Classify Pictish man

[Peterski]

The face of a Pictish man who was killed 1,400 years ago has been reconstructed by Dundee University researchers: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-39002843

http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/AAF8/production/_94686734_d08fc00c-06e2-47bf-a0f4-233c3c5fecb3.jpg

[decordoba]

Compare with the reconstruction of a man who was living in the area of Scotland in the Neolithic age. But he didnot look Neolithic at all.

http://www.culture24.org.uk/asset_arena/8/70/26/462078/v0_master.jpg

Almost the same phenotype like the Pictish man.

Now I would like to see the reconstruction of a Mesolithic Scottsman - old European ;)

[decordoba]

I classify the Pictish man - Sub-Nordid or Atlantid Nordid.

And I guess that their phenotype didnot change much the last 8.000 years (or longer). This phenotype is not IndoEuropean !

[Enflamme]

Otzi

[Peterski]

This phenotype is not IndoEuropean !

Why not? Picts were Indo-Europeans. Most likely Celtic-speakers.

[Percivalle]

I classify the Pictish man - Sub-Nordid or Atlantid Nordid.

And I guess that their phenotype didnot change much the last 8.000 years (or longer). This phenotype is not IndoEuropean !

Why do you always use the space before punctuation like in French?

French sentences have spaces before their exclamation marks (!) or question marks (?), a practice not common in English and in German.

[decordoba]

Why not? Picts were Indo-Europeans. Most likely Celtic-speakers.

I mean, that this phenotype of this Scottsman exist longer than 8.000 years. And in Neolithic-Age no Indoeuropean immigrant had entered the British islands yet.

Ok - the Picts had a Celtic language, but language, culture and ancestry are not the same

[decordoba]

I am not expert in Latin languages, but I think you can read and understand, what I mean.

It is my decision how I put the punctuation marks!
And you're not my teacher,
I am allergic to master-dare of any person!

[Peterski]

the Picts had a Celtic language, but language, culture and ancestry are not the same

They will probably test the DNA of that Pict, so we will see.

But I'm quite sure that he was genetically much more similar to Post-Neolithic Britons (Rathlin, Hinxton, Eburacum ancient samples & modern Britons) than to Neolithic populations of the British Isles (Ballynahatty samples). In other words, I'm quite sure that Picts had a lot of ANE / Steppe admixtures.

[decordoba]

Of course the Picts have an Indoeuopean Admixture, maybe more than me ;)

But I mean the phenotype of this reconstruction, if this phenotype is true, it didnot change much to the Neolithic Scotsman.

I conclude that this phenotype is prae-Indoeuropean and exists more than 8,000 years.

The autosomale DNA and the phenotype need not necessarily be cover-equal. I remember any pics of men here in "The Apricity" who looked definitely North-African - and they had just 5 % North-African DNA in their autosomale-DNA-test.
Their North African DNA was predominant - even just 5 % of their DNA. (in German: ihre nordafrikanische DNA schlägt durch).

[Peterski]

I conclude that this phenotype is prae-Indoeuropean and exists more than 8,000 years.

It can be 8,000 years old but some Proto-Indo-Europeans also had this phenotype:

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?201406-Classify-Proto-Indo-Europeans&p=4201715&viewfull=1#post4201715

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?201406-Classify-Proto-Indo-Europeans&p=4206630&viewfull=1#post4206630

In other words an IE immigrant could have the same phenotype as a local farmer.

[Learning_Genetics]

It is not uncommon to see people with this sort of appearance in Scotland today. Even the hair is similar.

[averagedude]

Proto-Keltic-Nordid

[Mikula]

http://img.cncenter.cz/img/3/article/1904514_stonehedge.jpg

[Grab the Gauge]

Compare with the reconstruction of a man who was living in the area of Scotland in the Neolithic age. But he didnot look Neolithic at all.

http://www.culture24.org.uk/asset_arena/8/70/26/462078/v0_master.jpg

Almost the same phenotype like the Pictish man.

Now I would like to see the reconstruction of a Mesolithic Scottsman - old European ;)

Not even remotely the same, honestly you need a couple of 9mm slugs to the kneecaps for your incessant shitposting.

[Grab the Gauge]

It can be 8,000 years old but some Proto-Indo-Europeans also had this phenotype:

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?201406-Classify-Proto-Indo-Europeans&p=4201715&viewfull=1#post4201715

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?201406-Classify-Proto-Indo-Europeans&p=4206630&viewfull=1#post4206630

In other words an IE immigrant could have the same phenotype as a local farmer.

All those reconstructions are garbage, Indo Europeans were pretty much exclusively Cro Magnon (protoeuropoid) and Mongoloid.There were no Nordics or Mediterraneans among them, contrary to the humilated squeals emanating from the forsaken recesses of the homoweb.

[Peterski]

All those reconstructions are garbage, Indo Europeans were pretty much exclusively Cro Magnon (protoeuropoid) and Mongoloid. There were no Nordics or Mediterraneans among them, contrary to the humilated squeals emanating from the forsaken recesses of the homoweb.

Amerind, not Mongoloid.

[Peterski]

Another Pictish man:

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?231396-Classify-Pictish-man-(340-615-AD)&p=4876111&viewfull=1#post4876111

[Odin]

Brünn.