PDA

View Full Version : Europeans diverged from East Asians in ∼41,000 years ago



LoLeL
02-09-2018, 10:15 AM
To study the male and female lineages of East Asian and European humans, we have sequenced 25 short tandem repeat markers on 453 Y-chromosomes and collected sequences of 72 complete mitochondrial genomes to construct independent phylogenetic trees for male and female lineages. The results indicate that East Asian individuals fall into two clades, one that includes East Asian individuals only and a second that contains East Asian and European individuals. Surprisingly, the European individuals did not form an independent clade, but branched within in the East Asians. We then estimated the divergence time of the root of the European clade as ∼41,000 years ago. These data indicate that, contrary to traditional views, Europeans diverged from East Asians around that time. We also address the origin of the Ainu lineage in northern Japan.


Humans are traditionally viewed as falling into three major populations, Africans, East Asians, and Europeans, with the latter two diverging from the African ancestors ∼55,000 years ago. We sequenced Y-STR makers in Y chromosome and collected complete mtDNAs for many East Asian and European individuals to reexamine that view. Phylogenetic trees of Y-STR makers and Mt genes suggest that the Europeans interbred with East Asians until ∼41,000 years ago. On the other hand, East Asians diverged from their African acestors ∼55,000 years ago. Therefore, we suggest that the European and East Asian lineages diverged ∼41,000 years ago.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971580/bin/evu027f4p.jpg

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971580/

jackrussell
02-09-2018, 10:54 AM
Outbred into Inbred you mean , surely ?
;)

ovidiu
03-16-2018, 10:11 PM
What is Type 1 and Type 2 Asians?

And I guess this answers the question I had about when the populations split. Earlier than I thought. At that time though they probably weren't very phenotypically differentiated.

sailormoon
03-17-2018, 09:06 PM
https://s13.postimg.org/eah6jh9dz/evu027f1p.jpg
Fig. 1.—
Phylogenetic tree of Yap haplotypes for Europeans and East Asians. The tree was constructed by using the Y-STR data, and the Yap haplotypes were placed at the tips of the tree.

Type 1 East Asians are denoted as Yap-A in Figure 1 and they carry haplogroups C and D. Type 2 East Asians are denoted as Yap-B, who do not belong to haplogroups C and D. 91% of Yap-B1 individuals share haplogroup O2b which is found with its highest frequency among modern populations of Japan and Korea. Some Mesolithic Europeans such as La Braņa-1 belonged to haplogroup C6-V20 or C1a2 and there was a genetic overlap between Mesolithic Europeans and Type 1 East Asians.

Anglojew
03-17-2018, 09:34 PM
Interesting.

johen
03-18-2018, 12:59 PM
Sorry.........

Petalpusher
03-18-2018, 08:27 PM
What is Type 1 and Type 2 Asians?

And I guess this answers the question I had about when the populations split. Earlier than I thought. At that time though they probably weren't very phenotypically differentiated.

They must be talking about something similar to ENA (Eastern non African)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-JfsaZ0Arig0/VIwqnsNURuI/AAAAAAAABzA/XqR_3Y4l3y0/s400/2kjz7p.jpg