PDA

View Full Version : WikiLeaks cleared of breaking Australian law



The Lawspeaker
12-18-2010, 10:25 PM
The Wikileaks project has been officially cleared of breaking Australian law.

The Australian Federal Police today said an investigation which began November 30 had detected no offences.

This finding is an embarrassment to Prime Minister Julia Gillard who initially said the leaking of confidential cables to Washington from the US Embassy in Canberra was illegal.

Ms Gillard later modified her position by saying the leaks had been based on an illegality - the original downloading of the diplomatic messages by a junior American soldier.

Attorney General Rob McClelland directed the AFP to examine "the matter relating to the publishing of United States (US) embassy cables containing classified information on the WikiLeaks website".

The police today said: "The AFP examined material relevant to potential Australian offences to determine whether an official investigation was warranted.

"The AFP has completed its evaluation of the material available and has not established the existence of any criminal offences where Australia would have jurisdiction.

"Where additional cables are published and criminal offences are suspected, these matters should be referred to the AFP for evaluation."

Cables published so far have established that the Australian public was given a rosier outlook on our military involvement in Afghanistan than our leaders, particularly current Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, held in private.

It has also been revealed that when Deputy Prime Minister, Julia Gillard was looking at taking the top job after two or three elections, according to a junior MP.

Most of the revelations have been embarrassing to the Government, and less frequently to the Liberals.

Source: Courier Mail (http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/breaking-news/wikileaks-cleared-of-breaking-australian-law/story-e6freonf-1225972732042?from=public_rss) (17 December 2010)

Peasant
12-18-2010, 10:42 PM
So, are they going to rewrite the law so they can lock him up, like the US?

The Lawspeaker
12-18-2010, 10:46 PM
Probably.

Brynhild
12-18-2010, 11:57 PM
So, are they going to rewrite the law so they can lock him up, like the US?

I seriously doubt that. We don't have such censorhip laws and many people would fight to ensure it stays that way. They wouldn't dare to, given the huge publicity surrounding Wikileaks and Assange. There would be a huge public outcry, especially if Gillard tried to go against Kevin Rudd's position as the foreign minister who promised to defend Assange - it is his right as an Australian citizen. She already undermined Rudd's position by throwing him out of office when he was PM. Rudd didn't complete his term and the people were hugely pissed off that their voting rights were taken away from them in this regard. Gillard forced an early poll in August and was only voted in after having had a hung parliament, and the decision rested on key independents who finally voted her way. This government is already walking a very fine tightrope to stay in for the full term of three years. Plus Gillard has always claimed to be for the far Left. It would go against the Labor party's principals.

I'm all for her embarrassment. She took far more seriously what the U.S government laws were than even knowing about her own country's! :laugh: May her face have been as red as her hair!