Turkic warrior mocks Iranians for having inferior complexity

[Pahli]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61gAWtr5eF8

TURKIC WARRIOR UNHAPPY WITH IRANIANS, IRANIANS ARE BROWN SUBHUMANS FROM INDIA, SMELLY CURRY IRANIANS, IRANIANS MAKE CATCHY TUNES

[Drakoblare]

Death of Ali best day of my life.

[Pahli]

Death of Ali best day of my life.

Lets grab the chains!

[zarzian]

Iranians: the protectors of WOGs, worldwide

[Pahli]

Iranians: the protectors of WOGs, worldwide

IRANIANS ARE THE DISTANT ANCESTORS OF ALL TURKIC PEOPLE <333

[zarzian]

IRANIANS ARE THE DISTANT ANCESTORS OF ALL TURKIC PEOPLE <333

Your shouting to deaf ears my man.

[Pahli]

Your shouting to deaf ears my man.

Its funny how they mock us, because their appearance is Iranian / Kurdish + some mongolid for some people, as if that would look better

[zarzian]

Its funny how they mock us, because their appearance is Iranian / Kurdish + some mongolid for some people, as if that would look better

Yes, Iranians seem to really bring out their inferiority complex, how many countless idiots on youtube take time to make these types of videos. Meanwhile Iranians don't give a fuck, we know the reality.

[Pahli]

Yes, Iranians seem to really bring out their inferiority complex, how many countless idiots on youtube take time to make these types of videos. Meanwhile Iranians don't give a fuck, we know the reality.

They're just butthurt lmao xD

[StonyArabia]

Death of Ali best day of my life.

Do they know history Ali was an Arab from the Hejaz.

[Mortimer]

IRANIANS ARE BROWN SUBHUMANS FROM INDIA, SMELLY CURRY IRANIANS, IRANIANS MAKE CATCHY TUNES

why are brown people from india subhumans? turkish nationalists compared to iranian nationalists at least dont think they are white so i respect turks more

[zarzian]

why are brown people from india subhumans? turkish nationalists compared to iranian nationalists at least dont think they are white so i respect turks more

You missed the sarcasm bro.

[StonyArabia]

It's funny because Persianate culture was the most dominant among the Turks, even the Ottomans were a Persianate. They had a minor Arab elements. Persian was also a privileged language at the time.

[gültekin]

truly, those retard "Ironics" are the least ones who can talk about inferiority complex of other nations , when considering that they suffer from inferiority complex over centuries.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Timur_defeats_the_sultan_of_Delhi.jpg/220px-Timur_defeats_the_sultan_of_Delhi.jpg
just to remind:
here
http://www.mideastweb.org/Middle-East-Encyclopedia/Ghaznavid_empire_map.jpg
and here
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G5oBnFgWRLo/USYELV4qqUI/AAAAAAAAmzM/UTo45DtUyXw/s1600/ads%C4%B1z.PNG
and againe
http://img.webme.com/pic/t/turktarihsitesi/harzemsahlarharita.gif
lol
http://archive.artsmia.org/art-of-asia/history/images/maps/mongol-empire-large.gif
a good one
http://matrix.msu.edu/hst/guide/history140r/unit10/mod/imgs/tamerlane-empire.jpg
again
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/The_maximum_extent_of_the_Safavid_Empire_under_Sha h_Abbas_I.png
finaly Qajars
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Map_Iran_1900-en.png
...
i like the Mongol episode , The total population of Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 , some says
"Mongol violence and depredations killed up to three-fourths of the population of the Iranian Plateau, possibly 10 to 15 million people lol.
now this research of Iran makes sense, which result shows also that Iranians aren't Aryans:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7zqx0YUVBo
on over 2600 Iranian DNA-sequences (y-dna & mt-dna) shows something else. Dr. Bonab Ashrafian says:
"... We have done studies on 26 different Iranian groups. Although we speak an Indo-European language we are not genetically very close to Indo-European peoples. The Aryan genetic markers that exist in central Asia and the Caucasus are found very few in the Iranian Plateau. This shows that if there is any Aryan genetic markers in the Iranian DNA, it probably came from the Aryan tribes that entered Iran."
of course, remember "WHO" has entered Iran? " Turks+Mongols are indeed the fathers of neo-Iranians. would be naive to think otherwise.

FTDNA: Iranian Y-DNA Project result :
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php/4935-FTDNA-Iranian-Y-DNA-Project/page3
E1b1b1-M35 - 2.9% (1/35)
E1b1b1c1-M34 - 2.9% (1/35)
F3-P96 - 2.9% (1/35)
G*-M201 - 14.3% (5/35)
G1*-M342 - 5.7% (2/35)
G1a-P20 - 2.9% (1/35)
G2a-P15 - 2.9% (1/35)
G2a3b1-P303 - 2.9% (1/35)
H-M69 - 2.9% (1/35)
J1-M267 - 11.4% (4/35)
J1c3d-L147 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2-M172 - 8.6% (3/35)
J2a4a-M47 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2a4b-M67 - 5.7% (2/35)
J2a4d-M319 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2a4h2-M158 - 2.9% (1/35)
Q*-M242 - 2.9% (1/35)
R1a1-M17 - 2.9% (1/35)
R1b1b2a-L23 - 2.9% (1/35)
R2*-M479 - 2.9% (1/35)
R2a-M124 - 8.6% (3/35)
T1-M320 - 2.9% (1/35)

"Dr. Ashrafian has also studied on the Ancient Iranian bones. The study on the ancient bones found in Jiroft and Masjid Kabood shows they are the ancestors of todays Iranians. If these studies show Iranians are not Aryans, then where did they come from? Has the Arabian invasion of Iran (1400 years ago) effected the Iranian DNA?

Dr. Ashrafian continues as follows:
"Our research shows that all Iranian tribes are genetically related to the people who lived in south-west of Iran since 10.000 years. The Arabian invasion has effected south-west of Iran and Bushehr, but in very very few amounts.""

[Kamal900]

truly, those retard "Ironics" are the least ones who can talk about inferiority complex of other nations , when considering that they suffer from inferiority complex over centuries.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Timur_defeats_the_sultan_of_Delhi.jpg/220px-Timur_defeats_the_sultan_of_Delhi.jpg
just to remind:
here
http://www.mideastweb.org/Middle-East-Encyclopedia/Ghaznavid_empire_map.jpg
and here
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G5oBnFgWRLo/USYELV4qqUI/AAAAAAAAmzM/UTo45DtUyXw/s1600/ads%C4%B1z.PNG
and againe
http://img.webme.com/pic/t/turktarihsitesi/harzemsahlarharita.gif
lol
http://archive.artsmia.org/art-of-asia/history/images/maps/mongol-empire-large.gif
a good one
http://matrix.msu.edu/hst/guide/history140r/unit10/mod/imgs/tamerlane-empire.jpg
again
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/The_maximum_extent_of_the_Safavid_Empire_under_Sha h_Abbas_I.png
finaly Qajars
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Map_Iran_1900-en.png
...
i like the Mongol episode , The total population of Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 , some says lol.
now this research of Iran makes sense, which result shows also that Iranians aren't Aryans:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7zqx0YUVBo
on over 2600 Iranian DNA-sequences (y-dna & mt-dna) shows something else. Dr. Bonab Ashrafian says:
"... We have done studies on 26 different Iranian groups. Although we speak an Indo-European language we are not genetically very close to Indo-European peoples. The Aryan genetic markers that exist in central Asia and the Caucasus are found very few in the Iranian Plateau. This shows that if there is any Aryan genetic markers in the Iranian DNA, it probably came from the Aryan tribes that entered Iran."
of course, remember "WHO" has entered Iran? " Turks+Mongols are indeed the fathers of neo-Iranians. would be naive to think otherwise.

FTDNA: Iranian Y-DNA Project result :
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php/4935-FTDNA-Iranian-Y-DNA-Project/page3
E1b1b1-M35 - 2.9% (1/35)
E1b1b1c1-M34 - 2.9% (1/35)
F3-P96 - 2.9% (1/35)
G*-M201 - 14.3% (5/35)
G1*-M342 - 5.7% (2/35)
G1a-P20 - 2.9% (1/35)
G2a-P15 - 2.9% (1/35)
G2a3b1-P303 - 2.9% (1/35)
H-M69 - 2.9% (1/35)
J1-M267 - 11.4% (4/35)
J1c3d-L147 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2-M172 - 8.6% (3/35)
J2a4a-M47 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2a4b-M67 - 5.7% (2/35)
J2a4d-M319 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2a4h2-M158 - 2.9% (1/35)
Q*-M242 - 2.9% (1/35)
R1a1-M17 - 2.9% (1/35)
R1b1b2a-L23 - 2.9% (1/35)
R2*-M479 - 2.9% (1/35)
R2a-M124 - 8.6% (3/35)
T1-M320 - 2.9% (1/35)

"Dr. Ashrafian has also studied on the Ancient Iranian bones. The study on the ancient bones found in Jiroft and Masjid Kabood shows they are the ancestors of todays Iranians. If these studies show Iranians are not Aryans, then where did they come from? Has the Arabian invasion of Iran (1400 years ago) effected the Iranian DNA?

Dr. Ashrafian continues as follows:
"Our research shows that all Iranian tribes are genetically related to the people who lived in south-west of Iran since 10.000 years. The Arabian invasion has effected south-west of Iran and Bushehr, but in very very few amounts.""

And Turkish DNA is predominately Anatolian with small Turkic admixture, and the Azeris are nothing but Turkified Persians.

[Sideritis]

truly, those retard "Ironics" are the least ones who can talk about inferiority complex of other nations , when considering that they suffer from inferiority complex over centuries.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Timur_defeats_the_sultan_of_Delhi.jpg/220px-Timur_defeats_the_sultan_of_Delhi.jpg
just to remind:
here
http://www.mideastweb.org/Middle-East-Encyclopedia/Ghaznavid_empire_map.jpg
and here
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G5oBnFgWRLo/USYELV4qqUI/AAAAAAAAmzM/UTo45DtUyXw/s1600/ads%C4%B1z.PNG
and againe
http://img.webme.com/pic/t/turktarihsitesi/harzemsahlarharita.gif
lol
http://archive.artsmia.org/art-of-asia/history/images/maps/mongol-empire-large.gif
a good one
http://matrix.msu.edu/hst/guide/history140r/unit10/mod/imgs/tamerlane-empire.jpg
again
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/The_maximum_extent_of_the_Safavid_Empire_under_Sha h_Abbas_I.png
finaly Qajars
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Map_Iran_1900-en.png
...
i like the Mongol episode , The total population of Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 , some says lol.
now this research of Iran makes sense, which result shows also that Iranians aren't Aryans:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7zqx0YUVBo
on over 2600 Iranian DNA-sequences (y-dna & mt-dna) shows something else. Dr. Bonab Ashrafian says:
"... We have done studies on 26 different Iranian groups. Although we speak an Indo-European language we are not genetically very close to Indo-European peoples. The Aryan genetic markers that exist in central Asia and the Caucasus are found very few in the Iranian Plateau. This shows that if there is any Aryan genetic markers in the Iranian DNA, it probably came from the Aryan tribes that entered Iran."
of course, remember "WHO" has entered Iran? " Turks+Mongols are indeed the fathers of neo-Iranians. would be naive to think otherwise.

FTDNA: Iranian Y-DNA Project result :
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php/4935-FTDNA-Iranian-Y-DNA-Project/page3
E1b1b1-M35 - 2.9% (1/35)
E1b1b1c1-M34 - 2.9% (1/35)
F3-P96 - 2.9% (1/35)
G*-M201 - 14.3% (5/35)
G1*-M342 - 5.7% (2/35)
G1a-P20 - 2.9% (1/35)
G2a-P15 - 2.9% (1/35)
G2a3b1-P303 - 2.9% (1/35)
H-M69 - 2.9% (1/35)
J1-M267 - 11.4% (4/35)
J1c3d-L147 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2-M172 - 8.6% (3/35)
J2a4a-M47 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2a4b-M67 - 5.7% (2/35)
J2a4d-M319 - 2.9% (1/35)
J2a4h2-M158 - 2.9% (1/35)
Q*-M242 - 2.9% (1/35)
R1a1-M17 - 2.9% (1/35)
R1b1b2a-L23 - 2.9% (1/35)
R2*-M479 - 2.9% (1/35)
R2a-M124 - 8.6% (3/35)
T1-M320 - 2.9% (1/35)

"Dr. Ashrafian has also studied on the Ancient Iranian bones. The study on the ancient bones found in Jiroft and Masjid Kabood shows they are the ancestors of todays Iranians. If these studies show Iranians are not Aryans, then where did they come from? Has the Arabian invasion of Iran (1400 years ago) effected the Iranian DNA?

Dr. Ashrafian continues as follows:
"Our research shows that all Iranian tribes are genetically related to the people who lived in south-west of Iran since 10.000 years. The Arabian invasion has effected south-west of Iran and Bushehr, but in very very few amounts.""

Wait, Mongols are Aryan now?

[Pahli]

Wait, Mongols are Aryan now?

It gets better every day with these new theories. So far: Scythians are Turkic, Azeris are Turkic, Turkic people are pure Aryan, Mongols are pure Aryan ... We could go on xD

[gültekin]

Wait, Mongols are Aryan now?
never heard about "Sarcasm" ? this means "This shows that if there is any Aryan genetic markers in the Iranian DNA" thing is not aryan, "something" else xD

[lameduck]

......

[Kastrioti1443]

Ghasanavids belonged to the ''iranic'' family though and everything they did was for the interests of the natives mostly, not for ''turkic'' tribes.

On the other hand the mongol empire and timur empire are greatly exagerated there ( plus that the ottoman empire seems to big there, too much land in balkans and little asia for the year 1405), just like it happens with every wikipedia map, you have increased timur empire with 1/3 more lands ( an empire which existed for only 10 years, if we can call it an empire) and you have added some ''few'' hundred thousands square km to the mongol one.

On the other hand mongols were not ''turkic'' and didn't consider themselves turkic, they were akin to chinese.

Can you please show me the date of the 2nd map you posted here?

[gültekin]

Ghasanavids belonged to the ''iranic'' family though and everything they did was for the interests of the natives mostly, not for ''turkic'' tribes.

On the other hand the mongol empire and timur empire are greatly exagerated there ( plus that the ottoman empire seems to big there, too much land in balkans and little asia for the year 1405), just like it happens with every wikipedia map, you have increased timur empire with 1/3 more lands ( an empire which existed for only 10 years, if we can call it an empire) and you have added some ''few'' hundred thousands square km to the mongol one.

On the other hand mongols were not ''turkic'' and didn't consider themselves turkic, they were akin to chinese.

Can you please show me the date of the 2nd map you posted here?
Ghasanavids was Turkic and Ghasanavids means: from Gazni. (Turkish Gazneliler)
the first Emir of Ghasanavids was Alp Tigin ,and Sebük Tigin was the founder of the Ghaznavid dynast (Tigin or Tegin/Tekin means Prince in Turkish)

Alptigin, was the first Turkic emir of Ghazna between 962 to 963 after replacing the Lawiks, a native ruling dynasty.[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alp_Tigin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabuktigin
...
Mongol army had a lot of Turkic warriors

[TheGoldenSon]

I don't get it what's going on?

[Pahli]

Ghasanavids was Turkic and Ghasanavids means: from Gazni. (Turkish Gazneliler)
the first Emir of Ghasanavids was Alp Tigin ,and Sebük Tigin was the founder of the Ghaznavid dynast (Tigin or Tegin/Tekin means Prince in Turkish)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alp_Tigin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabuktigin
...
Mongol army had a lot of Turkic warriors

Sassanids had a lot of Turkic warriors too during the Islamic invasions, Ghasnavid was a Persianized turkic empire, Persians and Turks ruled it together.

[gültekin]

Sassanids had a lot of Turkic warriors too during the Islamic invasions, Ghasnavid was a Persianized turkic empire, Persians and Turks ruled it together.
if you think that this stuff will heal your hurt butts and makes better feeling , no problem for me xD

[Pahli]

if you think that this stuff will heal your hurt butts and makes better feeling , no problem for me xD

Just facts you knew nothing about :)

[gültekin]

Just facts you knew nothing about :)
then have fun with such masturbations xD :thumb001:
http://s3.postimg.org/ese41q8eb/index.jpg

[zarzian]

Im a retarded 15 year old son of a Mongol sex slave

Making up your own facts again son of a donkeybred whore? You again including Mongols empires like timur into Turkish credit? Are you fuckin kiddin me, Mongols hated the coward turks more then anyone else, when they were hunting turks, your coward ancestors fled all the way to Eastern Europe, you want to know why? Because turks are born cowards, with no allegiance and no land, always moving from 1 spot to another because they lack pride and civilization. Persians we have our land since the dawn of time and we never run or give up, if someone defeats us, then we die defending, unlike the cowardly Turk which had no homeland and who would give up his pastor and never return when facing a threat.
Ghaznavids were Samanid slaves who were totally persianate with Persians as the core of the empire, Safavids were Persian, and Ghajar were Persian you imbecil, Turkish was just a ceremonial language within these Empires the same way Arabic was, that's all, genetics were all Iranid.
When Persians were inventing algebra and medicine you Turkish donkeys were still shooting bows and arrows and running around in the steppe , without land and pride, resorting to savagery and banditry while the Persians, Arabs and Europeans were writing books. You dare compare yourself with Iranians? No Turk even existed before 1700 years ago, while Persians had made the biggest population ratio empire in the worlds history a 1000 years before a Turk even set foot on earth, lol.
Like I said before, your lucky shahpur didn't exterminate your gokturk forefathers when he had the chance. But we won't make the same mistake again in the future.

[Kastrioti1443]

Ghasanavids was Turkic and Ghasanavids means: from Gazni. (Turkish Gazneliler)
the first Emir of Ghasanavids was Alp Tigin ,and Sebük Tigin was the founder of the Ghaznavid dynast (Tigin or Tegin/Tekin means Prince in Turkish)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alp_Tigin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabuktigin
...
Mongol army had a lot of Turkic warriors

I wouldn't have a problem with the standards you apply mate, not at all. If we apply your standards, basically taking into account the origin of the leaders and their blood connections than half of the Balkans would be Albanian, many leaders of balkan nations descend from Albanians and half of the Balkans was ruled by Albanians once upon a time. Also God knows how many of the Ottoman administration, generals and mercenaries descend from Albanians...

What matters though in history and in real life is to who and to what those people served to and what was the final result. In the end those Albanians mercenaries in the majority of the cases served to the ottoman empire and not to the albanian nation, those albanian governors, generals, warriors, grand vezirs served to the ottomans and not to albanians.

The same with Ghasanavids, they might have been in their dynasty from ''turkic'' origin, but they served to iranic interests and to the native people.

You didn't answer my question, to what date is the 2nd map?

[Pahli]

Making up your own facts again son of a donkeybred whore? You again including Mongols empires like timur into Turkish credit? Are you fuckin kiddin me, Mongols hated the coward turks more then anyone else, when they were hunting turks, your coward ancestors fled all the way to Eastern Europe, you want to know why? Because turks are born cowards, with no allegiance and no land, always moving from 1 spot to another because they lack pride and civilization. Persians we have our land since the dawn of time and we never run or give up, if someone defeats us, then we die defending, unlike the cowardly Turk which had no homeland and who would give up his pastor and never return when facing a threat.
Ghaznavids were Samanid slaves who were totally persianate with Persians as the core of the empire, Safavids were Persian, and Ghajar were Persian you imbecil, Turkish was just a ceremonial language within these Empires the same way Arabic was, that's all, genetics were all Iranid.
When Persians were inventing algebra and medicine you Turkish donkeys were still shooting bows and arrows and running around in the steppe , without land and pride, resorting to savagery and banditry while the Persians, Arabs and Europeans were writing books. You dare compare yourself with Iranians? No Turk even existed before 1700 years ago, while Persians had made the biggest population ratio empire in the worlds history a 1000 years before a Turk even set foot on earth, lol.
Like I said before, your lucky shahpur didn't exterminate your gokturk forefathers when he had the chance. But we won't make the same mistake again in the future.

As if he is going understand that. He is just going to answer back with insults and flames :)

[Kamal900]

Making up your own facts again son of a donkeybred whore? You again including Mongols empires like timur into Turkish credit? Are you fuckin kiddin me, Mongols hated the coward turks more then anyone else, when they were hunting turks, your coward ancestors fled all the way to Eastern Europe, you want to know why? Because turks are born cowards, with no allegiance and no land, always moving from 1 spot to another because they lack pride and civilization. Persians we have our land since the dawn of time and we never run or give up, if someone defeats us, then we die defending, unlike the cowardly Turk which had no homeland and who would give up his pastor and never return when facing a threat.
Ghaznavids were Samanid slaves who were totally persianate with Persians as the core of the empire, Safavids were Persian, and Ghajar were Persian you imbecil, Turkish was just a ceremonial language within these Empires the same way Arabic was, that's all, genetics were all Iranid.
When Persians were inventing algebra and medicine you Turkish donkeys were still shooting bows and arrows and running around in the steppe , without land and pride, resorting to savagery and banditry while the Persians, Arabs and Europeans were writing books. You dare compare yourself with Iranians? No Turk even existed before 1700 years ago, while Persians had made the biggest population ratio empire in the worlds history a 1000 years before a Turk even set foot on earth, lol.
Like I said before, your lucky shahpur didn't exterminate your gokturk forefathers when he had the chance. But we won't make the same mistake again in the future.

You should see on what Genghis Khan and Timur had done to Iraq and eastern Syria. They destroyed the house of wisdom which housed countless precious books and etc, exterminated most of the native Mesopotamian, and destroyed most of the country in the most brutal fashion. Don't blame on the entire Turkic peoples of the world. The Kazakhs, Turkmen, Gagauz, Tatars and etc are good people, and you have mostly beef with the Anatolian Turks and their Azeri friends in Azerbaijan.

[Kamal900]

As if he is going understand that. He is just going to answer back with insults and flames :)

Dont forget the thumbs down.

[Pahli]

You should see on what Genghis Khan and Timur had done to Iraq and eastern Syria. They destroyed the house of wisdom which housed countless precious books and etc, exterminated most of the native Mesopotamian, and destroyed most of the country in the most brutal fashion. Don't blame on the entire Turkic peoples of the world. The Kazakhs, Turkmen, Gagauz, Tatars and etc are good people, and you have mostly beef with the Anatolian Turks and their Azeri friends in Azerbaijan.

Turkic people, Iranians and Arabs suffered, yet Gültekin found it funny how 3/4 of the Iranian population were slaughtered ... I think I read that almost half of the Chinese population were killed too.

[Nurzat]

I say you Persians and Turks be friends. a Turkish-Iranian alliance in the region would be number one power

[Pahli]

I say you Persians and Turks be friends. a Turkish-Iranian alliance in the region would be number one power

No thanks, Turks hate Iranians. Why should we ally with them? Should rather be Kurdish-Iranian alliance, once the Islamic government of Iran is gone.

[Kamal900]

Turkic people, Iranians and Arabs suffered, yet Gültekin found it funny how 3/4 of the Iranian population were slaughtered ... I think I read that almost half of the Chinese population were killed too.

Not exactly half of the population were wiped out, but sadly around 10 to 15 million innocent chinese people were killed, and they wiped out one of the most culturally and scientifically enlightened people in the world, the Tangut people.
http://www.china-tour.cn/images/China_Pictures/Ningxia-Pictures/Imperial-Tombs-of-Western-X.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_rioOt_Q4_1w/SgOUG_0JgXI/AAAAAAAAAFM/AdYsW5X6EEg/s400/Xixia_tombs1.jpg
http://images2.sina.com/english/p/1/2008/0509/U101P200T1D157772F12DT20080509024733.jpg

[Brian_R]

I normalized your Thumbs up/down. Thanks to me! :love: