Elongated skull DNA from Paracas, Peru

[Loki]

The results are rather interesting. They belong to European/Eurasian haplogroups, but also show some peculiar unique tendencies. The elongation in their case is natural. They date from 300 BC.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJCzzyDFr5w

[Peterski]

So, maybe European colonization of America after 1492 did not happen?

Maybe all of this Caucasoid-like DNA had been there already before that?

It seems that MyHeritage and Grab the Gauge were right:


This is very accurate, just as I predicted 23andme and other calculators were not equipped to identify Native American ancestry. Better systems such as this one which have a better dataset to compare against are going to give more accurate results. If Annie999 took one of these she'd probably come back 25% Amerindian. And this is just the tip of the iceberg, as the diversity of Native American datasets going in to these calculators is ever-growing, the opportunity for your Amerindian percentage to increase just keeps expanding.

[Loki]

So, maybe European colonization of America after 1492 did not happen?

Maybe all of this Caucasoid-like DNA had been there already before that?


It did happen, BUT... it only added to the European genes already on the continent, it seems. Very interesting conclusion. :)

[Rethel]

And what Y did they have?

[Arthur9]

How can the elongation be natural?

[Dragoon]

I recall hearing a few years back that one side of the skulls,was human and the unknown (i cant recall the details, so this may be wrong).
Also some people artificially did it?

Separate issue:

Ancestor of Native Americans in Asia was 30% “Western Eurasian”

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/11/scienhot-native-americans-were-mix-asian-and-european
https://dna-explained.com/2013/10/25/ancestor-of-native-americans-in-asia-was-30-western-eurasian/

Third issue:

There is a lot of disinformation, controlled opposition, and people pretending to be experts on this. Some of them are quite annoying. So I am skeptical.

[Rethel]

I recall hearing a few years back that one side of the skulls,was human and the unknown

This is why it is important, what Y did they have. Mt and au
say nothing in that case, as race and women did not transmit
anything - are just coincidental. In the programme is said, that
they have different scull morphology - not only the top but also
the bottom of the scull, what suggests, that they were hybrids
indeed. In that case, it doesn;t matter where their mothers were
taken, as they had nothing to say in the matter of travel, building
or developing a state. They were just incubators for somebody and
the most important is for whom? For Europeans or for fallen angles?
Or maybe a bunch of weid Indians traveled to the Medditerrenian and
did capture white women? Who knows... In any case, mt is irrelevant.

[Loki]

I think any Caucasoid DNA came into the Americas from the Siberian bridge into Alaska some 15,000 years ago.

Actually, no. For example, the Romans also seem to have reached the Americas via sea, as there have been found Roman artefacts. And this Paracas case is even more mysterious, but I think there are ways to consider other than the Bering Strait...

[Loki]

How can the elongation be natural?

This is a very good question. It could be a hybrid population, or a subspecies. More likely hybrids. We know it's natural, because they also found infants with such skulls.

[Loki]

And what Y did they have?

They don't say. I wonder why not.

[Rethel]

They don't say. I wonder why not.

Because it could be nephilims, so they showed their mt,
which obviously is human and says as usual nothing.

[Loki]

Because it could be nephilims, so they showed their mt,
which obviously is human and says as usual nothing.

Yes, I think that's the obvious conclusion that can be drawn. Hence the Y-DNA would not be recognisable as human.

[Rethel]

Yes, I think that's the obvious conclusion that can be drawn. Hence the Y-DNA would not be recognisable as human.

It could look like human, but the problem is, that it wouldn't
be like Adam's Y, so there would be a problem where to put
it in "evolutional" time line. Or if it would be weired indeed,
then the problem would be even bigger. So, the obvious
conclusion is to hide - as usuall everything what does
contradicts the Theory-godess.

[Loki]

Here's a very interesting and revealing talk about the Paracas skulls:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fz8WZhSl6XA

[Rethel]

Here's a very interesting and revealing talk about the Paracas skulls:

Can you tell us main thoughts?

[Loki]

Can you tell us main thoughts?

It's a mix. I recommend you listen to it, really revealing as to what's going on with regards to censorship in the media about this... and you'll understand why you don't hear about this on the mainstream news.

[Bobby Martnen]

They don't say. I wonder why not.

I wonder Y-not?

[Rethel]

It's a mix. I recommend you listen to it, really revealing as to what's going on with regards to censorship in the media about this... and you'll understand why you don't hear about this on the mainstream news.

I did seven minutes and couldn;t more.