My ancesrty report by Litvin

[Kamal900]

Special thanks to my friend, Litvin, for this amazing ancestral report.

Your ancestry 7000-5000 years ago:
• Levant, Neolithic Farmers – 51.00%
• Iran, Copper Age – 47.10%
• North-East Africa – 1.90%

https://image.ibb.co/dutJe5/2017_08_19_00_39_58_Litvin_s_Ancestry_Report_Mc_Cr ee_pdf.png

Your ancestry 5000-3000 years ago:
• Levant, Bronze Age Canaanites – 41.90%
• Levant, Bronze Age (others) – 17.10%
• Iran, Copper Age – 25.50%
• Armenia, Early Bronze Age – 6.30%
• South-East Europe, Bronze Age – 2.10%
• Anatolia, Bronze Age – 1.45%
• North Africa – 3.25%
• North-East Africa – 2.40%

https://image.ibb.co/nzi6XQ/2017_08_19_00_40_33_Litvin_s_Ancestry_Report_Mc_Cr ee_pdf.png

Your ancestry 3000-1000 years ago:
• Levant & Egypt, Iron Age – 58.75%
• Iran, Iron Age – 31.10%
• Greece, Bronze Age – 7.50%
• Armenia, Bronze Age – 2.65%

https://image.ibb.co/bFC0sQ/2017_08_19_00_40_54_Litvin_s_Ancestry_Report_Mc_Cr ee_pdf.png

[firemonkey]

Thanks to Litvin.


66560

66561

66562

[MysteriousWays]

Litvin, thank you for this!

https://s5.postimg.org/c9nmsytrb/mw-7000.png
https://s5.postimg.org/4i6wueplz/mw-5000.png
https://s5.postimg.org/7z8yxdoo7/mw-3000.png

[Dibran]

Im still waiting for mine. No response...

[Kamal900]

Im still waiting for mine. No response...

Did you pay Litvin?

[kingjohn]

very nice results all of you
the big question why he takes money for it
it is the same calculations as mlukasz
so why ? :confused:
because of the maps { very nice but still }
regards
Adam

[Dibran]

Thank Litvin.

23andme results:

66696

66697

66698

LivingDNA results:

66699

66700

66701

[Rethel]

Nice pictures, but what comes from this? What the sense of it? What is the practical value of it?

[Kriptc06]

Did you pay Litvin?

how much?

[kingjohn]

how much?

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?218371-Ancient-Ancestry-Reports
he tell the price :)

[Lek]

Thank Litvin.

23andme results:

66696

66697

66698

LivingDNA results:

66699

66700

66701

Lmao. 0.80% Steppe to almost none? I don't remember but I got a decent amount.

That Slavic migration period is just bullshit, such a sample shouldnt be included, and this isnt really an ancestry report. Not worth paying for IMO.

For example those czech medieval samples were supposed to be similar to steppe

[Rethel]

Did you pay Litvin?

Yet paying for it? Eeee...
I thought it is for fun.

It has the same relevantness as the map showing, where lived your
gene for skin colour x years ago, or the gene for the smallest toe at
your left leg. It can be probably done, at least will be possible in the
future - but what is the sense of it? None.

[Dibran]

Lmao. 0.80% Steppe to almost none? I don't remember but I got a decent amount.

That Slavic migration period is just bullshit, such a sample shouldnt be included, and this isnt really an ancestry report. Not worth paying for IMO.

For example those czech medieval samples were supposed to be similar to steppe

I think it depends on the age of the sample. For instance if you notice, in my livingdna version, it seems the wielbark and sudovia samples are absorbed into medieval slavic expansion. Whereas, the 23andme they are differentiated. They are technically steppe as well. Perhaps its the algorithm.

Why would it be bullshit? It did happen. Unless of course you mean due to insufficient samples. I am of the mind despite the accuracy or lack thereof for some calculators, its still valuable to get sometime of inference, as well as building mean averages to get a notion of what populations you match. Other than that its well informed speculation until further evidence.

Im sure these values would change as more remains are discovered and factored in. Little by little refining the process.

[Lek]

I think it depends on the age of the sample. For instance if you notice, in my livingdna version, it seems the wielbark and sudovia samples are absorbed into medieval slavic expansion. Whereas, the 23andme they are differentiated. They are technically steppe as well. Perhaps its the algorithm.

Why would it be bullshit? It did happen. Unless of course you mean due to insufficient samples. I am of the mind despite the accuracy or lack thereof for some calculators, its still valuable to get sometime of inference, as well as building mean averages to get a notion of what populations you match. Other than that its well informed speculation until further evidence.

Im sure these values would change as more remains are discovered and factored in. Little by little refining the process.

The slavic expansion here doesnt refer to the one in the balkans but when slavs expanded into Poland and Czechia, the latter two medieval samples were found in Czechia that have been used for this, in terms of actual ancestry it doesnt say much

[Dibran]

The slavic expansion here doesnt refer to the one in the balkans but when slavs expanded into Poland and Czechia, the latter two medieval samples were found in Czechia that have been used for this, in terms of actual ancestry it doesnt say much

I see what you are saying. Perhaps its just a point of reference. Much like calculators that don't include Albanians match us with Greek and Tuscan as these are the closest based on references. It is probably the same case here. I would imagine if they uncovered medieval Albanians that our results would shift drastically.

[firemonkey]

Living dna report

66887
66888
66889

In youngest mode Poland very much increased.

[kingjohn]

thank litvin :)

to be honest i like this report better than that of mlukasz
i think it is better to do it 3 periods like litvin do
because such a long time frame to split t to just 2 is wrong
because than you get Mesolithic Scandinavia and corded ware Poland together and the gap in years is huge .


now for the report i don't have power to put the maps :
but you can get the idea .
i bolded the european elments in each period :)

5000-3000 bc
6kyaCA_Iran_I1662 35.15
6kyaEN_Germany_I0048 21.65
9kyaN_Levant_AinGhazal5 15.85
9kyaN_Levant_AinGhazal1 10.00
7kyaN_Hungary_NE4 7.95

steppe
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/Yamna-en.svg/1200px-Yamna-en.svg.png :thumb001:
5kyaCA_Yamna_I0439 3.20
5kyaBA_Afanasievo_RISE509 2.50
5kyaCA_Yamna_RISE509 2.05
5kyaCA_Yamna_RISE546 1.65




Middle period:
3000-1000 bc

4kyaBA_Sidon 30.05
4kyaBA_Hungary_RISE254 12.95
4kyaEBA_Armenia_I1658 12.60
4kyaBA_Hungary_RISE374 11.15
5kyaCA_Remedello_Italy_RISE487 10.65
6kyaCA_Iran_I1665b 10.50
3kyaLBA_Hungary_BR2 8.20
6kyaCA_Iran_I1662 2.65
Anc_North_African 1.25

Youngest period:
1000 bc -1000 ad

3kyaBA_Mycenaean_I9041 32.8
3kyaMBA_Armenia_RISE423 20.4
IA_LevantEgypt_3DRIF26b 19.1
3kyaBA_Portugal_I0207 13.1
IA_LevantEgypt_3DRIF26 7.6
3kyaLBA_Sudovia_RISE598 5.2
3kyaLBA_Armenia_RISE396 1.8


regards
adam

[kingjohn]

i will add the link of the results of the other 2 members in
this forum it is the same subject same nmonte k36 by litvin
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?218517-Myanthropologies-ancient-ancestry-report/page2

[Peterski]

thank litvin* :)

to be honest i like this report better than that of mlukasz
i think it is better to do it 3 periods like litvin do

Thank you, maybe I will start offering these again with more detail and with more periods than before:

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?227660-Litvin-s-Ancient-Affinity-Maps

Because now the number of available samples is much greater than back in 2017.

I have all of 2500+ available ancient DNA samples stored on my computer in 23andMe format already.

====

*Litvin was my old nickname here, now Peterski.