WHGean admixture is overrated - otherwise we would be mulattos at beast.

[Rethel]

The blue one... a tiny part of us.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/w4P5OI3aSOT49p960CnVlb0lZn5jvku8SYymUjZfRX7u9fXg98 BWWsroumJnfzW7_oSB84Ku=w1360-h590

[Lucas]

What about CHG?

[Rethel]

I see the picture is gone. It was this:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-boprzJzw7VQ/VNxU8VTUphI/AAAAAAAAJ7g/2A_cJM6Hirk/s1600/3.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-boprzJzw7VQ/VNxU8VTUphI/AAAAAAAAJ7g/2A_cJM6Hirk/s1600/3.jpg





What about CHG?

Do you have a data?
Obviously did not influenced us too much.
But on the farmer example, we see, that the
more swarthy nation, the more Farmerish dna has.

[Rethel]

bump

[Graecian]

For your signature.
The stupidest negroid area of SSA, has R1 haplogroup too.

[Lek]

I see the picture is gone. It was this:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-boprzJzw7VQ/VNxU8VTUphI/AAAAAAAAJ7g/2A_cJM6Hirk/s1600/3.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-boprzJzw7VQ/VNxU8VTUphI/AAAAAAAAJ7g/2A_cJM6Hirk/s1600/3.jpg






Do you have a data?
Obviously did not influenced us too much.
But on the farmer example, we see, that the
more swarthy nation, the more Farmerish dna has.

Those swarthy nations are overall the most native to Europe according to your image here. Considering yamnaya peaks in North and they only entered Europe 5000 years ago, absorbing some WHG and farmer. But what we see here is the farmers adopted a steppe/IE language. But there should also be some minor CHG here.