

Type 2 is a devious whore whereas 1 is just a slut, but neither is ideal. Sluts might be more useful to men in the short term, but who wants to marry one?

[Linebacker]

It's just to compare opinions from people.
How their morality, point of view, insight reflects in the way they assess female sexuality.

That is really unimportant in our modern world,people who are not in a relationship(both men and women) just want to get a little action,get laid,doesn't really matter which way they do it,they get that out of their system and just keep moving on with their day to day activities and life progression.

Psychological patterns of female behavior is not what guys you walk by on the street are thinking or care about.

[Era]

I don't think you can separate the number 1 from 2. They usually are the same person. This goes for guys too.

[щрбл]

:rolleyes:

Really, it's none of your business what behavior the girl you want to date/marry has had? You would not reject a literal prostitute for marriage?

The only one who matters is obviously this very one. For the rest, be it friends, relatives, or people I vaguely know, I wouldn't even try to know details about their private life without their knowledge. It's just none of my concerns. Everyone has their moments that they aren't really proud of (or maybe not). Also, being nosy about these things is rather disrespectful. :)

[Darth Revan]

The worst is when the fun party girl wants to settle down so she becomes the scheming....

(voted 2 but meant i tolerate schemers less, atleast party girls are sincere)

Seems I fucked up writing the poll. A few people have already misvoted.

[Darth Revan]

I don't think you can separate the number 1 from 2. They usually are the same person. This goes for guys too.

Not really.
Nightclub girls you see making out with a different men over the course of the year, are really not the same to that mid-tier exec who wins contracts and promotions by doing whatever it takes. Usually dealing with men in her same or higher positions in the same or different companies.

[Darth Revan]

That is really unimportant in our modern world,people who are not in a relationship(both men and women) just want to get a little action,get laid,doesn't really matter which way they do it,they get that out of their system and just keep moving on with their day to day activities and life progression.

Psychological patterns of female behavior is not what guys you walk by on the street are thinking or care about.

Perhaps. But since this sort of topic is often mentioned one way or another, I figured I'd probe what Apricians have to voteand comment.

Sadly, several are even voting wrong, not reading the poll question >.>...

[Unome]

In my experiences, girls with a 1-6 partner count are poisonous. They don't know if they're prudish or slutty. They don't know what they want. They don't know who they want. The probably have been cheated on, or cheated. The low count ones, 2-3, usually are recovering from the "Pump and Dump" syndrome. They feel emotional attachment with the guy who deflowered her, but are left on a string (Justin Bieber, Selena Gomez, popular example). They don't want to seem like sluts, even though they're headed in that direction.

[Era]

Not really.
Nightclub girls you see making out with a different men over the course of the year, are really not the same to that mid-tier exec who wins contracts and promotions by doing whatever it takes. Usually dealing with men in her same or higher positions in the same or different companies.

Not from what I've seen. The first and the second are the same person really. :nod:

[Linebacker]

Perhaps. But since this sort of topic is often mentioned one way or another, I figured I'd probe what Apricians have to voteand comment.

Sadly, several are even voting wrong, not reading the poll question >.>...

Your general mistake was asking Apricitan men a question of female sexual behavior in the first place.

A lot of people here dont get much action and are sexually frustrated so their viewpoints on the subject are very feudal and misogynistic.

[Marusya]

What a silly question. Everybody is free to do whatever they want with their body as long as it hurts nobody else. It's none of my business to know who sleeps with who. :)

I guess you don't mind germy vaginas, then? ;) Whatever happened to self-respect? Respect all parts of your body and mind, please. The world will thank you.

[Darth Revan]

Your general mistake was asking Apricitan men a question of female sexual behavior in the first place.

A lot of people here dont get much action and are sexually frustrated so their viewpoints on the subject are very feudal and misogynistic.

Ok then, I'll ask for the thread to be deleted if you want.

[Kastrioti1443]

I don't think you can separate the number 1 from 2. They usually are the same person. This goes for guys too.

Not really, the 1st one is more animalistic and dumber.

Death Raven, in the 2nd behavior, she does that to get promoted or get a benefit always as the only solution or only when she sees it as very necessary ( after she worked and didn't achieve it)?

[N1019]

Not from what I've seen. The first and the second are the same person really. :nod:

The difference being the number of sexual partners?
Not all women have good opportunities in exhibiting behaviour 2, but would they if they could?


Your general mistake was asking Apricitan men a question of female sexual behavior in the first place.

A lot of people here dont get much action and are sexually frustrated so their viewpoints on the subject are very feudal and misogynistic.

lol true... on the other hand, we're talking about hypothetical women here. In the real world these factors matter less, especially to sex starved men.

[Darth Revan]

Not really, the 1st one is more animalistic and dumber.

Death Raven, in the 2nd behavior, she does that to get promoted or get a benefit always as the only solution or only when she sees it as very necessary ( after she worked and didn't achieve it)?

Second. I really doubt a woman could ever far ahead only by using her genitals. Since in the fictional story she was already employed and had income, let's assume she has other skills of her own.

Let's say she is about efficiency: "If I can get this without sleeping with this guy, it's fine; if not, I guess I'll have to do it".

[Era]

In my experiences, girls with a 1-6 partner count are poisonous. They don't know if they're prudish or slutty. They don't know what they want. They don't know who they want. The probably have been cheated on, or cheated. The low count ones, 2-3, usually are recovering from the "Pump and Dump" syndrome. They feel emotional attachment with the guy who deflowered her, but are left on a string (Justin Bieber, Selena Gomez, popular example). They don't want to seem like sluts, even though they're headed in that direction.

lol. The opposite, they know better what they want and you don't stand a chance manipulating them. While you can do that to a virgin (temporarily) or a slut will let you into thinking so, those in between are the ones who know what they want and that's why you are scared of them. That's a beta mentality by the way.

[HillY35]

And what is my point?
I wanted to compare opinions about a semi-trivial topic. What did I do wrong?

It's like you handed a buddy a porn video, but yet it had your stains on it.

[Kastrioti1443]

Second. I really doubt a woman could ever far ahead only by using her genitals. Since in the fictional story she was already employed and had income, let's assume she has other skills of her own.

Let's say she is about efficiency: "If I can get this without sleeping with this guy, it's fine; if not, I guess I'll have to do it".

None is acceptable, especially where I come from and this becomes much more disturbing when it is related to relatives or friends.

However the 1st one is much more animalistic by every point of view IMO. Why did you vote number 2?

[Unome]

There's no reason to be scared of women.

If I want to get married then she has to be a virgin or it's out of the question. And if I want to feed my need then a slut will do.

The 1-6 girls aren't worth much time.

[Darth Revan]

None is acceptable, especially where I come from and this becomes much more disturbing when it is related to relatives or friends.

However the 1st one is much more animalistic by every point of view IMO. Why did you vote number 2?

Because the poll is about which behaviour you can " tolerate/respect more"

I respect strong and cunning people, while people who do things for da lolz or to have fun are just mediocre.

[Darth Revan]

It's like you handed a buddy a porn video, but yet it had your stains on it.

Why am I dealing with sick analogies here?
Can you point out plainly what I did wrong or can you not?

[Aviator]

Your general mistake was asking Apricitan men a question of female sexual behavior in the first place.

A lot of people here dont get much action and are sexually frustrated so their viewpoints on the subject are very feudal and misogynistic.

^^^^^

[N1019]

lol. The opposite, they know better what they want and you don't stand a chance manipulating them. While you can do that to a virgin (temporarily) or a slut will let you into thinking so, those in between are the ones who know what they want and that's why you are scared of them. That's a beta mentality by the way.

Are you a number 2?

[Darth Revan]

^^^^^

Maybe you can answer what he didn't.
Should I then contact a moderator to delete the thread?

Interesting to see one can't open a trivial poll without dealing with psychologization (still waiting to know Hilly's diagnosis) or endless bitching why it shouldn't have been posted.

[Era]

Are you a number 2?

No. Are you?

[Aviator]

Maybe you can answer what he didn't.
Should I then contact a moderator to delete the thread?

Interesting to see one can't open a trivial poll without dealing with psychologization (still waiting to know Hilly's diagnosis) or endless bitching why it shouldn't have been posted.

Man, it's too easy to get under your skin.

[de Burgh II]

lol. The opposite, they know better what they want and you don't stand a chance manipulating them. While you can do that to a virgin (temporarily) or a slut will let you into thinking so, those in between are the ones who know what they want and that's why you are scared of them. That's a beta mentality by the way.

It can go both ways regardless of gender. This accounts for narcissism/manipulators; when they are faced with the fact their undesirable/ getting no where which they will almost always subconsciously try to repress the feelings of their own vanity as well as inadequacies. Nothing more than a juvenile mentality at best deluding themselves with such distortions.

It is much more wise to go along with a stable partner who are more genuine and are more self assured than to lower themselves to such things.

The very people who can't look past their own egotistic delusions will eventually seal their own fate through their own actions.

Such people like this will inevitably self destruct due to the very actions that will shatter their delusions soon enough.

[Darth Revan]

Such people like this will inevitably self destruct due to the very actions that will shatter their delusions soon enough.

Interesting post.
What delusions do you refer to?

[de Burgh II]

Simply the act of introspection and simply realizing the effects of one's consequences should be enough to either reform yourself or continue to self destruct is ultimately up to the individual in the end.

[N1019]

No. Are you?

No, I'm a total slut.

[Era]

No, I'm a total slut.

Gay?

[N1019]

Gay?

I'm not gay, but the last man I fucked was.

[Era]

I'm not gay, but the last man I fucked was.

I lol-ed. Ok since you self identify as slut would you hesitate to use your sexuality to get ahead at work too?

[Kastrioti1443]

Because the poll is about which behaviour you can " tolerate/respect more"

I respect strong and cunning people, while people who do things for da lolz or to have fun are just mediocre.

Than a lot of people, including me have misinterpreted the poll, since I voted the one which I consider worse or filthier.

However nr1 and nr2 can be related to each other.

I do agree this time with our bulgarian professional plumber, that you probably have to delete this thread or make a new one.

[MissProvocateur]

Honestly, despite the fact that their sex life is none of my business, as a woman, I can tolerate the Party Girl more. Why? Because women like the second one are competition, yes, she's cunning and intelligent, but I'd be furious if I were to find out that a woman got a promotion instead of myself simply because she spread her legs. Women who use their bodies to get popularity/money/etc. give women in general a bad name when it comes to their nature. The party girl, on the other hand, while usually dumb and kind of annoying, can still be a good person, and usually does not present herself as competition in the working field.

TL;DR: The second woman is more despicable, simply because she sets the standard that every time I want something, It would be expected of me to spread my legs.

However, I think all humans are worthy of respect until they harmed others. Your average weekend slut usually does not harm, she just wants to have fun with sex. the second one, while unintentionally harming other women, is simply doing a trade-off. Much like a prostitute. Even prostitutes deserve respect, so long as they don't harm others.

[de Burgh II]

Interesting post.
What delusions do you refer to?

Cognitive bias.

Essentially a conglomeration of one's suppressed primordial fears, negative experiences and stigmatized traits rolled into one. That are all intricately connected to the person's own defined individual experiences that varies from person to person. If one is strongly attached to any of these factors then their own sense of identity will be greatly distorted to avoid any sense of cognitive dissonance. So they reform one's own sense of identity to be molded in a way that they adopt self destructive behaviors in some vain attempt to be reminded of their own shortcomings which renders and inhibits any positive, malleable qualities to come into play.

Once one can accept such shortcomings for what they are rather than something their not, then only there can one redeem oneself and go on to live a functional, stable life. A person is a catalyst of their own path in life, which can be either for the "better" or "worse" depending on how you define such things.

[N1019]

I lol-ed. Ok since you self identify as slut would you hesitate to use your sexuality to get ahead at work too?

Were I ever to work in a female dominated industry, which is unlikely, I wouldn't have to "use" my sexuality to get ahead - it would naturally and effortlessly propel me into senior management.... but that's OK, because (1) I'm a male, so I can get away with it, and (2) I wouldn't blame my female bosses for finding me irresistible. :p

[Merida]

I don't like either behavior. But being forced to choose, I'll go with number 1. Number 2 is a sly slut, using her body in a manipulative way as a means to get something else. The fact that she has slept with fewer men than number 1 doesn't mean her behavior is less whorish either.

[Era]

Were I ever to work in a female dominated industry, which is unlikely, I wouldn't have to "use" my sexuality to get ahead - it would naturally and effortlessly propel me into senior management.... but that's OK, because (1) I'm a male, so I can get away with it, and (2) I wouldn't blame my female bosses for finding me irresistible. :p

To come to Darth's poll do you condemn females who act as you do.

[Darth Revan]

Simply the act of introspection and simply realizing the effects of one's consequences should be enough to either reform yourself or continue to self destruct is ultimately up to the individual in the end.

In practical terms, what will happen in your opinion to the woman that follows behaviour 2?

[Kastrioti1443]

Btw, the nr2 type of girl does that only when she sees it as very necessary and not always. If she worked and achieved nothing, that she uses other methods, I think we have to make a distinction in this matter. If she does it all the time, without making efforts before, than we have something else here, similar to number 1.

[Alessio]

Correction 2

[armenianbodyhair]

#2 is worse and more respectable at the same time. Both are extremely disgusting though.

[Marusya]

In practical terms, what will happen in your opinion to the woman that follows behaviour 2?

I know you didn't ask me, but I'd like to respond. I've worked with women who received favors/promotions by sleeping with male bosses. Every time it backfired. The dirty secret is always hovering over the woman's head. Once the women are demoted/fired - and they always are, eventually - they then try to sue for sexual harassment. This causes a news report. Now, their dirty deed is public. The women end up with a paltry settlement from the company, and have this forever on their record, hindering future employment prospects.

[de Burgh II]

In practical terms, what will happen in your opinion to the woman that follows behaviour 2?

Well if I had to diagnose this kind of "case study" then I would say the person would suffer from narcissistic/sociopathic tendencies due to the pathology that is predominant within the person. If we were to logically follow this frame of mind then the associated behaviors would follow compulsive tendencies. This compulsion would manifest and follow a path of possible drug-use, provoked drama, excessive promiscuity, drinking, etc. That will inevitably lead to the person being exposed through their actions when the "invincibility" ends. As a last result, the person will use its possible contacts to manipulate to suit their own pleasures for their own security to follow back on, and in the scenario if the given contacts break off and their left with nothing will more or less have an inevitably self destructive end. Since this kind of pathology will be something the individual would desperately cling to since their ego is very preoccupied with the given delusions. Something one should not involve yourself with or continue if a person knows whats good for them while their ahead.

[Amud]

In both cases, the woman is having sex and might end up pregnant. She also might end up with STD's, and could then spread those STD's to other people as well. The question then becomes, which situation will minimize the spread of diseases and lead to the best possible genetic selection?

Case 1: She has sex with typical slayerids. This means that tons of diseases are being spread around. It also means that she will most likely end up with a mini-Chad in her womb, generating more low IQ criminals in the gene pool.

Case 2: Fewer sexual partners, and her sexual partners, probably being Adenids, are very unlikely to have diseases. This option is far more sanitary. If she is impregnated, chances are the offspring will be fathered by someone in the upper tiers of society, like business professionals, which improves the gene pool.

Behavior #2 is clearly the less objectionable choice.

[щрбл]

I guess you don't mind germy vaginas, then? ;) Whatever happened to self-respect? Respect all parts of your body and mind, please. The world will thank you.

Not exactly sure what you're suggesting there... Chances you get STDs are closely linked to one's tendencies to go vagina hopping. Anyone with at least a tiny bit of grey matter between their ears is able to avoid most of them or at least the fatal ones. Besides, having nearly 1000 posts on TA is a much more effective protection mean than anything rubber-made...

As for self-respect, it is clearly is subjective. The religious sand nuts are generally those who teach you guilt for having a sexual intercourse. It's a constant in every single of their sects as sperm spillage is the greatest sin, obviously.

[N1019]

To come to Darth's poll do you condemn females who act as you do.

Who act as I do? That is, slutty. No - sluts are good for short term use. I condemn type 2, as I said. I'd rather an honest slut than a devious whore, despite the added risk of STDs.

[Marusya]

Not exactly sure what you're suggesting there...

I was teasing you, mostly. Sorry. I'm sure you have high standards when it comes to selecting suitable vaginas. :D (Though, you probably don't have any use for vaginas, since you are only 11! :D What are you doing in this topic, anyway?!)


Besides, having nearly 1000 posts on TA is a much more effective protection mean than anything rubber-made...

Yes, it is not good to wallow at the pig trough of the internet for too long. Living in the world in the here and now is much more rewarding. :)


As for self-respect, it is clearly is subjective. The religious sand nuts are generally those who teach you guilt for having a sexual intercourse. It's a constant in every single of their sects as sperm spillage is the greatest sin, obviously.

Self-respect may be subjective, but it, to me, is a sign of health and inspiration.

[Darth Revan]

Who act as I do? That is, slutty. No - sluts are good for short term use. I condemn type 2, as I said. I'd rather an honest slut than a devious whore, despite the added risk of STDs.

I'd be slut n2 myself.

[Marusya]

I'd be slut n2 myself.

Then you can sue for sexual harassment and win a paltry settlement!

[Era]

Who act as I do? That is, slutty. No - sluts are useful, although not desirable beyond short term use. I condemn type 2, as I said. I'd rather an honest slut than a devious whore.

So even though you yourself act as both a honest slut and devious whore you still find it in you to condemn her :D

Both men and women are sexual beings, why do you think women only should restrain themselves. Men should and can do it too. I expect only celibate men to have these condemning thoughts not a self described slut.

What do you think of Helen Gurly Brown. She was the boss of Cosmopolitan magazine, a woman who advocated and practiced free sex till marriage, including sleeping at work to get ahead. She had a happy marriage afterwards.

http://www.amazon.com/Bad-Girls-Go-Everywhere-Cosmopolitan/dp/0143118129

[Marusya]

I think the idea of "sexual freedom" for women is an illusion, and not desirable. Human babies come out of vaginas, notwithstanding the c-section births. Vaginas should be treated with care due to this factor. It is just biology. Women weren't meant or designed by nature to sleep around freely.

[N1019]

So even though you yourself act as both a honest slut and devious whore you still find it in you to condemn her :D

Both men and women are sexual beings, why do you think women only should restrain themselves. Men should and can do it too. I expect only celibate men to have these condemning thoughts not a self described slut.

What do you think of Helen Gurly Brown. She was the boss of Cosmopolitan magazine, a woman who advocated and practiced free sex till marriage, including sleeping at work to get ahead. She had a happy marriage afterwards.

http://www.amazon.com/Bad-Girls-Go-Everywhere-Cosmopolitan/dp/0143118129

I'm a slut, not a devious whore... I thought I made that clear.

[Era]

I think the idea of "sexual freedom" for women is an illusion, and not desirable. Human babies come out of vaginas, notwithstanding the c-section births. Vaginas should be treated with care due to this factor. It is just biology. Women weren't meant or designed by nature to sleep around freely.

I don't get it. Why?

[Era]

I'm a slut, not a devious whore... I thought I made that clear.

You would sleep at work given the chance. What industry is that with no women in management? I haven't seen any so far.

[щрбл]

Self-respect may be subjective, but it, to me, is a sign of health and inspiration.
СЕКСУАЛЬНЫЕ ОБРЯДЫ И МИФОЛОГИЯ ДРЕВНИХ СЛАВЯН
http://www.furfur.me/furfur/culture/culture/174549-seksualnaya-kultura-drevnih-slavyan

Культ фаллоса

По новой версии первое божество разорвало хаос с помощью фаллоса, лишив пустой мир девственности и населив его живыми существами. Естественно, мужской репродуктивный орган стал наделяться новыми смыслами и отожествляться с космической силой рождения всего сущего. Славянское название фаллоса — гоило, что значит «оживлять, дарить жизнь». Отныне изображение мужского полового органа являлось символом упорядочивания хаоса, и статуи всех божеств древних славян стали выполняться в форме фаллосов с лицом бога или его атрибутом в верхней части колонны.

Девственность

Если славянский жених обнаруживал, что его новоявленная жена девственница, он в гневе мог отказаться от неё, ведь это значило, что бедняжка так никому и не приглянулась до свадьбы — значит, порченая. Девственность у древних славян не имела совершенно никакой ценности.

On a second thought, returning to our slavic roots sounds much more fun actually. xD

[Marusya]

I don't get it. Why?

Women's vaginas are not designed to take the abuse of large numbers of sexual partners. Vaginas aren't made of industrial strength rubber. :D

[N1019]

You would sleep at work given the chance. What industry is that with no women in management? I haven't seen any so far.

Actually, I said I wouldn't have to "use" my sexuality, because it would ensure success would come naturally and effortlessly... lol Is that the same? I hope you're not choosing to take a joke seriously just because it would suit your agenda.

Where I work, women are not in positions of real power over me. That's just the way it is at the moment.


Both men and women are sexual beings, why do you think women only should restrain themselves. Men should and can do it too. I expect only celibate men to have these condemning thoughts not a self described slut.

Well, this is all hypothetical. This poll and related discussion are not indicative of how we want people to behave, because neither 1 nor 2 was an ideal choice - it's more a case of dealing with two types of people as they are and choosing between imperfect options. The type 1 slut is, for me, the less worse option. Is that how I want a prospective partner to be? Different matter.

If people - men and women - don't "behave" for me as I expect them to under whatever circumstances, they're out.

What you, as a woman, claim to expect from men is irrelevant.

[Marusya]

СЕКСУАЛЬНЫЕ ОБРЯДЫ И МИФОЛОГИЯ ДРЕВНИХ СЛАВЯН
http://www.furfur.me/furfur/culture/culture/174549-seksualnaya-kultura-drevnih-slavyan

Культ фаллоса


Девственность


On a second thought, returning to our slavic roots sounds much more fun actually. xD

This is fantasy. There are no accurate historical records of the sexual practices of ancient Slavic tribes. :D They weren't literate.

[Era]

Women's vaginas are not designed to take the abuse of large numbers of sexual partners. Vaginas aren't made of industrial strength rubber. :D

Isn't it the same physically for a woman to have sex with one partner as it is with a hundred. Why should it be different. That one can do just as much damage.

[щрбл]

This is fantasy. There are no accurate historical records of the sexual practices of ancient Slavic tribes. :D They weren't literate.

The author has added a number of references at the end though. It also says that Kupala night was an orgy. xD
Slavs were promiscuous (in the good sense of the word) before Christianity enslaved them by the means of senseless guilt. Returning to the old ways of our native faith worshiping Perun and the bunch is the only way that leads to freedom. :)

[Atvend]

So even though you yourself act as both a honest slut and devious whore you still find it in you to condemn her :D

Both men and women are sexual beings, why do you think women only should restrain themselves. Men should and can do it too. I expect only celibate men to have these condemning thoughts not a self described slut.

What do you think of Helen Gurly Brown. She was the boss of Cosmopolitan magazine, a woman who advocated and practiced free sex till marriage, including sleeping at work to get ahead. She had a happy marriage afterwards.

http://www.amazon.com/Bad-Girls-Go-Everywhere-Cosmopolitan/dp/0143118129

There is an inherent biological bias in this.

A man who sleeps around a lot is not viewed in a very negative light, because he has to work hard for it, especially if he was not lucky enough to win the gene lottery at birth. There is some sense of achievement in being a stud, something that one can brag about because he worked for it. It indicates that he is a successful specimen biologically speaking. Also it is very likely that he didn't receive anything for it except for pleasure, no other reward, no special treatment.

A slutty woman on the other side is a negative thing. Why? Because for one she doesn't have to do any work, she just has to be there and some guy will approach her, no matter how unattractive she may be. There is nothing to be proud about. Secondly, it says that she is a low quality female. Females by nature have to be selective, which says a lot about why guys are more attracted to those who play hard to get. One who sleeps around a lot is not selective and therefore low quality...

[Era]

There is an inherent biological bias in this.

A man who sleeps around a lot is not viewed in a very negative light, because he has to work hard for it, especially if he was not lucky enough to win the gene lottery at birth. There is some sense of achievement in being a stud, something that one can brag about because he worked for it. It indicates that he is a successful specimen biologically speaking. Also it is very likely that he didn't receive anything for it except for pleasure, no other reward, no special treatment.

A slutty woman on the other side is a negative thing. Why? Because for one she doesn't have to do any work, she just has to be there and some guy will approach her, no matter how unattractive she may be. There is nothing to be proud about. Secondly, it says that she is a low quality female. Females by nature have to be selective, which says a lot about why guys are more attracted to those who play hard to get. One who sleeps around a lot is not selective and therefore low quality...

She slept around. Is she low quality

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Grace_Kelly_MGM_photo.jpg

[Marusya]

The author has added a number of references at the end though. It also says that Kupala night was an orgy. xD
Slavs were promiscuous (in the good sense of the word) before Christianity enslaved them by the means of senseless guilt. Returning to the old ways of our native faith worshiping Perun and the bunch is the only way that leads to freedom. :)

All ancient peoples were probably promiscuous. These people acted on instinct, with little to no understanding of their bodies, and the world. We are civilized and educated now. Returning to ancient ways of living would be dangerous and ridiculous.

[Atvend]

She slept around. Is she low quality

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Grace_Kelly_MGM_photo.jpg

Depends, are talking about biological quality? Then yes she is.
If we mean societal quality, again it depends. Did she achieve anything from it? If not, then yes, she is low quality.

[Darth Revan]

There is an inherent biological bias in this.

A man who sleeps around a lot is not viewed in a very negative light, because he has to work hard for it, especially if he was not lucky enough to win the gene lottery at birth. There is some sense of achievement in being a stud, something that one can brag about because he worked for it. It indicates that he is a successful specimen biologically speaking. Also it is very likely that he didn't receive anything for it except for pleasure, no other reward, no special treatment.

A slutty woman on the other side is a negative thing. Why? Because for one she doesn't have to do any work, she just has to be there and some guy will approach her, no matter how unattractive she may be. There is nothing to be proud about. Secondly, it says that she is a low quality female. Females by nature have to be selective, which says a lot about why guys are more attracted to those who play hard to get. One who sleeps around a lot is not selective and therefore low quality...


The only value in female sexuality pertains to pregnancy/motherhood.

[Era]

Depends, are talking about biological quality? Then yes she is.
If we mean societal quality, again it depends. Did she achieve anything from it? If not, then yes, she is low quality.

So if you achieve something from it you are not low quality. I marvel at the reasoning here:D I would assume sleeping for profit would be way worse but apparently for most people isn't.

[Atvend]

So if you achieve something from it you are not low quality. I marvel at the reasoning here:D I would assume sleeping for profit would be way worse but apparently for most people isn't.

If you knew me and if you saw my earlier post you would now that I consider sleeping for profit or not, be it man or woman, to be undesirable degeneracy and I do not approve of neither.
But, if you are going to be a degenerate either way, well, at least make something good out of it. Use it to achieve something, work towards the betterment of yourself. Granted, the rest of us may not like at and may find it despicable and vile, but there is still some degree of respect for that person, compared to the other who will be just as big of a degenerate but will not bother to self improve. Hence the one who sleeps for profit is of a higher quality than the one who just sleeps.

[Darth Revan]

So if you achieve something from it you are not low quality. I marvel at the reasoning here:D I would assume sleeping for profit would be way worse but apparently for most people isn't.

Nope. For me it isn't.
When she uses her holes for specific goals, restricting them to fewer partners and of higher quality (just like Amud mentioned), the thing (sex) has more value.

When it's given easily to more consumers, and for a lower price (no need to convince her much), the thing (sex) has lower value.


Plus, the mind of a devious minx is probably more alluring than the mind of a braindead bimbo.

[Darth Revan]

Then you can sue for sexual harassment and win a paltry settlement!

Nope, I wouldn't.
I would get pictures of my boss and me to blackmail him with his wife; then work hard to do well in my position, and look out for a possibility to get the attention of my boss' boss see if I could convince into firing him and getting me promoted ;) Rinse and repeat, until you reach the end of the chain, whereupon the guy I'd get would be a professional hitman, to do a little wetwork for me, and get rid of the CEO, whom I had previously convinced into appointing me as his 1st lieutenant.

[Era]

Nope. For me it isn't.
When she uses her holes for specific goals, restricting them to fewer partners and of higher quality (just like Amud mentioned), the thing (sex) has more value.

When it's given easily to more consumers, and for a lower price (no need to convince her much), the thing (sex) has lower value.


Plus, the mind of a devious minx is probably more alluring than the mind of a braindead bimbo.

It's just a matter of brain at the end. ( and looks probably). Because what I am saying is the one that uses it for power it's pretty likely using it for pleasure , meaning promiscuous with a large number, while the first one has just as large a number minus the devious goals, meaning she doesn't have enough brain to make a profit of it. I just can't see the first person restraining herself only for power purposes.

[Armand_Duval]

None of the above. Just for the records, contrary to everyone thinks, having a relation with a promiscuos woman isnt pleasant at all, I used to have a relation with a woman who was very promiscuous and beleve me when I say, you don't wanna that.

[Darth Revan]

It's just a matter of brain at the end. ( and looks probably). Because what I am saying is the one that uses it for power it's pretty likely using it for pleasure , meaning promiscuous with a large number, while the first one has just as large a number minus the devious goals, meaning she doesn't have enough brain to make a profit of it. I just can't see the first person restraining herself only for power purposes.

Perhaps, yes.
After all, a stupid woman won't even identify or know to react to opportunities of using sex for advancing her projects.
It takes a cunning mind to create those opportunities, decision to seize them, and preparation to capitalize on them (so what Marusya says doesn't happen to you).

Basically you're right. A smarter woman (mental hiearchy) will always be more interesting even when she's 'immoral'.

[Kastrioti1443]

There is an inherent biological bias in this.

A man who sleeps around a lot is not viewed in a very negative light, because he has to work hard for it, especially if he was not lucky enough to win the gene lottery at birth. There is some sense of achievement in being a stud, something that one can brag about because he worked for it. It indicates that he is a successful specimen biologically speaking. Also it is very likely that he didn't receive anything for it except for pleasure, no other reward, no special treatment.

A slutty woman on the other side is a negative thing. Why? Because for one she doesn't have to do any work, she just has to be there and some guy will approach her, no matter how unattractive she may be. There is nothing to be proud about. Secondly, it says that she is a low quality female. Females by nature have to be selective, which says a lot about why guys are more attracted to those who play hard to get. One who sleeps around a lot is not selective and therefore low quality...

Good analyse and the words written here hold a value, because they say the truth, but I still do not agree with the guy that ''gets a lot of pussy''.

Yes he probably worked, he worked out, he tried to wear good clothes, keep himself feet, improve social skills, improve flirting, good psychological game, probably all things that a whore or slut does not need, nut to me is just an animalistic way of life. Such guys do not give any value to society and we both know that we do not want such guys around our female relatives, yes?

In the end they are just animals with a bit of higher consciousness, their way of life does not have the right ''inside meaning'' that it should have had, and after that he does not have the moral ground to be a good father or husband, because other guys like him might try to get inside the pants of his wife and doughtier, the same daughters of sisters of some one else...

Pleasure can be found in seeking knowledge, working on your body, working to make money, working for a greater cause, or even trying to keep your principles strong and to not get in the stage of the animal.

However considering how fucked up is the world today, especially the west, maybe some of these guys are not to be blamed. It is very difficult today to have an axis to follow and are too many sluts, because a society of sluts and gigolos has been created....and these gigolos like the guys you mentioned in your post do contribute in creating such society.

Personally I have refused to become one and also refused cases.... but this is another story. I do not agree though, that unattractive females get attention, personally never seen that.

For me, the only solution for us, is to come back again in our warrior/mercenary code and way of life, of course adopted a bit to modern days.

[Highlands]

None of them ideally... :ohwell: but if I had to choose #1 since I dislike cheating and unfair treatment, especially in the workplace or academic institutions and I believe we should all be appointed on merit. It disgusts me to think someone could achieve certain things by sleeping around. We should be rewarding dignity, good morals and self respect in society.

Although 10-20 partners still sounds ridiculous to someone like me.

[Atvend]

Good analyse and the words written here hold a value, because they say the truth, but I still do not agree with the guy that ''gets a lot of pussy''.

Yes he probably worked, he worked out, he tried to wear good clothes, keep himself feet, improve social skills, improve flirting, good psychological game, probably all things that a whore or slut does not need, nut to me is just an animalistic way of life. Such guys do not give any value to society and we both know that we do not want such guys around our female relatives, yes?

In the end they are just animals with a bit of higher consciousness, their way of life does not have the right ''inside meaning'' that it should have had, and after that he does not have the moral ground to be a good father or husband, because other guys like him might try to get inside the pants of his wife and doughtier, the same daughters of sisters of some one else...

Pleasure can be found in seeking knowledge, working on your body, working to make money, working for a greater cause, or even trying to keep your principles strong and to not get in the stage of the animal.

However considering how fucked up is the world today, especially the west, maybe some of these guys are not to be blamed. It is very difficult today to have an axis to follow and are too many sluts, because a society of sluts and gigolos has been created....and these gigolos like the guys you mentioned in your post do contribute in creating such society.

Personally I have refused to become one and also refused cases.... but this is another story. I do not agree though, that unattractive females get attention, personally never seen that.

For me, the only solution for us, is to come back again in our warrior/mercenary code and way of life, of course adopted a bit to modern days.

You don't approve of it and neither do I. Granted, i think we all should seek to transcend our animalistic behaviour, but it will always be present in some degree, and that is determined by how self aware we are. That is why these studs are most of the time quite stupid and braindead people, you rarely see an intelligent person resort to such lifestyle.

[Kastrioti1443]

None of them ideally... :ohwell: but if I had to choose #1 since I dislike cheating and unfair treatment, especially in the workplace or academic institutions and I believe we should all be appointed on merit. It disgusts me to think someone could achieve certain things by sleeping around. We should be rewarding dignity, good morals and self respect in society.

Although 10-20 partners still sounds ridiculous to someone like me.

But my dear, that is indeed the lowest level of morals and dignity.

Anyway what you described in a few words is the british society. A society where the structures of the state do work, but family and sexual dignity is on the ground, together with many other things.

In Britain the protocol of the state does function and there is meritocracy ( to a certain level) but totally slutiness in many other things, sexual degeneration on the highest level.

This gives an image on the outside that things are working there, and that brings chaotic immigration, especially the non european one, but this makes things even worse.

Things are not working at all, it is a total mess in fact.

[Dormammu]

First one represents the "chaotic evil" in the most of the cases, the one who just doesn't care about the final consequences of their own acts, likely to engage in deviant behavior out of some hollow rebellion or simply not knowing better. The second one represents true villain behavior, calculating plans with great patience and cunning and of a truly manipulative and psychopathic nature.

People are instinctively scared of this kind of behavior, although it seems more common in white men's societies. There the "chaotic behavior" is just larva state for the latter and are often hard to distinguish. Large population of emotionally and beyond superficiality otherwise involuntary celibate whites males + 'empowered' white womens with a freedom complex, will create large amounts of scheming psychopaths. They go to the point of doing this:
https://scontent-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10256208_897581226957960_1916603885516300273_n.jpg ?oh=54e65f325f82a264a40fd806730fc313&oe=558E8045

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10997728_897580946957988_33969728420173809_n.jpg?o h=bd3852be69e7b71f707bd30f015fbd1d&oe=55944EEF&__gda__=1435642115_cb62e141fbc4ae3654754b386b8c42b 9

[Armand_Duval]

Lets highlight that a high promiscous behavior doesn't always mean evil itself but frequently this behavior talks about some other interesting personality disorder and psychiatric issues.

Talking about my own experience with this promiscuous woman I talked about in the other post, it turned out she was under psychiatric care. By the way I have to say these patients refuse to follow all good advice that comes from others, that including taking their medications.

When I met her it was at work and from the first time I met her she flirted at me, even she told me she just gotten divorce and she was willing to start something else from and adveture or whatever it comes into business (her words). I did not cede to her approaches just like that, my first reaction to her behavior was surprise and I thought: "this has to be a joke, where's the trick, she completely lost her mind I barely know her!".

Maybe if I had just seen her twice or three times for most sure nothing had happened I am not really into women that throw themselves so straight forward to me, but in this case I used to see her 4 times per week at work and she was always flirting and using the double sense when talking to me. She was quite attractive and sexy eith a nice and talkative personallity so after thinking it over I gave it a go and decided to start something with her. She was really aggressive about sex, since our first date she wanted me to fuck her but I never go to bed in the first date, maybe after the third one but the first nor the second one, she seemed to really want it though, in our second date she made me a blow job while we were on the movie teathre lol and soon she got what she wanted, we became lovers lolz.

I have to confess that in the beginning of everything it really feels good, your male ego boost to the top, a nice attractive woman so crazy about you and eager to get you into bed and desperately fuck you seems really appealing to every male, but soon bad sings, the hidden issues started to come up.

As our relationship grew, so her personality disorders started to show: she had a voluble personality almost bipolar, one day she said she loved me the most, I was her life, the next day she paid so little attention to me even as if she were making me a favor by dating me, she showed herself as a manipulative personallity.

But she wasn't a bad woman but a sick woman. When I complained about her voluble personallity she confessed to be under psychiatric care although she refused to tell me about more details, I gave little importance to it at that point, I was too crazy about having sex and to be honest I was starting to feel a more deep emotional connection and attachment to her.

It is in this point when many guys lose their objetivity and capability to see signs, you always have to listen to you instinct and my instinct told me it was something wrong about our relation.

Not to make this story too long I'm gonna tell you that this woman was actually fucking 5 more guys besides me and she had been doing that for some time by the time she met me.

Lets talk about those signs I've been telling you: the firs time we were at this hotel she was very talkative and from her purse she took a handfull of condoms with the name of 4 different hotels, I didnt care because I was hot and I wanted to fuck her, lol, there are more signs but I am not talking about them not to get you bored.

The fact is that she not only was promiscuous but actually had a sordid life, she was even related to members of the organized crime, she confessed me she knew drug dealers and even a kidnaper and only god knows what else!. ( later on I knew she was actually fucking that criminal besides me too).

Soon I found the way to get rid of her without getting her pissed off and I did. It was not that difficult due to the platoon of lovers she had, one more or one less would't make a big difference to her.

I got not only scared but hurt and started to look out for answers to her crazy behavior because to tell true It is difficult to me to let it go after some months such close relation with somebody. She told me she was under psychiatric care so I started to make some reading about personallity disorders and eventhough she never mentioned it now I am sure she was affected by the borderline personallity disorder, what I have read of it, describes her the best.


So boys and gals be very careful and do not fall for those handsome guys or pretty talkative and bold charming gals that seem to be crazy to take you to bed there is this saying that states:

When something appears to be too good to be true the fact is that it isn't really good.

[BeerBaron]

Neither, bin both the slags.:fponder:

[Rumata]

*Not reading messages*
The poll title is the opposite to the topic title. It could be misleading.

I voted I could tolerate/respect more Behaviour 1 (Fun party girl), according to the poll question.

[randomguy1235]

She slept around. Is she low quality

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Grace_Kelly_MGM_photo.jpg

Attractive and symmetrical physical features aren't the only indicator of someone's gene "quality" though. You have to factor in mental variables such as intelligence, health and well-being, etc.

[Desaix DeBurgh]

Second one: because in my mind most women are basically prostitutes in one form or another but once a woman has sex with too many men it is impossible to hypnotize her with only one cock so she is much more likely to cheat on any husband or boyfriend she has. There is nothing worse than a cheater, in my book, when it comes to relationships because I have never cheated on woman I have been in a relationship with and relationships are based on honesty and trust etc.. also, once a cheater always a cheater. The second one is merely acting like a prostitute which is basically what women are anyway. Even if a woman is in a relationship with only one man she is basically a prostitute to him, in most cases, because the man is probably spending his resources on her.

[Desaix DeBurgh]

Ooops, I meant second one so I edited my post to reflect that (according to the poll question)

[Queen B]

Both are behaviors that I'm against, but I respect #1 more.
Number 1 is just sluttish. She uses sex for pleasure.
Number 2 is a whore. She uses sex for exchanging goods.

[Darth Revan]

Both are behaviors that I'm against, but I respect #1 more.
Number 1 is just sluttish. She uses sex for pleasure.
Number 2 is a whore. She uses sex for exchanging goods.

I actually remember we disagreed on this very issue in some other thread, and figured I'd compare with the opinion of the rest

[Zmey Gorynych]

Which one is your girlfriend? :laugh:

[Darth Revan]

Which one is your girlfriend? :laugh:

?
Not dating anyone at the moment.

[Queen B]

I actually remember we disagreed on this very issue in some other thread, and figured I'd compare with the opinion of the rest
I don't remember it, but yeah, its interesting to see what people think.
The question is :

A slut or a whore?

[Darth Revan]

I don't remember it, but yeah, its interesting to see what people think.
The question is :

A slut or a whore?

Possible. Though would nuance by saying the 'whore' in this case, picks her customers whenever she wants too.
Not up for calling/picking up whenever you want to as the normal prostitution deal is done.

[Fear Fiain]

Simple poll about people's opinions over sexual behaviour. Which one can you tolerate/respect more?
Nothing more to it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Behaviour 1: The woman sleeps around out of boredom, or 'to have fun' every 2 weekends or so. Racks up 20, 30, 50 sexual partners by the time she's 30.

Behaviour 2: The woman's count is 3 or 4 men. All of them she slept with to get something out of them.
1- The teacher in high school that passed her in math, because she would have never done so on her own.
2- The branch manager who promoted her at work.
3- The real estate agent who cut her an incredibly good deal on her flat.
4- Most recently, got in the pants of an executive from corporate who came to visit her office. She pleased him enough, and so he gave her the branch manager position (firing guy number 2).


----

Vote.

both of them are unsuitable for the kind of relationship I am seeking, as I want a woman I can get married to, hold hands in church, raise children with, and ultimately I'm considering priesthood as an option ... so I cannot afford a woman who will divorce. whether in five years or thirty.

[Queen B]

Possible. Though would nuance by saying the 'whore' in this case, picks her customers whenever she wants too.
Not up for calling/picking up whenever you want to as the normal prostitution deal is done.
Each person have different definition of what is a whoreish behavior.
Personally I consider her a whore. She offers her body in exchange of goods.
And actually, a real whore (prostitute as a profession) is more respectable than her.
At least, she isn't doing it in against others, meaning, no#2 will probably get a position in a firm that someone deserved more with more qualities (suitable for this job).

[Seraph of the End]

Behaviour 1 is just pointless spreading of legs with no gain. It's disgusting and shows that woman has no brain, no self respect, and no dignity. Probably thinks only about fun too.

Behaviour 2 is maybe less tolerable (no one likes injustice) but it's more respectable, since it shows that woman actually has some goal, and enough intelligence and will to use what she has, in any way she can.

In the first case, woman is an idiot, in the second case, men are idiots since they let themselves be manipulated. Woman is just cunning and ready to do whatever it takes, which is, understandably, intolerable for many people since they look at it from the moral point of view. If possible, both behaviours are undesirable.

[Roy]

Both attitudes are discreditable, but what's more annoying for women is that if there was a man in that position he would be treated indulgently while women are faced with ostracism when they are revealed.



1 seems like a cool chick

Would you like to be with such a chick? :picard1:

[Raven_]

Each person have different definition of what is a whoreish behavior.
Personally I consider her a whore. She offers her body in exchange of goods.
And actually, a real whore (prostitute as a profession) is more respectable than her.
At least, she isn't doing it in against others, meaning, no#2 will probably get a position in a firm that someone deserved more with more qualities (suitable for this job).

A woman who engages in such casual relationships with many different partners is no much different than a prostitute who can decline offers from men she deems as repulsive.
I would say type 1 woman is buying sex herself (for cheap) while type 2 woman is offering it. Who is more moral: a prostitute or a client? One creates supply, another one demand. Type 1 and type 2 are just different sides of the same coin.

[Queen B]

A woman who engages in such casual relationships with many different partners is no much different than a prostitute who can decline offers from men she deems as repulsive.
I would say type 1 woman is buying sex herself (for cheap) while type 2 woman is offering it. Who is more moral: a prostitute or a client? One creates supply, another one demand. Type 1 and type 2 are just different sides of the same coin.

No#1 is just doing something for her pleasure that affects herself.
Like some people are fat because they like to eat much, she is promiscious because she likes to sleep around.

No #2 is someone that uses sex as a form of personal advance, many times against the advance on others.
She is the type that would do anything to get what she wants.
I don't see it as the same at all. Both are against my morals and ideas, but if I had to choose f.e. who to have a friend, I would prefer the 1st.

[Raven_]

No#1 is just doing something for her pleasure that affects herself.


How do you know type 1 woman is not seducing married men who have children on the top of that? How do you know type 1 woman is aware of a man's marital status? A married man who cheats his wife may be no more faulty than a man who accepts type 2 woman's offer.



Like some people are fat because they like to eat much, she is promiscious because she likes to sleep around.


Fatness have various neg. effects on one's mind, body and family (such as transmitting their eating habits to their children). Likewise sleeping around may have multiple 'unforeseen' effects.


No #2 is someone that uses sex as a form of personal advance, many times against the advance on others.
She is the type that would do anything to get what she wants.

You see, type 1 and type 2 both get what they want except that their needs differ.



I don't see it as the same at all.

Both types are sexually promiscuous, both of them are selfish and don't concern themselves further than their own needs.



Both are against my morals and ideas, but if I had to choose f.e. who to have a friend, I would prefer the 1st.

Right, such a friend may betray you. Although a slut may not necessarily put your friendship above her carnal desires either.

[Queen B]

How do you know type 1 woman is not seducing married men who have children on the top of that? How do you know type 1 woman is aware of a man's marital status? A married man who cheats his wife may be no more faulty than a man who accepts type 2 woman's offer.
Well, then the OP should make a clear description of whom type 1 exactly fucks.


Right, such a friend may betray you. Although a slut may not necessarily put your friendship above her carnal desires either.
You never know what a person is. A virgin could be the worst person as well. We are talking in general.

A person that uses all means available to gain what she wants, even though it is unfair to others, she is cunning, manipulative and doesn't play a fair game, is by default someone to stay away from.

Every person have different views and hierarchies when it comes to that. Apparently .

[Ice]

It's funny because i know many girls like #2

[Longbowman]

The jews have won.

You know it!

http://www.entertainmentwallpaper.com/images/res1920x1080/movie/jewtopia01.jpg

[Hithaeglir]

Behaviour 2 .

[de Burgh II]

Armand conveyed the situation with this perfectly.

If one intends to engage in a relationship like this, then your basically sealing you own fate since both choices are undesirable.

Some may use the argument that number two is more "respectable" in the sense that she has fewer partners as well as using her intelligence to cunningly use it to her own means to an end, but the reality is not so much for the person who was naive about it since their hormones got the best of them or have never been exposed to such a person before so thus their mind would never anticipate it. Regardless of the reasons, if a person has any self respect then you would cut the person completely off. This can go for anyone for the matter. The person is just as bad as number one. If given the choice don't settle for either. Your better off staying single until an actual stable and genuine spouse presents themselves so don't settle for used goods like that. One choice is simply a common prostitute and the other one is a cunning manipulator. Both will lead a parasitic, self destructive lifestyle in the end. So given these options retain your own self respect and move on with your life to something more respectable and worthwhile in the end.

[Armand_Duval]

Second one: because in my mind most women are basically prostitutes in one form or another but once a woman has sex with too many men it is impossible to hypnotize her with only one cock so she is much more likely to cheat on any husband or boyfriend she has. There is nothing worse than a cheater, in my book, when it comes to relationships because I have never cheated on woman I have been in a relationship with and relationships are based on honesty and trust etc.. also, once a cheater always a cheater. The second one is merely acting like a prostitute which is basically what women are anyway. Even if a woman is in a relationship with only one man she is basically a prostitute to him, in most cases, because the man is probably spending his resources on her.

I would agree with you if only you dont use that generalization saying all women are whores, there are plenty of nice good women out there, the trick is to know enough women to learn to know how to differenciate one kind from another, yet there are some very intelligent whores that can make them pass as nice virtuous women to your eyes, the fact is you always have to listen to your instincts and learn to read the signs inside the relation that blink as red lights if you know what I mean, but when someone is in love, that blinds you and you could become a victim of a whore. The antidote is to date as many women as you can and learn to know poeople before choosing the one to spend your life with.

[Raven_]

Well, then the OP should make a clear description of whom type 1 exactly fucks.

You never know what a person is. A virgin could be the worst person as well. We are talking in general.

A person that uses all means available to gain what she wants, even though it is unfair to others, she is cunning, manipulative and doesn't play a fair game, is by default someone to stay away from.

Every person have different views and hierarchies when it comes to that. Apparently .

Why do you limit your perception of these women only to work sphere? Don't you think that someone who lets her itchy pussy dictate her life is necessarily less manipulative and dangerous?

Why is a woman who rises in her career through bed more manipulative and cunning than a woman who makes effort to bed a man who is in a relationship with another woman? I don't believe a woman who beds, say, 50 men likely cares about their (possible) spouses. Why do you value relationships less than work?

[Queen B]

Why do you limit your perception of these women only to work sphere? Don't you think that someone who lets her itchy pussy dictate her life is necessarily less manipulative and dangerous?

Why is a woman who rises in her career through bed more manipulative and cunning than a woman who makes effort to bed a man who is in a relationship with another woman? I don't believe a woman who beds, say, 50 men likely cares about their (possible) spouses. Why do you value relationships less than work?

According to the thread, I got the impression that the first one, the woman who meets random men in clubs/parties and just sleeps with them, is either a younger slut (since there is the mention of by the age of 30) in her early 20s, and she most likely doesn't know them enough to learn about their marital status.

If the comparison is a woman who sleeps around with married men, and the woman in #2, then the result/ answer of course changes.

[Shkembe Chorba]

#1 are usually funnier and enjoyable. I know a student girl with above 100 men and she is cool, educated and decent. She just fucks a lot.

[Foxy]

The second hurts more because within the society this behavour could damage other more qualified people to favourite a whore. The first may just be a lively bored girl.

[Armand_Duval]

Armand conveyed the situation with this perfectly.

If one intends to engage in a relationship like this, then your basically sealing you own fate since both choices are undesirable.

Some may use the argument that number two is more "respectable" in the sense that she has fewer partners as well as using her intelligence to cunningly use it to her own means to an end, but the reality is not so much for the person who was naive about it since their hormones got the best of them or have never been exposed to such a person before so thus their mind would never anticipate it. Regardless of the reasons, if a person has any self respect then you would cut the person completely off. This can go for anyone for the matter. The person is just as bad as number one. If given the choice don't settle for either. Your better off staying single until an actual stable and genuine spouse presents themselves so don't settle for used goods like that. One choice is simply a common prostitute and the other one is a cunning manipulator. Both will lead a parasitic, self destructive lifestyle in the end. So given these options retain your own self respect and move on with your life to something more respectable and worthwhile in the end.

You have summarized it rather good mate, that woman of my story was the worst scenario because she was the sum of both options in the poll.

She used her beauty and charm to hook up you, once inside her nets of sex and seduction she started to get you inlove of her, then when she felt you are ready she started to tell you sad stories of how tragic and unfortunate her life had been in such way she starts to get what she wants, some sort of profit.

In my case it was guilt because I was just doing her with no compromise at all so I started feeling bad about it so ceded into her money making scheme: Every date she starterd getting some sort of benefit: Gifts and some money to sort out some of her "troubles". The demands of money started growing bigger though, and what happes when you say "not this time honey"?: Her attitude changes, she used to think I was completely hooked up and stated a kind of manipulative game where sex and passion become her best weapons, "The carrot in front of donkey's snout" if you know what I mean.

I'm actually not that stupid so I put a healthy end to that relation. The lest of the problems would have been to continue giving her some economical help and keep on having a lot of fun and sex, but that was not really the focal issue, here the main issue was to share her with a small platoon of lovers, some of them straighforward scumbags, this of course would end up getting my well being in jeopardy not only because what it represent to have intercourse with a woman of multiple sexual partners but the kind of people she was getting related to.

This is actually one sympthom of the borderline personality disorder: The patinet falls into potentially dangerous activities such as a rather promisuous life and choosing friends among the worst people.

[N1019]

Armand conveyed the situation with this perfectly.

If one intends to engage in a relationship like this, then your basically sealing you own fate since both choices are undesirable.

Some may use the argument that number two is more "respectable" in the sense that she has fewer partners as well as using her intelligence to cunningly use it to her own means to an end, but the reality is not so much for the person who was naive about it since their hormones got the best of them or have never been exposed to such a person before so thus their mind would never anticipate it. Regardless of the reasons, if a person has any self respect then you would cut the person completely off. This can go for anyone for the matter. The person is just as bad as number one. If given the choice don't settle for either. Your better off staying single until an actual stable and genuine spouse presents themselves so don't settle for used goods like that. One choice is simply a common prostitute and the other one is a cunning manipulator. Both will lead a parasitic, self destructive lifestyle in the end. So given these options retain your own self respect and move on with your life to something more respectable and worthwhile in the end.

Agreed. There is nothing respectable about behaviour 2 (or 1 for that matter), and it's interesting to see the sex of some who prefer 2. I think everyone knows that neither of the two options was ideal... These women can be useful for men as long as their interests coincide with ours, and that is all, and if the man is in full command of his faculties, those interests should seldom stray far from sex and casual social activities.

[Armand_Duval]

#1 are usually funnier and enjoyable. I know a student girl with above 100 men and she is cool, educated and decent. She just fucks a lot.

I don't think you know what you are talking about, believe me there's nothing enjoyable, and that woman has some issues for sure.

Besides thrust me, you dont want a woman like that, maybe for one night stand it could sound cool but not more than that and using the due protection, such lifestyle is potentially very dangerous and leads to moral and physical self destruction.

[Shkembe Chorba]

I don't think you know what you are talking about, believe me there's nothing enjoyable, and that woman has some issues for sure.

Besides thrust me, you dont want a woman like that, maybe for one night stand it could sound cool but not more than that and using the due protection, such lifestyle is potentially very dangerous and leads to moral and physical self destruction.

I said enjoyable as a having time together, not in a romantic relationship and lifetime commitment way. I dont really divide people on future wives and sluts.

[Armand_Duval]

I said enjoyable as a having time together, not in a romantic relationship and lifetime commitment way. I dont really divide people on future wives and sluts.

I've been in those kinds of relations before, as you must have read, and talking about my experience I will say that when I date someone for some time and live several sexual encounters with her I start to feel something else, I start to care and you dont want to be so emotionally involved with someone like that, but that's me, maybe you or other ppl can disassociate emotions and sex better than me.

[Nurzat]

haha great thread idea. voted 2 although i know girls that are totally first option and are fun etc.. maybe i should've voted 1. i wouldn't consider any for marriage.

[Shkembe Chorba]

I've been in those kinds of relations before, as you must have read, and talking about my experience I will say that when I date someone for some time and live several sexual encounters with her I start to feel something else, I start to care and you dont want to be so emotionally involved with someone like that

Ive dated for fair amount of time a rich girl with amphetamine addition. You cant scare me with emotional involvings :laugh:

Generally, you are right, its better for a woman not to slept with a number equal to a artillery baterry, but my point is that #1 are better than #2. Both use you, but #1 use you for penis and #2 use your money and I dont enjoy using my money :eyes

Also, #1 can have honest personality, which is uncommon in #2's case and in many other females that you all consider for more decent.

[armenianbodyhair]

#1 are usually funnier and enjoyable. I know a student girl with above 100 men and she is cool, educated and decent. She just fucks a lot.

Legit over 100? Wow.

[Shkembe Chorba]

Legit over 100? Wow.

Those are the men, the girls were much fewer :yawnee20:

[armenianbodyhair]

Those are the men, the girls were much fewer :yawnee20:

That's a lot of fucking people. I don't think I know anyone even close to that.

[Shkembe Chorba]

That's a lot of fucking people. I don't think I know anyone even close to that.

I think it is not that hard for a girl to achieve it :D

It is a manner of choice in that case.

[Armand_Duval]

I said enjoyable as a having time together, not in a romantic relationship and lifetime commitment way. I dont really divide people on future wives and sluts.

There are plenty of nice women to spend time with, you don't need a whore of 100 lovers or more to have great times, I have been involved in several relations with very good women, we have had really great times together dating and in bed too, I'm not saying all of them were necessarly wifeable but they were good women, so based on that I wouldn't really want a "100 lover hooker" to have fun, a woman with such a lifestyle doesn't make any good to me at all, I dumped the one I met and still she kept looking out for me for some time, fact that I cannot understand, she could get lovers everywhere(and she actually did even when she had a relation with me), she's very good looking I always made me this question: What the hell does she want me for?, I donno, maybe it was just her pride, and didn't like I dumped her.

[Catkin]

The first girl seems like an airhead who doesn't give much thought to things. She may just like the attention of men, or maybe she does it to distract herself and cover deeper issues she hasn't dealt with. Perhaps she takes delight in showing she's young and free to do as she likes.

The second girl seems far more clued up, manipulative, and knows what she's doing. You could argue the first girl is only harming herself, whereas the second is willing to hurt others (like the man she got fired) in order to get what she wants. So maybe the second is the least tolerable, I don't think you could trust her not to betray you too if you got in her way.

Looking at the voting, I too wonder if some people didn't realise the poll question was the opposite of the thread question.

[Darth Revan]

Looking at the voting, I too wonder if some people didn't realise the poll question was the opposite of the thread question.

Yes, it was brought in page 2 or so.
My apologies really.

I really slipped badly when writing down the poll question.

[Harley]

I've known Number 1s, but not Number 2s.

I'd probably be afraid of Number 2 unless she was already my friend or something. Hopefully, she loves me as a person.

[Catkin]

Yes, it was brought in page 2 or so.
My apologies really.

I really slipped badly when writing down the poll question.

No need to apologise, it really doesn't matter, I was just curious about a few votes :)

[Shkembe Chorba]

Long live #1.

[Trun]

Number 1s avoid me. I try to avoid number 2s.

[Odin]

Both.

[Harley]

I've known Number 1s, but not Number 2s.

I'd probably be afraid of Number 2 unless she was already my friend or something. Hopefully, she loves me as a person.
Still this.

[sean]

Behaviour 1.

Women who don't get pregnant until 30s or later are usually the worst mothers. They spend the whole time baiting men and not producing until they get desperate or need support. They use men as tools for money and stabilty, once they are locked in, immediately use sex as some sort of bargaining chip.