A working model of the deep relationships of diverse modern human genetic lineages outside of Africa

[Harkonnen]

http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2017/01/10/molbev.msw293.long

Brand new paper by Lipson and Reich models both MA1 and WHGs mixed with East Eurasian.

Kostenki and presumably also Oase and Ust-Ishim represent pure West Eurasians.

[Harkonnen]

According to this paper Finns are 30% Mongoloid.

[Rethel]

Subscribed.

[Harkonnen]

Subscribed.

According to this paper French are about 20% Mongoloid, so it means you are at least 25% Mongoloid.

[Harkonnen]

While we did not carefully model present-day Europeans in our main admixture graph, we did build an extended graph with French added (25 individuals). A good fit was obtained with four ancestry components, related to western (K14), northern (near the base of the MA1 lineage), and eastern (specified as the same source as for MA1) Eurasians, plus Basal Eurasian (specified without Neanderthal introgression (Lazaridis et al., 2016)). The inferred proportions were 27.7%, 34.9%, 23.2%, and 14.2%, respectively, with essentially no change in the list of residuals

So French are:

27.7% Kostenki (West Eurasian)
34.9% MA1 (North Eurasian)
23.2% Eastern Eurasian
14.2% Basal Eurasian

[Harkonnen]

Basal Eurasian is missing from the tree to keep it simple with the crown eurasians:

http://i64.tinypic.com/npigew.jpg

After the divergence of Dinka from non-Africans, the next split point on the modern human lineage in our model is that between the major eastern and western clades (the node labeled “Non-African”—although we note that the split point of Basal Eurasian would be deeper.) This split is soon followed on the western Eurasian branch by the split between K14 and Ust’-Ishim (i.e., their respective modern-human ancestry components). The original Ust’-Ishim analysis (Fu et al., 2014) inferred a near-trifurcation at this point, and we wished to test whether K14 (and other western Eurasians) and Ust’-Ishim form a statistically supported clade. In fact, while the best-fitting position for Ust’-Ishim is on the western lineage (0.6 shared drift), the inferred 95% confidence interval for this point overlaps the eastern/western split (standard error 0.4 for the Ust’-Ishim split position), so that we cannot confidently resolve the branching order. We therefore continue to regard this cluster as approximately a trifurcation; while we show Ust’Ishim at its best-fitting split point in Figure 1, we color-code it as a basal non-African rather than a member of the western clade.

[Harkonnen]

There was also recent Danish paper which modeled Germans as 20% East Asian. I go see if I can find it.

[Harkonnen]

So French are:

27.7% Kostenki (West Eurasian)
34.9% MA1 (North Eurasian)
23.2% Eastern Eurasian
14.2% Basal Eurasian

You folks should seriously read this and understand the racial reality.

[Marmara]

It doesn't mean French are 20% or Finns are 30% Mongoloid. It only shows the genetic relation of modern populations.

They purposelly selected extremely distant samples to determine in where modern populations are.

It's a fact that modern humans are more related to each other than ancient populations, mixing occured.

[Harkonnen]

It doesn't mean French are 20% or Finns are 30% Mongoloid. It only shows the genetic relation of modern populations.

They purposelly selected extremely distant samples to determine in where modern populations are.

It's a fact that modern humans are more related to each other than ancient populations, mixing occured.

Yes it means exactly that.

[Bobby Martnen]

This thread should be moved to the Troll Carnival where it belongs.

[Harkonnen]

This thread should be moved to the Troll Carnival where it belongs.

You belong to troll carnival :D

[Bobby Martnen]

You belong to troll carnival :D

:butt: