Scientific study from 2014 reveals Turkey's hidden African admixture.

[Voskos]

Source:
Early Back-to-Africa Migration into the Horn of Africa

Jason A. Hodgson,
Connie J. Mulligan,
Ali Al-Meeri,
Ryan L. Raaum

http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393



Table S6.

Ancestry proportions for each study population from ADMIXTURE ancestry components.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393.s012

Admixture results for Turkish sample, copied from above article:

1% Nilo-Saharan
6%Maghrebi
4%Ethio-somali
1%Pygmy
8% South Asian
23%European
34%Eurasian
1%Khoesan
1%Ethiopic
13%East Asian
9%Arabian

[Voskos]

bump

[wvwvw]

It's not so hidden, it is quite evident in many Turks

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000003280104/25244baa01bbbed8d4c0094a84d90b1d_400x400.jpeg
Mustafa Şağban

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct71o_QWcAAW3vr.jpg
Turkish writer Mustafa Olpak

[Hudayar]

13%East Asian
34%Eurasian

Wait what

[Hudayar]

the study literally makes no sense
Orcadians are 11% East Asian and Russians are 25%

[Cristiano viejo]

It's not so hidden, it is quite evident in many Turks


Exactly, I always considered them the same people.

[Bornoz]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct71o_QWcAAW3vr.jpg
Turkish writer Mustafa Olpak

You are literally a f*ck

''Olpak's ancestors, of Kikuyu ethnicity from today's Kenya,[2] were enslaved around the year 1890, brought to Crete and sold in Rethymno. Following the population exchange between Greece and Turkey, the family settled in Ayvalık.[3] Olpak married a Turkish woman named Sevgi in İzmir after his military service.[4]

In 2006, Olpak founded the first officially recognised organisation of Afro-Turks, the Africans' Culture and Solidarity Society (Afrikalılar Kültür ve Dayanışma Derneği) in Ayvalık.[5] The opening ceremony was attended by Ali Moussa Iye, the Chief of UNESCO Slave Routes Project.[6][7] A principal aim of the association is to promote studies of oral history of Afro-Turks, a community history of whom was usually ignored by official historiography in Turkey.''

He is such a valuable writer, beside that he is at least 50% African already, why are you making that kind of a sharing? Why are you spreading false information? What is your purpose? Are you trying to manipulate people?

[Pennywise]

This retarded Malakas can't even read it seems. So much asspain for having N. African admixture. :laugh:

[Lavrentis]

This retarded Malakas can't even read it seems. So much asspain for having N. African admixture. :laugh:

Greeks have zero African admixture though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Voskos]

This retarded Malakas can't even read it seems. So much asspain for having N. African admixture. :laugh:

1% Nilo-Saharan
6%Maghrebi
4%Ethio-somali
1%Pygmy
8% South Asian
23%European
34%Eurasian
1%Khoesan
1%Ethiopic
13%East Asian
9%Arabian

[Bornoz]

1% Nilo-Saharan
6%Maghrebi
4%Ethio-somali
1%Pygmy
8% South Asian
23%European
34%Eurasian
1%Khoesan
1%Ethiopic
13%East Asian
9%Arabian

Lets say this is true, does that make us less valuable or something like that?

[Bornoz]

Why the f*ck it is that normal and common to insult black and African people in this forum?

[Pennywise]

1% Nilo-Saharan
6%Maghrebi
4%Ethio-somali
1%Pygmy
8% South Asian
23%European
34%Eurasian
1%Khoesan
1%Ethiopic
13%East Asian
9%Arabian

You must have tried so hard to find this article but nice try, even Russians seems to have some African/Arabian ancestry

Russian

%2 Nilo-Saharan
%0 Maghrebi
%1 Ethio-somali
%1 Pygmy
%4 South Asian
%61 European
%2 Eurasian
%1 Khoesan
%1 Ethiopic
%25 East Asian
%1 Arabian

You should be glad they did not include Greek samples, otherwise you would have tripled so called Turkish score. The study makes no sense for admixture distributions.

[Lavrentis]

Why the f*ck it is that normal and common to insult black and African people in this forum?

Agreed.

[Voskos]

You must have tried so hard to find this article but nice try, even Russians seems to have some African/Arabian ancestry

Russian

%2 Nilo-Saharan
%0 Maghrebi
%1 Ethio-somali
%1 Pygmy
%4 South Asian
%61 European
%2 Eurasian
%1 Khoesan
%1 Ethiopic
%25 East Asian
%1 Arabian

You should be glad they did not include Greek samples, otherwise you would have tripled so called Turkish score. The study makes no sense for admixture distributions.

No matter which study is used you end up more Middle Eastern than any European population which of course is difficult to deal with considering how many posts you've dedicated to label Greeks as such.Here another one, the author is Turkish (Ugur Honoduglil) if I'm not mistaken:


Forward reference allele frequencies in Turkish vs. other HGDP populations were compared and visualized (Fig. S7). The highest correlations were between Turks and Middle Easterners (r = 0.923, Druze and Palestinian), Europeans (r = 0.914, French, Italian, Tuscan, and Sardinian), and South Asian populations (r = 0.894, Pakistani). There was some degree of correlation with Central Asian populations (r = 0.747, Hazara and Uygur) (Fig. S6). These results are in line with results of the PC analysis, FRAPPE, and STRUCTURE analyses.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904778/

[Pennywise]

No matter which study is used you end up more Middle Eastern than any European population which of course is difficult to deal with considering how many posts you've dedicated to label Greeks as such.Here another one, the author is Turkish (Ugur Honoduglil) if I'm not mistaken:


Forward reference allele frequencies in Turkish vs. other HGDP populations were compared and visualized (Fig. S7). The highest correlations were between Turks and Middle Easterners (r = 0.923, Druze and Palestinian), Europeans (r = 0.914, French, Italian, Tuscan, and Sardinian), and South Asian populations (r = 0.894, Pakistani). There was some degree of correlation with Central Asian populations (r = 0.747, Hazara and Uygur) (Fig. S6). These results are in line with results of the PC analysis, FRAPPE, and STRUCTURE analyses.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904778/

LOL, you don't even know the difference between "African" and "Middle Eastern", Islander Greeks are lot more North African/Levantine shifted than Turks. Cypriots are basically Greek speaking Levantines, they cluster closer to Syrians and Lebanese than Turks do. Plenty of genetic results have already been posted. Stop shitting blood with articles that you don't even know how to interpret and embrace your genetic heritage. Don't be such a self-hater.

[Voskos]

LOL, you don't even know the difference between "African" and "Middle Eastern", Islander Greeks are lot more North African/Levantine shifted than Turks. Cypriots are basically Greek speaking Levantines, they cluster closer to Syrians and Lebanese than Turks. Plenty of genetic results have already been posted. Stop shitting blood with articles that you don't even know how to interpret and embrace your genetic heritage. Don't be such a self-hater.

Where did I say that that North African equals Middle Eastern? Just deal with being closer to Palestinians than to anyone else on this planet and stop coming back with strawman arguments.

[Pennywise]

Where did I say that that North African equals Middle Eastern? Just deal with being closer to Palestinians than to anyone else on this planet and stop coming back with strawman arguments.

In none of the "studies" such thing is indicated, it entirely depends on the aim of the study, methodology and samples were used. You don't even have the brain to understand this basic thing fucking Malaka. Don't make me post Cretan and Cypriot results here, we'll see who is closer to Palestinans.

[Token]

Why the f*ck it is that normal and common to insult black and African people in this forum?

Because most people here are a bunch of retarded incels.

[kingjohn]

a cretan ubermench
http://c8.alamy.com/comp/BAG5PG/greece-crete-agios-basilios-village-old-cretan-man-portrait-BAG5PG.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_civilization :)

[Voskos]

In none of the "studies" such thing is indicated, it entirely depends on the aim of the study, methodology and samples were used. You don't even have the brain to understand this basic thing fucking Malaka. Don't make me post Cretan and Cypriot results here, we'll see who is closer to Palestinans.

Post what you like,even though I am not talking about oracle distances here.


In none of the "studies" such thing is indicated

The highest correlations were between Turks and Middle Easterners (r = 0.923, Druze and Palestinian)


it entirely depends on the aim of the study, methodology and samples were used
These results are in line with results of the PC analysis, FRAPPE, and STRUCTURE analyses.