PDA

View Full Version : Cause of the Racial Tragedy - Cultural Marxism?



Freomęg
02-21-2009, 12:17 PM
In our struggle to understand the global corruption we see around us... the hidden assassins of our traditions and freedoms... the parasite that destabilizes our families and communities, we're quick to fixate our gaze upon the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, or Illuminati. While we may be right to do so, I believe we're missing an extremely vital component:

Cultural Marxism

Cultural Marxism is formulated as a way to subvert European folk and civilization-using methods other than direct political action. It was propagated by the Frankfurt School, formed in Germany in 1923 as a method by which a postmodernist, Marxist revolution could silently overthrow traditional Western society.

Not only does Cultural Marxism explain almost everything that undermines and perplexes us socially, but there is absolute, undeniable documentation of its existence as a covert revolution which attacks our way of life.


Antonio Gramsci, a young communist who died in one of Mussolini's prisons in 1937 at the age of 46, conjured up the notion of a 'quiet' revolution that could be diffused throughout a culture -- over a period of time -- to destroy it from within. He was the first to suggest that the application of psychology to break the traditions, beliefs, morals, and will of a people could be accomplished quietly and without the possibility of resistance. He deduced that "The civilized world had been thoroughly saturated with Christianity for 2,000 years..." and a culture based on this religion could only be captured from within.
Source (http://frankfurtschool.us/history.htm)

Cultural Marxist methods include:

- Political Correctness
When implementing a slow, subversive revolution, an outright ban on freedom of speech only triggers immediate dissent and protest against the establishment responsible. Cultural Marxism achieves this, instead, by political correctness. Introduced slowly, a public knows not who to blame, so they blame no-one and accept it.

- Breakdown of the Traditional Family

One of the basic tenets of Critical Theory was the necessity to break down the contemporary family. The (Frankfurt) Institute scholars preached that [21] "...Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change."
Source (http://frankfurtschool.us/history.htm)

- Multiculturalism and Mass Immigration
This is a sensitive subject. Very difficult for members of mass immigrant groups to accept that their presence in a new country is largely facilitated and used by an insidious world revolution.

As they proclaim, this means their activities have been directed toward the disintegration of the traditional white male power structure. As anyone with eyes to view present-day television and motion pictures can confirm, this has been largely achieved.
Source (http://frankfurtschool.us/history.htm)
Destroying the traditional white male power structure is a concept very easily accepted by a compassionate society. Much like Feminism, what good man or woman is going to fight the movement towards racial and sexual equality? However, equality is not the Cultural Marxists true reasoning for promoting these concepts. They are methods of destroying old values and cultural ties so that the new postmodern world can replace our traditional one.

- Feminism
It's important to tie all these methods together because they're really the same thing - ways of destroying universal western traditions.

That the CIA funded the Women's Liberation movement (http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm) speaks volumes about how deeply entrenched within Western power structures Marxism may be.


Gramsci insisted that alliances with non-Communist leftist groups would be essential to Communist victory. In our time, these would include radical feminist groups, extremist environmental organizations, so-called civil rights movements, anti-police associations, internationalist-minded groups, liberal church denominations, and others. Working together, these groups could create a united front working for the destructive transformation of the old Judeo-Christian culture of the West.
Source (http://frankfurtschool.us/history.htm)


Acknowledge and Fight the Covert War

What's important to remember is that we are subject to a drawn-out, covert revolution. An open, overt, traditional-style revolution would have been rejected and defeated. But by the methods of Cultural Marxism, we're losing.


"...there is one thing we can say with complete assurance. The traditional idea of revolution and the traditional strategy of revolution have ended. These ideas are old-fashioned"
Herbert Marcuse - member of the Frankfurt School (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Marcuse)

What is worth noting is that Marxists believe they are revolutionising the world in a positive way. They're surely aware that their methods are deplorable to an objective mind, but they take the perspective that it is a 'means to an end'. All of the evil they are perpetrating right now (and have done for decades) is negated by the postmodern utopia they envisage replacing our current society. They want to abolish religion, they want the kind of neutered future we see in movies like Equilibrium, or that which is depicted in George Orwell's novels. We might not be free, but we'll be free of war and poverty. Even if this is achieved, is it something any liberty-loving human being wants? Should we be forced into against our will?


Relations to Our Current Situation

Look at the new American administration and the European Union. In America we have a new President who many associate with a Socialist (left wing) mindset who will do nothing short of strengthening Political Correctness and teaching a population how to spy on one another. The European Union is responsible for actually turning Cultural Marxism into law - particularly in Britain where we no longer have control over our borders, freedom of speech or freedom not to be surveilled at every moment of our lives. Both Europe and America have been infiltrated, right under our noses.


Conclusion

Revolutions like Cultural Marxism go beyond left and right. They are an infringement upon all our liberties.


Most Americans do not yet realize that they are being led by social revolutionaries who think in terms of the destruction of the existing social order in order to create a new social order in the world. These revolutionaries are the New Age elite Boomers, the New Totalitarians [24]. They now control every public institution in the United States of America.
Source (http://frankfurtschool.us/history.htm)

Loddfafner
02-21-2009, 02:57 PM
In our struggle to understand the global corruption we see around us... the hidden assassins of our traditions and freedoms... the parasite that destabilizes our families and communities, we're quick to fixate our gaze upon the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, or Illuminati. While we may be right to do so, I believe we're missing an extremely vital component:

Cultural Marxism

Cultural Marxism is formulated as a way to subvert European folk and civilization-using methods other than direct political action. It was propagated by the Frankfurt School, formed in Germany in 1923 as a method by which a postmodernist, Marxist revolution could silently overthrow traditional Western society.

Not only does Cultural Marxism explain almost everything that undermines and perplexes us socially, but there is absolute, undeniable documentation of its existence as a covert revolution which attacks our way of life.


I am astonished to see an actual conspiracy theory focused on a few stale theorists. First of all, Leninist Communism, academic Marxism (focused on class, sometimes surprisingly open to Pat Buchanan), identity politics (focused on race and gender, the source of so-called political correctness), Marcuse's anti-authoritarian Marxist-Freudian hybrid, and postmodernism (which rejects all grand narratives including revolution and inhibits any political action) are incompatible philosophies. None are compatible with modern American liberalism. To confuse and combine these movements is the same kind of error many leftists make in confusing the Republican and Nazi parties with each other.

So-called critical theory is a muddled beast and is far too muddled to have much real impact. Marcuse was influential in the 1960s but even people of that generation tend to see him as just one more embarrassment of their youth along with flowery bell bottoms. As for Gramsci, he is merely a name to drop when talking about how the media, schools, and churches pacify populations from acting in their real interests, which is an argument that one can make from the Right just as comfortably as from the Left.

I suspect that the recent wave of concern about Gramsci might actually have been a tactic of neo-conservatives during the Bush administration. They spread fears about Gramsci's influence in those institutions of civil society - especially colleges and churches - exactly at the moment that they were themselves trying to transform them into pillars of support for Bush. Their accusations of leftists were actually a template for their own strategy.

stormlord
02-21-2009, 03:54 PM
I am astonished to see an actual conspiracy theory focused on a few stale theorists. First of all, Leninist Communism, academic Marxism (focused on class, sometimes surprisingly open to Pat Buchanan), identity politics (focused on race and gender, the source of so-called political correctness), Marcuse's anti-authoritarian Marxist-Freudian hybrid, and postmodernism (which rejects all grand narratives including revolution and inhibits any political action) are incompatible philosophies. None are compatible with modern American liberalism. To confuse and combine these movements is the same kind of error many leftists make in confusing the Republican and Nazi parties with each other.



I know the article focuses on America, but its subject concerns the whole western world, and your remarks are very specific to America, just because American liberalism isn't exactly the same doesn't really disprove anything.

Secondly, it's not really a "conspiracy", it might seem so to non-intellectuals/the mass of the population in so far as the people in power don't actually admit their aims openly to the public, but it's no secret. I don't like being specific about these things, but I'm studying a humanities subject at a university within the top thirty or so in the world, and this stuff is rammed down our throats day in day out, and from whose ranks do you think teachers, lecturers, writers, journalists, film makers, politicians, heads of large companies etc are drawn?

Essentially all of the people who run our lives and form public opinion endure the same ideological conditioning, sounds pretty relevant to out current problems to me.

As for the idea that the theories don't make sense and aren't compatible; they don't need to be, they're a means to an end, and they're all immensely destructive to western civilization.

Freomęg
02-21-2009, 04:26 PM
I appreciate your insight Loddfafner and was about to respond myself, but noticed rivalin had written pretty much precisely what I would have here:


As for the idea that the theories don't make sense and aren't compatible; they don't need to be, they're a means to an end, and they're all immensely destructive to western civilization.

Essentially what I'm saying (or rather, relaying) is that all of the aforementioned political ideologies - perhaps even Communism itself - are not so much self-contained ideologies but complex stepping stones to a new age. Even if many involved are ex-Marxists, they still share and retain their youthful ideal of a new post-Christian, post-traditional, post-democratic society and are so convinced of this notion's sanctity that they'll use, abuse and feign other ideologies to arrive there - their disdain for the previous order of things being so great.

Regardless of that, a quick comparison of Frankfurt School teachings with the current state of affairs (particularly in Europe) presents a pretty damning confirmation of Marxist influence.

Loddfafner
02-21-2009, 06:59 PM
I really don't see any evidence of a coherent pattern, and certainly not of an effective conspiracy. Randomly-located stars are not deliberate representations of mythological heroes. A generation of teachers form a subculture in which they only talk to each other and insulate themselves from challenging ideas and from the unintended consequences of their actions. Just as they are merely reacting against the limitations of earlier generations of teachers, so their students will (one can hope) react against their own increasingly obvious limitations.

They can earnestly chirp on about resettling Somali refugees without any concern for the impact on longstanding communities while their own experience of diversity is limited to Thai restaurants and black lesbian poetry readings. They foolishly assume that folkish traditions are merely quaint relics that will dissolve under modernity, as they themselves were practically born uprooted, but that does not mean that they are useful idiots for some grand project to deliberately dismantle the folk.

I am sure there are all kinds of marxist, masonic, political, and religious cells attempting to shape the course of events, but they keep each other in check and are ultimately limited by the chaotic course of history itself.

Conservationist
02-22-2009, 12:39 AM
What's the source of cultural Marxism?

Cultural egalitarianism.

Start there in your battles, advises Nietzsche, and I agree.

SwordoftheVistula
02-22-2009, 02:32 PM
I am sure there are all kinds of marxist, masonic, political, and religious cells attempting to shape the course of events, but they keep each other in check and are ultimately limited by the chaotic course of history itself.

The problem is that they managed to simultaneously propel their cells to the top of the heap, and relentlessly persecute and marginalized and destroy the ones most in opposition to them, particuarly the 'European preservationist' ones. European 'preservationist cells' are only allowed to exist in the form of 'ethnic whites' whose primary purpose is opposition to 'Anglo' culture.

NationalConservative
02-17-2010, 06:55 PM
Cultural Marxism- sick degeneracy that attacks the West through promotion of sexual perversions such as pornography, homosexuality, promiscuity, surrogate parenting, incest, polyamory and zoophilia; crack-addiction, softness on crime, mass immigration for big business boys to whom they claim to "oppose", political correctness, miscegenation and distortion of history and culture.

Treffie
02-17-2010, 06:58 PM
Cultural Marxism- sick degeneracy that attacks the West through promotion of sexual perversions such as pornography, homosexuality, promiscuity, surrogate parenting, incest, polyamory and zoophilia; crack-addiction, softness on crime, mass immigration for big business boys to whom they claim to "oppose", political correctness, miscegenation and distortion of history and culture.

Yes, I blame the Telly-tubbies :mad:

Liffrea
02-17-2010, 07:18 PM
Originally Posted by Arawn
Yes, I blame the Telly-tubbies

Quite right that man.

I mean it doesn't get more suggestive than what these spawn of Satan have on their heads now does it? hmmm....

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll54/Liffrea66/teletubbies.jpg

Agrippa
02-17-2010, 09:03 PM
In the end its all about destroying larger structures which work independently from the (especially monetary) system and unlike real Marxism, the main aims of Cultural Marxism are not clearly defined, nor do they have strict socio-economic rules, but the enemies are very clear, so its a deconstructivist approach which would be, to the full extend, almost unthinkable without the "Holocaust" instrumentalisation by politics.

Basically it all started with the anti-National Socialist propaganda in World War 2 and the re-education programs in Germany, including the efforts of the Frankfurter School.

The same crap the Americans sent to Germany came back over the Atlantic Ocean even much stronger than it was sent away and in the situation of the Cold War, in which the legitimation was largely based on "Anti-Fascism", the powers which still defended Conservative or generally European values in the USA were in the defensive.

Now real Marxism would have been a threat both to the enemies of the Jews and some of the Jews and of course all Plutocrats if being successful in the USA, since the plutocrats could only use Marxism/Socialism from a "save haven" so to say, from which they could manipulate it, especially financially, from within it would have been much to dangerous - as Stalin proved too.

So what they did was to eliminate everything really dangerous for the establishment, a more pseudo-individualist, consumer oriented approach was left which ended up in the "1968 revoluzzers", which in the end just "fought" for more Hedonism and Materialism without being limited by the traditional Conservatism and other social limitations (like Capitalist!), though against the latter much less successful obviously...

Again this was an easy thing because post World War "Conservative" ideology was horrible, it was backwarded, limited the individual in an irrational, Christian-superstitious way and was simply unacceptable for most clear thinking young people then and weakly defended once under pressure anyway, especially in the more enlightened Europe.

Finally the alternative which most could agree with from the establishment in the political sphere, science and economy in particular, was this sort of "castrated Marxism", which was very useful for getting rid of all structures which might have been a problem for the full exploitation and control of the individual in a Liberalcapitalist control state.

Its quite typical that the most destructive longer term effectsof Cultural Marxism for the people of Europe being the product of the Western ideologists, not the Eastern ones. Actually the Western Cultural Marxists stripped Marxism from everything which was in one way or another useful and left only a nacked tool for the social engineering of the people, like the Plutocratic Oligarchy wanted it.

It doesnt matter whether every professor, journalist, writer or politician defending Cultural Marxism was aware of the tremendous harm he did to the people and for whom he or she finally worked, but crucial is it was done and those which fitted the bill were supported sooner or later by the establishment, all others, from the Left or Right real opposition, being fought down or left alone at least.

F.e., the kind of Feminism we have today in the West is just a Capitalist construct, made up to use the female workforce, use them as consumers, soft voters for the system, getting rid of family influences on the children, letting them to get indoctrinated as early as possible and having low birthrates, so that the homogeneous people of the Western countries getting mixed and fractionated, so supporting a fractionised "plural" society in which resistance against the Financial Oligarchy is much harder to rally, with no strong bonds between the people and every individual being easier to exploit, manipulate and blackmailed one by one, on its own.

Think about everything which makes a people weaker, more vulnerable to exploitation and control by the banks and corporations, the means of the Plutocratic Oligarchy and you will see most of it is, in one way or another, a part of the current re-education programs and defended by "political correctness", "the lesson from the Holocaust" and everything related to Liberalism and Cultural Marxism.

Neoliberalism is Liberalcapitalism using Cultural Marxism as a mean of control over and manipulation of the people in structures and states ruled by the banks and corporations, which in turn are finally under the supervision of the Plutocratic Oligarchy.