PDA

View Full Version : Do you think Michael Jackson was innocent or guilty of child molestation?



Bobby Martnen
04-27-2018, 06:06 AM
I think he was innocent.

Maintenance
04-27-2018, 06:07 AM
I think he was innocent.

Lucia
04-27-2018, 06:14 AM
Well those who were accusing him confessed to lying about it after his death, so innocent.

Mortimer
04-27-2018, 06:17 AM
I didnt followed the story but one guy told me Michael always liked children, and he built amusement parks for children. And he was accused later so I think innocent.

zhaoyun
04-27-2018, 06:18 AM
Not really. I think he was just weird.

Leonius
04-27-2018, 11:34 AM
Psychology 101 lesson > his father emotionally/physically abused Michael & rumours were sexually too. Victims of childhood sexual abuse risk becoming abusers themselves; moreso if no support/counselling offered.

So no, it likely just wasn't as many.

Zroota
04-30-2018, 02:52 AM
I think he was innocent, but we cannot guarantee it. Nobody will ever know.

NSXD60
04-30-2018, 03:36 AM
I have no idea, but screwed up in the head he certainly was, otherwise why have multiple facejobs until your nose looses blood supply and starts to deteriorate.

JohnSmith
04-30-2018, 03:40 AM
yes.

Bobby Martnen
04-30-2018, 03:49 AM
yes.

How come?

JohnSmith
04-30-2018, 03:52 AM
How come?

He had an alarm system that went off when people approached his bedroom. This is after he admitted to sleeping in the bed with children. He also gave children wine and called it Jesus Juice. He used the Peter Pan complex to cover his actions but he was a grown man knowing exactly what he was doing with those children. He also payed off the one child. If he was innocent why pay them off,, that is basically admitting guilt.

Bobby Martnen
04-30-2018, 03:53 AM
He had an alarm system that went off when people approached his bedroom. This is after he admitted to sleeping in the bed with children. He also gave children wine and called it Jesus Juice. He used the Peter Pan complex to cover his actions but he was a grown man knowing exactly what he was doing with those children. He also payed off the one child. If he was innocent why pay them off,, that is basically admitting guilt.

He paid them off because he wanted to get back to doing music.

JohnSmith
04-30-2018, 03:57 AM
He paid them off because he wanted to get back to doing music.

Odd, if someone accused me of such a thing I would for sure go to court and prove innocence.

Zroota
04-30-2018, 06:10 AM
Honestly, I understand both sides of the argument.

If he wanted to prove his innocence, why pay them off? This is like admitting guilt.

But I guess you can say he also wanted to continue with his career and shut his accusers up.

Again, we'll never know.

StonyArabia
05-02-2018, 07:00 AM
Innocent I think he was a decent guy who people want to pull money out of him. He was talented it was sad that he passed away. He was true legend. A king of Pop indeed. I think he had issues since he got abused by his controlling father. You can tell he was a good guy and was not malicious or disgusting.

Jamovitz
05-09-2018, 10:09 AM
I think he was a bit of a screwed up mess but he wasn't a child molester