View Full Version : How to interpret EuroGenes results?
LatinAmazon
04-05-2015, 03:49 AM
I have no idea how to interpret this... Using K13 Oracle these are my reults:
Amerindian 55.94
2 North_Atlantic 13.11
3 West_Med 11.69
4 Sub-Saharan 7.66
5 East_Med 5.82
6 Baltic 2.24
7 Red_Sea 1.32
8 Northeast_African0.76
9 Siberian 0.71
10 Oceanian 0.47
11 West_Asian 0.28
Btw. How accurate is this? Thanks!
RighNick
04-05-2015, 04:00 AM
Eurogenes, especially K13 and K15 is generally pretty good. What redults does the oracle give you. Based on these numbers, it seems you're around 56% Amerindian, 36% European and 8% African. You could be slightly more Anerindian or SSA though, if you include the Siberian and Northeast African. If you don't mind my asking, where are you from? Ecuador? Peru?
LatinAmazon
04-05-2015, 04:06 AM
Eurogenes, especially K13 and K15 is generally pretty good. What redults does the oracle give you. Based on these numbers, it seems you're around 56% Amerindian, 36% European and 8% African. You could be slightly more Anerindian or SSA though, if you include the Siberian and Northeast African. If you don't mind my asking, where are you from? Ecuador? Peru?
My parents are from Peru, but Dad is of European decent. Some of these GEDmatch results give me different results. some say more Indian, and less SSA, some say more SSA. My haplogorups are D1 (Mom's side) Dad's side is a group of R1B that I'm too lazy to type out. I'm so confused by GEDmatch...
RighNick
04-05-2015, 04:17 AM
Have you tried Eurigenes K15 and MDLP k23? Those are also pretty good, and I think you can get a pretty good idea of your abcestry by combining your results from those three.
LatinAmazon
04-05-2015, 04:24 AM
Have you tried Eurigenes K15 and MDLP k23? Those are also pretty good, and I think you can get a pretty good idea of your abcestry by combining your results from those three.
This is under Eurogenes V2 K15. Now what is all the other jiberish at the bottom? Single population sharing etc.
1 Amerindian 55.81
2 Atlantic 11.21
3 Sub-Saharan 7.7
4 West_Med 7.03
5 East_Med 6.18
6 North_Sea 6.14
7 Baltic 1.71
8 Red_Sea 1.56
9 Eastern_Euro 1.04
10 Northeast_African 0.6
11 Siberian 0.57
12 Oceanian 0.44
13 West_Asian 0.01
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 North_Amerindian 32.1
2 Mayan 38.81
3 Pima 43.08
4 Anzick-1 45.65
5 West_Greenlander 49.83
6 East_Greenlander 52.4
7 Karitiana 55.28
8 MA-1 59.16
9 Romanian 70.9
10 Bulgarian 70.95
11 Greek_Thessaly 71.1
12 Serbian 71.3
13 Tuscan 71.4
14 Spanish_Extremadura 71.41
15 Ashkenazi 71.42
16 Spanish_Murcia 71.43
17 Portuguese 71.46
18 North_Italian 71.48
19 Moldavian 71.61
20 Spanish_Galicia 71.68
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 65.2% Mayan + 34.8% Spanish_Extremadura @ 8.51
2 65.2% Mayan + 34.8% Spanish_Murcia @ 8.52
3 65.4% Mayan + 34.6% Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon @ 8.65
4 65.5% Mayan + 34.5% Spanish_Valencia @ 8.71
5 65.2% Mayan + 34.8% Portuguese @ 8.73
6 65.5% Mayan + 34.5% Spanish_Andalucia @ 8.74
7 65.5% Mayan + 34.5% Spanish_Cataluna @ 8.86
8 65.6% Mayan + 34.4% Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha @ 8.93
9 65.3% Mayan + 34.7% Spanish_Galicia @ 9
10 65.3% Mayan + 34.7% North_Italian @ 9.04
11 65.8% Mayan + 34.2% Spanish_Aragon @ 9.13
12 65.6% Mayan + 34.4% Spanish_Cantabria @ 9.2
13 65.3% Mayan + 34.7% Tuscan @ 9.43
14 56.5% Karitiana + 43.5% Spanish_Extremadura @ 9.53
15 65.7% Mayan + 34.3% Southwest_French @ 9.55
16 56.5% Karitiana + 43.5% Spanish_Murcia @ 9.61
17 61.3% Anzick-1 + 38.7% Spanish_Extremadura @ 9.64
18 62.8% Pima + 37.2% Spanish_Extremadura @ 9.67
19 61.3% Anzick-1 + 38.7% Spanish_Murcia @ 9.7
20 56.5% Karitiana + 43.5% Portuguese @ 9.72
RighNick
04-05-2015, 04:42 AM
This is under Eurogenes V2 K15. Now what is all the other jiberish at the bottom? Single population sharing etc.
1 Amerindian 55.81
2 Atlantic 11.21
3 Sub-Saharan 7.7
4 West_Med 7.03
5 East_Med 6.18
6 North_Sea 6.14
7 Baltic 1.71
8 Red_Sea 1.56
9 Eastern_Euro 1.04
10 Northeast_African 0.6
11 Siberian 0.57
12 Oceanian 0.44
13 West_Asian 0.01
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 North_Amerindian 32.1
2 Mayan 38.81
3 Pima 43.08
4 Anzick-1 45.65
5 West_Greenlander 49.83
6 East_Greenlander 52.4
7 Karitiana 55.28
8 MA-1 59.16
9 Romanian 70.9
10 Bulgarian 70.95
11 Greek_Thessaly 71.1
12 Serbian 71.3
13 Tuscan 71.4
14 Spanish_Extremadura 71.41
15 Ashkenazi 71.42
16 Spanish_Murcia 71.43
17 Portuguese 71.46
18 North_Italian 71.48
19 Moldavian 71.61
20 Spanish_Galicia 71.68
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 65.2% Mayan + 34.8% Spanish_Extremadura @ 8.51
2 65.2% Mayan + 34.8% Spanish_Murcia @ 8.52
3 65.4% Mayan + 34.6% Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon @ 8.65
4 65.5% Mayan + 34.5% Spanish_Valencia @ 8.71
5 65.2% Mayan + 34.8% Portuguese @ 8.73
6 65.5% Mayan + 34.5% Spanish_Andalucia @ 8.74
7 65.5% Mayan + 34.5% Spanish_Cataluna @ 8.86
8 65.6% Mayan + 34.4% Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha @ 8.93
9 65.3% Mayan + 34.7% Spanish_Galicia @ 9
10 65.3% Mayan + 34.7% North_Italian @ 9.04
11 65.8% Mayan + 34.2% Spanish_Aragon @ 9.13
12 65.6% Mayan + 34.4% Spanish_Cantabria @ 9.2
13 65.3% Mayan + 34.7% Tuscan @ 9.43
14 56.5% Karitiana + 43.5% Spanish_Extremadura @ 9.53
15 65.7% Mayan + 34.3% Southwest_French @ 9.55
16 56.5% Karitiana + 43.5% Spanish_Murcia @ 9.61
17 61.3% Anzick-1 + 38.7% Spanish_Extremadura @ 9.64
18 62.8% Pima + 37.2% Spanish_Extremadura @ 9.67
19 61.3% Anzick-1 + 38.7% Spanish_Murcia @ 9.7
20 56.5% Karitiana + 43.5% Portuguese @ 9.72
Interesting, thanks for sharing! The numbers at the bottom show how "close" your results are to the average for the listed population. It doesn't mean you necessarily have ancestry from that group, just that they have similar ancestral components to you. Generally distances of below 10, and especially five indicate that you are very close to the population in question.
The first part (single population sharing) shows you how close you are the the average numbers for a single population. In your case, the closest single population to you is North Amerindians, but your distance (32) means that it's not really a good match.
The second part (mixed mode) assumes you are a mix of two populations and shows you which mixes would be most similar to you genetically. In you case, all of these matches are fairly good (a distance of under 10). All of these Native and Iberian mixes are consistent with someone of Latin American ancestry. According to their formula, you're closest match would be a mix of Mayan and Extremeduran. Again, that doesn't mean that you actually have those ancestries, just that that specific mix would produce the closest match to you.
You'll note that almost all of the mixed numbers put you at around 65% Native. Looking at the components, though, we can see that you are actually less native than that. However, the formula assumes you are a mix of two populations while you are, in fact a combination of three (Native, European, and African). Most of your 8% or so African has been put in with Native groups and this is the reason why your distance (8) isn't an exact match. If you were 65% Native and 35% Iberian (with 0% African) your distance would be almost 0.
LatinAmazon
04-05-2015, 05:08 AM
Interesting, thanks for sharing! The numbers at the bottom show how "close" your results are to the average for the listed population. It doesn't mean you necessarily have ancestry from that group, just that they have similar ancestral components to you. Generally distances of below 10, and especially five indicate that you are very close to the population in question.
The first part (single population sharing) shows you how close you are the the average numbers for a single population. In your case, the closest single population to you is North Amerindians, but your distance (32) means that it's not really a good match.
The second part (mixed mode) assumes you are a mix of two populations and shows you which mixes would be most similar to you genetically. In you case, all of these matches are fairly good (a distance of under 10). All of these Native and Iberian mixes are consistent with someone of Latin American ancestry. According to their formula, you're closest match would be a mix of Mayan and Extremeduran. Again, that doesn't mean that you actually have those ancestries, just that that specific mix would produce the closest match to you.
You'll note that almost all of the mixed numbers put you at around 65% Native. Looking at the components, though, we can see that you are actually less native than that. However, the formula assumes you are a mix of two populations while you are, in fact a combination of three (Native, European, and African). Most of your 8% or so African has been put in with Native groups and this is the reason why your distance (8) isn't an exact match. If you were 65% Native and 35% Iberian (with 0% African) your distance would be almost 0.
Ok, thanks for giving me a better insight. So based on the information so far, I can be estimated to be about 57% Native, 35% European and about 8% African?
RighNick
04-05-2015, 05:17 AM
Ok, thanks for giving me a better insight. So based on the information so far, I can be estimated to be about 57% Native, 35% European and about 8% African?
I would say so, yes. What does MDLP K23 say? None of these tools is perfect, but if we look at results from some of the better ones (Eurogenes K13 + K15, MDLP K23), we can get a pretty clear picture.
LatinAmazon
04-05-2015, 05:23 AM
I would say so, yes. What does MDLP K23 say? None of these tools is perfect, but if we look at results from some of the better ones (Eurogenes K13 + K15, MDLP K23), we can get a pretty clear picture.Population
Amerindian 58.28%
Ancestral_Altaic -
South_Central_Asian 0.92%
Arctic 0.60%
South_Indian -
Australoid -
Austronesian 0.17%
Caucasian 9.44%
Archaic_Human -
East_African 0.31%
East_Siberian -
European_Early_Farmers 13.13%
Khoisan -
Melano_Polynesian -
Archaic_African 1.96%
Near_East -
North_African 2.40%
Paleo_Siberian -
African_Pygmy -
South_East_Asian -
Subsaharian 5.83%
Tungus-Altaic 0.39%
European_Hunters_Gatherers. 6.51
LatinAmazon
04-05-2015, 06:02 AM
I would say so, yes. What does MDLP K23 say? None of these tools is perfect, but if we look at results from some of the better ones (Eurogenes K13 + K15, MDLP K23), we can get a pretty clear picture.
So am I still a Mestizo?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.