Log in

View Full Version : PATRI-REALITY PROVED AGAIN (of course it was obvious since ever, but this is for TA-tards to absorb)



Rethel
06-29-2017, 07:41 PM
http://yournewswire.com/women-dna-man-sex/

Semen turns woman into image and likness of her husband.
It was prooved two years ago by Australian scientists, now another study...

The more slutish girl is, the more schizophrenic become...


Women Absorb And Retain DNA From Every Man They Have Sex With

Women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have sexual intercourse, according to a new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

The study, which discovered the startling information by accident, was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases that occur more frequently in males.

But as the scientists picked apart the female brain, the study began to veer wildly off course. As it turns out, the female brain is even more mysterious than we previously thought.

The study found that female brains often harbor “male microchimerism“, or in other words, the presence of male DNA that originated from another individual, and are genetically distinct from the cells that make up the rest of the woman.

fake-news-websites

According to the study: “63% of the females (37 of 59) tested harbored male microchimerism in the brain. Male microchimerism was present in multiple brain regions.”

So 63% of women carry male DNA cells that live in their brains. Obviously the researchers wanted to know where the male DNA came from.

Anyone care to guess? From the women’s fathers? No. Your father’s DNA combines with your mother’s to create your unique DNA. So where else could it come from?

Through the study the researchers assumed that the most likely answer was that all male DNA found living in the female brain came from a male pregnancy. That was the safe, politically correct assumption. But these researchers were living in denial.

Because when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant, let alone with a male child, they STILL found male DNA cells prevalent in the female brain.

At this point the scientists didn’t know what the hell was going on. Confused, they did their best to hide the evidence until they could understand and explain it. They buried it in numerous sub studies and articles, but if you sift through them all you will find the damning statement, the one line that gives the game away and explains exactly where these male DNA cells come from.

What are they so afraid of?

“CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.“

So according to the scientists, the possible sources of the male DNA cells living in the women’s brains are:

an abortion the woman didn’t know about
a male twin that vanished
an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation
sexual intercourse

Considering the fact that 63% of women have male DNA cells residing in the recesses of their brain, which of the above possibilities do you think is the most likely origin of the male DNA?

The first three options apply to a very small percentage of women. They couldn’t possibly account for the 63% figure. The fourth option? It’s rather more common.

The answer is 4. Sex.

This has very important ramifications for women. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you for life. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had been carrying the living male DNA inside them for well over 50 years.

Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and swims until it crashes headlong into a wall, and then it attaches and burrows into your flesh. If it’s in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then it digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine.

Like something out of a scifi movie, it becomes a part of you and you can’t get rid of it.

We are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourse.

Sources

Male Microchimerism in the Human Female Brain
(http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592)
Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16084184/)

Rethel
06-29-2017, 07:47 PM
For being complete, has to be added this:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730313-500-semen-has-controlling-power-over-female-genes-and-behaviour/

Semen has controlling power over female genes and behaviour

By Michael Le Page

THERE’S more to semen than sperm. In many animals, seminal fluid alters both the bodies and sometimes even the behaviour of females. Human semen, too, triggers changes in the uterus, and might have wider effects on women, aimed at just one goal.

“It’s all about maximising the chances of the male reproducing,” says Sarah Robertson of the University of Adelaide in Australia. The effects are most striking in fruit flies: seminal fluid can make the females eat more, lay more eggs and be less receptive to other males.

Now a team led by Tracey Chapman at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, UK, has found that male fruit flies selectively alter the chemical make-up of their seminal fluid. In the presence of rivals, the males produce more seminal proteins. “It came as a real surprise,” says Chapman. “It’s a sophisticated response to the social and sexual situation.”

Some of their findings were presented at the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution conference in Vienna, Austria, last week, including their discovery that one of these proteins is a “master regulator” of genes. Females exposed to it show a wide range of changes in gene expression.

Chapman thinks this kind of seminal signalling is widespread in the animal world. The semen of people, pigs and mice affects the female reproductive tract, and the question is whether it can also produce behavioural responses in female mammals similar to those seen in fruit flies.

“It’s all about maximising the chances of the male reproducing”

There have been claims that semen can do everything from making women sleepy after sex to strengthening the emotional bond with their partner. One 2002 study, based on a survey of 300 students, even found that women whose partners did not use condoms scored lower on a measure of depression.

If that effect is real, depression in some people might be treatable with artificial-semen suppositories. Gordon Gallup of the State University of New York at Albany, who carried out the study, says a PhD student of his has replicated the finding in a survey of 1000 women, but the results were never published.

In flies, seminal proteins can directly affect behaviour because they enter the circulatory system, travelling throughout the body to the brain. “They rapidly get to many places in the female,” Chapman says.

From the female’s perspective, seminal signalling is usually nothing sinister. According to Chapman, it’s an efficient way of getting a female’s body ready to produce offspring as soon as possible.

It’s not clear whether any components of human semen get into the bloodstream, but it could be possible, particularly for small molecules like hormones, says Robertson. She has shown that seminal fluid induces expression of a range of genes in the cervix, including ones that affect the immune system, ovulation, the receptivity of the uterus lining to an embryo, and even the growth of the embryo itself.

As for seminal signalling, she thinks it’s more likely to be indirect, with semen causing the cervix to produce molecules that influence the rest of the body. Her team is studying the effect of three microRNAs – RNA fragments that affect gene expression – released by the cervix in response to semen.

Whatever the mechanism, both Chapman and Robertson say it’s plausible that semen could have effects on women well beyond their reproductive tract.

This article appeared in print under the headline “Females heed seminal signals”

Óttar
06-29-2017, 08:02 PM
Bullshit.

http://www.snopes.com/women-retain-dna/

Rethel
06-29-2017, 08:33 PM
Bullshit.

http://www.snopes.com/women-retain-dna/

In conclusion they disclaim only: it clearly wouldn’t happen in all cases.

And this research did not claim it, so idk what they want to debunk - fictional problem.

Secondly beneath you have links to originbal articles.
Thirdly - the reaserch from 2015 which say about tiny something else, but complete this new studies.

Btw, even if it wouldnt be true at all (but is), then reality is anyway as it claims.

Only blind people, stupid ones, ignorants or butthurted leftists do not see this.
It is enaugh to read some handbook from the schooll, to lean it. Nothing hard, really.

Kriptc06
10-11-2017, 09:16 PM
I've read that the mother exchange DNA with the fetus, so if its a male, she WILL have some cells with Y chromosome, specially in the brain, this can happen. I've read something about this and longevity of women, they could "steal" some cells to repair hers. So theres some truth behind this.

I'm not sure however if a second pregnancy of a different male would affect this child with the first male DNA.

https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/growth-curve/children%E2%80%99s-cells-live-mothers

Rethel
11-25-2017, 10:44 AM
After McCree900-Gilgamesh put it here...
If someone still will be autosomalist after
that, then he is autosomalotard indeed...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=EnmQtjWBrfI


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUXxLlVKLw