Turkish greediness: 16 empires of the Turkic people as all Turkish

[ButlerKing]

This only 16 selected empire of Turkish people, god knows how many more they will claim on the future.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16_Great_Turkic_Empires

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan_Mahmoud_Abbas.jpg

A PROVOCATIVE INSULTING VIDEO


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=qC3BCzTy84w

" Turks conquered India in 800 and ruled it until 1858 " <---- what's the point of this ?

" Turks conquered Persia in 999 and ruled until 1925 "

A exaggeration, 700 years but they made it like 1000 years and it was Central Asian Turks who were racially different to the Turkish of modern Turkey.

Turkish always like to brag about how they conquered the world.

When ever there's a Turk insulting India 99.99999999999999% of the time it's always a Turk from Turkey. I've never seen a Turk from central Asia insulting India nor do they waste time on bragging about they conquered the world, that's always a Turkish thing. It's always a Turkish Turks, a genetically Indo-European Anatolian ethnic group who were conquered and Turkified by the original Turk/Turkic were Mongoloid and Mongoloid-Europoid.

[Pahli]

Why do you get triggered by an autistic video? Jesus christ xD

[ButlerKing]

THIS IS WHAT IT WANTS TO DO: Claiming all Turkic empire so Turkish Turks can claim they rule every race and ethnic group on the world


BUT unfornately for Turkish Turks. The original Turks/Turkic looked like a typical Asian Mongoloid and mixed

Turks in Arabic texts
:بنو قنطوراء


Medieval Muslim writers noted that Tibetans and Turks resembled each other and often were not able to tell the difference between Turks and Tibetans.[131]

1)

The Hadith collection Sahih al-Bukhari records a Sahih Hadith by Muhammad on the Turks- Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Turks; people with small eyes, red faces, and flat noses. Their faces will look like shields coated with leather. The Hour will not be established till you fight with people whose shoes are made of hair."[/B] (حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي، عَنْ صَالِحٍ، عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ، قَالَ قَالَ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " لاَ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى تُقَاتِلُوا التُّرْكَ صِغَارَ الأَعْيُنِ، حُمْرَ الْوُجُوهِ، ذُلْفَ الأُنُوفِ، كَأَنَّ وُجُوهَهُمُ الْمَجَانُّ الْمُطَرَّقَةُ، وَلاَ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى تُقَاتِلُوا قَوْمًا نِعَالُهُمُ الشَّعَرُ ".)[132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][136][140][141][142][143



Original Turks: Small eyes, flat nose, red faces


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3494/3899920825_a030c198cb_m.jpg
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/old-mongolian-man-kharkhorin-mongolia-july-official-traditional-clothes-naadam-midsummer-festival-july-kharkhorin-32774189.jpg
http://img0.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/c/1//62/857/62857805_westernmongolianman.jpg

Even if they had blonde hair, blue eyes, red hair, green eyes. They looked like this due to indo-European genes influence

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/03/73/8b/03738b8354f5e3230dbdd3291e512c59.jpg

[ButlerKing]

Why do you get triggered by an autistic video? Jesus christ xD

Why shouldn't I be triggered.


There so many FREAKING COMMENTS like this one but I know need two use to prove my points



cetin cagri
2 years ago
" Turkish people spreaded all over the world. My brothers Indian Turks Essalamualeykum. We established Great Babur Empire in India. We did a lot of mosque in India " <----------- What's the purpose of this comment ? clearly Mughals were a Mongol-Turkic people like Uzbeks who are central Asians but 99.999999% of time it's like seeing a Turkish person claiming it's people like Turkey who ruled over India

Another one like this. You can see the lack of respect and greediness they have for India.
http://i63.tinypic.com/iz6a2p.jpg



WHAT ARE UZBEKS LIKE ? Uzbeks are like these

http://d4615.u22.vectordatasystems.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/15.jpg
http://www.m1key.me/photography/uzbekistan/uzbekistan_08.jpg
https://cdni.rt.com/files/oldfiles/news/moscows-uzbeks-rally-fearing/moscow-uzbeksrally.si.jpg
https://gdb.rferl.org/FA32E8CD-5311-45B9-854B-D1610EFA957A_w1023_r1_s.jpg
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/AKY0CK/uzbeks-dressed-in-traditional-cloth-samarkand-uzbekistan-AKY0CK.jpg

[Pahli]

Those comments are made by autistic retards, let them live in the past and enjoy their "conquests", but you're pretty much on the same boat as them when you make such threads like these lol

[Yaglakar]

Turan is a myth. Turkic speaking peoples were slaughtering each other more than they were conquering others. Many Turkic ethnonyms are in fact derogatory exoethnonyms coined by other more powerful confederations. For example Kipchak means 'worthless' or 'futile' and they were named so after they lost power struggle against Toquz Oghuz/old Uighurs (not to be confused with modern ones) and had to move in westward direction. When Kipchaks attained power and influence they called the Caspian/Aral Oghuz "our shepherds", so on and so forth. This animosity is evident even today.

[ButlerKing]

Those comments are made by autistic retards, let them live in the past and enjoy their "conquests"

What ? You mean to tell me just let them keep bragging about how they conquered, ruled over Indians and other people when they have nothing to do with these people ? They are promoting lies, confusion on people everywhere.

AtalanTar
3 years ago
" Beautiful Indian women have either Turkish or foreign ancestry. The real Indians are mixed heavily with Australoid niggers. " <---- You can see they add Turkish, yes there is Ottoman Turkish ancestry it's quite obvious they are talking about the other Indian-Turkic empires including Mughals who ruled over India as Turkish Turks.

Ottoman Turks never ruled India in it's entire history nor any anyone who came straight out from Turkey.

[Böri]

Even Afsharid Nadir Shah took India.
Aryans -> Alexander -> Turks -> British.
That's the summary of Indian history.

[ButlerKing]

Even Afsharid Nadir Shah took India.
Aryans -> Alexander -> Turks -> British.
That's the summary of Indian history.


Turkey anatolian history is also conquered for a very long time, like 1300 years. By Romans, Greeks, Byzantine later by the invading Seljuk Turks.

Of course you Anatolian Turkish Turks do not claim to be Anatolian but Turks although genetics still show you are predominant Anatolians


The original Seljuk Turks came from Kazakhstan, so they were 60-80% Mongoloid, later conquered the Iranic people of Turkmenistan and they became like 30-70% Mongoloid.


The fact that Turkemenistan today are heavily mixed with Persians or Tajiks in the 17th-19th century that is why they are less Mongoloid today. Turkmen absorbed millions of Iranic people.

[Sora]

Turkey anatolian history is also conquered for a very long time, like 1300 years. By Romans, Greeks, Byzantine later by the Seljuk Turks.

Of course you Anatolian Turkish Turks do not claim to be Anatolian but Turks although genetics still show you are predominant Anatolians

Butthurt! You're too much! We Turks are not predominantly Anatolian, faggot! How many times should I say that? We're 50/50, even more Central Asian than it! But you're so brainless for understanding it!

When we came to Anatolia from CA, we were like Turkmenistani or Afghan Turkmens. And they were approximately 16%-35% Mongoloid. And we have half of it!

Also what do you think about Northeast Indians? Or else they're not brothers because of Mongoloid looking? :confused::fwhat::rolleyes:

[ButlerKing]

Butthurt! You're too much! We Turks are not predominantly Anatolian, faggot! How many times should I say that? We're 50/50, even more Central Asian than it! But you're so brainless for understanding it!

When we came to Anatolia from CA, we were like Turkmenistani or Afghan Turkmens. And they were approximately 16%-35% Mongoloid. And we have half of it!

Also what do you think about Northeast Indians? Or else they're not brothers because of Mongoloid looking? :confused::fwhat::rolleyes:


You are predominant Anatolian as shown from genetics

And many Turkmens are a lot more Mongoloid than that

http://i63.tinypic.com/23m3cqx.jpg


As for Northeast Indians they invaded the original Australoid lands of the Adavasi people of Northeast India for thousand years. They came from modern day China via Burma to Northeast india, they created separate empires to rule over India and raided like barbarian tribes, they were headhunters. Now India today is one of the most powerful countries and so they assimilate.

India has ethnic minorities too no just Turkey and other countries. Do I claim these Adaman people to be Indians too ? yes Indian by nationality but not proper Indians/South Asians that represents 98% of the Indians

http://thephoenixpostindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Ongi.jpg

[Marmara]

We should reclaim India.

[ButlerKing]

India.

In Kashmir, there is pseudo-European looking people like Hunza, Kalash types

In Adamans, there is like a negroid-African looking like people

In, Central India, east India there is Adavasi tribes

In, Northeast India, there is the Burmese tribes, although Mongoloid they are partially South Asians

In, North India and South India we have Indo-Aryans and Dravidian speakers (<---- the general representatives of the Indians image in the world )

[Voskos]

The last genetic paper about the steppe has claimed everything east of Greece as Turanic, but I could be mistaken. These days anything Asian is either Turanic, Chinese or Indian.

[ButlerKing]

India has the most racially diverse ethnic group in entire world but than again many countries are diverse. Even China has Uyghur, Pamiri, Turks, Manchus, Mongolians, Tibetans, Zhuangs, Koreans and Burmese people but real representants are those " Han Chinese ", the real Chinese. Indians to me can include Anglo-Indians but they are not proper Indians

[Pahli]

Here we go again :picard2:

[ButlerKing]

Here we go again :picard2:

Finno-Ugric are nowhere closest to Turkic people. As linguistic had already proven that they became similar through language contact, early Finno-Ugric and Turkic shows much less similarity meaning they became a bit more similar simply through language contact and exchanging words.

[Pahli]

Finno-Ugric are nowhere closest to Turkic people. As historians proven that they became similar through language contact, early Finno-Ugric and Turkic shows much less similarity meaning they became a bit more similar simply through language contact and exchanging words.

Only Tatars are genetically close to them, otherwise there is no any overlap as such, I agree, but I don't understand why you just can't ignore those retarded comments? There's millions of them on the internet, this thread won't change a single thing xD

[ButlerKing]

Only Tatars are genetically close to them, otherwise there is no any overlap as such, I agree, but I don't understand why you just can't ignore those retarded comments? There's millions of them on the internet, this thread won't change a single thing xD

That's because the original lands of Tatars were western Uralic people, even Indo-Europeans were present there before the migrations of Turkic people.

Those are not simply retarded comment. Those comments are made to offend, disrespect, lie and confuse the world. Problem is these empires nothing to do with the Anatolian Turkish people but you see them going over and over again the same crap about them ruling India. History has prove they have nothing to do with this but than why do they still continue promote this false opinion to the world ? why do they keep making similar videos, comments everywhere ??? I really can't find any other reason other than Turkish Turks wants the world to know they are the same race as the people who ruled over India and all over the world. THEY DON'T JUST USE " TURKIC " , they try to fit in " Turkish " as if Turkish people = Turkic people. They want a sense of superiority over every race/ethnic group in the world.

This thread obviously won't change a damn thing but is still a thousand times better than youtube. I could easily gather a 1,000+ views and a lot more in a short time or in a day better than typing a individual youtube comments which would take a very long time especially ones that are several years ago. Also youtube quality is getting worse and rubbish, I've once nearly broke my keyboard when I found all my replies to Turks ( like 500+ words ) did not appear on the comment box. When I log out the comment isn't there.

[Marmara]

Let's learn some Indian history


https://youtu.be/L8DNVHNASRM

[Sora]

You are predominant Anatolian as shown from genetics


Faggot! How much should I say that? Turkic is not only Mongoloid! Neither Turkic=/=Mongoloid nor Mongoloid=/=Turkic

[Decius]

Turkish people are not even mainly Turkic by genetics but more Native Anatolian. They also resemble Native Anatolians far more then other Turkic people. As Armenoid and other West Asian phenotypes dominate in Turkey.

[Decius]

Faggot! How much should I say that? Turkic is not only Mongoloid! Neither Turkic=/=Mongoloid nor Mongoloid=/=Turkic

Yes but still you are much closer to the Native Anatolian peoples then you are to Tajiks/Uzbeks/Kazakhs genetically.

[Sora]

Yes but still you are much closer to the Native Anatolian peoples then you are to Tajiks/Uzbeks/Kazakhs genetically.

No, dude! You think wrong. Yes, we mixed with Anatolian people but we're still close to Central Asia than Anatolia. We only have 45%-50% Anatolian on average

Proof:

An Aydın Turk:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
6 59% Turkmen + 41% Sephardic_Jewish @ 5.23
10 61.7% Turkmen + 38.3% Italian_Jewish @ 5.55
16 53.6% Nogay + 46.4% Lebanese_Druze @ 5.74

A Çanakkale Turk:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 58.2% Nogay + 41.8% Algerian_Jewish @ 5.19
2 53.7% Nogay + 46.3% Ashkenazi @ 5.36
3 51% Cyprian + 49% Afghan_Turkmen @ 5.76
4 59% Nogay+ 41% Italian_Jewish @ 5.79
5 59.5% Nogay + 40.5% Tunisian_Jewish @ 5.8

[Decius]

India.

In Kashmir, there is pseudo-European looking people like Hunza, Kalash types


Even though some people in these groups look European, the majority of the peoples in these groups dont look European. On top of this Kalash people and other people from Kashmir are very distant genetically from Europeans.

[Decius]

No, dude! You think wrong. Yes, we mixed with Anatolian people but we're still close to Central Asia than Anatolia. We only have 45%-50% Anatolian on average

Proof:

An Aydın Turk:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
6 59% Turkmen + 41% Sephardic_Jewish @ 5.23
10 61.7% Turkmen + 38.3% Italian_Jewish @ 5.55
16 53.6% Nogay + 46.4% Lebanese_Druze @ 5.74

A Çanakkale Turk:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 58.2% Nogay + 41.8% Algerian_Jewish @ 5.19
2 53.7% Nogay + 46.3% Ashkenazi @ 5.36
3 51% Cyprian + 49% Afghan_Turkmen @ 5.76
4 59% Nogay+ 41% Italian_Jewish @ 5.79
5 59.5% Nogay + 40.5% Tunisian_Jewish @ 5.8

I guess it depends on the region but It seems you guys are almost 50 50

[Sora]

I guess it depends on the region but It seems you guys are almost 50 50

Yes. We're 50/50 on average. In Western Turkey, Central Asian admixture can reach to 60%, in Central Turkey(I'm from the Central Turkey, also) it's 50/50. But when we go to the east, Central Asian admixture can down to 35%-40%. In North-eastern Turkey, it's very low to none.

[ButlerKing]

Let's learn some Indian history


https://youtu.be/L8DNVHNASRM

So what propaganda nonsense video is this ? Mughals and Ottoman and Native Americans. All this nonsense crap.

[Marmara]

So what propaganda nonsense video is this ? Mughals and Ottoman and Native Americans. All this nonsense crap.

Lol all truth, watch all of it.

[ButlerKing]

Yes but still you are much closer to the Native Anatolian peoples then you are to Tajiks/Uzbeks/Kazakhs genetically.

Keep in mind most Turkish are not as Mongoloid as Aydin where it reaches 16-18% on average. Other parts of Turkey are a lot lower than that. ( East Turkey btw is predominated by Kurdish speakers just so you know ) so average Turkish is a lot lower than 50% central Asian and genetic distance have many problems aswell.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HKjsPDMkfWY/Wh7EfeBL8GI/AAAAAAAAANM/Vo6HpnwN7ow8MCYBh9WZdLokDDsSZrzxgCLcBGAs/s1600/East_Eurasian.png


There are even places in parts of Turkey where they have abnormal level of Caucasus admixture proving they aren't typical Turks and other Turks from like western turkey have a much higher admixture europeans.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IcXudJ6nb8Y/Whr2jFdgUyI/AAAAAAAAAJw/_JOTEr9olXAbhVngDpwdQGUYr25Tt2AKgCLcBGAs/s1600/Caucasus%2B1.png

[ButlerKing]

Yes. We're 50/50 on average. In Western Turkey, Central Asian admixture can reach to 60%, in Central Turkey(I'm from the Central Turkey, also) it's 50/50. But when we go to the east, Central Asian admixture can down to 35%-40%. In North-eastern Turkey, it's very low to none.

More like anything from 10/90 to 50/50. And besides there is huge problem with these genetic distance and that's because Turkmen's west Eurasian is already similar to those of Caucasus region,Georgians and Turkey.

Only in your dreams maybe. You deliberately cherry picked results with places with much more higher Mongoloid admixture in same I can used places in Turkey where they have abnormal high Caucasus admixture than the typical Turkish turks

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IcXudJ6nb8Y/Whr2jFdgUyI/AAAAAAAAAJw/_JOTEr9olXAbhVngDpwdQGUYr25Tt2AKgCLcBGAs/s1600/Caucasus%2B1.png

[ButlerKing]

Faggot! How much should I say that? Turkic is not only Mongoloid! Neither Turkic=/=Mongoloid nor Mongoloid=/=Turkic

Original Turkic and original Turks were Mongoloid and predominate Mongoloid. Turkmenistan was originally inhabited by Iranic people anyway.

All Caucasoid Turks are Turkified, assimilated, converted or intermixed

[ButlerKing]

Lol all truth, watch all of it.

So the Mughals was supported by the Ottomans.Let's say even if that's so what though ? what can you claim by that.... are you going to say Turkish turks also ruled India or Turkish Turks contributed of conquest India ?

[Marmara]

More like anything from 10/90 to 50/50. And besides there is huge problem with these genetic distance and that's because Turkmen's west Eurasian is already similar to those of Caucasus region,Georgians and Turkey.

Only in your dreams maybe. You deliberately cherry picked results with places with much more higher Mongoloid admixture in same I can used places in Turkey where they have abnormal high Caucasus admixture than the typical Turkish turks

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IcXudJ6nb8Y/Whr2jFdgUyI/AAAAAAAAAJw/_JOTEr9olXAbhVngDpwdQGUYr25Tt2AKgCLcBGAs/s1600/Caucasus%2B1.png

They are Laz (Northeasterners)

[ButlerKing]

They are Laz (Northeasterners)

How do you know they are Laz ? Also the Caucasus admixture in Turkey vary a lot.

Highest Caucasus admixture 62-66% after that is 54-58%, 46-50%, 42-46%

Lowest Caucasus admixture in Turks 26-30%, 30-34%

Most Turks seems to have 34-42%

[Marmara]

How do you know they are Laz ? Also the Caucasus admixture in Turkey vary a lot.

Highest Caucasus admixture 62-66% after that is 54-58%, 46-50%, 42-46%

Lowest Caucasus admixture in Turks 26-30%, 30-34%

Most Turks seems to have 34-42%

Because Laz people live in Northeast.

[ButlerKing]

Because Laz people live in Northeast.

But how do you the results aren't Turkish people ( like as in Turkified Laz )

[ButlerKing]

I guess it depends on the region but It seems you guys are almost 50 50

Not only depending on the region and is natural to begin with they have similar DNA with Turkmen. This has nothing to do with the fact modern Turkish are more Turkmen than Anatolian but the fact that ancient Anatolian like most west Asians are genetically West Asian.

Because most of the west Eurasian DNA in Central Asia are similar to Caucasus ( non-Turkic ) and Turkish people to begin with which is west Asian and they also share a portion of European DNA. The only thing that make them even more similar is that they all share similar Mongoloid DNA which makes them more closer.

West Asian DNA is even significant in Kazakhstan let alone Turkmenistan. CHOP OFF A PORTION of the already native anatolian west asian DNA and their genetic distance to turkey is properly only 30%.
https://cache.eupedia.com/images/content/West-Asian-admixture.gif

[ButlerKing]

Even though some people in these groups look European, the majority of the peoples in these groups dont look European. On top of this Kalash people and other people from Kashmir are very distant genetically from Europeans.

You be the judge. I think many of them look European and half European/half South Asian.

They are European looking enough that people would claimed them to be as descendants of Greeks, Albanians but if you ask me even they look more Europeans than the average dark skin Albanian, greeks.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoiGhRGCHtQ&t=209s

[Decius]

You be the judge. I think many of them look European and half European/half South Asian.

They are European looking enough that people would claimed them to be as descendants of Greeks, Albanians but if you ask me even they look more Europeans than the average dark skin Albanian, greeks.


There are Kalash that look European but its in the minority most Kalash look South Asian. The Kalash in the video you posted are atypical

[Bornoz]

They are Laz (Northeasterners)

Bu site sadece etnik Türklerin sonuçlarını alıyor. Onun dışında benim bildiğim kadarıyla Doğu Karadenizli Türkler'de Kafkasya etkeni zaten fazla.

[ButlerKing]

There are Kalash that look European but its in the minority most Kalash look South Asian. The Kalash in the video you posted are atypical

That absolutely depends. Sometimes I see them with mostly South Asian appearance and sometimes with their own European-like look,


Most of the Kalash people in this video have a sort of European like faces mixed with middle easterners.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPRTnA7L0gQ

[Decius]

That absolutely depends. Sometimes I see them with mostly South Asian appearance and sometimes with their own European-like look,


Most of the Kalash people in this video have a sort of European like faces mixed with middle easterners.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPRTnA7L0gQ

I guess it depends on the individual but still genetically they are very different from Europeans.

[İrle]

"400 years" of Turkic rule in India and the result is ButlerKing.

https://scontent.fada1-7.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/24232504_753839441482208_1849568083802622881_n.png ?_nc_cat=0&oh=3f1d92641b33034c3c8bcf15a47fd793&oe=5B9C7E7D

[Armenian Bishop]

All I can say is: More Popcorn Please! :popcorn:
I'll pass on the butter this time.
And, some coffee would be nice too. :coffee:

[ButlerKing]

I guess it depends on the individual but still genetically they are very different from Europeans.

Kalash people live in Pakistan not India but Burusho people/Hunza types also live in India and many of them are European looking as heck.

As for the people from that region you can see these looks. SUPER EUROPEAN FACES but genetically they are not European.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0f7097caa0bbbf3484297e879dbe0a19
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9f67fc62d111aa457c634f7953f45ecc

[Marmara]

Kalash people live in Pakistan not India but Burusho people/Hunza types also live in India and many of them are European looking as heck.

As for the people from that region you can see these looks. SUPER EUROPEAN FACES but genetically they are not European.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0f7097caa0bbbf3484297e879dbe0a19
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9f67fc62d111aa457c634f7953f45ecc

They look like light type of Kurds.

[Marmara]

But how do you the results aren't Turkish people ( like as in Turkified Laz )

There are very very few Turks in Northeast (Beyond Trabzon) so it proves nothing.

[ButlerKing]

They look like light type of Kurds.

I'm almost 100% sure these are pigmented people.

You can find a genetically South Indian all the way to Sri Lanka with faces like this guy

https://c7.alamy.com/comp/M3NPG9/albino-man-indian-hindu-blonde-white-parade-matale-sri-lanka-M3NPG9.jpg

A Indian women can produce that look once they are pigmented (skin Pigmentation is different to albino, it looks more natural )

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2yjGloq0d98/UgzL3IjTDZI/AAAAAAAAAHA/zNDe2Kbuf-I/s1600/IMG_3074.JPG

[ButlerKing]

There are very very few Turks in Northeast (Beyond Trabzon) so it proves nothing.

1 in 3 Turks who live there is not small. Just because most are Laz does not mean all are.

Edit: Actually they make a minority....the Laz.

[Marmara]

I'm almost 100% sure these are pigmented people.

You can find a genetically South Indian all the to Sri Lanka with faces like this guy

https://c7.alamy.com/comp/M3NPG9/albino-man-indian-hindu-blonde-white-parade-matale-sri-lanka-M3NPG9.jpg

A Indian women can produce that look once they are pigmented (skin Pigmentation is different to albino, it looks more natural )

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2yjGloq0d98/UgzL3IjTDZI/AAAAAAAAAHA/zNDe2Kbuf-I/s1600/IMG_3074.JPG

First guy looks Albino Indian, second woman is definitely not Indian.

[ButlerKing]

First guy looks Albino Indian, second woman is definitely not Indian.


Don't be so sure and even if she's not Indian there Indians who look like born from pure Indian families so don't be surprised.

http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kuow/files/styles/x_large/public/201604/20160402_172155__2__0.jpg

[Mingle]

This animosity is evident even today.

How so?

[Gangrel]

Man in the top right is obviously a Central Asian Turk.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0f7097caa0bbbf3484297e879dbe0a19

[drugnick]

I'm almost 100% sure these are pigmented people.

You can find a genetically South Indian all the way to Sri Lanka with faces like this guy

https://c7.alamy.com/comp/M3NPG9/albino-man-indian-hindu-blonde-white-parade-matale-sri-lanka-M3NPG9.jpg

A Indian women can produce that look once they are pigmented (skin Pigmentation is different to albino, it looks more natural )

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2yjGloq0d98/UgzL3IjTDZI/AAAAAAAAAHA/zNDe2Kbuf-I/s1600/IMG_3074.JPG

Mistook that 1st guy for Prince Harry at firstoh my eyes 🤨
That woman looks like some chitpavan with dyed hair


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

Indians have a friend in British-Irishman ButlerKing.

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

Don't be so sure and even if she's not Indian there Indians who look like born from pure Indian families so don't be surprised.

http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kuow/files/styles/x_large/public/201604/20160402_172155__2__0.jpg

Change your profile ethnicity to what you actually are, you fucking fraud.

[zhaoyun]

The British Scouser gets triggered again in the name of India.

[Kamal900]

First guy looks Albino Indian, second woman is definitely not Indian.

Indeed. She's most likely Ukrainian or something.

[Austrvegr]

Golden Horde is especially hilarious. It was created by pagan Mongols who were mass-slaughtering and subjugating Muslim Turkics.

Turks claiming Golden Horde was Turkic is like Jews claiming Nazi Germany was Jewish.

[itilvolga]

Oh haha some cunts feel aggrieved here

[Yaglakar]

Golden Horde is especially hilarious. It was created by pagan Mongols who were mass-slaughtering and subjugating Muslim Turkics.

Turks claiming Golden Horde was Turkic is like Jews claiming Nazi Germany was Jewish.

Did you sit on a Chechen bottle today? :)

Get your facts right. Religious composition of steppes west of Mongolia consisted of shamanists, nestorian christians and buddhists before the Golden Horde lands were eventually Islamicized and Mongols turkified.

[Kamal900]

Oh haha some cunts feel aggrieved here

He's Indian..yeah.

[Yaglakar]

How so?

Ethnic nationalism and traditional animosity between pastoralists and sedentary/semi-nomadic populations + folk-national pseudo-history that is being conducted in each of the Central Asian states. Kazakhs claiming Ghengis Khan and Mongol empire being Kazakh in origin, and Turkmens claiming all Oghuz heritage even though their connection to Seljuks and and even less so to Ottomans is indirect at best. There is term "sart", that initially carried a neutral meaning of non-Turkic merchant (Sogdian) is now being applied to primarily Uzbeks and sometimes to Uyghurs with a slanderous context of "petty trader of Indo-Iranic origin without origin (clan, tribe)". Tensions between traditionally nomadic peoples like Kirghiz and Kazakhs are also present.

[Böri]

I watched TV news about the armours of these soldiers representing the 16 historical Turkic states. Designers and producers said they used different historical sources to prepare them (Chinese, Iranian, Roman etc). Best looking are Göktürk and Khazar imo.
The Khazar helmet is fashionable. The Göktürk helmet really had eagle feathers on top.

https://i.hizliresim.com/OoYnDP.jpg

[Gold-Shekel]

I don't think that's odd, many nationalisms seek credibility in the past and try to go as far back as they can and claim as much as possible. It may also be non Turkish people trying to get into the Turkish nation by retroactivity.