How to differentiate a CM influenced person from an Amerindian one?

[Ancap]

For example, the Chilean actor Pedro Pascal; everybody classifies him as Dinarid + CM, although I think he's part mapuche because of his lips, nose format, big head etc.
Here are some pics of him:

http://i.imgur.com/CqEKIqC.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/a1rG4AJ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/DtaAPHS.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/8lEDOaZ.jpg

Specially when it comes to latin american people, how can I find out the difference between a CM influenced person and an amerindian one (since they look very similar to my eyes)?

https://i0.wp.com/askwhy.co.uk/dinosauroids/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/indian_cromagnon0-e1354575670883.jpg

[Linebacker]

There shouldn't have to be any difference between the features of the rarely seen today Proto-Native types like Sitting bull and Cro-Magnon remains in modern European populations.

Both groups developed robust features in the exact same way,due to a meat-rich diet and very demanding hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

In the end its just robust versus gracile.Big bones versus small bones.Cro-Magnon robust European,Amerind robust South American.Only difference is the ethnicity.

[Ancap]

There shouldn't have to be any difference between the features of the rarely seen today Proto-Native types like Sitting bull and Cro-Magnon remains in modern European populations.

Both groups developed robust features in the exact same way,due to a meat-rich diet and very demanding hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

In the end its just robust versus gracile.Big bones versus small bones.Cro-Magnon robust European,Amerind robust South American.Only difference is the ethnicity.

So, can I classify an amerindian person as a CM instead?

[Abdelnour]

Both groups have a lot of neanderthal genes. Also, as another poster mentioned, they had a diet of meat and veggies. Once the Agriculture Revolution hit, men where fatter on average compared to the Upper Paleolithic survivors.

[Hamlet]

So, can I classify an amerindian person as a CM instead?

No lol

[Grab the Gauge]

Pedro is clearly differentiated from Amerindians by the extreme triangularity of his face (wide head, tapering to a narrow chin), the overall gracility of his jaw and mandible, his flattened (laterally) zygomatic bones, the low position of the orbits on the skull, short face, short nose and the great distance between his eyes. His soft features (eyes, nose, lips, ears) are totally unlike Amerindians.

The typical Amerindian has a jaw that proportionately wider relative to the width of the forehead, having a more oval, square or rectangular face shape, a mandible that is heavier, zygomatic bones not flattened, and often flaring, orbits located higher on the slull, face very long, nose vertically very tall, and a very short distance between the eyes.

If you could look at the teeth you would see that he lacks Amerindian/Northeast Asian features like medial incisor winging and shoveled incisors.


Here are some perfect examples of Northern Amerindians.


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d1/61/a3/d161a381b4775a5bfadb565b61947e38.png

http://i57.tinypic.com/29e1x6s.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/d9/f2/45d9f21303a9c53b66b85837c412e70d.jpg

You can see how they share the characteristics mentioned (extremely long faces, tall nose, extremely narrow distance between the eyes) with Northeast Asians, despite looking different from Asians.

A Buryat:

https://ssl.c.photoshelter.com/img-get2/I0000ACSilTL35.A/fit=1000x750/105644-Buryat-man.jpg

[Ancap]

Pedro is clearly differentiated from Amerindians by the extreme triangularity of his face (wide head, tapering to a narrow chin), the overall gracility of his jaw and mandible, his flattened (laterally) zygomatic bones, the low position of the orbits on the skull, short face, short nose and the great distance between his eyes. His soft features (eyes, nose, lips, ears) are totally unlike Amerindians.

The typical Amerindian has a jaw that proportionately wider relative to the width of the forehead, having a more oval, square or rectangular face shape, a mandible that is heavier, zygomatic bones not flattened, and often flaring, orbits located higher on the slull, face very long, nose vertically very tall, and a very short distance between the eyes.

If you could look at the teeth you would see that he lacks Amerindian/Northeast Asian features like medial incisor winging and shoveled incisors.


Here are some perfect examples of Northern Amerindians.


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d1/61/a3/d161a381b4775a5bfadb565b61947e38.png

http://i57.tinypic.com/29e1x6s.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/d9/f2/45d9f21303a9c53b66b85837c412e70d.jpg

You can see how they share the characteristics mentioned (extremely long faces, long nose, extremely narrow distance between the eyes) with Northeast Asians.

A Buryat:

https://ssl.c.photoshelter.com/img-get2/I0000ACSilTL35.A/fit=1000x750/105644-Buryat-man.jpg

It makes sense. But some pics of his look a bit odd, like this one for example:

https://static.vix.com/es/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/btg/series.batanga.com/files/game-of-thrones-temporada-4-pedro-pascal-interpretara-a-oberyn-martell-2.jpg?itok=2Xoe41w_

His lips are much thicker without mustache and his head looks a bit big (even a TA user said it in a post about him), these are the only features that strikes me a bit, but the rest looks completely euro indeed

[zarzian]

There shouldn't have to be any difference between the features of the rarely seen today Proto-Native types like Sitting bull and Cro-Magnon remains in modern European populations.

Both groups developed robust features in the exact same way,due to a meat-rich diet and very demanding hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

In the end its just robust versus gracile.Big bones versus small bones.Cro-Magnon robust European,Amerind robust South American.Only difference is the ethnicity.

THe average human height up to the Neolithic revolution was 6 feet, grains and sedentary lifestyle contributed gracilization to AMH.