Karakhitai
03-28-2018, 08:43 PM
73811
73812
73813
From the ftDNA admin:
Cinnioğlu's work is a disaster because:
a) Even despite this test is shown as "Turkish people's Y-DNA average", it is not. Cinnioğlu's work, as he says "Turkey's average" so Kurds, Armenians, Arabs, Circassians, Albanians etc. are too included. However, our y-dna average table is only based on ethnic Turks, around %74-76 of population.
b) Not that the sourcing choice for the samples isn’t bad enough in and of itself, but the regional weighting is also not in favor of ethnic Turks.
(West Anatolia: n=30/523, South Anatolia: n=33/523, Western Black Sea: n=29/523 -vs- East Anatolia: n=82, Southeast Anatolia: n=43.)
It is not even a good Turkey average, E+SE Anatolia is over represented, whereas a crowded population in Western Anatolia(highly ethnic Turks) is quite underrepresented.
From Wikipedia:
2) The inhabitants of an older Turkish village which didn't receive much migration had about 25% of haplogroup N and 25% of J2a, with 3% of G and close to 30% of R1 variants (mostly R1b).
This suggests that C and O are largely found in non-Turkish populations. From the Ilkhanate perhaps?
So Anatolian Turks are 20% (or 30% if ButlerKing is right about R1a) Mongoloid yDNA and 0% Mongoloid mtDNA.
73812
73813
From the ftDNA admin:
Cinnioğlu's work is a disaster because:
a) Even despite this test is shown as "Turkish people's Y-DNA average", it is not. Cinnioğlu's work, as he says "Turkey's average" so Kurds, Armenians, Arabs, Circassians, Albanians etc. are too included. However, our y-dna average table is only based on ethnic Turks, around %74-76 of population.
b) Not that the sourcing choice for the samples isn’t bad enough in and of itself, but the regional weighting is also not in favor of ethnic Turks.
(West Anatolia: n=30/523, South Anatolia: n=33/523, Western Black Sea: n=29/523 -vs- East Anatolia: n=82, Southeast Anatolia: n=43.)
It is not even a good Turkey average, E+SE Anatolia is over represented, whereas a crowded population in Western Anatolia(highly ethnic Turks) is quite underrepresented.
From Wikipedia:
2) The inhabitants of an older Turkish village which didn't receive much migration had about 25% of haplogroup N and 25% of J2a, with 3% of G and close to 30% of R1 variants (mostly R1b).
This suggests that C and O are largely found in non-Turkish populations. From the Ilkhanate perhaps?
So Anatolian Turks are 20% (or 30% if ButlerKing is right about R1a) Mongoloid yDNA and 0% Mongoloid mtDNA.