View Full Version : Interracial Marriage: Pros and Cons
DarknessInside
04-29-2015, 07:21 AM
Support side
It's good for genetic diversity, integration and assimilation.
Oppose side
It causes genetic problems, biracial/multiracial kids have identity crisis, destroys cultures, miscegenation practiced in human history and it always fail, other races reject biracial/multiracial people.
My opinion
I think interracial (or inter-ethnic) marriage is a 50-50 gamble. 50% success chance, 50% failure chance. It depends on many factors. A successful example is us (Jews). Some Jews mix and marry other races (non-Jew). But Jews do these mixes with caution. We don't race mixing randomly. And after marriage, those non-Jews either will become assimilated or they are aware to not harm our ethnic values. They must contribute to our ethnicity. So this is the reason why we manage race mixing and half-Jew half-X cases successfully. Not all of those marriage are perfect or 100% successful, but not troublesome or problematic too.
Prisoner Of Ice
04-29-2015, 07:48 AM
When you make genetic crosses you get a good result with best of both about 1 in 1000 times. And that's only if both of the crossees have something of benefit to the other in the first place.
rhiannon
04-29-2015, 08:17 AM
A person with recessive genes who marries a person with dominant genes is going to have children that don't look like their own children in most cases.
This phenomenon is particularly highlighted in cases of IR parents who have children together. I see it all around.
It's one of the reasons why I have mixed feelings about it.
However, it is not my place to dictate what others do, and it would be very presumptuous of me to attempt doing so.
It's also wrong to treat bi or triracial people with any less decency than anyone else.
Lithium
04-29-2015, 08:43 AM
There are no pros to interracial marriage IMO. I wouldn't do it.
pelikarski
04-29-2015, 08:50 AM
The only pros I can think about is fat white trash, whales, low morale whores thrown out from the white genepool ( USA/UK) case
DarknessInside
04-29-2015, 02:33 PM
There are no pros to interracial marriage IMO. I wouldn't do it.
I mentioned in my opinion that it's not problematic if peoples do it wisely. My view is neutral. I don't promote it, but I'm not against it. It's a hard and complicated decision. It's OK for some people, but it makes a lot of problems for others too.
Longbowman
04-29-2015, 02:46 PM
@Rhiannon: mendellian traits are quite limited. Eye colour, for example, is not one, although one or two markers do determine most of it. But of course mixed race people (pure black + pure let's say Irish) are more likely to have brown or dark eyes because most blacks have 100% of the relevant markers causing dark eyes, and most Irish do not have 100% of the light eyed markers. So the chance for blue eyes would drop to 25-30% even in the 'best' cases because Europeans have that pigmentation diversity that Africans lack. But to say one group is 'genetically dominant' is wrong, that's just our perception. Line Rihanna up between a pure Congoid and Melonhead and you'll see she's about halfway between.
I'm neither pro nor against. Do as you please. Your kids will be a mix of the two of you. Saying mixed race people are superior because genetic diversity is out of context propaganda; saying they're more likely to have mental problems is out of context propaganda. If you marry a black with an IQ of 90 and your IQ is 110 your kids will probably have IQs averaging 100 or so, that's how it works (mass generalisation, obviously there's a huge range of genetic and cultural factors).
BeerBaron
04-29-2015, 03:02 PM
Cons- to many to list
Pros- the land whates and white trash that have taken to black guys are no longer bothering white guys. <until they get dumped
Thunder_shock
04-29-2015, 03:27 PM
Most problems stem from social issues. One problem is identficiation, if two people from two different countries have a child which country/culture will the offspring identify with, have an emotion connection, struggle with and procreate with it's people. Most of the time it's the father's line, sometimes not. If it's from the same country like the US, if the parents are black and white the child usually identfies with Aframs (mostly because of society perception), although the (white) father passes on his surname and blood he still loses out in some way. Usually the offspring will identify with the mother's line if the father was absent or dead beat. A nation stands little chance of survival if the women have a high miscegenation rate and high dead beat fatherhood. Those people are fucked.
Highlands
04-29-2015, 03:37 PM
I have nothing against it.
Linebacker
04-29-2015, 03:45 PM
Pros - basement dweller nationalists on the internet will be butthurt and cry.
pelikarski
04-29-2015, 03:46 PM
Pros - basement dweller nationalists on the internet will be butthurt and cry.
Reading your posts lately, you are ready for a cuck
Linebacker
04-29-2015, 03:54 PM
Reading your posts lately, you are ready for a cuck
Got one
https://norlightspressblog.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/bill-dance.jpg
StonyArabia
04-29-2015, 04:03 PM
Pros - basement dweller nationalists on the internet will be butthurt and cry.
So true rofl
Shqipez
04-29-2015, 04:27 PM
If you think only whales go with non-white males you are mistaken. Then explain to me why I have seen hot white chicks into black dudes and black hip hop? Of course they are also into white guys, there is the misconception that if she likes black dudes she is not into anything else, which is obviously wrong, but they are still into them.
Because I have seen it myself, and experienced it myself. There have been white girls all reggae and hip hop who have been into me, and I am pale, with brown eyes and brown hair... I'm into most chicks, race doesn't matter to me... if she is attractive, she is attractive. And when I say attractive I mean more than just looks, I mean the whole package, including personality.
My friend is together with a black chick and she does everything for him, cooks, cleans, shops, gives gifts etc. more than any white chick will ever do.. white chicks just wanna go out and get drunk and suck someones dick in the bathroom.
And also explain to me why do white people talk so much about black people? Lol. It's almost embarrassing. :picard1: When will the white man stop being so insecure?
People can marry who they wanna marry, who they fall in love with. you gotta be fucking mental to say it's not good... what's not good about being with someone you love? As long as it's a healthy relationship.
People of mixed races don't neccessarily carry the better genes. That's nonsense... explain to me why Ronaldo the Brazilian, mixed race, had number 99 on his shirt at the end of his carrier, the same as his weight :D
You know, while living life I have realized all this hate and worry about your nation and race is not good.. it's usually people who have no life or nothing going on for them.
Weedman
04-29-2015, 04:33 PM
pro- you get to go on the apricity and say you have an interracial marriage
con- you get to go on the apricity and say you have an interracial marriage
if it's a Black-White marriage there could be certain things to look at.
From an African American perspective-pro- good chance your kids will have 'that good hair' lmfao
From a white perspective- pro-there's a good chance your kids won't ever get skin cancer
From a white perspective also, con- a greater chance your kids wont be able to get a job,
pro- but there's also a greater chance your kids can get on welfare easier when they can't find a job. lmfao
con-greater chance your kids will end up in jail and more than once, whether its from a corrupt system or anything else
pro-your mixed race kids will be less likely to ever be taken hostage by terrorists , lmfao
pro-NBA and NFL scouts will be watching over them.
con-so will the fucking cops, everywhere they go, no matter what.
con-they will be more likely to be racially profiled by the police
pro-they will be more likely to fight back, stand up for themselves and not give a fuck. or even riot if they have too.
LMFAO
BeerBaron
04-29-2015, 04:59 PM
If you think only whales go with non-white males you are mistaken. Then explain to me why I have seen hot white chicks into black dudes and black hip hop? Of course they are also into white guys, there is the misconception that if she likes black dudes she is not into anything else, which is obviously wrong, but they are still into them.
Because I have seen it myself, and experienced it myself. There have been white girls all reggae and hip hop who have been into me, and I am pale, with brown eyes and brown hair... I'm into most chicks, race doesn't matter to me... if she is attractive, she is attractive. And when I say attractive I mean more than just looks, I mean the whole package, including personality.
My friend is together with a black chick and she does everything for him, cooks, cleans, shops, gives gifts etc. more than any white chick will ever do.. white chicks just wanna go out and get drunk and suck someones dick in the bathroom.
And also explain to me why do white people talk so much about black people? Lol. It's almost embarrassing. :picard1: When will the white man stop being so insecure?
People can marry who they wanna marry, who they fall in love with. you gotta be fucking mental to say it's not good... what's not good about being with someone you love? As long as it's a healthy relationship.
People of mixed races don't neccessarily carry the better genes. That's nonsense... explain to me why Ronaldo the Brazilian, mixed race, had number 99 on his shirt at the end of his carrier, the same as his weight :D
You know, while living life I have realized all this hate and worry about your nation and race is not good.. it's usually people who have no life or nothing going on for them.
First point, most white girls that are "into" black guys usually do it in their youth, and the vast majority regret it and end up with a white guy, the divorce statistics for black male/ white female are the worst (highest divorce rate) of all inter-racial marriages.
second your friend- i would bet money if someone talks to him he will complain about "western" women. I'd also bet money if a smokin hot Russian girl were to do the same things the black girl does, he would take her over the black chick.
third- white people talk so much about black people - 1) the majority of this comes from americans, 2) they have every right to be pissed at blacks
Fourth- People do marry who they want, and I don't have to be mental to say its not good for caucasians because they will eventually be bred out, it's just math
fifth- no shit they dont, last time I tried to get a better german shepherd by breeding a pure bred shepherd with a poodle, shockingly i didn't get a better shepherd but this is always lost on liberals, ultra leftists whatever you want to call them
sixth- typical statement from a norwegien, ROK actually featured a norwegien girl in one of his dating blogs, she revealed how she didn't care if norwegiens died out there were to many people on the planet anyways. Ironically there was a study that suggested that most migrants from scandinavia during the mass exodus in the late 1800's were mostly aggressive people, the pacifists stayed behind. Go figure.
OnceLord
04-29-2015, 05:03 PM
When you make genetic crosses you get a good result with best of both about 1 in 1000 times. And that's only if both of the crossees have something of benefit to the other in the first place.
Quoted for truth.
Another thing to consider-- cultural differences are very real and they are more obvious the older/wiser you get.. I remember being a teen and thinking differences are only physical. And there definitely always is a mountain of salt to stereotyping. Nobody can bypass these unless they are rootless.
If one is rooted, you can only fully connect with one that's part of the same soil.. or willing to grow into yours.
But these are just words on the Internet.. People will certainly do as they please regardless. But they will learn from their mistakes eventually.
Longbowman
04-29-2015, 05:03 PM
If Caucasians would be 'bred out,' so would non-Caucasians.
BeerBaron
04-29-2015, 05:11 PM
If Caucasians would be 'bred out,' so would non-Caucasians.
Not really, http://www.prb.org/wpds/2014/index.html
There are more non caucasians than caucasians, ofc we can nit pick the living shit out of what caucasian is but you get what I am saying
Shqipez
04-29-2015, 05:26 PM
First point, most white girls that are "into" black guys usually do it in their youth, and the vast majority regret it and end up with a white guy, the divorce statistics for black male/ white female are the worst (highest divorce rate) of all inter-racial marriages.
That's like saying most western women who are together with Immigrants, white muslims etc do it in their youth, but the truth is a lot of muslims date western women and then ditch them for some muslima wifey or some immigrant wife, because they come from a culture where one marries within their own. The opposite can happen too. Usually it's pressure from parents. so it has nothing to do with blacks. And I have seen girls here mature and dating outside their nationalities. and divorce rates are very high among white couples.... especially in the western world... I rarely know a Norwegian kid here that doesn't have two fathers or two mothers :D I'm sure a lot of times, the same would be in other cultures if they weren't traditional... divorce rates are also high among black people. high divorce rates are a part of the western world
and nothing to do with race
second your friend- i would be money if someone talks to him he will complain about "western" women. I'd also be money if a smokin hot Russian girl were to do the same things the black girl does, he would take her over the black chick.
He doesn't complain about western women. Because there are good and bad girls in every type. He was with a good one, but it got over because they lived too far apart. So that statement might of been kind of ignorant from me, but it's very true among western women, a lot of times regardless of race, just the western mentality can make a women turn like that. He has been with all types of women. He just happens to be with a black one this time.
third- white people talk so much about black people - 1) the majority of this comes from americans, 2) they have every right to be pissed at blacks
They can talk about them when they are pissed off, just like black people talk about them when they are pissed off at them. btut talking how they go with their women and shit, man it's so embarassing, it screams insecurity.
Fourth- People do marry who they want, and I don't have to be mental to say its not good for caucasians because they will eventually be bred out, it's just math
I got better things to do in life than worrying some people will be bred out. Because tthey chose to themselves.
sixth- typical statement from a norwegien, ROK actually featured a norwegien girl in one of his dating blogs, she revealed how she didn't care if norwegiens died out there were to many people on the planet anyways. Ironically there was a study that suggested that most migrants from scandinavia during the mass exodus in the late 1800's were mostly aggressive people, the pacifists stayed behind. Go figure.
I'm not Norwegian. But Norwegians are not indigenous to Scandinavia. They have almost made another population here go extinct who were here before them. But what do people who talk about races and extinction care about that? They mostly care about their own kind, talk about hipocrites.
let's worry about things people choose themselves. Big difference between ethnic cleansing/genocide and simply being bred out or people marrying others. Ain't much you can do. I would rather follow my dreams, have a fucking job maybe? do things that make me happy, be the best person I can be... maybe be a winner at life? or atleast be happy? I have yet to encounter a succesful person in life with ultra nationalistic/racial views.. most of them are just angry, insecure people. some of them might be sucessful but are they happy? all that hate just makes you tired.
I still don't think white people will ever be bred out, if that was the case then there would not exist white people in Brazil or America, who are mixed with blacks... a lot of white americans have black ancestry, and so do black americans -> white ancestry.... black and brown brazilians have dominant white genes, you can even see some of their kids with blond hair when they are babies.
I read some study that said atleast 60% of white american males have black ancestry. I don't know how they came to that conclusion.
Another race can not be bred out 100%, those genes will always exist, especially white and black genes.... in a mixed race society, one will still see babies with white genes and black genes...
Atvend
04-29-2015, 05:29 PM
Go check out the divorce rates for interracial marriages and then talk about pros and cons.
If I recall correctly, black male and white female are 200% more likely to end up in divorce, but don't quote me for it.
Gooding
04-29-2015, 05:38 PM
I reckon it's none of my business who does what behind closed doors. My preference leans to the daughters of my own people.
Longbowman
04-29-2015, 05:50 PM
Not really, http://www.prb.org/wpds/2014/index.html
There are more non caucasians than caucasians, ofc we can nit pick the living shit out of what caucasian is but you get what I am saying
Well, we already 'bred out' native americans, polynesians and pretty much austronesians. For 'pure races' that leaves Africans, whom we outnumber, Subcontinentals and East Asians.
Shqipez
04-29-2015, 05:52 PM
Go check out the divorce rates for interracial marriages and then talk about pros and cons.
If I recall correctly, black male and white female are 200% more likely to end up in divorce, but don't quote me for it.
There could be many reasons for that.
zhaoyun
04-29-2015, 05:53 PM
In the end, what really matters in a relationship are the two individuals involved. I'm not saying that to be PC, I'm saying that out of personal experience.
All this hoopla going on here is just noise.
Dr. Robotnik the Subbotnik
04-29-2015, 05:55 PM
I wonder who I will marry and have children with. Could be anyone, love is color blind too.
BeerBaron
04-29-2015, 05:57 PM
That's like saying most western women who are together with Immigrants, white muslims etc do it in their youth, but the truth is a lot of muslims date western women and then ditch them for some muslima wifey or some immigrant wife, because they come from a culture where one marries within their own. The opposite can happen too. Usually it's pressure from parents. so it has nothing to do with blacks. And I have seen girls here mature and dating outside their nationalities. and divorce rates are very high among white couples.... especially in the western world... I rarely know a Norwegian kid here that doesn't have two fathers or two mothers :D I'm sure a lot of times, the same would be in other cultures if they weren't traditional... divorce rates are also high among black people. high divorce rates are a part of the western world
and nothing to do with race
He doesn't complain about western women. Because there are good and bad girls in every type. He was with a good one, but it got over because they lived too far apart. So that statement might of been kind of ignorant from me, but it's very true among western women, a lot of times regardless of race, just the western mentality can make a women turn like that. He has been with all types of women. He just happens to be with a black one this time.
They can talk about them when they are pissed off, just like black people talk about them when they are pissed off at them. btut talking how they go with their women and shit, man it's so embarassing, it screams insecurity.
I got better things to do in life than worrying some people will be bred out. Because tthey chose to themselves.
I'm not Norwegian. But Norwegians are not indigenous to Scandinavia. They have almost made another population here go extinct who were here before them. But what do people who talk about races and extinction care about that? They mostly care about their own kind, talk about hipocrites.
let's worry about things people choose themselves. Big difference between ethnic cleansing/genocide and simply being bred out or people marrying others. Ain't much you can do. I would rather follow my dreams, have a fucking job maybe? do things that make me happy, be the best person I can be... maybe be a winner at life? or atleast be happy? I have yet to encounter a succesful person in life with ultra nationalistic/racial views.. most of them are just angry, insecure people. some of them might be sucessful but are they happy? all that hate just makes you tired.
I still don't think white people will ever be bred out, if that was the case then there would not exist white people in Brazil or America, who are mixed with blacks... a lot of white americans have black ancestry, and so do black americans -> white ancestry.... black and brown brazilians have dominant white genes, you can even see some of their kids with blond hair when they are babies.
I read some study that said atleast 60% of white american males have black ancestry. I don't know how they came to that conclusion.
Another race can not be bred out 100%, those genes will always exist, especially white and black genes.... in a mixed race society, one will still see babies with white genes and black genes...
your first point helps mine, they did it for a while, then ended up with their own kind. I was using blacks as an example, the group is irrelevant. But divorce rates and kids outside of marriage are the highest among black people.
it doesnt really scream insecurity when the entire media hypes inter racial unions, take a guess what race the woman usually is. no one bats an eye if brown people complain about getting the shit end of the stick, but fuck if white people do its just insecurity
the genes wont be bred out entirely, but no one is gonna look at an asian-african-caucasian baby in 100 years and say 'oh look at that white kid"
ironically, most successful, well educated people i know do in fact hold racial nationalist views, they just don't publicly talk about it because of the whole pc nonsense
it's all well and good to talk about how well, its their choice, that seems simple. But it isn't when they don't know the ramifications and only see a glorified version of one side. Case in point, media portrayal of white women marrying black men is positive, in actual fact it has over a 90% divorce, double what a white-white couples chances are, guess what is being left out when people talk about this. Another point so you don't think im picking on one peoples, lesbian couple unions are portrayed as positive, even glorified as liberation, fact- lesbian couples have higher rates of domestic violence, guess what part of that they dont talk about
Dictator
04-29-2015, 06:12 PM
I'm too busy living my own life to care about other people's marriages
♥ Lily ♥
04-29-2015, 09:40 PM
OP; What a load of nazi propaganda and codswallop! Inbreeding, however, is scientifically proven to cause deformities in a child.
Here's another pro: no need for fake tan and less chances of being amongst the millions of people who die prematurely in their teens and twenties each year from skin cancer statistics. You get lots of complements from people on a biracial childs looks and they get the best of both features, and also the best of both cultures in multicultural nations where there's already lots of mixed children and adults too with successful careers and happy lives. The planet is a constantly changing environment where humans are moving around and humans will look differently in the future anyway to survive in the changing climates; whether they mix or not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lcy7g05AbC0
zalmoxe
04-29-2015, 09:52 PM
Pros: Depends.
If a sub-saharan african will marry an european and procreate with him,his children will certainly be smarter than the average Mogadishu citizen and dumber than average Joe on the street.
Interracial marriage is in no way in any advantage for europeans and east asians,for others,yes!
Cons:seriously?
Annie999
04-29-2015, 09:57 PM
I don't care what others do, to each their own, but I wouldn't do it myself.
Prisoner Of Ice
04-29-2015, 10:09 PM
Reading your posts lately, you are ready for a cuck
Hahaha there was already an ethnic in that boy's woodpile in place of true father.
LightHouse89
04-29-2015, 10:15 PM
No 'pros' because it is an abominable act.
The bible forbids it. It is also bad because it is dysgenic to practice.
One must think eugenics not dysgenics.
LightHouse89
04-29-2015, 10:17 PM
Pros: Depends.
If a sub-saharan african will marry an european and procreate with him,his children will certainly be smarter than the average Mogadishu citizen and dumber than average Joe on the street.
Interracial marriage is in no way in any advantage for europeans and east asians,for others,yes!
Cons:seriously?
No they wont. That's dysgenics.
Mixing high IQ population with a low one will result in a less intelligent population. This will slow a society/civilization down until it falls apart and becomes 'third world'. Look at Haiti and countries like that.
Dysgenics is disastrous.
LightHouse89
04-29-2015, 10:19 PM
If Caucasians would be 'bred out,' so would non-Caucasians.
Which would be the end of our civilizations. So I don't see how it would be good.
zalmoxe
04-29-2015, 10:24 PM
No they wont. That's dysgenics.
Mixing high IQ population with a low one will result in a less intelligent population. This will slow a society/civilization down until it falls apart and becomes 'third world'. Look at Haiti and countries like that.
Dysgenics is disastrous.
I said that there are pros only for the low-iq ethnic groups to procreate with high-iq ones.
It's an advantage for an african to procreate with an european,but this will be an disadvantage for the european
Ukgjin
04-29-2015, 10:45 PM
Existence itself changes shape constantly, set aside humans who are temporarily guests in one of the countless realms, despite how much unlikely it may seem, conservative forces loose, the universe itself is embodied in chaos and expanding.
In the end people will be making their choices, probably the majority will stick to their own ethnicity, set aside race which is bigger concept, whilst there will always be individuals taking different paths, which to some may seem controversary, some just don't care, and some will keep raging hard, but in the end everyone will get consequences of their actions, some may be bitter some others kind.
I have nothing against it, as everyone will answer to their choices, and everyone should be free to experiment as much as they want if they juedge that no harm will come to them, go ahead..this whole existence is based on free will and subsequent karma.
The Illyrian Warrior
04-29-2015, 11:01 PM
If Caucasians would be 'bred out,' so would non-Caucasians.
That doesn't make any sense, if a Caucasian start intermixing his/her eventual offspring automatically falls under non-Caucasian category unless you'd be more specific in this regard.
Longbowman
04-29-2015, 11:11 PM
That doesn't make any sense, if a Caucasian start intermixing his/her eventual offspring automatically falls under non-Caucasian category unless you'd be more specific in this regard.
They'd also be non-eg. Asian.
coolstorybro
04-29-2015, 11:25 PM
Pros:
- Hybrid vigor effect, more likely to have attractive female offspring, less likely to have strong, intelligent male offspring
- More likely to stay in love longer due to non-familiarity, which is also good for kids
- International family, many interests and a global lifestyle, can relate to two cultures
- Strong family unity due to not being fully part of either group
Cons:
- Lack of identity, feeling not belonging either race, rootlessness
- Bullying
- Children not identifying equally with either parent, depending on gene distribution
- Chilren who don't look like you for eye and hair color
- Quarreling in marriage due to cultural differences which originally were cute, but now annoying
- Getting called misceginator at white nationalist forums
Longbowman
04-29-2015, 11:47 PM
- Getting called misceginator at white nationalist forums
brb dumping gf
kabeiros
04-30-2015, 12:01 AM
When you make genetic crosses you get a good result with best of both about 1 in 1000 times. And that's only if both of the crossees have something of benefit to the other in the first place.The case of Jews doesn't support your argument. A lot of Euro/Jewish mixes are successful
Prisoner Of Ice
04-30-2015, 12:35 AM
The case of Jews doesn't support your argument. A lot of Euro/Jewish mixes are successful
Like Elliot Rodgers?
Jews are actually highly inbred. This is not the same as incest, though. They are mixed but the mixture is mostly very old.
Anyway the key here is selecting a mate carefully. Theoretically I could find a black woman smarter than myself and very attractive and has values similar to mine. In that case I would be dumb to pass her up. But randomly breeding with some ghetto dweller is not going to produce good results.
kabeiros
04-30-2015, 12:41 AM
Anyway the key here is selecting a mate carefully. Theoretically I could find a black woman smarter than myself and very attractive and has values similar to mine. In that case I would be dumb to pass her up. But randomly breeding with some ghetto dweller is not going to produce good results. There will never be random breeding, interracial or not. Most people breed with other people who they find attractive, based on their looks and personality. I doubt that a smart, successful white guy will get married and procreate with a stupid, ugly black woman, they wouldn't have anything in common. Low class, ugly white guys will probably get anything they can, regardless of what you or anyone thinks about it
Longbowman
04-30-2015, 12:42 AM
Like Elliot Rodgers?
Elliot Rodgers is Jewish in the same way Obama is white.
thumbed up for remainder of post.
Prisoner Of Ice
04-30-2015, 12:51 AM
There will never be random breeding, interracial or not. Most people breed with other people who they find attractive, based on their looks and personality. I doubt that a smart, successful white guy will get married and procreate with a stupid, ugly black woman, they wouldn't have anything in common. Low class, ugly white guys will probably get anything they can, regardless of what you or anyone thinks about it
Of course there's random breeding that takes account nothing but looks. That is how africa is, and how modern society is becoming. Generally in the past everyone would only mate within their religion, within their race, and within their country.
What happens when you don't have a religion, media tells you you are racis for only dating whites, half the people in your country are foreigners and you don't even really plan on getting married? Random breeding.
Just like Elliot Rodgers. Dad looked like an utter psychopath. Mom had very gracile build. Any son was very likely to turn out the way he did. If the dad married a nice jewish girl instead Elliot would probably be a dentist now.
kabeiros
04-30-2015, 12:56 AM
Generally in the past everyone would only mate within their religion, within their race, and within their country. That's how it still is in Greece, so...
What happens when you don't have a religion, media tells you you are racis for only dating whites, half the people in your country are foreigners and you don't even really plan on getting married? Random breeding. Do Americans do what the media tells them? If so, they deserve to be ''interracialised''
Prisoner Of Ice
04-30-2015, 01:01 AM
That's how it still is in Greece, so...
Do Americans do what the media tells them? If so, they deserve to be ''interracialised''
I guess race mix never occurs in greece :rolleyes:
Potentia
04-30-2015, 01:14 AM
I can smell racism here.... I am actually almost offended.
coolstorybro
04-30-2015, 01:27 AM
I can smell racism here.... I am actually almost offended.
Ok, learn to live with it. Or call your mom, whatever you decide.
Potentia
04-30-2015, 01:32 AM
Ok, learn to live with it. Or call your mom, whatever you decide.
I find this whole thread amusing. Considering I am mixed race myself.
Prisoner Of Ice
04-30-2015, 01:32 AM
I can smell racism here.... I am actually almost offended.
racis :rolleyes:
Dragoon
04-30-2015, 01:41 AM
The positives and negatives have already been mentioned here.
Particularly the children might have some identity problems and with fitting in. A mixed person might be very internationalist. Sometimes they might identify with both races. This could create a problem in more homogenous countries because the person has split loyalties. What might be good for the tribe may be different for a mixed person.
A couple examples:
Racially speaking, a mixed Chinese-European American might be a little loyal to both America and China because of his/her race, but for many Chinese this might be a problem as China is a competitor to the US. The Chinese would want to know if this individual would ignore his European American half for the good of China, while the mixed person would probably not take the Chinese side so easily without ignoring the American side.
A mixed ethnically German and Jewish person could be a Zionist. Where many Germans are not as Zionist, this conflict of interest might show itself.
However, all this depends on the culture too. In Europe these problems might show, but in South America where there is lots of mixing these differences wont matter as much.
Myself? I would want my children to look like me. And I think being the same race and/or ethnicity is more beneficial than not.
If someone wants to marry another race though, I wont stop them. I would still treat them nicely as anyone else.
Prisoner Of Ice
04-30-2015, 01:42 AM
Pros:
- Hybrid vigor effect, more likely to have attractive female offspring, less likely to have strong, intelligent male offspring
Not really true. First off hybrid vigor won't really occur because assuming this is a white [fill in blank] mix you are not likely to pick up any size or strength or bone density genetics. You might get high testosterone from an african y-dna though.
Brains also come mostly from the woman due to how the x chromosome works. You will never pass your brains down to a son, they will mostly come from the woman. So for a white guy your x chromosome may be good but you are throwing it in the toilet no whatever what mate you have, unless your child is a female. The collorary is that if a black penis violates a tender white girl his x chromosome is probably going down the drain, though, too.
Probably part of why women don't care as much about looks and brains etc. (qualities) and only care mostly about end result (like having money or prestige).
- International family, many interests and a global lifestyle, can relate to two cultures
Generally don't fit to either, and whine about it constantly.
- More likely to stay in love longer due to non-familiarity, which is also good for kids
- Strong family unity due to not being fully part of either group
The opposite is true.
BeerBaron
04-30-2015, 01:44 AM
OP; What a load of nazi propaganda and codswallop! Inbreeding, however, is scientifically proven to cause deformities in a child.
Here's another pro: no need for fake tan and less chances of being amongst the millions of people who die prematurely in their teens and twenties each year from skin cancer statistics. You get lots of complements from people on a biracial childs looks and they get the best of both features, and also the best of both cultures in multicultural nations where there's already lots of mixed children and adults too with successful careers and happy lives. The planet is a constantly changing environment where humans are moving around and humans will look differently in the future anyway to survive in the changing climates; whether they mix or not.
You can't honestly be spouting about "nazi" propaganda then turn right around, post some stupid video, and change your signature to a bunch of pro black men garbage while still crying about being exposed to "hateful" propaganda.
"No need for a fake tan," "wont die prematurely of skin cancer" "compliments on how he got the best of both racial features" fuckin hell give me a break sweet heart you sound like a parrot with natias hand up your backside.
Here's a thought, maybe people just tell you your baby is pretty to be nice, even the most hideous kids are called cute, it's just social etiquette.
Here's another form of social etiquette, Me not saying what everyone, even you, is thinking when they see a single young white mother
with a black kid.
OnceLord
04-30-2015, 01:58 AM
OP; What a load of nazi propaganda and codswallop! Inbreeding, however, is scientifically proven to cause deformities in a child.
Here's another pro: no need for fake tan and less chances of being amongst the millions of people who die prematurely in their teens and twenties each year from skin cancer statistics.
Well, people in India and Pakiland use skin whitening creams very often-- it's a cultural practice that rivals and dwarfs our finicky desire for bronzeness, LoL.. Same way Blacks use weaves or hair straightening chemicals but many Whites and other Caucasoids invariably yearn for curls (I don't, never did). People are basically never happy. Give it time and you will see a subculture among biracials about preferred nose shape or eyebrow shape or something or other like that.
The skin cancer thing isn't a major determinant for us Whites to wholesale intermingle with non-Whites; it is only really a big issue in sunny parts of the world inhabited by European folk (like America or Aussieland). Global warming is happening but UV radiation has nothing to do with that (that's O zone related, and the major tear in the south pole is slowly healing back up). The reason why it sky rocketed in mainland Europe though is because of 'sun worshipping' culture.. So all the high rates we have seen for years build up are in fact because of mainland Europeans going on holidays often from the 50s onwards and now they're developing the cancer.
In terms of evolution and disease load I highly doubt Caucasoids of any variety are any more or less 'worse' than the other world racial groups.. we have our own genetic issues most likely and so do they. Aren't American Indians known for their alcohol and diabetes problems (Ie. drunk obese casino owner stereotype)? I wonder how much of that is genetic..
BeerBaron
04-30-2015, 02:18 AM
Well, people in India and Pakiland use skin whitening creams very often-- it's a cultural practice that rivals and dwarfs our finicky desire for bronzeness, LoL.. Same way Blacks use weaves or hair straightening chemicals but many Whites and other Caucasoids invariably yearn for curls (I don't, never did). People are basically never happy. Give it time and you will see a subculture among biracials about preferred nose shape or eyebrow shape or something or other like that.
The skin cancer thing isn't a major determinant for us Whites to wholesale intermingle with non-Whites; it is only really a big issue in sunny parts of the world inhabited by European folk (like America or Aussieland). Global warming is happening but UV radiation has nothing to do with that (that's O zone related, and the major tear in the south pole is slowly healing back up). The reason why it sky rocketed in mainland Europe though is because of 'sun worshipping' culture.. So all the high rates we have seen for years build up are in fact because of mainland Europeans going on holidays often from the 50s onwards and now they're developing the cancer.
In terms of evolution and disease load I highly doubt Caucasoids of any variety are any more or less 'worse' than the other world racial groups.. we have our own genetic issues most likely and so do they. Aren't American Indians known for their alcohol and diabetes problems (Ie. drunk obese casino owner stereotype)? I wonder how much of that is genetic..
Indians, Natives, Native Americans wtvr you want to call them lack an enzyme that caucasians have that aids breaking down alcohol, hospitals and treatment facilities in canada treat "natives" differently than caucasians just because of this. They are also more prone to violent behavior when drinking, its so bad that an entire communities are "dry" because "da naaatives cant gets enuff of dah fire water from whitey ehhh"
rhiannon
04-30-2015, 02:58 AM
@Rhiannon: mendellian traits are quite limited. Eye colour, for example, is not one, although one or two markers do determine most of it. But of course mixed race people (pure black + pure let's say Irish) are more likely to have brown or dark eyes because most blacks have 100% of the relevant markers causing dark eyes, and most Irish do not have 100% of the light eyed markers. So the chance for blue eyes would drop to 25-30% even in the 'best' cases because Europeans have that pigmentation diversity that Africans lack. But to say one group is 'genetically dominant' is wrong, that's just our perception. Line Rihanna up between a pure Congoid and Melonhead and you'll see she's about halfway between.
I'm neither pro nor against. Do as you please. Your kids will be a mix of the two of you. Saying mixed race people are superior because genetic diversity is out of context propaganda; saying they're more likely to have mental problems is out of context propaganda. If you marry a black with an IQ of 90 and your IQ is 110 your kids will probably have IQs averaging 100 or so, that's how it works (mass generalisation, obviously there's a huge range of genetic and cultural factors).
I was being pretty general in my reply. I know Mendelian genetics are more complicated than just your typical Punnet square, nor do they define most traits. :) There are more factors at play in the process of inheritance. Eye color and height are great examples.
I have a lot of recessive genes, myself. For me to consider getting with a black person or whatnot would almost guarantee loss of those recessive genes in my offspring's phenotype. There is much lower likelihood of a SA person having similar recessive genes themselves unless they possess at least a modicum of European ancestry. The chances are great that any kid I'd have had with a SA or Asian person would not look like my kid at all.
I've already seen this in my niece (half Asian) and nephews. It would be weird for me if I saw it in my own child as well. Just my own opinion, of course. There are aspects also of my niece/nephews that do resemble our side of the family, but the immediate gestalt you have upon first glance would be that they're unrelated.
Rihanna...is she half and half?
Again, I don't care what people do, although it does bother me now that you almost get the sense IR relationships are being more or less promoted as more desirable than same race relationships. Call it your PC mindset, but I do hear of people referring to European ancestry/heritage as "boring" or "pasty" I don't like that at all.
Longbowman
04-30-2015, 04:00 AM
Rihanna is 3/4 black, although that 3/4 is probably around 5% white. Blacks don't have 'dominant genes.' That's anti-White bullcrap.
Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin
04-30-2015, 04:47 AM
the op really haqs no idea what he is talking about. Its most likely a thread to circle jerk with his buddies
LightHouse89
04-30-2015, 04:55 AM
Existence itself changes shape constantly, set aside humans who are temporarily guests in one of the countless realms, despite how much unlikely it may seem, conservative forces loose, the universe itself is embodied in chaos and expanding.
In the end people will be making their choices, probably the majority will stick to their own ethnicity, set aside race which is bigger concept, whilst there will always be individuals taking different paths, which to some may seem controversary, some just don't care, and some will keep raging hard, but in the end everyone will get consequences of their actions, some may be bitter some others kind.
I have nothing against it, as everyone will answer to their choices, and everyone should be free to experiment as much as they want if they juedge that no harm will come to them, go ahead..this whole existence is based on free will and subsequent karma.
Pure liberal-communist thinking at work. Sorry I don't dislike you or anything but I am flagging and tagging this one.
XvThomas_LysergicV
04-30-2015, 05:20 AM
Who the hell gets married anymore? In America,its not cool to get married. Marriage went out of style years ago. Of course i'm just joking around. People still get married but its definitely not as common as it use to be. There are tons of people who date interracially or have multiracial children without getting married. The title of this thread should been Interracial couples: Pros and Cons.
Rihanna is 3/4 black, although that 3/4 is probably around 5% white. Blacks don't have 'dominant genes.' That's anti-White bullcrap.
If she's 3/4ths SSA and 1/4ths European then how can she only be 5%? If one out of four of her grandparents is European then she should be 25% or more,depending on if her other grandparents have European ancestry. Even if SSA's had weak genes,5% wouldnt have much of an affect on her phenotype. 5% wont have much of an impact on anyones appearance. It doesn't matter what race they are.
rhiannon
04-30-2015, 05:21 AM
Rihanna is 3/4 black, although that 3/4 is probably around 5% white. Blacks don't have 'dominant genes.' That's anti-White bullcrap.
DNA is DNA...doesn't matter whose DNA it is. This is true. :)
I gave my reasons though and don't think they're completely off-base, especially because of the situation in my own family. My niece and nephews look very different from my brothers. Admittedly, when there are big differences in pigmentation between a parent and child, other traits, even if they're more similar, are harder to notice.
My daughter has her dad's pigmentation, but his wasn't that much different from my own, overall, so my daughter doesn't look unrelated to me so much as she might have had there been a greater difference in pigmentation between her father and I. In fact, she is a very even mixture of the both of us, and people who have seen her pic next to one of him or I can tell immediately that she's related.
I dunno. I just prefer my kids to look more like they're obviously mine lol.
Prisoner Of Ice
04-30-2015, 05:22 AM
Rihanna is 3/4 black, although that 3/4 is probably around 5% white. Blacks don't have 'dominant genes.' That's anti-White bullcrap.
Probably each of them is 25% white, not 5%.
As for dominant, curly hair and dark hair, eyes, and skin are all dominant. If you are heterogenous the result is still black.
Mortimer
04-30-2015, 05:31 AM
i cannot talk in general if its good or not. i just can talk from my own perspective, i would be friends with interracial couples and i would date interracial, race is not on my list as dating criteria
my dating criteria
looks/attractiveness, personality, and also important for me would be that she is a helper like eve was created for adam to be a helper, that she respects me and is faithful and concerned with my well being that she is there in emergency and need in good and bad times. race is not a criteria at all.
as for identification, i think mixed race children do struggle somewhat to find their identity but that doesnt bother me they will struggle and usually find their own way to deal with it and to identify what makes most sense to them, i wouldnt want to force my identity on my children and i dont think i need to create offspring in order to spread my identity onto next generations. i have nothing against traditional people who think like that, but for me its just not something important. lets say i would have a child with a african woman and the child would lean towards the african side i would support it and dont force it to accept my own identity. i also have no problem if the child doesnt resemble me ethnically it could still resemble me somewhat because im convinced that cross-racial resemblance is possible that two different races can resemble eatch other or share part of their traits etc. and even if it doesnt look at all like me, that wouldnt bother me at all, its not important to me at all. but i know there are many with such a argument, which is respect and they shouldnt procreate with another race if they think like that. everyone how he wants having preferences is not wrong at all, i also dont see it as wrong if you are a white girl having a preference for black males, just like if you are white male wanting a white woman, its part of our liberties and freedom i appreciate to make decisions for us selfes.
Brianna
04-30-2015, 08:12 AM
Ask this question to yourself. Will it affect me if two perfect strangers have an interracial relationship? I couldn't care less about this issue. If two people, of any race, are fortunate enough to form a healthy, lasting bond, good for them. Such things are hard to find in many places around the world. Besides that, most relationships are intraracial, so it's not one of the world's most important issues. The bottom line is I'm not concerned with the sex lives of other people. I don't care what two (or more) consenting adults do.
SkyBurn
04-30-2015, 08:15 AM
Pros - basic civil rights
BeerBaron
04-30-2015, 08:23 AM
Ask this question to yourself. Will it affect me if two perfect strangers have an interracial relationship? I couldn't care less about this issue. If two people, of any race, are fortunate enough to form a healthy, lasting bond, good for them. Such things are hard to find in many places around the world. Besides that, most relationships are intraracial, so it's not one of the world's most important issues. The bottom line is I'm not concerned with the sex lives of other people. I don't care what two (or more) consenting adults do.
I give 0 fucks about what 2 consenting adults do.
What I do give a fuck about is media hyping inter racial unions as greatest thing since sliced bread, while any sort of counter point even with all the evidence in the world to support it, is simply deemed "racis." < This kind of rubbish, is good ol Marxist engineering
rhiannon
04-30-2015, 08:30 AM
If Caucasians would be 'bred out,' so would non-Caucasians.
Yes, from a phenotypical perspective, everyone would be bred out because the world's population would become an amalgam of all races/ethnicities.
It won't happen, though. Most people still prefer to stick within their own group, so I'm not gonna freak out just yet lol
Brianna
04-30-2015, 08:45 AM
I give 0 fucks about what 2 consenting adults do.
What I do give a fuck about is media hyping inter racial unions as greatest thing since sliced bread, while any sort of counter point even with all the evidence in the world to support it, is simply deemed "racis." < This kind of rubbish, is good ol Marxist engineering
I think the media are obsessed with tran this and tran that now. That's their latest social engineering project. If you don't think that boys and girls should share the same school restrooms, they'll portray you as a bigot. I'm done with them.
Brianna
04-30-2015, 08:48 AM
Most people still prefer to stick within their own group
quoted for truth
BeerBaron
04-30-2015, 08:53 AM
I think the media are obsessed with tran this and tran that now. That's their latest social engineering project. If you don't think that boys and girls should share the same school restrooms, they'll portray you as a bigot. I'm done with them.
What ever their new "talking" point is, its just that. Realistically this has been going on for a long time now, trans is their new shiny toy, tomorrow who knows wtf it will be. There's a good video on ideological subversion on youtube I remember seeing a while back.
Brianna
04-30-2015, 08:57 AM
What ever their new "talking" point is, its just that. Realistically this has been going on for a long time now, trans is their new shiny toy, tomorrow who knows wtf it will be. There's a good video on ideological subversion on youtube I remember seeing a while back.
I shudder to think. Hopefully, they'll draw the line at bestiality! To the cultural Marxists: no, I'm not comparing that to transgendered people.:rolleyes:
Mortimer
04-30-2015, 09:51 AM
I give 0 fucks about what 2 consenting adults do.
What I do give a fuck about is media hyping inter racial unions as greatest thing since sliced bread, while any sort of counter point even with all the evidence in the world to support it, is simply deemed "racis." < This kind of rubbish, is good ol Marxist engineering
i dont think thats the case, most couples in movies, sitcoms, and in media are same race either white couple or black couple etc. sometimes you see a interracial couple but not often. you sound as if you want to put a taboo on interracial relationships in media etc. same race relations are still the general norm and interracial is still a taboo so its ok to bring to attention the struggles interracial couples face.
Mortimer
04-30-2015, 09:54 AM
What ever their new "talking" point is, its just that. Realistically this has been going on for a long time now, trans is their new shiny toy, tomorrow who knows wtf it will be. There's a good video on ideological subversion on youtube I remember seeing a while back.
i dont see it as indoctrination or social engineering (sounds evil) because your society and many other societies come from a background where people got lynched for such things and it was forbidden by law, so a few media attention to promote tolerance is not bad
Longbowman
04-30-2015, 11:23 AM
Probably each of them is 25% white, not 5%.
As for dominant, curly hair and dark hair, eyes, and skin are all dominant. If you are heterogenous the result is still black.
Not in the Caribbean. We didn't screw our slaves as much as you did. The average is about 6-7% so let's say 10% (of 75%) which is a bonus 7.5% for a generous 1/3 white. No, they're not all dominant.
LightHouse89
04-30-2015, 02:48 PM
Who the hell gets married anymore? In America,its not cool to get married. Marriage went out of style years ago. Of course i'm just joking around. People still get married but its definitely not as common as it use to be. There are tons of people who date interracially or have multiracial children without getting married. The title of this thread should been Interracial couples: Pros and Cons.
If she's 3/4ths SSA and 1/4ths European then how can she only be 5%? If one out of four of her grandparents is European then she should be 25% or more,depending on if her other grandparents have European ancestry. Even if SSA's had weak genes,5% wouldnt have much of an affect on her phenotype. 5% wont have much of an impact on anyones appearance. It doesn't matter what race they are.
LOL
LightHouse89
04-30-2015, 02:48 PM
i dont see it as indoctrination or social engineering (sounds evil) because your society and many other societies come from a background where people got lynched for such things and it was forbidden by law, so a few media attention to promote tolerance is not bad
It is bad.
LightHouse89
04-30-2015, 02:50 PM
I think the media are obsessed with tran this and tran that now. That's their latest social engineering project. If you don't think that boys and girls should share the same school restrooms, they'll portray you as a bigot. I'm done with them.
every liberal should be tarred and feathered. then hanged for all of this crap they created.
LightHouse89
04-30-2015, 02:52 PM
Pros - basic civil rights
Yeah for liberalism!
LightHouse89
04-30-2015, 02:53 PM
Yes, from a phenotypical perspective, everyone would be bred out because the world's population would become an amalgam of all races/ethnicities.
It won't happen, though. Most people still prefer to stick within their own group, so I'm not gonna freak out just yet lol
I hate to tell you but it is because we are importing millions of third world brown and black trash into our lands. do we have plans to deport them? [I pray we do]. If not you better bet that bottom dollar we will disappear.
I hate to tell you but it is because we are importing millions of third world brown and black trash into our lands. do we have plans to deport them? [I pray we do]. If not you better bet that bottom dollar we will disappear.
White women can't help it to get all dripping wet with latino men, and white men can't hide their erections from Asian and latina women.
every liberal should be tarred and feathered. then hanged for all of this crap they created.
Don't be such hypocrite. I am sure these kids love going to the bathroom after a hot chick and get a glimpse of stinky pussy. :yuck:
Jägerstaffel
04-30-2015, 03:50 PM
It is up for the couple to weigh the pros and cons.
Brianna
05-01-2015, 01:45 AM
every liberal should be tarred and feathered. then hanged for all of this crap they created.
I wouldn't go THAT far.:D Some of my best friends are liberal.
Prisoner Of Ice
05-01-2015, 01:58 AM
I hate to tell you but it is because we are importing millions of third world brown and black trash into our lands. do we have plans to deport them? [I pray we do]. If not you better bet that bottom dollar we will disappear.
Stop being so racis it's just a coincidence.
Prisoner Of Ice
05-01-2015, 01:59 AM
White women can't help it to get all dripping wet with latino men
Nothing like a 5 foot tall swarthikin between your thighs :rolleyes:
Potentia
05-01-2015, 03:18 AM
Liberals for the win! However, I would actually consider myself more closely aligned to political radicalism.
Nothing like a 5 foot tall swarthikin between your thighs :rolleyes:
There are some very ugly indo-mestizo guys out there, but those are not the ones girls go for. They go for the more robust tan or light skinned manly looking dark haired dude, with that mysterious appeal that chicks dig.
Katie Karma
05-02-2015, 08:49 PM
Since most of our genetic material comes from Africa, what is the point in breeding with Africans? We have already processed those genes in the presence of a very new environment. Those old African genes where squeezed through the screen of selection, some being amplified and others being lost over the course of the last 55,000 years. It is a done deal for us, we took on some Neanderthal genes, some of which had tremendous selective value, and created a whole other kind of human.
The real question is taking on genes of other archaics in Asians, Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, and American Indians, should we do this? Some of those old genes do have value, especially the human leukocyte antigen system. There are at least six non-African alleles, three from Neanderthals and three from Denisovans. At least in East Asia, Australia, Oceania, these Denisovan alleles are at high frequency, as are our Neanderthal alleles in Europe, indicating the are a real benefit. The question is whether to further mix with them and if it would benefit us in our current environment.
Longbowman
05-02-2015, 08:51 PM
Since most of our genetic material comes from Africa, what is the point in breeding with Africans? We have already processed those genes in the presence of a very new environment. Those old African genes where squeezed through the screen of selection, some being amplified and others being lost over the course of the last 55,000 years. It is a done deal for us, we took on some Neanderthal genes, some of which had tremendous selective value, and created a whole other kind of human.
The real question is taking on genes of other archaics in Asians, Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, and American Indians, should we do this? Some of those old genes do have value, especially the human leukocyte antigen system. There are at least six non-African alleles, three from Neanderthals and three from Denisovans. At least in East Asia, Australia, Oceania, these Denisovan alleles are at high frequency, as are our Neanderthal alleles in Europe, indicating the are a real benefit. The question is whether to further mix with them and if it would benefit us in our current environment.
Is this a joke or do you think this is how genetics, breeding and human social interractions work?
Katie Karma
05-02-2015, 09:11 PM
Is this a joke or do you think this is how genetics, breeding and human social interractions work?
My post had nothing to do with how things work. These are the thought processes a person ought to consider before interracial marriage or simply producing an interracial racial child.
Unome
05-02-2015, 09:16 PM
Since most of our genetic material comes from Africa, what is the point in breeding with Africans? We have already processed those genes in the presence of a very new environment. Those old African genes where squeezed through the screen of selection, some being amplified and others being lost over the course of the last 55,000 years. It is a done deal for us, we took on some Neanderthal genes, some of which had tremendous selective value, and created a whole other kind of human.
The real question is taking on genes of other archaics in Asians, Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, and American Indians, should we do this? Some of those old genes do have value, especially the human leukocyte antigen system. There are at least six non-African alleles, three from Neanderthals and three from Denisovans. At least in East Asia, Australia, Oceania, these Denisovan alleles are at high frequency, as are our Neanderthal alleles in Europe, indicating the are a real benefit. The question is whether to further mix with them and if it would benefit us in our current environment.
OOA Theory is liberal science and a simple propaganda lie, only fools honestly would believe that "we all came from Afrika!"
There literally is no evidence whatsoever for these premises. Humans arose in different parts of the world, not just one, and certainly not Afrika.
It's more reasonable to presume that "humanity", homo sapiens, "began" in the Kavkaz Mountains.
Don't remain a fool to propaganda…
Prisoner Of Ice
05-02-2015, 09:22 PM
There are some very ugly indo-mestizo guys out there, but those are not the ones girls go for. They go for the more robust tan or light skinned manly looking dark haired dude, with that mysterious appeal that chicks dig.
Yeah, sure. Guys like antonio banderas are very popular, but they are mostly spanish blood, and they are hardly the average. Especially these days we get mainly pure indeo types coming across the border.
Prisoner Of Ice
05-02-2015, 09:23 PM
Whoops I did not actually read. Nevermind.
NatiaCutie
05-02-2015, 09:42 PM
People should have the right to marry whoever they want to :)
Race, religion or gender shouldn't matter.
Unome
05-02-2015, 09:52 PM
People should have the right to marry whoever they want to :)
Race, religion or gender shouldn't matter.
Incorrect, because marriage is an institution of faith, culture, and religion, not the liberal state.
Rights don't apply to religions. You have no rights, to marriage. When you step into a Christian Church, you abide by God's Divine Law.
Church > State.
NatiaCutie
05-02-2015, 10:01 PM
Incorrect, because marriage is an institution of faith, culture, and religion, not the liberal state.
Rights don't apply to religions. You have no rights, to marriage. When you step into a Christian Church, you abide by God's Divine Law.
Church > State.
Civil marriages exist, and they are by far the majority of unions between people in the United Kingdom. Few people in our society care about religious dustdead books and clergymen.
This is a good document for you :)
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/marriages-in-england-and-wales--provisional-/2011/sty-marriages.html
Basically people who care about religious marriages are less than half, and the number is decreasing constantly, fortunately we will one day be a fully secular country.
Raikaswinþs
05-02-2015, 10:34 PM
Interracial marriage is ok. Intercultural can be a bit trickier, specially if the cultures are antagonistic to each other.
Weedman
05-02-2015, 10:43 PM
pro-I get to fuck Jennifer Lopez every night
con-I have to put up with her crazy Mexican momma who hates gringos.
LightHouse89
05-03-2015, 04:52 AM
People should have the right to marry whoever they want to :)
Race, religion or gender shouldn't matter.
I think progressive liberals should be tarred and feathered publically. Then publically hanged. Would you like to be the first volunteer?
LightHouse89
05-03-2015, 04:53 AM
Interracial marriage is ok. Intercultural can be a bit trickier, specially if the cultures are antagonistic to each other.
Yes because the western world will be the western world without the western man. Great logic.
Unome
05-03-2015, 06:03 AM
Civil marriages exist,
No, they don't. The liberal state invented a form of fake marriage, to mimic christian morals and social law. Liberals tried (and failed) to copy a system and behaviors that they/you inherently cannot understand. This is also the same reason that liberals reinforce mental insanity in homosexuals, pretending to be "man and wife". It's like little children playing house, pretending to be self-responsible, autonomous adults. But they aren't, and some will never be. Because to be an adult, and have morals, implies that you can mature beyond the state of adolescence.
Liberals continue to prove this incorrect; liberalism is a state of perpetual childhood/adolescence.
Pretending to be moral, and have morals, doesn't mean you do have them, or can copy them.
and they are by far the majority of unions between people in the United Kingdom.
The UK is a cesspit today, similar to the collapse of ancient Rome. Native ethnic English are an embarrassment to their formerly glorious empire and historical progress. What you call "progress" actually is a regress of English culture. You are an invasive, foreign specie to the British and other European peoples.
Your genetic makeup is foreign; your liberal ideals expose your genes for what you truly are. An invader that has infiltrated a foreign land.
Few people in our society care about religious dustdead books and clergymen.
This explains your moral decay, good point.
This is a good document for you :)
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/marriages-in-england-and-wales--provisional-/2011/sty-marriages.html
I don't read documents; I write them.
Basically people who care about religious marriages are less than half, and the number is decreasing constantly, fortunately we will one day be a fully secular country.
And I keep telling you, lead by example, take Afrikan refuges into your home and bedroom. Show your mercy to them, where it counts. Make a litter of white-black children, otherwise, you're a complete hypocrite, saying one thing but doing the opposite. Put your money where your mouth is… lol! Talk is cheap.
Prove your ideology with actions, not words. Bring more non-English foreigners into the country and breed with them. Don't pretend to be a liberal, be a liberal!
Felix Volkbein
05-03-2015, 08:12 AM
And also explain to me why do white people talk so much about black people? Lol. It's almost embarrassing. :picard1: When will the white man stop being so insecure?
People can marry who they wanna marry, who they fall in love with. you gotta be fucking mental to say it's not good... what's not good about being with someone you love? As long as it's a healthy relationship.
Because Blacks are physically and mentally repulsive and they destroy gene pools.
NatiaCutie
05-03-2015, 08:34 AM
I don't read documents; I write them.
I don't think it's a surprise to people that you don't read :lol:
You shouldn't worry so much about Europe really, it's not your continent. There are plenty of big problems in the land of guns and Christian preachers where you live in, focus on that instead :)
Unome
05-03-2015, 02:56 PM
I don't think it's a surprise to people that you don't read :lol:
You really don't speak for any significant amount or type of people…
You shouldn't worry so much about Europe really, it's not your continent.
It's more mine than yours
There are plenty of big problems in the land of guns and Christian preachers where you live in, focus on that instead :)
Your big problems are your own, not others'.
SupaThug
05-03-2015, 03:05 PM
Because Blacks are physically and mentally repulsive and they destroy gene pools.
No,they aren't and they don't!
Longbowman
05-03-2015, 03:16 PM
OOA Theory is liberal science and a simple propaganda lie, only fools honestly would believe that "we all came from Afrika!"
There literally is no evidence whatsoever for these premises. Humans arose in different parts of the world, not just one, and certainly not Afrika.
It's more reasonable to presume that "humanity", homo sapiens, "began" in the Kavkaz Mountains.
Don't remain a fool to propaganda…
And then intrepid bands of humans migrated to Africa and therein 'devolved?'
Why is OOA political? Are there any humans out there who look at it and go, 'by gum! We came from Kenya. My daughter can marry a black now.' At a certain point, in Africa, or to humour you, in Georgia, we and black people shared ancestry, probably in the last 200,000 years. It doesn't really matter where it was.
It's more mine than yours.
How so? She lives here, and if we go by ethnicity, she's 100% European and 'Kavkazian.' Troo original human.
Unome
05-03-2015, 03:30 PM
And then intrepid bands of humans migrated to Africa and therein 'devolved?'
Possibly, Afrikans never took to civilization and technology like Europeans and Asians did, signalling a deep racial division at some point in ancient history. Also Amerindians never supposedly invented the wheel.
Why is OOA political? Are there any humans out there who look at it and go, 'by gum! We came from Kenya. My daughter can marry a black now.' At a certain point, in Africa, or to humour you, in Georgia, we and black people shared ancestry, probably in the last 200,000 years. It doesn't really matter where it was.
Because "Humanist" ideology is politickal. It's a christian ideal. Because "humanity" binds together all seven billion hominids together under one label. It's an obvious politickal tool, focusing on 'human' similarities instead of differences. If people focus on differences then it becomes too apparent and undeniable how & why some groups form and separate from each-other. Under humanist ideology, everybody needs to *tolerate* and live with each-other.
Humanism is an imperial politickal ideology. How do you create a world empire (NWO)? You force everybody, against their will, to cohabit in the same cities and environment. This means forcing blacks, whites, yellows, browns, reds, every color to *integrate*. Globalism and NWO ideologies support race-mixing and miscegenation, hence the related ideology of liberalism where everybody is "free to do whatever and date whomever they want".
If you take an objective approach to science, as any scientist and thinker ought to, then there is no real need nor cause to force diverse groups (humans) into one mish-mash common identity (hominid). People are different, physically, mentally, emotionally, etc. Politicking destroys human difference and then denies it ever existed.
Hence:
"We are all one!"
"Race is a social construct!"
"Check your privilege!"
Also it's ridiculous to contemplate existence as "all beginning from one source and point". This is a monotheistic (abrahamic) compulsion. This logic suggestions "the universe began from one point, not many" and "humanity began from one place, not many". There literally is no reason to believe this, compared to an alternative, that the universe may "begin" at multiple points, or that humans "begin" at multiple places.
Life and existence doesn't need to be concentrated on "just one absolute beginning point". That is a simplistic premise for more simplistic minds. It's easier conjecture to suppose that "everybody and everything begins at one starting point" (Creationism/BBT same difference).
I propose an alternative possibility. If there is a "starting point" to such things then there maybe many: two, five, a dozen, a hundred. Nobody knows, including "science". And again, to conclude, premising that "all begin from one point" is a monotheistic compulsion and logic.
I'm a polytheist. Not one god, but many. Not one starting point, but many. Not "one human race", but many.
Pro-difference
Pro-distinction
Pro-discrimination
See the world with through all colors, not just black & white, and not just one gray blur…
Longbowman
05-03-2015, 03:40 PM
Please spell the word 'African' correctly. Amerindians did invent the wheel, they had toys with wheels, they just didn't really use it. Rest of post ridiculous.
Iron Sheik
05-03-2015, 03:44 PM
Lol all world populations are already race-mixed, including west-eurasians. Basal eurasians are unrelated to western hunter gatherers, who are different from ancestral north eurasians. There are no pure races. All the worlds peoeples are interrelated at one point or another. It hasn't changed much in how the world developed.
There were no stable, "races" before 3000 years ago.
also to those complete brain-dead WNs. First provide genetic, anthropological and archaelogical evidence of "homo sapiens" emerging in the caucasus, then call the OoA theory political fabrication. OoA theory is pretty solidly based on genetic, archaelogical, evidence. Hundreds of thousands universities around the world don't engage in interdisciplinary research, just so they can create some vacuous race-mixing agenda. How fucking stupid are you to think that outside of your small corner on the internet, people, including academics are thinking obsessively about creating some anthropological counter-narrative to yours?
NatiaCutie
05-03-2015, 06:33 PM
You really don't speak for any significant amount or type of people…
It's more mine than yours
Your big problems are your own, not others'.
Somehow I really doubt you've ever even stepped on European soil, the amount of nonsense you say would just make any person in Western Europe laugh.
Learn to spell btw my American friend, it's political, not POLITICKAL :lol:
Kabul
05-03-2015, 07:06 PM
Every ethnicity on the face of this earth was created through the admixture of 2 or more different groups of peoples. There are no pure races. Up until the middle ages linguistic association was a far more clear denominator than "racial" or "ethnic" association.
Well, anyway, back on topic.
Cons: Some pig-faced societal-reject anthrotards would silently judge me as they sulk in their chair and die incels. Oh wait, that isn't much of a con.
Pros: If you like it then that's what matters.
NatiaCutie
05-03-2015, 07:13 PM
Every ethnicity on the face of this earth was created through the admixture of 2 or more different groups of peoples. There are no pure races. Up until the middle ages linguistic association was a far more clear denominator than "racial" or "ethnic" association.
Well, anyway, back on topic.
Cons: Some pig-faced societal-reject anthrotards would silently judge me as they sulk in their chair and die incels. Oh wait, that isn't much of a con.
Pros: If you like it then that's what matters.
I didn't get one word there, but that was very funny still :lol: :lol: :lol:
Reminded me of those funny videos about silly chavs complaining about British girls dating foreign men, so silly.
Thank you for giving me a laugh dear :)
Unome
05-03-2015, 07:21 PM
Somehow I really doubt you've ever even stepped on European soil, the amount of nonsense you say would just make any person in Western Europe laugh.
As-if where a person born matters compared to ethnicity/race?
A european born on foreign soil is no longer european? Now you are making people laugh…
Learn to spell btw my American friend, it's political, not POLITICKAL :lol:
I spell impeccably and precisely.
NatiaCutie
05-03-2015, 07:28 PM
As-if where a person born matters compared to ethnicity/race?
A european born on foreign soil is no longer european? Now you are making people laugh…
I spell impeccably and precisely.
That's good, just stay in America dreaming and imagining things, nobody is hurt or annoyed in Europe that way :)
Unome
05-03-2015, 07:30 PM
That's good, just stay in America dreaming and imagining things, nobody is hurt or annoyed in Europe that way :)
I have a strange compulsion to do the opposite of everything you say… guess I'll start booking my trip to occupied-England Londistan, and start my European burn & pillage campaign from there.
NatiaCutie
05-03-2015, 07:32 PM
I have a strange compulsion to do the opposite of everything you say… guess I'll start booking my trip to occupied-England Londistan, and start my European burn & pillage campaign from there.
For some reason I don't think you could even afford that dear. Your face and clothing look like a classical pauper who only has an internet connection to compensate for his failed career and life.
Save up for for a better bike to ride to work instead :) Chop chop!
Unome
05-03-2015, 08:06 PM
For some reason I don't think you could even afford that dear. Your face and clothing look like a classical pauper who only has an internet connection to compensate for his failed career and life.
Save up for for a better bike to ride to work instead :) Chop chop!
Money never meant much to me in life, and probably never will.
But I can still afford your time very cheaply, yes? ;)
Jägerstaffel
05-03-2015, 08:55 PM
I don't read documents; I write them.
LMFAO.
That is the douchiest thing I've ever read.
de Burgh II
05-03-2015, 08:59 PM
Liberal-minded creations? Nahhhh...
Prisoner Of Ice
05-03-2015, 09:02 PM
Cons:
Elliot Rodgers
Longbowman
05-03-2015, 09:26 PM
Cons:
Elliot Rodgers
Pros: no Timothy McVeighs.
Prisoner Of Ice
05-03-2015, 09:34 PM
Pros: no Timothy McVeighs.
That's supposed to be a pro? Considering how country has gone it's clear we did need a revolution. He also went after actual feds who took down koresh compound as well, not random people. After that and ruby ridge where special forces chumps got mowed down after shooting an unarmed pregnant woman without even announcing themselves, feds stepped down in a hurry. Just like in Nevada with Clive Bundy who BLM tried to toss off of land his familyhad rached on for 100+ years to appropriate it for chinese business interests.
Skjaldemjøden
05-03-2015, 09:44 PM
Yes, children risk an identity crisis when they hit their teens. But this is only one of many identity questions that challenge a teenager: sexuality, sociability, work, purpose, politics, religious beliefs, life style; et cetera. While it is a con, it isn't that weighty. A far more complicated situation arises when a child is the offspring of two nations at war - which is less relevant for most of Europe in our times.
♥ Lily ♥
05-03-2015, 11:04 PM
It's more mine than yours
I don't read documents; I write them.
What a megalomaniac. :D
Only documents which you write are relevant in life, huh?! Never gonna learn much with that kind of arrogant and omnipotent attitude.
♥ Lily ♥
05-03-2015, 11:31 PM
Pros: no Timothy McVeighs.
No more Anders Breiviks and David Copelands either! :thumb001:
Aviator
05-03-2015, 11:35 PM
Some people really seem to struggle when it comes to determining if a post is a joke/sarcastic or not.
Lightman
05-04-2015, 12:11 AM
A kike promoting race mixing, why am I not surprised?
Prisoner Of Ice
05-04-2015, 12:18 AM
No more Anders Breiviks and David Copelands either! :thumb001:
Instead you have 14000 children disappear every year due to brown rape cannibals.
Longbowman
05-04-2015, 01:01 AM
A kike engaging in race mixing, why am I not surprised?
I'm neither promoting it nor discouraging it. It's a private choice, Mr. Big Government.
Sikeliot
05-04-2015, 01:15 AM
My maternal aunt always says she thinks interracial marriage shouldn't be allowed nor should having mixed race children (never mind that she wouldn't be here if it didn't happen at SOME point in time). So I've grown up hearing people with those sorts of views but I think it's stupid. Just let people do what (and who) they want, and marry who they choose so long as it's a consenting adult.
Lightman
05-04-2015, 01:17 AM
I'm neither promoting it nor discouraging it. It's a private choice, Mr. Big Government.
That's fine for you but when most Jews promote racemixing , it's always for thee and not for me.
Sikeliot
05-04-2015, 01:22 AM
pro-I get to fuck Jennifer Lopez every night
con-I have to put up with her crazy Mexican momma who hates gringos.
Her mother loves white people... she hates African ancestry though, including her own.
Longbowman
05-04-2015, 01:23 AM
That's fine for you but when most Jews promote racemixing , it's always for thee and not for me.
What if I told you that Jews don't give worth a damn about your love life and the ones that do are non-traditional ones that don't have 3 Jewish kids with a traditional spouse themselves?
Lightman
05-04-2015, 01:55 AM
What if I told you that Jews don't give worth a damn about your love life and the ones that do are non-traditional ones that don't have 3 Jewish kids with a traditional spouse themselves?
The Jews has always been promoting race mixing for thousands of years. Ever since the ancient egyptians when Abraham fathered Ishmael by Hagar, and Ishmael was of course the patriarch of Semitic people of the ilk of the Arabs, who are today the Jews’ leading enemies and adversaries, as payback from God for Abraham’s race-mixing transgression in ancient times. Egypt disappeared from history forever. Jews also destroyed the Roman Empire through race mixing by creating Christianity with its filthy doctrine of equal under god then race mixing occurred. Now today Jews are promoting race mixing through the media.
The following speech was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952
The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave. We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our control Commissions will, in the interest of peace and wiping out our interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with white. The white woman must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark people.
"One world - one race: the deliberate encouragement of inter-racial marriage."
Rabbi Abraham Feinberg.
Longbowman
05-04-2015, 02:11 AM
The Jews has always been promoting race mixing for thousands of years. Ever since the ancient egyptians when Abraham fathered Ishmael by Hagar, and Ishmael was of course the patriarch of Semitic people of the ilk of the Arabs, who are today the Jews’ leading enemies and adversaries, as payback from God for Abraham’s race-mixing transgression in ancient times. Egypt disappeared from history forever. Jews also destroyed the Roman Empire through race mixing by creating Christianity with its filthy doctrine of equal under god then race mixing occurred. Now today Jews are promoting race mixing through the media.
The following speech was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952
Rabbi Abraham Feinberg.
Didn't read.
Mortimer
05-04-2015, 02:19 AM
whats up with this "jews promote race mixing" jews dont give a fuck really, and they come in all colours and shapes you got the jews who wear yarmulke go to synagogue eat kosker and want to marry only a jewess and you got the jews like longbowman who is in happy relationship with a gentile euroasian
Felix Volkbein
05-04-2015, 05:30 AM
No,they aren't and they don't!
Then how come the poorest, dumbest, and most crime-ridden areas of Brazil are those with higher percentages of Black DNA?
SupaThug
05-04-2015, 05:35 AM
Then how come the poorest, dumbest, and most crime-ridden areas of Brazil are those with higher percentages of Black DNA?
Historical factors like slavery,ever heard about it?
Felix Volkbein
05-04-2015, 05:38 AM
Historical factors like slavery,ever heard about it?
How come the same statement holds true everywhere in the world, including countries that never enslaved Blacks on their soil, like Canada and the UK and the Netherlands? Why is Liberia also a mess? Why is Haiti such a shithole even though it's been free for two centuries?
SupaThug
05-04-2015, 05:43 AM
How come the same statement holds true everywhere in the world, including countries that never enslaved Blacks on their soil, like Canada and the UK and the Netherlands? Why is Liberia also a mess? Why is Haiti such a shithole even though it's been free for two centuries?
Because blacks on these countries are mostly of recent immigrant origin,anyway,there are blacks doing well in these countries...African countries like Liberia have been run by dictators for a long time...Haiti has alaways been a mess,it's true,but you can't take a unsuccesful example like it to claim blacks are savages as you claim.
Felix Volkbein
05-04-2015, 05:47 AM
Because blacks on these countries are mostly of recent immigrant origin,anyway,there are blacks doing well in these countries...African countries like Liberia have been run by dictators for a long time...Haiti has alaways been a mess,it's true,but you can't take a unsuccesful example like it to claim blacks are savages as you claim.
So where are all the successful Black countries? How come whenever Blacks take over a city in America, e.g. Detroit or Baltimore, the place turns to shit? How do they consistently manage to ruin everything Whites built?
SupaThug
05-04-2015, 05:51 AM
So where are all the successful Black countries? How come whenever Blacks take over a city in America, e.g. Detroit or Baltimore, the place turns to shit? How do they consistently manage to ruin everything Whites built?
Actually,there are no black countries that you could call ''succesful'' or developed,but plenty of the fastest growing markets in the world are in Africa!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-25/the-20-fastest-growing-economies-this-year
SupaThug
05-04-2015, 05:58 AM
Then how come the poorest, dumbest, and most crime-ridden areas of Brazil are those with higher percentages of Black DNA?
Hmh...and I forgot to tell you that the second richest state in Brazil,Rio de Janeiro,is the second most african place in Brazil,full of black DNA!
Felix Volkbein
05-04-2015, 05:59 AM
Actually,there are no black countries that you could call ''succesful'' or developed
You could've stopped right there.
The only reason those Black economies are growing at such a fast rate is that they're starting from a very very very low base. This is Economics 101. If you start without much, then your growth rate is going to look deceptively rapid as you begin to reach the stages that everyone else reached long ago.
StonyArabia
05-04-2015, 06:03 AM
Barbados and Bahamas are relatively well off Black nations actually.
SupaThug
05-04-2015, 06:04 AM
You could've stopped right there.
The only reason those Black economies are growing at such a fast rate is that they're starting from a very very very low base. This is Economics 101. If you start without much, then your growth rate is going to look deceptively rapid as you begin to reach the stages that everyone else reached long ago.
As I told you,Africa was doomed by dicatorships for a long time...and if blacks were the piece of shit you claimed them to be,these countries would all be in recession,you are just pointing out the obvious when say that they are starting from a very low base,who cares...they are growing and you can't acceot that fact because you are prejudicied against blacks!
SupaThug
05-04-2015, 06:05 AM
Barbados and Bahamas are relatively well off Black nations actually.
Good examples Nabatea.
Dictator
05-04-2015, 06:11 AM
:popcorn:
♥ Lily ♥
05-04-2015, 06:50 AM
Instead you have 14000 children disappear every year due to brown rape cannibals.
Really?!? Nobody (not even the police) knows what happened to those runaway teens yet, so what are you on about with your conspiracy theories that missing kids were abducted by 'brown rape cannibals' and the other claims your ilk made on another thread about runaway teens being abducted by immigrants and 'used as meat in a kebab store.' Pff. :picard1:
Start showing the actual factual sources of what really happened to all of the missing children if you really know more about where they are than the police involved in their cases does, instead of concocting stupid conspiracy theories and malicious accusations based on no real evidence, but merely from figments of your warped imagination. Your conspiracy accusations wouldn't hold any validity with Scotland Yard, nor in any court trial without actual evidence for your imaginative and sick claims and accusations. Go and name the people you are claiming to have eaten the runaway teens in a court case then... :rolleyes:
Maybe you ate them, huh? The thought and idea is in your own warped head, n'est-ce pas?! OAO.
Prisoner Of Ice
05-04-2015, 06:52 AM
Why do you love to defend black muslim rape and murder so much? So pathetic.
Unome
05-04-2015, 07:04 AM
Never gonna learn much with that kind of arrogant and omnipotent attitude.
If I want to learn how to destroy millenniums of years of European values, culture, and lineage in a single lifetime then you and Natia will be my #1 and #2 educators.
♥ Lily ♥
05-04-2015, 07:41 AM
Why do you love to defend black muslim rape and murder so much? So pathetic.
I'm not defending actual and proven real rapists, proven child traffickers, proven paedophiles, or proven murderers (including Myra Hindley, Fred West, Doctor Harold Shipman, Beverley Allitt, the Camden Ripper, the Yorkshire Ripper, Gary Glitter, Ian Watkins, Jimmy Savile, Ted Bundy, Josef Fritzel, Anders Breivik, David Copeland, Timothy McVeigh, high school shooters, etc... and the atrocities, genocides, and mass rapes and murders to millions of people under former Empires....and all the child victims at the childrens care home in Haut de la Garenne on the small and quiet English Channel island of Jersey... and the 250,000 British children who were proven to have been abducted by the catholic churches and taken to Australia and Canada which caused a national scandal in all 3 countries... and the 50,000 dead childrens bodies found around both the Anglican and Catholic churches in Canada... and all the stolen children who were taken by nuns in Argentina and Spain too... and the child rapes across Ireland in the catholic churches there as well... which are all proven cases!)
I'm defending the facts and truth against your untrue accusations and malicious lies you spew of missing children being 'eaten by immigrants' (which is utter codswallop and a load of bollocks!) Would you bet your money that your speculative claims and malicious accusations are factually true?!?
Hey, here's 2 real proven serial-killing, paedophiliac, murdererous, necrophiliac, cannibals for you to digest, (before you go to your holy communion to preach love and peace for all, and practice symbolic cannibalism by symbolically drinking the blood and symbolically eating the flesh of your sacrificed 'blond' dead man hanging on the cross, which is reminiscent of maggots feeding off a dead corpse);-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Dahmer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Nilsen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtCjQ233_h4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0tJ4u1Lldk
Are you able to differentiate truth, facts, and reality from your imagination?
Porpolita
05-04-2015, 09:56 AM
My maternal aunt always says she thinks interracial marriage shouldn't be allowed nor should having mixed race children (never mind that she wouldn't be here if it didn't happen at SOME point in time)
This is self-hatred at its finest. Does she realise that some of her recent ancestors were mixed?
Yeah, sure. Guys like antonio banderas are very popular, but they are mostly spanish blood, and they are hardly the average. Especially these days we get mainly pure indeo types coming across the border.
I think that is happening everywhere, even here in Kansas. In places like CA and AZ it has been like that for a long time.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 10:53 PM
Mixed race population have brown skin and mongol shaped eyes.
Longbowman
05-05-2015, 10:54 PM
Mixed race population have brown skin and mongol shaped eyes.
Depends on the mixed race population.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 10:55 PM
If I want to learn how to destroy millenniums of years of European values, culture, and lineage in a single lifetime then you and Natia will be my #1 and #2 educators.
Both of them are subhumans don't listen to them or debate with them. They are the typical lower class peasantry with non white ancestry or have produced such offspring. These types of people are abominations.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 10:56 PM
Depends on the mixed race population.
White people are not mixed. They are God's chosen race. The rest of mankind is not. I don't really care which population. I would say Asians [eastern orientals] are the least mixed or not mixed at all.
The darker the skin the more likely they are mongrel offspring or some other beast of the field.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 10:57 PM
Pros: no Timothy McVeighs.
He was a hero.
Longbowman
05-05-2015, 10:59 PM
Your last two posts make me question your sanity. Whatever, no Adam Lanzas.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 11:00 PM
No,they aren't and they don't!
Look at down south here in the states. the most backward. look at detriot look at the Caribbean....LOL race mixing literally destroys civilizations.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 11:01 PM
Your last two posts make me question your sanity. Whatever, no Adam Lanzas.
Adam Lanza was a subhuman.
Timothy McVeigh bombed the feds. He is a hero for Christianity as far as I am concerned.
SupaThug
05-05-2015, 11:03 PM
Look at down south here in the states. the most backward. look at detriot look at the Caribbean....LOL race mixing literally destroys civilizations.
Wow,so many convincing arguments...
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 11:05 PM
Race mix populations here perform the same as those who are not. I might add though there is an exception that maybe some Asians/Eurasian mongrels are smart like the whites but the others are not intelligent what so ever.
There are race differences whether we like it or not. A society that becomes dysgenic is a society that's bound to fall apart. We see that happening here in America. If Europe wants to go down that road and continue with the immorality they will end up like USA. A shithole.
Already large areas are brown and will continue to become more and more brown and it will resemble a third world country. Oh well.
LightHouse89
05-05-2015, 11:06 PM
Wow,so many convincing arguments...
The best part about it is that I do not have to even argue about it because it is literally happening.
Not to mention brown and blacks here are not that smart. Don believe me look it up your self. I am not doing YOUR homework.
Thunder_shock
05-06-2015, 12:38 PM
The product of an interracial marriage would struggle to find a bone marrow transplant, actually it's extremly hard. This is down to the genetic differences in the immune system, the bone marrow brings a new immune system, the new white blood cells will attack the host body.
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html
LightHouse89
05-06-2015, 01:39 PM
The product of an interracial marriage would struggle to find a bone marrow transplant, actually it's extremly hard. This is down to the genetic differences in the immune system, the bone marrow brings a new immune system, the new white blood cells will attack the host body.
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html
mixed race be superior yo! muh dick muh dick!
the middle class mind thinks its a wonderful idea. doesnt matter what the health problems could occur from it. No! but I have rights! I should be able to do what I want!
My rights to marry a man or non white woman! That is liberation. That is freedomz. :rolleyes:
My god why did we close the gas camps from world war 2. We need them more now than ever to save western civilization.
LoLeL
12-19-2016, 05:35 PM
People who suffer from racial fetishism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_fetishism) should not do it. For the other people, it's their life so it's none of my business. Maybe they really love each other, they can manage a mixed family and they are aware of what they do.
Iloko
01-28-2017, 12:14 AM
Good for the children they will birth. Because mixing strengthens the DNA.
Dr. Bambo
01-30-2017, 11:51 AM
Nope.
LoLeL
01-23-2018, 05:34 PM
Good for the children they will birth. Because mixing strengthens the DNA.
How? Any source?
Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin
01-23-2018, 06:20 PM
Pros - my kids become mixed
Cons - walking through alabama might be dangerous
Berlko2
01-23-2018, 06:53 PM
Marriage itself has pros and cons, irrespective of whether it's interracial or not.
That said, a con of interracial marriage could be that the parent (if they decide to have children) with recessive genes will have a child that will not look similar to them.
Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin
01-23-2018, 06:58 PM
Marriage itself has pros and cons, irrespective of whether it's interracial or not.
That said, a con of interracial marriage could be that the parent (if they decide to have children) with recessive genes will have a child that will not look similar to them.
You realize children tend to look like their parents right. Even when they are mixed? Cuz you know. They have their genes?
Black Panther
01-23-2018, 06:58 PM
Pros - my kids become mixed
Cons - walking through alabama might be dangerous
Aren't you "mixed race" already?
Black Panther
01-23-2018, 07:01 PM
I am pro or con depending on the circumstances. I am against race mixing if it is intended to genocide a people like the case with Afro-Brazilians, who were killed off by the White Brazilians through race mixing. However, if it's happening to an equal extent in all continents, I am neutral to it.
Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin
01-23-2018, 07:02 PM
Aren't you "mixed race" already?I can still mix more. I can mix with an asian girl or pacific islander.
Also i can mix with an anglo american girl or german ect. I dont have those genes.
Black Panther
01-23-2018, 07:04 PM
I can still mix more. I can mix with an asian girl or pacific islander.
Well, it would further dilute your African roots, so the children would become quasi-hapas.
Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin
01-23-2018, 07:12 PM
Well, it would further dilute your African roots, so the children would become quasi-hapas.I'll swirl them black womens too.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d2/fb/67/d2fb67881aad095598ffef3be3b16571--ebony-girls-ebony-women.jpg
Black Panther
01-23-2018, 09:35 PM
I'll swirl them black womens too.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d2/fb/67/d2fb67881aad095598ffef3be3b16571--ebony-girls-ebony-women.jpg
That's how I want my White genes to die off :cool:
Berlko2
01-23-2018, 09:52 PM
You realize children tend to look like their parents right. Even when they are mixed? Cuz you know. They have their genes?
Of course children inherit their parent's genes. I didn't said that. I said that the parent with recessive genes will pass down less traits or they will be much less visible.
It's not always like that, but it happens in the majority of the cases.
Example: a 100% white dad and a 100% black mother will give birth to an offpring that will be probably dark-skinned, black/brown curly hair and the probabilities of having light eyes is very low. The child will be much more similar to his mother than his father.
LoLeL
06-12-2018, 08:09 AM
Good for the children they will birth. Because mixing strengthens the DNA.
^This
Longbowman
06-12-2018, 02:08 PM
Of course children inherit their parent's genes. I didn't said that. I said that the parent with recessive genes will pass down less traits or they will be much less visible.
It's not always like that, but it happens in the majority of the cases.
Example: a 100% white dad and a 100% black mother will give birth to an offpring that will be probably dark-skinned, black/brown curly hair and the probabilities of having light eyes is very low. The child will be much more similar to his mother than his father.
Nonsense. The kid will on average be intermediate and usually to a European that will mean he looks black because the black phenotype spectrum is so extensive due to how we perceive race.
That's how I want my White genes to die off :cool:
You may suffer the same fate as Kevin-Prince Boateng (half Ghanaian, half German, his wife Melissa Satta is Sardinian-Italian). The Neolithic is strong in her
https://preview.ibb.co/jWmzKd/29416323_2054636514794070_7242862449441898496_n.jp g (https://ibb.co/mB4VQJ)
https://preview.ibb.co/g7PfQJ/29088882_2349192918440020_6878547977477029888_n.jp g (https://ibb.co/kN1S5J)
https://preview.ibb.co/hPFn5J/30084330_188839868579945_1989501200231301120_n.jpg (https://ibb.co/ewvn5J)
https://preview.ibb.co/for25J/31571228_372835906544251_1585217367472865280_n.jpg (https://ibb.co/euqJed)
BLEACHED
J. Ketch
06-12-2018, 06:29 PM
Con: It is a crime against nature.
Morena
06-12-2018, 07:07 PM
You may suffer the same fate as Kevin-Prince Boateng (half Ghanaian, half German, his wife Melissa Satta is Sardinian-Italian). The Neolithic is strong in her
https://preview.ibb.co/jWmzKd/29416323_2054636514794070_7242862449441898496_n.jp g (https://ibb.co/mB4VQJ)
https://preview.ibb.co/g7PfQJ/29088882_2349192918440020_6878547977477029888_n.jp g (https://ibb.co/kN1S5J)
https://preview.ibb.co/hPFn5J/30084330_188839868579945_1989501200231301120_n.jpg (https://ibb.co/ewvn5J)
https://preview.ibb.co/for25J/31571228_372835906544251_1585217367472865280_n.jpg (https://ibb.co/euqJed)
BLEACHED
I do wonder. That kid looks so white...:rolleyes:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.