Archaic DNA Matches

[Wrong]

Seems like I got quite a high match with a number of Ancient samples

0.5cM

http://i.imgur.com/RuWMbp3.png



Post yours.

[RN97]

http://i.imgur.com/x8ZRlB2.png

[Wrong]

img
We both got high Ancient matches on many, both more and less on different samples.

[Dick]

Threshold should be higher. 2-3

[Lek]

Pretty much everyone Ive seen gets that.

[Wrong]

Threshold should be higher. 2-3
Only a few small segments here with 2cM, tiny with 3 ;)

[Wrong]

Pretty much everyone Ive seen gets that.
I saw a French who I compared to that got way lower in 90% of the Ancient segments.

[Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas]

How we see that?

[Wrong]

How we see that?
http://i.imgur.com/bQwmtY0.png

[Lek]

I saw a French who I compared to that got way lower in 90% of the Ancient segments.

Depends on how isolated their ancestors were. could even be Basque descendant.

[Wrong]

Depends on how isolated their ancestors were. could even be Basque descendant.
I meant that I got higher in 90%.

[Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas]

https://s9.postimg.org/k5ix91gjj/archaic.jpg

[Iloko]

Ancient as hell!

[Wrong]

Ancient as hell!
:thumb001:

[Wrong]

Bump for this great tool.

[Arduti]

Nope, guys, you need to do a one-to-one comparison between your kit and each of those kits. Lower the threshold to 1 in the cM field, otherwise the default will be 7 cM and it's unlikely that you will match any ancient sample at 7 cM length or more.

Do that and come back and repost your results.

I matched to 3 of the ancient samples in Hungary and one in Stuttgart Germany. But do not think ancient peoples at all resembled the peoples who inhabit those regions today. The haplogroups associated with my ancient samples do not match the populations that cluster there today.