View Full Version : Do Dalmatians have Roman/Italian ancestry?
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 02:45 PM
Do people from Dalmatia have ancient roman ancestry if so is it signifigant and we're would it be most frequent in dalmatia
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 02:46 PM
Bump
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 02:52 PM
Bump
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 03:03 PM
Bump
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 03:05 PM
Bump..
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 03:08 PM
Bump
Who the hell knows, man...
Sikeliot
12-07-2017, 09:11 PM
I don't think so. Most of the Italian population that was there likely returned to Italy. Croatians are genetically close to Slovaks, Czechs, and Hungarians and not to Italy at all.
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 09:16 PM
Romance Dalmatian people were partly descendants of Romans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalmatian_language
We are just a stone throw away, but apparently none. Wich is curious. I m speaking more over on scientific proved Italian ancestry or exchange of genes from us to them:
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VQ0HLRv2aO8/WUWKx3SRE-I/AAAAAAAACFI/qhyV50n8dRcfrVrmrdhqmUDVnUhodV6ZgCLcBGAs/s1600/23and_Me_Italian.png
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 09:33 PM
We are just a stone throw away, but apparently none. Wich is curious. I m speaking more over on scientific proved Italian ancestry or exchange of genes from us to them:
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VQ0HLRv2aO8/WUWKx3SRE-I/AAAAAAAACFI/qhyV50n8dRcfrVrmrdhqmUDVnUhodV6ZgCLcBGAs/s1600/23and_Me_Italian.png
Italian admixture = west med admixture, is not it?
Italian admixture = west med admixture, is not it?
No. It s Italian admixture in 23andme tests
Even thought precisely it s South Italy admixture
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 09:36 PM
No. It s Italian admixture in 23andme tests
Exist in Germany, Hungary, Austria and Belgium but does not exist in Dalmatia and throughout western Balkans, it's very weird.
Sikeliot
12-07-2017, 09:37 PM
Italian admixture = west med admixture, is not it?
No, West Med = Sardinia on most calculators.
"Italian" is highest in central-south Italy and Aegean islands like Crete or Rhodes.
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 09:50 PM
I have Montenegrin ancestry.
Montenegro = Duklja = Dioclea founded by Diocletian, populated by the Romans.
Dalmatia as well.
We have 45-47% Greek/Roman DNA just like Romanians for example.
we have some % of Celtic and Thracian Autosomal as well.
We are slavic for the reason we speak slavic languages, but all Dinaric, Pontid people descended from Roman Empire.
^the 23andme says 0 for bosnians
You are right for Montenegrins.. Literally a venetian small concentrate of at least cultural influence
Hell in italy there is even a famous liqueur, called Amaro Montenegro
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 09:53 PM
I don't think so. Most of the Italian population that was there likely returned to Italy. Croatians are genetically close to Slovaks, Czechs, and Hungarians and not to Italy at all.
I guess most returned but could some of the population be slavisized romans I'm sure Dalmatians plot differently then north croats
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 09:53 PM
^the 23andme says 0 for bosnians
You are right for Montenegrins.. Literally a venetian small concentrate of at least cultural influence
Hell in italy there is even a famous liqueur, called Amaro Montenegro
Well Bosnia is mixed, military province settled by various people of various cultures and backgrounds.
My family came to Kordun Croatia in 15th century from Montenegro, then in 19th moved to Bosnia.
Stears
12-07-2017, 09:54 PM
I have Montenegrin ancestry.
Montenegro = Duklja = Dioclea founded by Diocletian, populated by the Romans.
Dalmatia as well.
We have 45-47% Greek/Roman DNA just like Romanians for example.
we have some % of Celtic and Thracian Autosomal as well.
We are slavic for the reason we speak slavic languages, but all Dinaric, Pontid people descended from Roman Empire.
Dalmatian people are not similar to the Romanians.
speak for yourself.
Lucia
12-07-2017, 09:54 PM
Some probably do(Italian), but I would guess it's more likely in Istria.
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 09:56 PM
I have Montenegrin ancestry.
Montenegro = Duklja = Dioclea founded by Diocletian, populated by the Romans.
Dalmatia as well.
We have 45-47% Greek/Roman DNA just like Romanians for example.
we have some % of Celtic and Thracian Autosomal as well.
We are slavic for the reason we speak slavic languages, but all Dinaric, Pontid people descended from Roman Empire.
Could you elaborate more on romans in Dalmatia?
Stears
12-07-2017, 09:57 PM
Romans were present in Hungary too...can Transdanubian people claim the Roman ancestry ?
it is stupid thread...the romans were administrative elite outside the italian peninsula, and that was all.
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 09:59 PM
Could you elaborate more on romans in Dalmatia?
Emperor Diocletian was born in Dalmatia in 3rd century.
City of Solin had 60.000 of Romano-Illyrians who spoke predominantly Latin language.
Emperor Diocletian was obsessed with Dalmatia that he moved a large populace of Italy to the province of Dalmatia and Dioclea (modern Montenegro).
When Slavs came by the permission of Emperor Heraclius they mixed with those people which is why we have 50% Roman/Greek ancestry and 50% Slavic ancestry (just like myself).
Source: De Administrando Imperio
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 10:00 PM
We are just a stone throw away, but apparently none. Wich is curious. I m speaking more over on scientific proved Italian ancestry or exchange of genes from us to them:
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VQ0HLRv2aO8/WUWKx3SRE-I/AAAAAAAACFI/qhyV50n8dRcfrVrmrdhqmUDVnUhodV6ZgCLcBGAs/s1600/23and_Me_Italian.png
This map is suspicious it doesn't make sense that Bulgaria and Germany has more Italian then dalmatia
^ Hungary could have spoken a Latin language
The presence there of Roman i think was noteworthy.. Mainly because Romans were obsessed with Thermaes
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:02 PM
This map is suspicious it doesn't make sense that Bulgaria and Germany has more Italian then dalmatia
Italians simply ignore Slavic lands cause they believe that we are all Slavs from Russia or Ukraine, but they are very wrong.
Serbian people are mostly Pontid, Dinarids, Dinaro-Meds... <-- non slavic people.
Stears
12-07-2017, 10:03 PM
Emperor Diocletian was born in Dalmatia in 3rd century.
City of Solin had 60.000 of Romano-Illyrians who spoke predominantly Latin language.
Emperor Diocletian was obsessed with Dalmatia that he moved a large populace of Italy to the province of Dalmatia and Dioclea (modern Montenegro).
When Slavs came by the permission of Emperor Heraclius they mixed with those people which is why we have 50% Roman/Greek ancestry and 50% Slavic ancestry (just like myself).
Source: De Administrando Imperio
Why do you speak in name of Dalmatian Croatians ? you are not related with them.
Stears
12-07-2017, 10:04 PM
^ Hungary could have spoken a Latin language
The presence there of Roman i think was noteworthy.. Mainly because Romans were obsessed with Thermaes
There are lot or Roman ruins in Budapest and western Hungary (Transdanubia).
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 10:04 PM
Emperor Diocletian was born in Dalmatia in 3rd century.
City of Solin had 60.000 of Romano-Illyrians who spoke predominantly Latin language.
Emperor Diocletian was obsessed with Dalmatia that he moved a large populace of Italy to the province of Dalmatia and Dioclea (modern Montenegro).
When Slavs came by the permission of Emperor Heraclius they mixed with those people which is why we have 50% Roman/Greek ancestry and 50% Slavic ancestry (just like myself).
Source: De Administrando Imperio
How many people were moved and is this all across dalmatia? Also what do u mean by Romano Illyrians are they italic or Illyrians?
Stears
12-07-2017, 10:08 PM
Romance Dalmatian people were partly descendants of Romans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalmatian_language
I think they were Vlachs.
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 10:10 PM
Why do you speak in name of Dalmatian Croatians ? you are not related with them.
DO you think Dalmatian croats have possible Roman ancestry
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:10 PM
How many people were moved and is this all across dalmatia? Also what do u mean by Romano Illyrians are they italic or Illyrians?
Well we don't have information for Dalmatia, but Dioclea (ancient city near podgorica) was fully settled by the people from Italy. Rather large amount of people.
Romano-Illyrians are people who lived on Western Balkans before Slavic arrival, Illyrians were primitive tribal Greeks who mixed with Ancient Romans after SPQR conquered Illyricum in Bellum Batonianum (War).
Romano-Illyrians then mixed with Slavs and that's what we are today.
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:10 PM
Italians simply ignore Slavic lands cause they believe that we are all Slavs from Russia or Ukraine, but they are very wrong.
Serbian people are mostly Pontid, Dinarids, Dinaro-Meds... <-- non slavic people.
Why are you speak in the name of Serbians?
Bosnian are the oldest people on the world, they built bosnian pyramid which is old 20 000 years.
Stears
12-07-2017, 10:11 PM
DO you think Dalmatian croats have possible Roman ancestry
I don't think so. Real Romans were only the administrative elite in the provinces.
they are native people mixed with slavs
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:12 PM
Why are you speak in the name of Serbians?
Bosnian are the oldest people on the world, they built bosnian pyramid which is old 20 000 years.
Why wouldn't I speak in the name of Serbians beg your pardon?
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 10:13 PM
I don't think so. Real Romans were only the administrative elite in the provinces.
they are native people mixed with slavs
So mostly Illyrians then?
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:13 PM
Why wouldn't I speak in the name of Serbians beg your pardon?
Because you are Bosniak and Serbian users think that you trolling them.
Lucia
12-07-2017, 10:15 PM
Well we don't have information for Dalmatia, but Dioclea (ancient city near podgorica) was fully settled by the people from Italy. Rather large amount of people.
Romano-Illyrians are people who lived on Western Balkans before Slavic arrival, Illyrians were primitive tribal Greeks who mixed with Ancient Romans after SPQR conquered Illyricum in Bellum Batonianum (War).
Romano-Illyrians then mixed with Slavs and that's what we are today.
What I found for Dioclea:
According to an account from the Abbreviator of Strabo:
"Nothing was speared. The Slavs after killing whoever had remained in the city, took whatever they could, and destroyed every thing else. From the large library of Dioclea not even a book remained, after everything was burned down, not even one!"
Stears
12-07-2017, 10:15 PM
So mostly Illyrians then?
i think mixature of slavic and illyrian tribes
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:21 PM
What I found for Dioclea:
According to an account from the Abbreviator of Strabo:
"Nothing was speared. The Slavs after killing whoever had remained in the city, took whatever they could, and destroyed every thing else. From the large library of Dioclea not even a book remained, after everything was burned down, not even one!"
Yes, Slavs imposed their own Culture, Language and what not.
That could not be achieved without force.
But modern Genetics reveals to us that statement was a bit of a stretch. It wasn't THAT bad.
Hundreds of thousands Illyrians, Romans lived on Western Balkans they couldn't have been ALL killed.
They were assimilated.
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:23 PM
They were assimilated.
For sure, you are descendant of assimilatted Romans-Illyrians (aka Vlachs).
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 10:23 PM
Yes, Slavs imposed their own Culture, Language and what not.
That could not be achieved without force.
But modern Genetics reveals to us that statement was a bit of a stretch. It wasn't THAT bad.
Hundreds of thousands Illyrians, Romans lived on Western Balkans they couldn't have been ALL killed.
They were assimilated.
I hope I have an R1a slavic haplo group I love slavicness I don't want to be Illyrian or roman
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:30 PM
For sure, you are descendant of assimilatted Romans-Illyrians (aka Vlachs).
Yes, Slavs called Romans and Illyrians = Vlachs.
I have both slavic and native blood (just like all Serbs, Montenegrins, Bosnians) today.
And all have ratio about 50%/50%
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:31 PM
Yes, Slavs called Romans and Illyrians = Vlachs.
I have both slavic and native blood (just like all Serbs, Montenegrins, Bosnians) today.
And all have ratio about 50%/50%
Why are you worship Vlachs?
Do you think that they are better than Slavs?
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:33 PM
I hope I have an R1a slavic haplo group I love slavicness I don't want to be Illyrian or roman
Well, even modern Russia is influenced by Roman culture, HEAVILY.
Russian Names are mostly Roman names.
Russian culture is like 50% Roman Culture.
Serbian R1a isn't like Ukrainian or Russian R1a.. in the sense that Autosomal DNA of R1a Serbs is again 50% Balkan 50% Slavic.
MercifulServant
12-07-2017, 10:35 PM
Well, even modern Russia is influenced by Roman culture, HEAVILY.
Russian Names are mostly Roman names.
Russian culture is like 50% Roman Culture.
Serbian R1a isn't like Ukrainian or Russian R1a.. in the sense that Autosomal DNA of R1a Serbs is again 50% Balkan 50% Slavic.
Well I hope my haplogroup is Slavic and I'm mostly autosomally Slavic too I love slavs
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:40 PM
@ Bosniensis
Until recent past Vlachs were semi-nomadic sheperds without any culture and even without state, nobody in the Balkans want to be Vlach.
https://youtu.be/YdZoNqD97p0
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:40 PM
Why are you worship Vlachs?
Do you think that they are better than Slavs?
No, Slavs are fine but:
Why would I prefer Slavic ancestry over Native Balkan ancestry when I am more native than Slavic?
Romanians are also 35% Slavic 65% Greek/Illyrian/Roman.. and they have decided to speak Latin like language...
and Romanians are 1:1 identical people to Serbs.
Actually we have more right to speak Latin then Romanians yet we continued with Slavic.
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:42 PM
@ Bosniensis
Until recent past Vlachs were semi-nomadic sheperds without any culture and even without state, nobody in the Balkans want to be Vlach.
https://youtu.be/YdZoNqD97p0
Those are Vlachs who lived like Albanians, secluded on Mountains and they survived.
But true Vlachs who lived in Cities are completely assimilated into Serbs, Bosnians, Croats etc..
So now Vlach today is a term for Shepherds, but it wasn't like that in 6th century.
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:43 PM
Those are Vlachs who lived like Albanians, secluded on Mountains and they survived.
But true Vlachs who lived in Cities are completely assimilated into Serbs, Bosnians, Croats etc..
So now Vlach today is a term for Shepherds, but it wasn't like that in 6th century.
There is no Vlash who were civilized and lived in cities, Vlach are semi-nomadic sheperds.
it s very interesting. thank you.
i would likme to know the distribution of mal and female haplogroups in the balkans. wich are linked to romans, and wich are linked to slavs
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:46 PM
There is no Vlash who were civilized and lived in cities, Vlach are semi-nomadic sheperds.
Vlach is a Slavic/Germanic name for Romans and Illyrians.
Even today, people from Poland call Italians = Wlochy/Vlachs
Do you get it?
it s very interesting. thank you.
i would likme to know the distribution of mal and female haplogroups in the balkans. wich are linked to romans
probably some J and R1b, not sure of the subclades.
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:49 PM
Vlach is a Slavic/Germanic name for Romans and Illyrians.
Even today, people from Poland call Italians = Wlochy/Vlachs
Do you get it?
Vlach are semi-nomadic sheoperds from Balkans who speak vulgar Latin language.
Latin speakers who lived in Dalmatians cities were not Vlachs.
Bosniensis
12-07-2017, 10:50 PM
it s very interesting. thank you.
i would likme to know the distribution of mal and female haplogroups in the balkans. wich are linked to romans, and wich are linked to slavs
We have many different haplogroups like EV13, J2, I2 etc..
We don't have R1b a lot, but we do have slavic R1a though.
Female haplogroups are mostly H (as far as I know, but I haven't checked a lot).
Kelmendasi
12-07-2017, 10:51 PM
probably some J and R1b, not sure of the subclades.
For R1b it would be R1b-U152 and for J it would be the “Roman” J2a clade
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:51 PM
it s very interesting. thank you.
i would likme to know the distribution of mal and female haplogroups in the balkans. wich are linked to romans, and wich are linked to slavs
Vlach from southern Balkans known as Aromanians are mostly R1b, J2b2 and E1b, those 3 haplogroups are more than 70% among them and that haplogroups are not conected with Slavs.
Slavic haplogroups in the Balkans are I2a and R1a.
Female haplogroups are mostly H (as far as I know, but I haven't checked a lot).
they are mostly H-ish, yes.
Kelmendasi
12-07-2017, 10:53 PM
it s very interesting. thank you.
i would likme to know the distribution of mal and female haplogroups in the balkans. wich are linked to romans, and wich are linked to slavs
The Ydna haplogroups from the Romans or Italians would be R1b-U152 and the Italic J2a clades. The Slavic Ydna haplogroups are R1a(Slavic clades) and I2a1b-Din
Lucia
12-07-2017, 10:54 PM
I have to agree with Makeridov on this one, Vlachs lived in rural Dalmatian hinterland, not cities.
Hanuman
12-07-2017, 10:55 PM
I have to agree with Makeridov on this one, Vlachs lived in rural Dalmatian hinterland, not cities.
Vlachs lived in mountains of central and southern Balkans (especaially southern).
ovidiu
03-10-2018, 04:16 PM
^Not so far south until later in history.
I have Montenegrin ancestry.
Montenegro = Duklja = Dioclea founded by Diocletian, populated by the Romans.
Dalmatia as well.
We have 45-47% Greek/Roman DNA just like Romanians for example.
we have some % of Celtic and Thracian Autosomal as well.
We are slavic for the reason we speak slavic languages, but all Dinaric, Pontid people descended from Roman Empire.
With all due respect, I think you're approaching this a bit too simplistically. Those types were most probably native to the region long before that. Most anthropologists agree that they are of very ancient origin. I don't take that stuff in ancient Greek writings about everyone to the north having red hair at face value. Populations can't change that drastically and be replaced like that.
I also think you're exaggerrating the impact of actual Romans somewhat. They were mainly administrators and even then many in the army and who were sent to colonize were from around the entire empire. I doubt they were a significant factor in the ethnogeneses of these nations.
That being said it might not be absolutely negligible either, and a small amount may have gotten quickly absorbed and assimilated into the larger population around them.
We are just a stone throw away, but apparently none. Wich is curious. I m speaking more over on scientific proved Italian ancestry or exchange of genes from us to them:
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VQ0HLRv2aO8/WUWKx3SRE-I/AAAAAAAACFI/qhyV50n8dRcfrVrmrdhqmUDVnUhodV6ZgCLcBGAs/s1600/23and_Me_Italian.png
Yeah that is interesting. They on the western part of the Balkans oddly have quite little genetic connection, despite what you'd think. So either the Dalmatians were mainly natives or if not they moved out or were overwhelmed by Croats later. But the present day ones still do seem distinct from Slavonians for example. So it points toward a probable cultural romanization of the area at one point.
I admit I thought it was interesting that many Romanians who I compared genomes with on 23andme actually did have a small (1-5%) amount of Italian listed there, including myself. But there needs to be more research. The field is still in its infancy. It will evolve more over the coming decades I'm sure.
I was looking up some genetic autosomal plots of European and other populations, and interestingly, Romanians aren't actually that far from some of their linguistic relatives on some maps, but I think it depends on the data and how they choose to display it.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8211/8437291103_92212c88bf_o.png
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8080/8325654300_7d1a494875_o.png
http://oi52.tinypic.com/335gmd4.jpg
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/files/2011/01/MDS1600.png
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/files/2010/06/jewsnat2.png
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/TA_tjcMrcnI/AAAAAAAACb0/iMP8YJM3D8E/s1600/pca.jpg
Some other plots I've found, which also include other Balkan ethnicities
https://dnatestingchoice.com/perch/resources/britains-dna-european-600x530-border-v2.jpg
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/science/13visual.html
https://3c1703fe8d.site.internapcdn.net/newman/gfx/news/hires/2008/4-researchersl.jpg
https://blog.23andme.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Genes-mirror-geography-for-Europeans.jpg
Seems they pull much closer to southern or central Europe than far Eastern like Russia/Ukraine for example. Maybe Bosniensis is on to something. But I still think his analysis is overly simplistic and the native element far outshines whatever else. Populations always have at least some continuity with older ones and don't just start with a blank slate after a linguistic shift. Slavs of course were an important later layer too.
Also haplogroups can be misleading too. For instance many Latin American mestizos who have R1b as their paternal one are obviously not genetically the same as their Spanish ancestors.
Those are Vlachs who lived like Albanians, secluded on Mountains and they survived.
But true Vlachs who lived in Cities are completely assimilated into Serbs, Bosnians, Croats etc..
So now Vlach today is a term for Shepherds, but it wasn't like that in 6th century.
Actually I believe it was the cities that were the most depopulated after the tumults of the barbarian invasions around the beginning of the Middle Ages. The Vlachs in general were probably more of a country people to begin with, but at least from that time (as we can see by a loss of much city-life related Latin vocabulary). It was probably easier to survive in more isolated areas. However, many of the cities still show some continuity of name, although heavily altered. This was probably mostly due to the Byzantine imperial administrators.
I do get some Italian on 23andme, DNA land and myheritage.
we're would it be most frequent in dalmatia
Coastal cities.
No, Slavs are fine but:
Why would I prefer Slavic ancestry over Native Balkan ancestry when I am more native than Slavic?
Romanians are also 35% Slavic 65% Greek/Illyrian/Roman.. and they have decided to speak Latin like language...
and Romanians are 1:1 identical people to Serbs.
Actually we have more right to speak Latin then Romanians yet we continued with Slavic.
Stop this BS already. Romanians and serbs are not identical people in any way. And where do u take those 35% from? Tell me pls? I don’t get those 33% of north slavic on DNA.LAND as u do... it doesn’t even matter anyway...what makes u a vlach or any other ethnicity is primarly the culture and language...
MercifulServant
03-10-2018, 06:40 PM
Stop this BS already. Romanians and serbs are not identical people in any way. And where do u take those 35% from? Tell me pls? I don’t get those 33% of north slavic on DNA.LAND as u do... it doesn’t even matter anyway...what makes u a vlach or any other ethnicity is primarly the culture and language...
We are very simalar people genetically wether you like it or not
MercifulServant
03-10-2018, 06:42 PM
I do get some Italian on 23andme, DNA land and myheritage.
I get more Sardinian then you on DNA land (2.8%) and im partly Dalmatian is it roman blood?
I get more Sardinian then you on DNA land and im partly Dalmatian is it roman blood?
It's possible.
But I didn't mean Sardinian, since they are genetically different from Italy. I meant south/central European which is based on north and central Italians.
Tauromachos
03-10-2018, 06:50 PM
Yep
Yep
Not nearly as much as people imagine, to add. It's common in wealthy or noble city families, not among the average people.
The Illyrian Warrior
03-10-2018, 06:52 PM
I get more Sardinian then you on DNA land (2.8%) and im partly Dalmatian is it roman blood?
I think you should not pay much attention to DNA.land, the calculator's trace region values are far from actual background, in dna.land I get Italian, Northwestern Euro even Siberian now according to ftdna autosomal results which goes as far as 2000 years back I'm entirely southeast european, no italian or anything, also in other calculators I get typical albanian score, only Dna.land has some weird results which confuses people more than actually tells you anything.
A_Magnus7
03-10-2018, 06:54 PM
Some Dalmatian have Venetian roots, it was us for more than 400 years so yeah but in the latest centuries most of Venetian descendants emigrated in Istria and Italy, nowadays there are few Venetian descendants, Croats took it supported by Habsburg and kicked all Italian speakers and Serbian ones :(
Some Dalmatian have Venetian roots, it was us for more than 400 years so yeah but in the latest centuries most of Venetian descendants emigrated in Istria and Italy, nowadays there are few Venetian descendants, Croats took it supported by Habsburg and kicked all Italian speakers and Serbian ones :(
It was well deserved. Dalmatia is land of Croats, and all the others are guests.
MercifulServant
03-10-2018, 07:38 PM
It was well deserved. Dalmatia is land of Croats, and all the others are guests.
No it isnt there were always many serbs in dalmatia. Knin was a majority serbian town until after the war
No it isnt there were always many serbs in dalmatia. Knin was a majority serbian town until after the war
Not anymore.
Btw, Serbs became majority in Knin after ww1. Should I mention it was Croatian royal capital ?
:)
piro ilir
03-12-2018, 03:41 PM
Well we don't have information for Dalmatia, but Dioclea (ancient city near podgorica) was fully settled by the people from Italy. Rather large amount of people.
Romano-Illyrians are people who lived on Western Balkans before Slavic arrival, Illyrians were primitive tribal Greeks who mixed with Ancient Romans after SPQR conquered Illyricum in Bellum Batonianum (War).
Romano-Illyrians then mixed with Slavs and that's what we are today.
Illyrians tribal primitive Greeks!!! That's really astonishing
piro ilir
03-12-2018, 03:54 PM
I hope I have an R1a slavic haplo group I love slavicness I don't want to be Illyrian or roman
Y-dna it's not the same as DNA. It's only a very tiny portion of our genetic composition. British people and Hindu people are both R1 and still too different in physiognomy or physical appearance.
MercifulServant
03-13-2018, 01:43 AM
Y-dna it's not the same as DNA. It's only a very tiny portion of our genetic composition. British people and Hindu people are both R1 and still too different in physiognomy or physical appearance.
Don't pay attention to that comment it was a while ago
MercifulServant
03-13-2018, 04:25 PM
I think you have an identity crisis...
Once you want to be a Thraco-Illyrian, and than the next day a Slav.
Better your parents start watching on you...
The r1a comment was months ago dont pay attention to it. I am what I am A south slav. A mix of both but more paleo balkanic/thraco illyrian genetically speaking.
Vincent_D
01-20-2025, 10:31 PM
Hello! I was wondering where you found those images (not including the Eupedia map)? I tried to reverse search the first one (West_Central_Eurasia.dat) and only found other forums, not the original source. Thanks in advance!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.