Tajik_Ishkashim autosomal results

[Pahli]

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 34.74
2 NE_Europe 26.65
3 South_Asia 19.01
4 SW_Europe 7.85
5 Siberia 4.62
6 NE_Asia 2.56
7 Americas 1.55
8 Oceania 1.4
9 West_Africa 1.28
10 SW_Asia 0.29
11 South_Africa 0.06

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 9.67
2 Afghan_Pashtun 12.14
3 Pakistan_Pashtun 13.99
4 Pathan 15.39
5 Afghan_Uzbeki 16.71
6 Burusho 16.94
7 Kumyk 20.69
8 Romani 20.84
9 Chechen 21.37
10 Balochi 21.51
11 Kashmir_Pandit 21.99
12 Makrani 22.7
13 Nogay 22.82
14 Sindhi 22.91
15 Punjabi 23.19
16 Brahui 23.36
17 Dagestan_Azeri 24.45
18 Balkar 24.62
19 Adygei 25.12
20 Ossetian 26.13

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 80.1% Pakistan_Pashtun + 19.9% Finnish @ 4.83
2 82.7% Afghan_Pashtun + 17.3% Finnish @ 4.97
3 76.6% Pakistan_Pashtun + 23.4% Mordovian @ 5.33
4 74.6% Pathan + 25.4% Mordovian @ 5.39
5 77.7% Pakistan_Pashtun + 22.3% Russian @ 5.43
6 79.8% Pakistan_Pashtun + 20.2% Latvian @ 5.49
7 82.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 17.6% Latvian @ 5.51
8 79.7% Afghan_Pashtun + 20.3% Mordovian @ 5.51
9 82.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 17.6% Lithuanian @ 5.55
10 79.8% Pakistan_Pashtun + 20.2% Lithuanian @ 5.55
11 73.5% Pakistan_Pashtun + 26.5% Chuvash @ 5.55
12 80.7% Afghan_Pashtun + 19.3% Russian @ 5.56
13 75.8% Pathan + 24.2% Russian @ 5.59
14 78.6% Pathan + 21.4% Finnish @ 5.59
15 70.4% Pakistan_Pashtun + 29.6% Tatar @ 5.62
16 76.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 23.2% Chuvash @ 5.63
17 77.9% Pathan + 22.1% Lithuanian @ 5.63
18 78% Pathan + 22% Latvian @ 5.64
19 82.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 17.7% Estonian @ 5.66
20 79.6% Pakistan_Pashtun + 20.4% Estonian @ 5.67

Just picked the sample with the most N. Euro admix, the others were similar however, Ishkashim is a town in North Eastern Afghanistan hosting an East Iranian speaking people similar to Pamiris and some Pashtuns as well. This came out as Pashtun + around 20% Baltic. Here's my source, use gedmatch genesis:

http://www.anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?10906-KHANABADOSHI-Calculator-Results&p=289843&viewfull=1#post289843

[Hadouken]

77.7% Jew_Tat ( ) + 22.3% Tajik_Pomiri_Ishkashim ( ) @ 2.94

[Pahli]

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 36.74
2 NE_Europe 26
3 South_Asia 16.02
4 SW_Europe 6.05
5 Siberia 5.76
6 NE_Asia 3.8
7 SW_Asia 2.35
8 Americas 2.14
9 East_Africa 0.62
10 South_Africa 0.52

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 7.91
2 Afghan_Pashtun 11.79
3 Pakistan_Pashtun 14.36
4 Afghan_Uzbeki 14.8
5 Pathan 14.98
6 Burusho 17.78
7 Kumyk 18.93
8 Chechen 19.63
9 Nogay 21.09
10 Balochi 21.38
11 Makrani 22.25
12 Dagestan_Azeri 22.52
13 Romani 22.92
14 Brahui 23.05
15 Balkar 23.31
16 Adygei 23.43
17 Sindhi 23.82
18 Kashmir_Pandit 23.82
19 Ossetian 24.23
20 Punjabi 24.48

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 77.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 22.8% Chuvash @ 5.21
2 83.6% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.4% Finnish @ 5.43
3 79.1% Afghan_Pashtun + 20.9% Aluet @ 5.58
4 74.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 25.2% Tatar @ 5.67
5 72% Pathan + 28% Chuvash @ 5.72
6 68.9% Pathan + 31.1% Tatar @ 5.75
7 74% Pathan + 26% Aluet @ 5.92
8 79.5% Pathan + 20.5% Finnish @ 6.01
9 81.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 18.8% Mordovian @ 6.26
10 76% Pathan + 24% Mordovian @ 6.27
11 82.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 17.8% Russian @ 6.37
12 73.4% Pakistan_Pashtun + 26.6% Chuvash @ 6.39
13 84% Afghan_Pashtun + 16% Latvian @ 6.51
14 77.3% Pathan + 22.7% Russian @ 6.53
15 70.5% Pakistan_Pashtun + 29.5% Tatar @ 6.58
16 84.1% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.9% Lithuanian @ 6.6
17 63.6% Balochi + 36.4% Chuvash @ 6.66
18 84% Afghan_Pashtun + 16% Estonian @ 6.72
19 75.5% Pakistan_Pashtun + 24.5% Aluet @ 6.72
20 80.8% Pakistan_Pashtun + 19.2% Finnish @ 6.75

Another sample

[Pahli]

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 34.93
2 NE_Europe 24.47
3 South_Asia 18.86
4 SW_Europe 8.53
5 Siberia 4.67
6 NE_Asia 3.38
7 Americas 1.48
8 East_Africa 1.47
9 SW_Asia 1.13
10 South_Africa 0.7
11 Oceania 0.38

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 7.94
2 Afghan_Pashtun 10.6
3 Pakistan_Pashtun 12.55
4 Pathan 13.84
5 Afghan_Uzbeki 14.87
6 Burusho 15.7
7 Kumyk 19.38
8 Romani 19.9
9 Balochi 20
10 Chechen 20.69
11 Kashmir_Pandit 21.32
12 Makrani 21.39
13 Nogay 21.42
14 Sindhi 21.62
15 Brahui 21.8
16 Punjabi 22.48
17 Dagestan_Azeri 22.91
18 Balkar 23.15
19 Adygei 23.93
20 Ossetian 24.64

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 72.6% Pakistan_Pashtun + 27.4% Tatar @ 4.14
2 79.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 20.8% Chuvash @ 4.42
3 76.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 23.5% Tatar @ 4.43
4 70.5% Pathan + 29.5% Tatar @ 4.44
5 75.7% Pakistan_Pashtun + 24.3% Chuvash @ 4.44
6 77% Pathan + 23% Mordovian @ 4.57
7 85% Afghan_Pashtun + 15% Finnish @ 4.61
8 82.4% Pakistan_Pashtun + 17.6% Finnish @ 4.73
9 79% Pakistan_Pashtun + 21% Mordovian @ 4.75
10 82.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 17.8% Mordovian @ 4.76
11 81% Afghan_Pashtun + 19% Aluet @ 4.81
12 77.6% Pakistan_Pashtun + 22.4% Aluet @ 4.82
13 78.1% Pathan + 21.9% Russian @ 4.84
14 83.1% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.9% Russian @ 4.84
15 80% Pakistan_Pashtun + 20% Russian @ 4.9
16 84.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.2% Latvian @ 4.98
17 84.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.2% Lithuanian @ 4.99
18 73.9% Pathan + 26.1% Chuvash @ 5.01
19 84.6% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.4% Estonian @ 5.04
20 79.9% Pathan + 20.1% Estonian @ 5.08

Posting the last one for now, the OP that uploaded these will post some more gedmatch numbers from Tajiks later. They also have some Turkic admixture but their East Eurasian admixture stays around but slightly below 10%, could be related to Indo-Iranians and Scythians but probably also has some Turkic admixture to them.

[Kamal900]

I wonder if the original Iranian tribes were like that genetically?

[Babak]

I wonder if the original Iranian tribes were like that genetically?

Pretty much, yea. West iranics were probably somewhat more south-central asian shifted. Other than that, this is accurate.

[Babak]

77.7% Jew_Tat ( ) + 22.3% Tajik_Pomiri_Ishkashim ( ) @ 2.94

Half native half indo-iranian :thumb001:

[Pahli]

I wonder if the original Iranian tribes were like that genetically?

Original Iranian tribes afaik were something like 75% Baltic and 25% Afghan Pashtun, although these Tajiks have a great portion of ancestry from them, almost if not 50% Andronovo admixed. Considering that the Indo-Iranian tribes that migrated to Central Asia were a lot smaller in population than the native farmers, its still rather impressive how these Tajiks get almost 50% Andronovan;

Andronovo:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 NE_Europe 55.73
2 West_Asia 17.68
3 SW_Europe 17.59
4 South_Asia 4.08
5 Siberia 2.47
6 Americas 2.4
7 Oceania 0.04

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Mordovian 10.44
2 Russian 12.06
3 Belarusian 13.22
4 Ukrainian 13.46
5 Polish 13.99
6 Estonian 16.06
7 Slovak 16.19
8 German_North 16.64
9 Lithuanian 16.76
10 Latvian 16.94
11 Swedish 17.14
12 Norwegian 17.21
13 Moldavian 17.91
14 Slovene 18.04
15 Tatar 18.27
16 Hungarian 19.13
17 Irish 19.81
18 Utahn_European 20.09
19 Scottish 20.11
20 Orcadian 20.33

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 73.8% Lithuanian + 26.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.71
2 70.4% Latvian + 29.6% Tadjik @ 4.77
3 70.7% Lithuanian + 29.3% Tadjik @ 4.79
4 73.6% Latvian + 26.4% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.79
5 74.8% Estonian + 25.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.98
6 74.8% Lithuanian + 25.2% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.1
7 74.6% Latvian + 25.4% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.16
8 71.8% Estonian + 28.2% Tadjik @ 5.22
9 75.5% Lithuanian + 24.5% Pathan @ 5.25
10 75.8% Estonian + 24.2% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.34
11 77.5% Lithuanian + 22.5% Balochi @ 5.4
12 75.3% Latvian + 24.7% Pathan @ 5.4
13 76.4% Estonian + 23.6% Pathan @ 5.41
14 77.3% Latvian + 22.7% Balochi @ 5.45
15 78.1% Lithuanian + 21.9% Brahui @ 5.49
16 77.9% Latvian + 22.1% Brahui @ 5.56
17 77.9% Lithuanian + 22.1% Makrani @ 5.63
18 78.4% Estonian + 21.6% Balochi @ 5.66
19 79% Estonian + 21% Brahui @ 5.74
20 78.8% Estonian + 21.2% Makrani @ 5.78

Scythians have some more South Central Asian admixture compared to Andronovo and proves that they picked up some native farmer DNA from Central Asia before migrating along the Steppes to Europe.

Scythian:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 NE_Europe 47.19
2 West_Asia 24.04
3 SW_Europe 13.65
4 Siberia 6.75
5 South_Asia 3.11
6 Americas 3.02
7 NE_Asia 1.25
8 SE_Asia 0.98

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tatar 13.67
2 Chuvash 18.02
3 Mordovian 18.65
4 Moldavian 20.39
5 Ukrainian 20.91
6 Slovak 21.29
7 Russian 21.49
8 Aluet 22
9 Slovene 22.5
10 Belarusian 22.63
11 Bosnian 22.88
12 Hungarian 23.42
13 German_North 23.45
14 Croatian 24.21
15 Polish 24.37
16 Romanian 24.4
17 Serbian 24.51
18 Montenegrin 25.27
19 Norwegian 25.31
20 Scottish 25.69

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 62.3% Mordovian + 37.7% Tadjik @ 7.16
2 51.8% Latvian + 48.2% Tadjik @ 7.24
3 51.9% Lithuanian + 48.1% Tadjik @ 7.38
4 58.5% Russian + 41.5% Tadjik @ 7.41
5 67.8% Mordovian + 32.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 7.44
6 50.3% Tadjik + 49.7% Finnish @ 7.58
7 50.8% Chechen + 49.2% Finnish @ 7.66
8 52.7% Estonian + 47.3% Tadjik @ 7.72
9 70.3% Mordovian + 29.7% Pathan @ 7.93
10 69.6% Mordovian + 30.4% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 8.08
11 64.4% Russian + 35.6% Afghan_Pashtun @ 8.18
12 73.7% Mordovian + 26.3% Makrani @ 8.21
13 73.2% Mordovian + 26.8% Balochi @ 8.25
14 74% Mordovian + 26% Brahui @ 8.3
15 62.3% Mordovian + 37.7% Chechen @ 8.39
16 55.2% Polish + 44.8% Tadjik @ 8.43
17 50.2% Kumyk + 49.8% Finnish @ 8.44
18 55.7% Finnish + 44.3% Dagestan_Azeri @ 8.53
19 53.7% Finnish + 46.3% Adygei @ 8.73
20 67% Russian + 33% Pathan @ 8.81

[Hadouken]

Half native half indo-iranian :thumb001:

lol bro cant you read ? it says 22.3% not 50%

my 50 50 population approx on the same calc is :

50% Georgian_Jew_ +50% Kurd_East_ @ 3.062138

we come out as 80-85% Armenian/GeorgianJew/MountainJew and 20-25% Tajik or Pashtun . in my region rather Tajik especially people with a turkish shift (as you also see the tajik has decent siberian etc)

[Babak]

lol bro cant you read ? it says 22.3% not 50%

my 50 50 population approx on the same calc is :

50% Georgian_Jew_ +50% Kurd_East_ @ 3.062138

we come out as 80-85% Armenian/GeorgianJew/MountainJew and 20-25% Tajik or Pashtun . in my region rather Tajik especially people with a turkish shift (as you also see the tajik has decent siberian etc)

yea i understand that, but im simply exaggerating

[Babak]

Original Iranian tribes afaik were something like 75% Baltic and 25% Afghan Pashtun, although these Tajiks have a great portion of ancestry from them, almost if not 50% Andronovo admixed. Considering that the Indo-Iranian tribes that migrated to Central Asia were a lot smaller in population than the native farmers, its still rather impressive how these Tajiks get almost 50% Andronovan;

Andronovo:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 NE_Europe 55.73
2 West_Asia 17.68
3 SW_Europe 17.59
4 South_Asia 4.08
5 Siberia 2.47
6 Americas 2.4
7 Oceania 0.04

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Mordovian 10.44
2 Russian 12.06
3 Belarusian 13.22
4 Ukrainian 13.46
5 Polish 13.99
6 Estonian 16.06
7 Slovak 16.19
8 German_North 16.64
9 Lithuanian 16.76
10 Latvian 16.94
11 Swedish 17.14
12 Norwegian 17.21
13 Moldavian 17.91
14 Slovene 18.04
15 Tatar 18.27
16 Hungarian 19.13
17 Irish 19.81
18 Utahn_European 20.09
19 Scottish 20.11
20 Orcadian 20.33

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 73.8% Lithuanian + 26.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.71
2 70.4% Latvian + 29.6% Tadjik @ 4.77
3 70.7% Lithuanian + 29.3% Tadjik @ 4.79
4 73.6% Latvian + 26.4% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.79
5 74.8% Estonian + 25.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.98
6 74.8% Lithuanian + 25.2% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.1
7 74.6% Latvian + 25.4% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.16
8 71.8% Estonian + 28.2% Tadjik @ 5.22
9 75.5% Lithuanian + 24.5% Pathan @ 5.25
10 75.8% Estonian + 24.2% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.34
11 77.5% Lithuanian + 22.5% Balochi @ 5.4
12 75.3% Latvian + 24.7% Pathan @ 5.4
13 76.4% Estonian + 23.6% Pathan @ 5.41
14 77.3% Latvian + 22.7% Balochi @ 5.45
15 78.1% Lithuanian + 21.9% Brahui @ 5.49
16 77.9% Latvian + 22.1% Brahui @ 5.56
17 77.9% Lithuanian + 22.1% Makrani @ 5.63
18 78.4% Estonian + 21.6% Balochi @ 5.66
19 79% Estonian + 21% Brahui @ 5.74
20 78.8% Estonian + 21.2% Makrani @ 5.78

Scythians have some more South Central Asian admixture compared to Andronovo and proves that they picked up some native farmer DNA from Central Asia before migrating along the Steppes to Europe.

Scythian:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 NE_Europe 47.19
2 West_Asia 24.04
3 SW_Europe 13.65
4 Siberia 6.75
5 South_Asia 3.11
6 Americas 3.02
7 NE_Asia 1.25
8 SE_Asia 0.98

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tatar 13.67
2 Chuvash 18.02
3 Mordovian 18.65
4 Moldavian 20.39
5 Ukrainian 20.91
6 Slovak 21.29
7 Russian 21.49
8 Aluet 22
9 Slovene 22.5
10 Belarusian 22.63
11 Bosnian 22.88
12 Hungarian 23.42
13 German_North 23.45
14 Croatian 24.21
15 Polish 24.37
16 Romanian 24.4
17 Serbian 24.51
18 Montenegrin 25.27
19 Norwegian 25.31
20 Scottish 25.69

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 62.3% Mordovian + 37.7% Tadjik @ 7.16
2 51.8% Latvian + 48.2% Tadjik @ 7.24
3 51.9% Lithuanian + 48.1% Tadjik @ 7.38
4 58.5% Russian + 41.5% Tadjik @ 7.41
5 67.8% Mordovian + 32.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 7.44
6 50.3% Tadjik + 49.7% Finnish @ 7.58
7 50.8% Chechen + 49.2% Finnish @ 7.66
8 52.7% Estonian + 47.3% Tadjik @ 7.72
9 70.3% Mordovian + 29.7% Pathan @ 7.93
10 69.6% Mordovian + 30.4% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 8.08
11 64.4% Russian + 35.6% Afghan_Pashtun @ 8.18
12 73.7% Mordovian + 26.3% Makrani @ 8.21
13 73.2% Mordovian + 26.8% Balochi @ 8.25
14 74% Mordovian + 26% Brahui @ 8.3
15 62.3% Mordovian + 37.7% Chechen @ 8.39
16 55.2% Polish + 44.8% Tadjik @ 8.43
17 50.2% Kumyk + 49.8% Finnish @ 8.44
18 55.7% Finnish + 44.3% Dagestan_Azeri @ 8.53
19 53.7% Finnish + 46.3% Adygei @ 8.73
20 67% Russian + 33% Pathan @ 8.81

Probably east-iranics, but west iranics were already something like 50% IE 50% BMAC. I believe east-iranics preserved more IE than west-iranics

[Leto]

Are there any GEDmatch kit numbers of them?

[Pahli]

Are there any GEDmatch kit numbers of them?

Only for gedmatch genesis, but here's a link:

http://www.anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?10906-KHANABADOSHI-Calculator-Results/page6

Also, we got samples from Yaghnobis, Tajiks from Shugnan and Rushan:

Rushan sample:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 36.21
2 NE_Europe 27.63
3 South_Asia 11.8
4 SW_Europe 9.79
5 Siberia 5.04
6 Americas 2.97
7 SW_Asia 2.77
8 SE_Asia 1.43
9 NE_Asia 1.36
10 South_Africa 0.62
11 East_Africa 0.3
12 West_Africa 0.08

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 8.25
2 Afghan_Pashtun 14.46
3 Chechen 15.22
4 Kumyk 15.23
5 Afghan_Uzbeki 16.86
6 Pakistan_Pashtun 17.47
7 Pathan 18.54
8 Nogay 19.21
9 Adygei 19.65
10 Dagestan_Azeri 19.77
11 Balkar 19.93
12 Ossetian 21.1
13 Romani 21.28
14 Burusho 22.7
15 Turkish_Aydin 22.78
16 Balochi 24.15
17 Iranian 24.95
18 Makrani 25.23
19 Azerbaijan_Azeri 25.55
20 Brahui 25.85

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 88.6% Tadjik + 11.4% Latvian @ 5.34
2 89% Tadjik + 11% Finnish @ 5.35
3 88.6% Tadjik + 11.4% Lithuanian @ 5.4
4 74.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 25.2% Mordovian @ 5.47
5 88.6% Tadjik + 11.4% Estonian @ 5.49
6 88.1% Tadjik + 11.9% Polish @ 5.57
7 67.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 32.5% Tatar @ 5.59
8 87.6% Tadjik + 12.4% Russian @ 5.63
9 87% Tadjik + 13% Mordovian @ 5.72
10 76.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 23.8% Russian @ 5.79
11 88% Tadjik + 12% Belarusian @ 5.89
12 79.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 20.6% Finnish @ 5.98
13 71.7% Afghan_Pashtun + 28.3% Chuvash @ 6.13
14 87.6% Tadjik + 12.4% Ukrainian @ 6.17
15 78.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 21.2% Latvian @ 6.22
16 78.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 21.2% Lithuanian @ 6.25
17 78.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 21.5% Estonian @ 6.26
18 73.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 26.2% Aluet @ 6.26
19 89.2% Tadjik + 10.8% Swedish @ 6.29
20 77.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 22.5% Polish @ 6.32

[Pahli]

Shugnan sample:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 33.77
2 NE_Europe 27.96
3 South_Asia 14.64
4 SW_Europe 11.15
5 Siberia 3.9
6 NE_Asia 2.91
7 Americas 2.89
8 SW_Asia 1.77
9 East_Africa 0.63
10 South_Africa 0.37

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 8.8
2 Afghan_Pashtun 14.61
3 Afghan_Uzbeki 16.3
4 Kumyk 16.66
5 Pakistan_Pashtun 17.13
6 Chechen 17.37
7 Pathan 18.48
8 Romani 18.84
9 Nogay 19.56
10 Balkar 21
11 Burusho 21.23
12 Adygei 21.53
13 Dagestan_Azeri 21.58
14 Ossetian 23.04
15 Turkish_Aydin 23.55
16 Balochi 24.22
17 Makrani 25.62
18 Brahui 26.02
19 Iranian 26.37
20 Kashmir_Pandit 26.56

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 73.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 26.6% Mordovian @ 3.62
2 74.7% Afghan_Pashtun + 25.3% Russian @ 3.84
3 76.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 23.1% Estonian @ 4.16
4 77.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 22.8% Lithuanian @ 4.23
5 77.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 22.7% Latvian @ 4.27
6 75.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 24.1% Polish @ 4.34
7 74.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 25.2% Belarusian @ 4.4
8 66.1% Afghan_Pashtun + 33.9% Tatar @ 4.45
9 68.5% Pathan + 31.5% Mordovian @ 4.67
10 78.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 21.6% Finnish @ 4.77
11 86.6% Tadjik + 13.4% Latvian @ 4.82
12 70.3% Pakistan_Pashtun + 29.7% Mordovian @ 4.83
13 86.6% Tadjik + 13.4% Lithuanian @ 4.85
14 86.4% Tadjik + 13.6% Estonian @ 4.92
15 73.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 26.7% Ukrainian @ 4.98
16 85.9% Tadjik + 14.1% Polish @ 5.05
17 75.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 24.2% Swedish @ 5.06
18 70% Pathan + 30% Russian @ 5.07
19 71.8% Pakistan_Pashtun + 28.2% Russian @ 5.1
20 62.3% Pakistan_Pashtun + 37.7% Tatar @ 5.23

[Pahli]

Yaghnobi sample:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 38.48
2 NE_Europe 24.22
3 SW_Europe 12.03
4 South_Asia 7.06
5 SW_Asia 6.43
6 Siberia 4.55
7 NE_Asia 2.34
8 Americas 1.88
9 East_Africa 1.78
10 South_Africa 0.92
11 West_Africa 0.16
12 Oceania 0.15

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 8.73
2 Kumyk 9.6
3 Chechen 10.05
4 Adygei 13.69
5 Dagestan_Azeri 13.7
6 Balkar 14.72
7 Ossetian 15.06
8 Afghan_Pashtun 15.78
9 Nogay 15.89
10 Afghan_Uzbeki 16.54
11 Turkish_Aydin 17.41
12 Pakistan_Pashtun 19.1
13 Pathan 19.49
14 Iranian 19.52
15 Azerbaijan_Azeri 19.58
16 Abkhasian 19.97
17 Kurdish 20.42
18 Turkish 20.74
19 Turkish_Kayseri 21.68
20 Romani 21.81

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 54.5% Tadjik + 45.5% Chechen @ 4.37
2 64.8% Chechen + 35.2% Afghan_Uzbeki @ 5.34
3 75.5% Chechen + 24.5% Burusho @ 6.01
4 66.5% Tadjik + 33.5% Adygei @ 6.2
5 54.5% Tadjik + 45.5% Kumyk @ 6.33
6 80.8% Chechen + 19.2% Afghan_Hazara @ 6.55
7 68.1% Kumyk + 31.9% Afghan_Pashtun @ 6.96
8 66.2% Chechen + 33.8% Afghan_Pashtun @ 6.97
9 86.3% Chechen + 13.7% Bengali @ 6.98
10 90.7% Chechen + 9.3% Paniya @ 7.02
11 81.3% Chechen + 18.7% Kashmir_Pandit @ 7.08
12 90.1% Chechen + 9.9% Mawasi @ 7.09
13 70% Tadjik + 30% Dagestan_Azeri @ 7.15
14 88.8% Chechen + 11.2% Gond @ 7.15
15 89% Chechen + 11% Selkup @ 7.17
16 88.3% Chechen + 11.7% Altaian @ 7.19
17 90% Chechen + 10% Tuvinian @ 7.2
18 72.1% Chechen + 27.9% Pathan @ 7.21
19 90.4% Chechen + 9.6% Pulliyar @ 7.21
20 73% Tadjik + 27% Ossetian @ 7.25

[Böri]

Siberia+NE Asia around 9 percent, which also explains the reason for the increase in Northern Euro like admixture.
The real question they mixed with whom to get that 20 percent South Asian?
Or maybe that 20 percent represents the proto-Tajik?

Tajiks are proto-Tajik mixed with Turkic. That's all. But later they didn't assimilate Mongols like Kyrgyz and Kazakhs did, that explains these results.

[Pahli]

Probably east-iranics, but west iranics were already something like 50% IE 50% BMAC. I believe east-iranics preserved more IE than west-iranics

These East Iranian people are basically 50% Indo-Iranian and 50% BMAC, the West Iranic tribes were probably genetically similar to them.


Siberia+NE Asia around 9 percent, which also explains the reason for the increase in Northern Euro like admixture.
The real question they mixed with whom to get that 20 percent South Asian?
Or maybe that 20 percent represents the proto-Tajik?

Tajiks are proto-Tajik mixed with Turkic. That's all. But later they didn't assimilate Mongols like Kyrgyz and Kazakhs did, that explains these results.

Asian admixture is from Scytho-Sarmatians and Turkic people; They have more Northern European admixture than Turkic people and have always had. We could argue that they actually lost some North European admixture due to Turkic influence because the Turkic tribes that settled in Central Asia were dominantly Mongoloid with less North European admixture, when do you stop with your pro-turanist bullshit?

Kyrgyz and Kazakhs have less N. Euro than these people so where's the fucking logic in your claim lol? They are definitely a mix of Indo-Iranian tribes and BMAC (Central Asian farmers), there was no Turks at this time. If you look at my sample from Andronovo they can be modelled as smth like 50% Andronovo and 50% BMAC.

Also they are a mix of Indo-Iranian tribes and BMAC (Which is Iran_Neolithic + some extra Australoid), they were probably around 30% South Asian prior to mixing with Indo-Iranian tribes.

[Pahli]

Srubnaya (related to Indo-Iranians

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 NE_Europe 56.69
2 SW_Europe 20.33
3 West_Asia 18.13
4 South_Asia 2.72
5 East_Africa 0.8
6 Americas 0.76
7 Siberia 0.43
8 Oceania 0.1
9 South_Africa 0.02

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Mordovian 10.69
2 Ukrainian 11.31
3 Belarusian 11.47
4 Russian 11.66
5 Polish 12.33
6 Slovak 14.35
7 German_North 14.43
8 Estonian 14.82
9 Swedish 14.9
10 Norwegian 14.94
11 Lithuanian 15.58
12 Latvian 15.9
13 Slovene 16.2
14 Moldavian 16.65
15 Hungarian 17.18
16 Irish 17.64
17 Scottish 17.92
18 Utahn_European 18.02
19 Orcadian 18.17
20 English 18.83

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 71.5% Lithuanian + 28.5% Chechen @ 4.39
2 71.1% Latvian + 28.9% Chechen @ 4.56
3 72.7% Estonian + 27.3% Chechen @ 4.77
4 76.2% Lithuanian + 23.8% Afghan_Pashtun @ 5.36
5 74.3% Lithuanian + 25.7% Adygei @ 5.37
6 73.9% Latvian + 26.1% Adygei @ 5.39
7 77.2% Estonian + 22.8% Afghan_Pashtun @ 5.41
8 75.8% Lithuanian + 24.2% Dagestan_Azeri @ 5.46
9 80.9% Polish + 19.1% Afghan_Pashtun @ 5.52
10 75.4% Latvian + 24.6% Dagestan_Azeri @ 5.54
11 79.4% Lithuanian + 20.6% Balochi @ 5.56
12 73.4% Lithuanian + 26.6% Tadjik @ 5.56
13 80.3% Estonian + 19.7% Balochi @ 5.63
14 79.9% Lithuanian + 20.1% Brahui @ 5.65
15 77.3% Polish + 22.7% Chechen @ 5.69
16 80.9% Estonian + 19.1% Brahui @ 5.72
17 77.2% Lithuanian + 22.8% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.72
18 75.9% Latvian + 24.1% Afghan_Pashtun @ 5.74
19 81.8% Polish + 18.2% Pakistan_Pashtun @ 5.74
20 74.6% Estonian + 25.4% Tadjik @ 5.75

[Böri]

How the heck South Asian component got earlier in the Pamir mountains than the arrival of Turks? That's not about my ideology that just doesn't make sense.

The 18-20% South Asian was smth they ever had since their beginning and the Sibero-NE Asian and Northern Euro-like admixture is what they got later through assimilation. That's how İ conceive.

They were living at the mountains during the 2nd millenia, they didn't assimilate Mongols like Kipchak speakers (Kazakhs and Kyrgyz) did. That's where the difference came from İ guess.

Anyway it's interesting, a population living at the Pamir mountains, so north compared to South Asia but getting up to 20 percent SA, in addition to unexpectedly high N.Euro and Siberia makes Tajiks an outstanding population.

[Pahli]

How the heck South Asian component got earlier in the Pamir mountains than the arrival of Turks? That's not about my ideology that just doesn't make sense.

The 18-20% South Asian was smth they ever had since their beginning and the Sibero-NE Asian and Northern Euro-like admixture is what they got later through assimilation. That's how İ conceive.

They were living at the mountains during the 2nd millenia, they didn't assimilate Mongols like Kipchak speakers (Kazakhs and Kyrgyz) did. That's where the difference came from İ guess.

Anyway it's interesting, a population living at the Pamir mountains, so north compared to South Asia but getting up to 20 percent SA, in addition to unexpectedly high N.Euro and Siberia makes Tajiks an outstanding population.

Read what I wrote, the native farmers that lived there were probably 30% South Asian or a bit more, this was greatly reduced with the arrival of Indo-Iranian tribes, East Asian has been added to by mixing with Scytho-Sarmatians but more so with Turkic tribes that were mostly Mongoloid. Central Asian farmers have been in those lands for millenias before the Iranians or Turks arrived.

[Böri]

Read what I wrote, the native farmers that lived there were probably 30% South Asian or a bit more, this was greatly reduced with the arrival of Indo-Iranian tribes, East Asian has been added to by mixing with Scytho-Sarmatians but more so with Turkic tribes that were mostly Mongoloid. Central Asian farmers have been in those lands for millenias before the Iranians or Turks arrived.

There is still a flaw in that theory. The native Central Asian neolithic farmers (probably speaking language which was neither IE nor Turkic) which you suppose being up to 1/3 South Asians should have genetically influenced the Turkic population too. But when we look at the current Turkic population living in the more western parts of Central Asia up to Urals (like less Mongol influenced west Kazakhs or Bashkirs) don't show significant effects of those supposed 1/3 SA central Asian natives.

[Pahli]

There is still a flaw in that theory. The native Central Asian neolithic farmers (probably speaking language which was neither IE nor Turkic) which you suppose being up to 1/3 South Asians should have genetically influenced the Turkic population too. But when we look at the current Turkic population living in the more western parts of Central Asia up to Urals (like less Mongol influenced west Kazakhs or Bashkirs) don't show significant effects of those supposed 1/3 SA central Asian natives.

No but Central Asian Turks have South Asian which makes perfect sense, the ones living in the Steppe zones are obviously not affected by these farmers because they live too far to the North, these farmers lived in modern Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan.

[Chev Chelios]

That South Asian admixture is an old/archaic component from BMAC. All modern ethnicities of that region have that admixture.

[Leto]

Only for gedmatch genesis, but here's a link:
Is there a spreadsheet for that calculator?

[Leto]

To me the whiteness of the early Indo-Iranians is not something very doubtful. Some remnants of it have been passed on to this day. A girl from the Khatlon region. The close-up was taken from a larger photo posted on a governmental website.
<a href="https://imgbb.com/"><img src="https://image.ibb.co/fVDY9Q/4458.jpg" alt="4458" border="0"></a>

[Pahli]

To me the whiteness of the early Indo-Iranians is not something very doubtful. Some remnants of it have been passed on to this day. A girl from the Khatlon region. The close-up was taken from a larger photo posted on a governmental website.
<a href="https://imgbb.com/"><img src="https://image.ibb.co/fVDY9Q/4458.jpg" alt="4458" border="0"></a>

Like I wrote earlier, some of them have 50% from the Andronovo culture which is quite a lot, some have more European admixture than some Southern European ethnicities :laugh:


Is there a spreadsheet for that calculator?

gedmatch genesis is just like gedmatch but it works a bit different (I am not sure what the difference is)

You simply login and then go to the calculators and put in the kit numbers given on the thread I linked you to :)

[Babak]

To me the whiteness of the early Indo-Iranians is not something very doubtful. Some remnants of it have been passed on to this day. A girl from the Khatlon region. The close-up was taken from a larger photo posted on a governmental website.
<a href="https://imgbb.com/"><img src="https://image.ibb.co/fVDY9Q/4458.jpg" alt="4458" border="0"></a>

A good representation of the early indo-iranians tbh.

[Pahli]

A good representation of the early indo-iranians tbh.

Early Indo-Iranians were genetically and physically more similar to Eastern Europeans than any modern Indo-Iranian ethnicity, however there is some resemblance in these isolated East Iranic populations;

http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae74/aiwn-13/arkaim-12-1.jpg

http://i46.tinypic.com/33nj58k.jpg

[Hadouken]

I doubt they looked like that on average. 20-25% of our ancestry is from them the rest being Caucasus and Mediterranean neolithic mostly. and we are more woggy looking (on average) than those depictions

[Babak]

I doubt they looked like that on average. 20-25% of our ancestry is from them the rest being Caucasus and Mediterranean neolithic mostly. and we are more woggy looking (on average) than those depictions

Probably something like this

https://potd.pdnonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/green-eyes.jpg

http://www.pamirs.org/images/children/images/girls_blonde_and_dark_vanj.jpg

[Pahli]

I doubt they looked like that on average. 20-25% of our ancestry is from them the rest being Caucasus and Mediterranean neolithic mostly. and we are more woggy looking (on average) than those depictions

The ones I posted are the early ones, our ancestry comes from the Central Asian Iranian tribes that already got mixed which is why we get 20 - 25%, if we look at ancestry from the early Indo-Iranians it would be somewhere around 10 - 15%.

[Leto]

A good representation of the early indo-iranians tbh.
And this is what BMAC people looked like?:D
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/US_Navy_090108-N-6651N-008_Salh_Mohammad%2C_from_Farah_City%2C_registers_ to_vote_at_the_Voter%27s_Registration_Center_for_m en.jpg/416px-US_Navy_090108-N-6651N-008_Salh_Mohammad%2C_from_Farah_City%2C_registers_ to_vote_at_the_Voter%27s_Registration_Center_for_m en.jpg

[Babak]

And this is what BMAC people looked like?:D
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/US_Navy_090108-N-6651N-008_Salh_Mohammad%2C_from_Farah_City%2C_registers_ to_vote_at_the_Voter%27s_Registration_Center_for_m en.jpg/416px-US_Navy_090108-N-6651N-008_Salh_Mohammad%2C_from_Farah_City%2C_registers_ to_vote_at_the_Voter%27s_Registration_Center_for_m en.jpg

Possibly, yea.

[Pahli]

And this is what BMAC people looked like?:D
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/US_Navy_090108-N-6651N-008_Salh_Mohammad%2C_from_Farah_City%2C_registers_ to_vote_at_the_Voter%27s_Registration_Center_for_m en.jpg/416px-US_Navy_090108-N-6651N-008_Salh_Mohammad%2C_from_Farah_City%2C_registers_ to_vote_at_the_Voter%27s_Registration_Center_for_m en.jpg

Difficult to say since BMAC = Iran_Neolithic + little extra Australoid. Brahui people resemble Iran_Neolithic, so they are probably a good guess, but I'd imagine they would be a bit more darker because of the extra australoid DNA.

[Leto]

Early Indo-Iranians were genetically and physically more similar to Eastern Europeans than any modern Indo-Iranian ethnicity, however there is some resemblance in these isolated East Iranic populations;
The boy in the middle and on the left are good canditates too, I guess. They are Afghans.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Afghan_boys_pose_for_a_photo_during_a_shura_on_pat rol_base_Mahteen%2C_Sangin%2C_Afghanistan_Nov._4%2 C_2011_111104-M-BE571-032.jpg/1280px-Afghan_boys_pose_for_a_photo_during_a_shura_on_pat rol_base_Mahteen%2C_Sangin%2C_Afghanistan_Nov._4%2 C_2011_111104-M-BE571-032.jpg

[Leto]

Difficult to say since BMAC = Iran_Neolithic + Australoid. Brahui people resemble Iran_Neolithic, so they are probably a good guess, but I'd imagine they would be darker because of the extra australoid DNA.
Well, I doubt they were darker than the Punjabis of Pakistan.

[Pahli]

Well, I doubt they were darker than the Punjabis of Pakistan.

Some were pretty dark in terms of skin colour, others were more brownish or light brown, I think they were pretty diverse pigmentation wise.

[Leto]

Some were pretty dark in terms of skin colour, others were more brownish or light brown, I think they were pretty diverse pigmentation wise.
Fair enough. Too bad we have no genetic samples from that culture. They would dispell the mistery of the BMAC.

[Pahli]

Fair enough. Too bad we have no genetic samples from that culture. They would dispell the mistery of the BMAC.

Indeed, I read somewhere that the BMAC people resembled Indo-Dravidians, so they were probably alike Brahuis with little extra Australoid, perhaps 30 - 35% South Asian.

[Babak]

http://oi61.tinypic.com/dcbq0w.jpg

or

https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8386/8589123597_0055a4d1ba_z.jpg

[Leto]

Eurogenes K13

Ishkashim:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asian 37.04
2 South_Asian 22.46
3 Baltic 14.73
4 North_Atlantic 9.91
5 Siberian 7.51
6 East_Med 3.64
7 Amerindian 2.65
8 East_Asian 0.9
9 Oceanian 0.6
10 Northeast_African 0.56

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Afghan_Pashtun 7.71
2 Tadjik 8.13
3 Afghan_Tadjik 12.26
4 Kalash 14.92
5 Burusho 16.08
6 Pathan 17.29
7 Tabassaran 19.93
8 Punjabi_Jat 20.47
9 Turkmen 20.53
10 Balochi 21.18
11 Makrani 21.5
12 Chechen 21.72
13 Lezgin 21.94
14 Brahui 22.34
15 Kabardin 22.56
16 Kumyk 22.79
17 Nogay 23
18 Balkar 24
19 Sindhi 24.34
20 North_Ossetian 24.61

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 86.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 13.7% Mari @ 3.27
2 85.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 14.2% Chuvash @ 3.53
3 84.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.6% Tatar @ 4.12
4 89.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 10.8% East_Finnish @ 4.68
5 91.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 8.7% Selkup @ 4.75
6 88.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 11.7% Erzya @ 4.75
7 68% Balochi + 32% Mari @ 4.77
8 88.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 11.6% Kargopol_Russian @ 4.77
9 91.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 8.8% Ket @ 4.86
10 66.8% Balochi + 33.2% Chuvash @ 4.89
11 89.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 10.5% Finnish @ 4.89
12 63.1% Balochi + 36.9% Tatar @ 4.98
13 68.7% Tadjik + 31.3% Kalash @ 5.03
14 89.1% Afghan_Pashtun + 10.9% Shors @ 5.06
15 61.7% Brahui + 38.3% Tatar @ 5.08
16 89.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 10.1% Estonian @ 5.08
17 65.6% Brahui + 34.4% Chuvash @ 5.14
18 89.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 10.1% Southwest_Finnish @ 5.21
19 90.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 9.7% Lithuanian @ 5.3
20 66.8% Brahui + 33.2% Mari @ 5.32


Rushan:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asian 40.36
2 North_Atlantic 17.67
3 South_Asian 16.94
4 Baltic 12.3
5 Siberian 5.4
6 Amerindian 3.77
7 East_Med 1.77
8 East_Asian 1.03
9 Sub-Saharan 0.63
10 Oceanian 0.12

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 10.76
2 Afghan_Pashtun 12.59
3 Tabassaran 15.91
4 Afghan_Tadjik 16.75
5 Chechen 18.87
6 Lezgin 19.05
7 Kalash 19.8
8 Kabardin 20.88
9 Kumyk 21.69
10 Turkmen 22.13
11 Balkar 22.33
12 Ossetian 22.51
13 North_Ossetian 22.63
14 Burusho 22.85
15 Adygei 23.06
16 Nogay 23.07
17 Balochi 23.14
18 Pathan 23.98
19 Makrani 24.16
20 Brahui 24.55

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 68.5% Balochi + 31.5% North_Swedish @ 8.13
2 67% Brahui + 33% North_Swedish @ 8.16
3 68.2% Balochi + 31.8% Swedish @ 8.35
4 66.8% Brahui + 33.2% Swedish @ 8.36
5 68.5% Balochi + 31.5% Norwegian @ 8.41
6 67.1% Brahui + 32.9% Norwegian @ 8.43
7 83.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.2% Norwegian @ 8.71
8 83.6% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.4% Irish @ 8.71
9 83.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.1% West_Scottish @ 8.75
10 69.4% Balochi + 30.6% Southwest_Finnish @ 8.81
11 83.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.2% Swedish @ 8.87
12 83.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.2% North_Dutch @ 8.87
13 84% Afghan_Pashtun + 16% Orcadian @ 8.88
14 68.3% Balochi + 31.7% North_Dutch @ 8.89
15 68% Brahui + 32% Southwest_Finnish @ 8.9
16 67.1% Balochi + 32.9% North_German @ 8.9
17 68.1% Balochi + 31.9% Danish @ 8.94
18 68.6% Balochi + 31.4% Orcadian @ 8.97
19 66.8% Brahui + 33.2% North_Dutch @ 8.98
20 83.8% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.2% Danish @ 8.99


Shungan:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asian 38.31
2 South_Asian 19.26
3 Baltic 16.65
4 North_Atlantic 14.14
5 Siberian 3.96
6 Amerindian 3.63
7 East_Med 3.12
8 Sub-Saharan 0.94

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Afghan_Pashtun 10.63
2 Tadjik 10.85
3 Afghan_Tadjik 16.41
4 Tabassaran 16.41
5 Kalash 17.37
6 Chechen 19.15
7 Lezgin 19.22
8 Burusho 20.81
9 Pathan 21.02
10 Kabardin 21.31
11 Kumyk 21.58
12 Turkmen 22.43
13 Balochi 22.82
14 Balkar 23.12
15 Punjabi_Jat 23.29
16 Adygei 23.29
17 North_Ossetian 23.37
18 Makrani 23.54
19 Nogay 23.92
20 Ossetian 24.05

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 68.4% Balochi + 31.6% Finnish @ 5.07
2 67% Brahui + 33% Finnish @ 5.18
3 68.3% Balochi + 31.7% Southwest_Finnish @ 5.33
4 66.9% Brahui + 33.1% Southwest_Finnish @ 5.36
5 68.5% Balochi + 31.5% East_Finnish @ 5.42
6 67.1% Brahui + 32.9% East_Finnish @ 5.64
7 68.9% Balochi + 31.1% Estonian @ 5.79
8 67.5% Brahui + 32.5% Estonian @ 5.83
9 84.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.1% Estonian @ 6.05
10 84.6% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.4% Finnish @ 6.06
11 84.6% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.4% Southwest_Finnish @ 6.08
12 66.6% Balochi + 33.4% Kargopol_Russian @ 6.17
13 84.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.5% North_Swedish @ 6.27
14 84.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.1% East_Finnish @ 6.28
15 85.1% Afghan_Pashtun + 14.9% Lithuanian @ 6.28
16 83.7% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.3% Kargopol_Russian @ 6.36
17 84% Afghan_Pashtun + 16% Polish @ 6.4
18 83.3% Afghan_Pashtun + 16.7% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 6.43
19 65.2% Brahui + 34.8% Kargopol_Russian @ 6.45
20 84.2% Afghan_Pashtun + 15.8% Russian_Smolensk @ 6.45


Yagnob:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asian 35.19
2 Baltic 15.43
3 South_Asian 15.07
4 North_Atlantic 13.06
5 East_Med 12.93
6 Siberian 5.21
7 Amerindian 2.49
8 West_Med 0.6
9 Oceanian 0.02

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tadjik 9.73
2 Afghan_Pashtun 13.22
3 Tabassaran 13.49
4 Afghan_Tadjik 14.19
5 Lezgin 14.98
6 Turkmen 15.04
7 Kumyk 15.13
8 Chechen 15.45
9 Kabardin 16.99
10 Adygei 18.41
11 Balkar 18.42
12 Nogay 19.25
13 North_Ossetian 19.25
14 Ossetian 20.27
15 Azeri 20.86
16 Iranian 22.41
17 Kurdish 22.81
18 Kalash 23.2
19 Turkish 23.86
20 Makrani 24.65

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 62.9% Tadjik + 37.1% Tabassaran @ 6.91
2 73.4% Afghan_Pashtun + 26.6% Bulgarian @ 7.02
3 73.5% Afghan_Pashtun + 26.5% Romanian @ 7.02
4 66.4% Tadjik + 33.6% Lezgin @ 7.08
5 74.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 25.1% Serbian @ 7.17
6 84.5% Tabassaran + 15.5% Chamar @ 7.34
7 83.5% Tabassaran + 16.5% Chenchu @ 7.41
8 83.4% Tabassaran + 16.6% North_Kannadi @ 7.47
9 82.6% Tabassaran + 17.4% Uttar_Pradesh @ 7.48
10 76.9% Afghan_Pashtun + 23.1% Hungarian @ 7.49
11 80% Tabassaran + 20% Bangladeshi @ 7.59
12 83.2% Tabassaran + 16.8% Kol @ 7.61
13 75.6% Afghan_Pashtun + 24.4% Moldavian @ 7.61
14 69.1% Tadjik + 30.9% Chechen @ 7.65
15 85.6% Tabassaran + 14.4% Austroasiatic_Ho @ 7.71
16 84.8% Tabassaran + 15.2% Sakilli @ 7.72
17 81.8% Tabassaran + 18.2% Dharkar @ 7.73
18 77.9% Tabassaran + 22.1% Brahmin_UP @ 7.74
19 75.3% Lezgin + 24.7% Brahmin_UP @ 7.76
20 68.9% Tadjik + 31.1% Kumyk @ 7.76