GEDmatch kitnumbers of Bashkirs

[Hudayar]

Have fun

M772165
M762761
M420554
M592377
M868779
M074377
M817894
M819114
M519852

[Hudayar]

M772165:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 20.86
2 East_Siberian 15.87
3 Caucasian 13.99
4 Tungus-Altaic 13.39
5 Ancestral_Altaic 13.20
6 South_Central_Asian 7.52
7 European_Early_Farmers 5.11
8 South_East_Asian 2.75
9 Amerindian 1.51
10 Arctic 1.36
11 South_Indian 1.07
12 East_African 1.01


Finished reading population data. 620 populations found.
23 components mode.

--------------------------------

Least-squares method.

Using 1 population approximation:
1 Bashkir_ @ 6.487055
2 Tatar-Siberian_ @ 10.330642
3 Chuvashs_ @ 16.275381
4 Mari_ @ 18.099121
5 Crimean_Tatar_Step_ @ 18.381605
6 Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 19.120346
7 Tatar_ @ 19.204288
8 Chuvash_ @ 19.569172
9 Udmurd_ @ 19.907579
10 Uzbek_ @ 20.372166
11 Karakalpak_ @ 21.040968
12 Tatar_Lithuania_ @ 21.237692
13 Tajik_Tajikistan_ @ 21.805683
14 Tatar-Kazan_ @ 21.874168
15 Yukagir_Forest_ @ 22.120724
16 Kazahs_ @ 23.114296
17 Turkmen_Uzbekistan_ @ 23.508993
18 Tatar-Lithuanian_ @ 23.689690
19 Tatar-Mishar_ @ 23.789967
20 Uygur-Han_ @ 24.081585

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Bashkir_ +50% Tatar-Siberian_ @ 5.154582


Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Karakalpak_ +25% Selkup_ +25% Swede_Saami_ @ 4.347824


Using 4 populations approximation:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++
1 Finn_West_ + Karakalpak_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 2.856720
2 Kashub_ + Kazahs_ + Mansi_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.040370
3 Finnish-East_ + Karakalpak_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.064396
4 Finnish_FIN_ + Karakalpak_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.099473
5 Kazahs_ + Mansi_ + Sorb_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.106208
6 Kashub_ + Kazakh_ + Mansi_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.135576
7 Finn_East_ + Karakalpak_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.160181
8 Kashub_ + Kazahs_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.208915
9 Belarusian_West_ + Kazahs_ + Mansi_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.218016
10 Kazakh_ + Mansi_ + Sorb_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.255530
11 Kazahs_ + Mansi_ + Russian-North-West_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.272958
12 Kazahs_ + Russian-West_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.320067
13 Kazahs_ + Selkup_ + Sorb_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.333118
14 Kazahs_ + Mansi_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ + Ukrainian_East_ @ 3.336851
15 Balt_ + Kyrgyz_ + Mansi_ + Turkmen_Uzbekistan_ @ 3.352797
16 Kazahs_ + Mansi_ + Russian-West_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.360315
17 Kazahs_ + Russian-North-West_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.361342
18 Finn_ + Karakalpak_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.385160
19 German_ + Karakalpak_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.413053
20 Kashub_ + Kazakh_ + Selkup_ + Turkmen_Afghan_ @ 3.423193

Done.

Elapsed time 59.6538 seconds.

[Leto]

Some more:
M771168
M715218
T901605

[Hudayar]

Thanks
It seems Bashkirs are a mix of Kipchak Turkics (Kazakhs-Kyrgyzes) and finno ugrics.

[Leto]

Thanks
It seems Bashkirs are a mix of Kipchak Turkics (Kazakhs-Kyrgyzes) and finno ugrics.
I think they have ancient Indo-Iranian/Aryan blood as well.

[Hudayar]

I think they have ancient Indo-Iranian/Aryan blood as well.

It comes from their Kipchak Turkic ancestors.

[Leto]

This is a very interesting part of this study (https://bmcgenet.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12863-017-0578-3):


One of most curious findings involved the Bashkir, an ethnicity with an extremely complex historical background. There are three main theories describing Bashkir origins: “Turkic”, “Finno-Ugric”, and “Iranian” [76, 77]. According to the “Turkic” theory, most Bashkir genetic ancestry was formed by Turkic tribes migrating from Central Asia in the first millennium AD. The “Finno-Ugric” theory stipulates that the nucleus of Bashkir ancestry was formed by the Magyar (Hungarians), who were later assimilated by Turkic tribes and adopted a Turkic language, while the “Iranian” theory considers Bashkir to be descendants of Sarmatians from the southern Ural.

Speaking generally, our findings add weight to “Finno-Ugric” theory of the origin of Bashkir. A majority of Bashkir IBD fragments were shared with Khanty, an ethnicity related to Magyar. Interestingly, some works point out that before the thirteenth century the Hungarians were commonly called Bashkir ([78], pp. 289–294). It is surmised that the Magyar ethnicity was formed in the region between Volga and the Ural Mountains, then, at the end of the sixth century AD, moved to the Don-Kuban steppes abandoned by the Proto-Bulgarians followed by the move to their present location between Dnieper and Danube somewhat later.

Further analyses (ADMIXTURE and recent IBD) pointed to proximity of Bashkir to Turkic-speaking Tatar and Chuvash as well as to Finno-Ugric Udmurt and Khanty. In addition, results of f3 outgroup analysis indicate that Bashkir, in contrary to other Turkic speakers, were strongly influenced by Ancient Northern Eurasians, highlighting a mismatch of their cultural background and genetic ancestry and an intricacy of the historic interface between Turkic and Uralic populations. As a general pattern, the Eastern European speakers of Uralic languages share large amounts of IBD with Khanty and Ket, with Turkic speaking Bashkir being added to this rule.

It is noteworthy that the genomes of closest linguistic relatives of Bashkir, Volga Tatar, bears very little traces of East Asian or Central Siberian ancestry. Volga Tatar are a mix between Bulgar who carried a large Finno-Ugric component, Pecheneg, Kuman, Khazar, local Finno-Ugric tribes, and even Alan. Therefore, Volga Tatars are predominantly European ethnicity with a tiny contribution of East-Asian component. As most Tatar’ IBD is shared with various Turkic and Uralic populations from Volga-Ural region, an amalgamation of various cultures is evident. When the original Finno-Ugric speaking people were conquered by Turkic tribes, both Tatar and Chuvash are likely to have experience language replacement, while retaining their genetic core. Most likely, these events took place sometime around VIII century AD, after the relocation of Bulgar tribes to Volga and Kama river basins, and expansion of Turkic people.

We speculate that Bashkir, Tatar, Chuvash and Finno-Ugric speakers from Volga basin has a common Turkic component, which could have been acquired as a result of Turkic expansion to Volga-Urals region. However, the original Finno-Ugric substrate was not homogeneous: Tatar and Chuvash genomes carry mainly “Finno-Permic” component, while Bashkir carry the “Magyar” one. The fraction of the Turkic component in Bashkir is, undoubtedly, quite significant, and larger than that in Tatar and Chuvash. This component reflects the South Siberian influence on Bashkir, which makes them related to Altai, Kyrgyz, Tuvinian, and Kazakh people.

[Pahli]

It comes from their Kipchak Turkic ancestors.

Or Scythian, I read somewhere that Bashkirs might be a mix of Scythian and Volgic elements then later Turkified.

[Leto]

Or Scythian, I read somewhere that Bashkirs might be a mix of Scythian and Volgic elements then later Turkified.
They are thoroughly mixed - Scythian, Uralic, Turkic and even possibly some Mongolian in there.