PDA

View Full Version : The love-cheat gene: One in four born to be unfaithful, claim scientists



Daos
12-03-2010, 11:55 AM
It might seem like the perfect get-out clause for those with a *roving eye: some people just aren’t built to be faithful.

Scientists have found a gene that raises the odds of *cheating on a partner.

They say that when a man or woman with the ‘love rat gene’ has an affair, they receive the same chemical rush as a gambler whose luck has changed or an alcoholic savouring a drink.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/12/02/article-1334932-05794E7D0000044D-565_468x339.jpg

Researchers quizzed 180 young men and women about their attitude towards relationships and tested them for a gene called DRD4, which affects levels of the brain chemical dopamine.

The one quarter or so with the ‘love rat’ version of the gene were more than twice as likely to be unfaithful. And when they did cheat, they had more one-night stands, the journal PLoS ONE reports.

Researcher Justin Garcia said: ‘What we found was that individuals with a certain variant of the DRD4 gene were more likely to have a history of uncommitted sex, including one-night stands and acts of infidelity.

‘The motivation seems to stem from a system of pleasure and reward, which is where the release of dopamine comes in.

‘In cases of uncommitted sex, the risks are high, the rewards substantial and the motivation variable – all elements that ensure a dopamine “rush”.’

He added that his results suggest it is possible to feel committed to a partner, but still feel the need to cheat on them.

But those with a wandering eye cannot wholly blame their genes.

Mr Garcia, of the State University of New York, said: ‘The study doesn’t let transgressors off the hook. Not everyone with this *genotype (genetic make-up) will have one-night stands or commit infidelity.’

Last month, scientists found that the same strain of the DRD4 gene can also make people have more liberal views.

Because the genetic variant drives people to seek out ‘novelty’, it can also make people more likely to seek out less conventional political views, the U.S. study found.

Those with the gene supposedly seek out other people’s points of view and are influenced by them far more than those without the gene.

In the U.S. this mean that people with the gene were more likely to have a liberal political viewpoint.


Source (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1334932/Sexually-promiscuous-gene-Why-cheats-blame-affairs-science.html#)

Loki
12-03-2010, 12:30 PM
Nice court case defence idea in marriage/adultery. "I couldn't help it, it's in my genes [jeans?]." 23andme could make a killing including this.

Don
12-03-2010, 01:45 PM
The old Eysenck's construct of Extraversion or "weak aras" (simplification).



http://www.kheper.net/topics/typology/eysenck_chart.gif

Grey
12-03-2010, 01:56 PM
Isn't this also the so-called "liberal gene"? Nice correlation.

Groenewolf
12-05-2010, 06:39 AM
Isn't this also the so-called "liberal gene"? Nice correlation.

I think it is, they pretty much revered to it at the bottom of this article.


Because the genetic variant drives people to seek out ‘novelty’, it can also make people more likely to seek out less conventional political views, the U.S. study found.

(...)

In the U.S. this mean that people with the gene were more likely to have a liberal political viewpoint.

Debaser11
12-05-2010, 07:28 AM
I'm not so sure I buy that liberal people are the ones seeking out less conventional points of view these days. The air outside my home is rife with liberalism and adherents are somehow viewed as mavericks of some sort? Shallow hedonistic lemmings is what I'd call them.

Oh, and a, what a nice, classy picture that is! I didn't know what "cheating" looked like. I'm glad the AP or whoever can show us all how fun and irresistable it appears to be simply by reading about a study on the subject. Lol.

Agrippa
12-05-2010, 08:59 AM
I wonder about the male : female proportions, since there should be a difference anyway and for males such short time relationships make just much more sense than females - which have much more to lose - at least in our evolutionary past, but still actually.


Researchers quizzed 180 young men and women about their attitude towards relationships and tested them for a gene called DRD4, which affects levels of the brain chemical dopamine.