Would you prefer having 1% SSA or 1% Australian Aborigines?

[User50]

It's hard to dispute that these are the 2 worst type of ancestries.

I'd prefer being a full blooded sub-Saharan African over being a full-blooded Australian Aborigines. I also would prefer having 1% SSA over 1% Australian Aborigines

Where I might prefer having abo blood over SSA blood is around the 1/4-1/8 mark. Supposedly Abo traits are less dominant than SSA traits, and being 1/4 or 1/8 Abo won't be as visible as being 1/4 or 1/8 SSA is. This was the justification for the "stolen generation" where the white Australians kidnapped Aborigines children, although I'm not 100% sure how true it really is.

If the blood is below the 1/8 or 1/16 mark, which means that even SSA is unlikely to show, then I'd prefer having SSA.

[Egyptian]

100% SSA

[Scar]

1% SSA can be visible in phenotype, 1% Aboriginal can't.

[Leto]

I wanna have a drop of nibber blood, lol.

[User50]

1% SSA can be visible in phenotype, 1% Aboriginal can't.


I don't think 1% of anything is going to be visible in phenotype. The lowest SSA might conceivably be visible might be around 6 or 7%. And if it even shows at that point the SSA would probably look more like non-white admixture than definitely black admixture. Meaning that it would be hard to tell if the person is part negroid or part mongoloid.

[Token]

Where I might prefer having abo blood over SSA blood is around the 1/4-1/8 mark. Supposedly Abo traits are less dominant than SSA traits, and being 1/4 or 1/8 Abo won't be as visible as being 1/4 or 1/8 SSA is.
Bullshit. There is no such thing as more or less dominant ancestry, this is anthrotardism at its finest.

[Cristiano viejo]

They are equally niggas.


1% SSA can be visible in phenotype, 1% Aboriginal can't.No way.

[Mingle]

I'm probably around 10% Negrito or so, and they're somewhat close to Australian aboriginals I think. So that I guess.

[User50]

They are equally niggas.

No way.

Abos are generally even worse if you can believe it or not. IQs, historic achievements, crime rates, etc. Also Abos are even uglier looking than SSAs are. Go on google images and look at their pictures. It's hard to bear looking at their pictures even through a computer screen.

[User50]

I'm surprised that everybody but me so far has voted Aborigines. People probably don't realize how bad Abos are since they're not familiar with them. Not that I'm familiar with Aborigines either but what I've read about Abos is awful.

[Abdelnour]

Is there any journals or essays that determine which racial gene is more dominant than the other?

I can understand why one feels that SSA genes are dominant, but I want to see scientific studies on it.

[Cristiano viejo]

Abos are generally even worse if you can believe it or not. IQs, historic achievements, crime rates, etc. Also Abos are even uglier looking than SSAs are. Go on google images and look at their pictures. It's hard to bear looking at their pictures even through a computer screen.

You have a point.

[User50]

Is there any journals or essays that determine which racial gene is more dominant than the other?

I can understand why one feels that SSA genes are dominant, but I want to see scientific studies on it.


The only real "proof" I've seen for Abo genes not being dominant is the claims that were made in the Lost Generation days. The people who ran the program all claimed Abo genes were not dominant or even recessive to white genes. Some pictures of part-Abos were provided where the people looked mostly white by the first generation and pretty much completely white by the 2nd generation. Even if some of the "quadroon" Abos looked vaguely admixed if you took a close look, any last slight signs of admixture were always gone by the "octoroon" generation.

Granted that the Australians probably deliberately chose pictures of when the breeding went well.

[Smeagol]

Abo I guess, but both are pretty bad mixtures to have. Though only 1% isn't really ever relevant I think.

[Abdelnour]

The only real "proof" I've seen for Abo genes not being dominant is the claims that were made in the Lost Generation days. The people who ran the program all claimed Abo genes were not dominant or even recessive to white genes. Some pictures of part-Abos were provided where the people looked mostly white by the first generation and pretty much completely white by the 2nd generation. Even if some of the "quadroon" Abos looked vaguely admixed if you took a close look, any last slight signs of admixture were always gone by the "octoroon" generation.

Granted that the Australians probably deliberately chose pictures of when the breeding went well.

Interesting. And yea, the pics could be cherry picked. I have seen people with 20 percent African person looking white and 10 percent African looking off(either with Caramel skin or wide nose).

[Smeagol]

Interesting. And yea, the pics could be cherry picked. I have seen people with 20 percent African person looking white and 10 percent African looking off(either with Caramel skin or wide nose).

Can you post some examples?

[Kelmendasi]

1% SSA

[Abdelnour]

Can you post some examples?

I don't have examples, but there is/was a female poster here with 20 percent African but looked white.

[Antimage]

There was a similar thread https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?126060-Are-Australoids-a-more-acceptable-input-than-SSA-poll

[Cristiano viejo]

There was a similar thread https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?126060-Are-Australoids-a-more-acceptable-input-than-SSA-poll

AA and blacks have to be related, by force. They look very similar and their behavior, or the lack of it, too.

[User50]

AA and blacks have to be related, by force. They look very similar and their behavior, or the lack of it, too.

Actually blacks and Abos are the 2 least related groups on the planet. As weird as that sounds. There are no human beings that are more genetically divergent than sub-Saharan African and Australian Aborigines are from each other.

Abos are the first Out of Africa group (if you believe in that theory) so it would make sense that they'd be less related to SSAs than any other group is.

[User50]

There was a similar thread https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?126060-Are-Australoids-a-more-acceptable-input-than-SSA-poll

That thread asked about Australoids, which includes the Dravidians in India. (And Negritos in Phillipines?) I was asking specifically about Australia Aborigines. Obviously Dravidian admixture is better than either Australian Aborigines or SSA admixture.

[Abdelnour]

Actually blacks and Abos are the 2 least related groups on the planet. As weird as that sounds. There are no human beings that are more genetically divergent than sub-Saharan African and Australian Aborigines are from each other.

Abos are the first Out of Africa group (if you believe in that theory) so it would make sense that they'd be less related to SSAs than any other group is.

The only thing I can think of is comparing humans to wolves.

An Alaskan wolf is a different subspecies than the Arabian/Indian wolf, but look very similar. All dogs are related to one type of wolf(possibly the Indian wolf) but all look so much different from each other and to the wolves.

I think phenotypical changes involves things like diet and everyday activities. Both Abos and Africans live in similar climates and have similar hunter-gatherer cultures.

[Leto]

Actually there's few unmixed Aboriginals these days. Wikipedia says 75% are in an interracial marriage now. And they don't migrate to Europe or America, so I have nothing against them. Let them be as they are.

[Mingle]

That thread asked about Australoids, which includes the Dravidians in India. (And Negritos in Phillipines?) I was asking specifically about Australia Aborigines. Obviously Dravidian admixture is better than either Australian Aborigines or SSA admixture.

All Dravidians are less than half-Negrito/Australoid.

[User50]

Actually there's few unmixed Aboriginals these days. Wikipedia says 75% are in an interracial marriage now. And they don't migrate to Europe or America, so I have nothing against them. Let them be as they are.

75% of Abos are married to whites? That's bizarre. It almost seems like Abos would disappear if that trend continues. Unfortunately that means that abo genes would become mixed into the general Australian populace. Which is not good.

[jamakzai12]

im probs 5-7 percent, thing is pashtuns dont show even a bit of negrito at all

[Leto]

75% of Abos are married to whites? That's bizarre. It almost seems like Abos would disappear if that trend continues. Unfortunately that means that abo genes would become mixed into the general Australian populace. Which is not good.
I have a different opinion. Their race is becoming "impoved". And they are only 2-3% of the pop. in Australia. Anyway most partial Aboriginals identify as "Aboriginal", because they are considered "oppressed" and stuff like that. Similar to American Indians.

[Kivan]

lol

[jamakzai12]

Bullshit. There is no such thing as more or less dominant ancestry, this is anthrotardism at its finest.

WTF are you on about, I study genetics in biology YES there is dominant and recessive alleles, dominant ones get expressed the recessive ones dont. god some of you fucktards piss me off in this thread.

[jamakzai12]

the australian aborigines and ssa might be the closest thing to 2 different apes. There are actually a few articles, so you might be right about that. In fact aborigines might be even closer to apes than SSA's when you look at their wide ass nose, some of them dont even pass as human lol.

[User50]

I have a different opinion. Their race is becoming "impoved". And they are only 2-3% of the pop. in Australia. Anyway most partial Aboriginals identify as "Aboriginal", because they are considered "oppressed" and stuff like that. Similar to American Indians.

Usually part-blacks are the only people who identify as black in the US. Even if some people are obsessed with their supposed 1/128 Native American heritage (which isn't even real most of the time), they don't identify as Native American. They just identify as a white person with Native American ancestry.

[Leto]

Usually part-blacks are the only people who identify as black in the US. Even if some people are obsessed with their supposed 1/128 Native American heritage (which isn't even real most of the time), they don't identify as Native American. They just identify as a white person with Native American ancestry.
Many registered Native Americans are in reality bi-racial genetically. And I don't mean 2-5% European. 20-30%.

[Jana]

1%, seriously ? autistic thread

[User50]

1%, seriously ? autistic thread

You wouldn't be upset if you found out you were 1% black or 1% Abo?

I would be extremely unhappy.

If I found out I was 1% Native American I wouldn't care but 1% Abo/Negro?


Granted that it would be pretty much impossible for an American to be 1% Abo. But just as a hypothetical if I somehow were 1% Abo I'd be very upset. What would that make me- the American version of Frederik Reinfeldt (the 1/16 black Swedish prime minister), who has the undesirable ancestry that basically nobody else in the country does?

[Kivan]

1%, seriously ? autistic thread

This thread is stupid, regardless of how much admixture.

[Jana]

You wouldn't be upset if you found out you were 1% black or 1% Abo?

I would be extremely unhappy.

If I found out I was 1% Native American I wouldn't care but 1% Abo/Negro?

No comment.

[User50]

This thread is stupid, regardless of how much admixture.

Why? You seriously think that negroes and Abos are the equals of anybody else on the planet?

[Leto]

Why? You seriously think that negroes and Abos are the equals of anybody else on the planet?
They are just the same as you and me, stop the oppression and they all will achieve the highest possible positions.

[Scar]

Why? You seriously think that negroes and Abos are the equals of anybody else on the planet?

Don't know about them, but I believe you are inferior to anyone else in the planet. Probably a no life fat loser.

[Leto]

A Torres Strait Islander athlete, his white wife and half white children
http://www.australiannetworkentertainment.com/Images/wendell_sailor745.jpg
https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/07a3318790f9400b1397213df8df324c?width=650

[Leto]

im probs 5-7 percent, thing is pashtuns dont show even a bit of negrito at all
I think it does darken their skin oftentimes.

[Kamal900]

:picard2:

[StonyArabia]

SSA, all Semitic people even Ashkenazim have SSA admixture

[User50]

SSA, all Semitic people even Ashkenazim have SSA admixture

Ashkenazi do not have SSA. I've seen a few Ashkenazi DNA kits before and they did not have SSA.

[Leto]

Ashkenhazi do not have SSA.
They sometimes score some African on GEDmatch, usually 1-2%, not more. Just like Sicilians and some Iberians.

[StonyArabia]

Ashkenazi do not have SSA. I've seen a few Ashkenazi DNA kits before and they did not have SSA.

They do, but some of it was probably reduced due to intermarrying with Europeans. Sephardim and Mizrahim have higher levels though

[User50]

They sometimes score some African on GEDmatch, usually 1-2%, not more. Just like Sicilians and some Iberians.

Seriously? The SSA in the Levant is from the slave trade, which began about 500 years after Ashkenazi left the Middle East. How would Ashkenazi have SSA?

I'm not 100% sure about Mizrachi and Sephardhim. They might have mated with SSA admixed Muslims in their regions. Mizrachi and Sephardhim are usually from especially bad regions like Yemen and North Africa. If Sephardi have SSA it's because of the toll that all those years in the Maghreb took on them. It's not like SSA was present in the ancient Israelites.

[Leto]

Seriously? The SSA in the Levant is from the slave trade, which began about 500 years after Ashkenazi left the Middle East. How would Ashkenazi have SSA?

I'm not 100% sure about Mizrachi and Sephardhim. They might have mated with SSA admixed Muslims in their regions. Mizrachi and Sephardhim are usually from especially bad regions like Yemen and North Africa. If Sephardi have SSA it's because of the toll that all those years in the Maghreb took on them. It's not like SSA was present in the ancient Israelites.
Not all SSA is from the slave trade. Some of it is East African, present in Christians and Druze as well. Even in the Roman-era gladiator (there's a thread about him).

[User50]

Not all SSA is from the slave trade. Some of it is East African, present in Christians and Druze as well. Even in the Roman-era gladiator (there's a thread about him).

Isn't the gladiator supposed to be from Egypt? Not the Levant.

Do Levantanian Christians seriously have negro blood? I know the Copts do but I've never heard about this in Levant Christians.

[zhaoyun]

At 1%, it is inconsequential either way.

[Leto]

Isn't the gladiator supposed to be from Egypt? Not the Levant.

Do Levantanian Christians seriously have negro blood? I know the Copts do but I've never heard about this in Levant Christians.
Below 5% usually. And it's mostly East African.

[Kamal900]

At 1%, it is inconsequential either way.

I'm 4% Black and I do have some Austroloid in the mix too, so it doesn't bother me in the slightest, lol.

[Heather Duval]

A Torres Strait Islander athlete, his white wife and half white children
http://www.australiannetworkentertainment.com/Images/wendell_sailor745.jpg
https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/07a3318790f9400b1397213df8df324c?width=650

Cute looking kids. His daughter will look stunning at adult age.

[Iloko]

Aust

[User50]

If I discovered I had a single black or Aborigines ancestor in the last 10,000 years, I would probably commit suicide.

[Tauromachos]

I'm surprised that everybody but me so far has voted Aborigines. People probably don't realize how bad Abos are since they're not familiar with them. Not that I'm familiar with Aborigines either but what I've read about Abos is awful.

I guess they think Abos are not as Black as Afros

[Smeagol]

If I discovered I had a single black or Aborigines ancestor in the last 10,000 years, I would probably commit suicide.

That sounds a bit extreme.

[Tauromachos]

Wouldn't care at all in either case,to be honest

[NSXD60]

What about the Juan percenters?

[Dick]

If I discovered I had a single black or Aborigines ancestor in the last 10,000 years, I would probably commit suicide.

https://j.gifs.com/pQKVRV.gif



What about the Juan percenters?

Taco emergency? Call Nine Juan Juan.

[itilvolga]

none

[CryoLava201819]

i'll gladly take the 1% SSA if it means a bigger dick :cool:

[Black Panther]

i'll gladly take the 1% SSA if it means a bigger dick :cool:

Yes. It does mean getting a bigger cock. :cool:

[CryoLava201819]

Yes. It does mean getting a bigger cock. :cool:

in that case i'll increase it to 2% SSA :high5

[Bobby Martnen]

SSA, for sure.

Black people have great music and dancing, all Abos ever did is throw a stick.

[kleenex]

Aborigine by a mile.

[StonyArabia]

SSA because I am around 3-4% SSA and it's found all Semitic people. Aborgine meh

[Bobby Martnen]

I'd rather be 1/2 SSA than .01% Abo.

[gıulıoımpa]

I would say abo.

Blacks that got white and got black again ; cool.

Inviato dal mio SM-G389F utilizzando Tapatalk