PDA

View Full Version : East Asian INDOEUROPEANS and other results... (R1)



Rethel
08-20-2017, 09:26 AM
Here: http://qudro.blog.me/

https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-64c229153df49c5d14ac9879d258b497

Rethel
08-20-2017, 09:34 AM
6659966600666016660266603

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66599&d=1503221579

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66600&d=1503221598

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66601&d=1503221611

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66602&d=1503221624

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66603&d=1503221640

Rethel
08-20-2017, 09:48 AM
In Peking Indoeuropeans contain 2.84% of population, what
should make us there some 625,000 among about 22 mln inhabitants
(if the Han % applys to all population).

66606
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66606&d=1503222490

But in Tjenjin we are propotionaly half of it 1.44% = only 53,000.

Noman
08-20-2017, 09:53 AM
Very informative! Thanks.

Rethel
08-20-2017, 09:57 AM
Malay R has even some R1b!
Interesting from where? Indian migrations or colonial influence?

11.22% R1, 14.5% R.

66607
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66607&d=1503223055

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:00 AM
About Philippinos I made a Thread, but for
the record it has to be mentioned. But these
are probably a tests only from Luzon:

66608
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66608&d=1503223214

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:03 AM
Even Thailand has some R1b. Interesting from where? Maybe
from infamous tourists? But part could be probably from Indian
colonizers from pre-eurocolonial era. (Siam is IE name btw).

6.09% R1, 7.71% R.

66610
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66610&d=1503223503

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:08 AM
These guys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibe_people), have 4.65% of us = 8000 people 4000 men ~2700 adults.

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:12 AM
Peruvian R1 = 26,5%

66611

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66611&d=1503223909

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:15 AM
Eskimos' R1 = 20.68%

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66612&d=1503224086

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:30 AM
In Tibet we are 4% of R1, 5% of R.

66622
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66622&d=1503225019

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:39 AM
In Vietnam we are also... From India and probably from France ;)
Many big cities in Vietnam are bearing Indoeuropean, sanscrit names...
Interesingly, R1a and R1b are equal there... 2x1.94% = 3.88% = 3,600,000 people (!!!)

66625

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66625&d=1503225434

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:44 AM
Liaoning, Manchuria... 7.28%
So nothing strange, if hypothesy about
Gengis Khan being R1b, would be true.
Mongolia has 9% of R1. In the next one
R1b in some place in manchuria is even
higher represented. 17%! I only remain,
that he was rather from Manchuria than
Mongolia in modern terms... In the second
post of this thread is even showed an enclave
in Manchuria of R1b...

66626
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66626&d=1503225802

66627
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66627&d=1503226056

Rethel
08-20-2017, 10:52 AM
This is quite interesting!
Causulties of war in Korea (I quess it is corean side)
It would be interesting if historical battles would be sampled! :)

Anyway, only 0.3% are R1b...

66628
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=66628&d=1503226290

Rethel
08-20-2017, 12:13 PM
Something about us, but Idk what :)

http://www.shanghaistudy.net/pic/20170318/34/article_4805234_810cb28b011a6c89816368.jpeg

gültekin
08-20-2017, 12:58 PM
Do you even know how old R* haplogroup is? How can you be so idiot to associate certain haplogroups with language families? Haplogroup R* predates language families, its origin lies in North Asia, not in Poland. R haplogroup in Asia is not from Europe, it is actually the other way around. So stop fantasizing about imaginary Indo-European "Polish-looking" warriors conquering Asia and spreading their genes LOL. In the steppe corridor, conquerors always came from the East. Indo-Europeans, Huns, Avars, Pechenegs, Cumans, Mongols; the east was pushing the west.

Original Indo-Europeans did not even resemble modern Slavs, they were 1/2 CHG 1/2 EHG.

Was Mal'ta boy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal%27ta%E2%80%93Buret%27_culture) (c. 24.000 to 15.000 BP) also Indo-European? :laugh:

Rethel
08-20-2017, 01:02 PM
You are repeating yourself.
It was allready explained - so stop making the same problem over and over again.
If you do not like the name, start your own thread with whatever name you want to.
You are free to do it.

Now stop trolling. The name is not the topic here.

Pennywise
08-20-2017, 01:05 PM
Rethel and his R1 autism. Haplogroups have no impact on phenotypes, Kyrgyz are 60% R1a too, do they look "Indo-European" to you? lel.

gültekin
08-20-2017, 01:12 PM
Rethel and his R1 autism. Haplogroups have no impact on phenotypes, Kyrgyz are 60% R1a too, do they look "Indo-European" to you? lel.

Ancient North Eurasians (original R-haplogroup carriers) are said to have resembled mongoloids metrically, even though they do not fall into East Eurasian category genetically.

Pahli
08-20-2017, 08:48 PM
ANE = EHG + Some Amerindian, they were still showing Caucasoid features, however early ANE seems to be even more Mongoloid than later samples, so they were basically Eurasian.