Log in

View Full Version : Vindija Neanderthal/Paleo-human GEDmatch results



Ajeje Brazorf
06-11-2018, 06:18 PM
https://i.imgur.com/tTVoN6a.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vindija_Cave

HarappaWorld
Kit M981753
174425 SNPs used in this evaluation

# Population Percent
1 San 52.97
2 Pygmy 33.87
3 NE-Euro 3.69
4 NE-Asian 2.57
5 W-African 2.05
6 Mediterranean 1.98
7 Papuan 1.27
8 SE-Asian 0.46
9 American 0.42
10 Beringian 0.36
11 Siberian 0.36

# Population (source) Distance
1 !kung (xing) 47.02
2 san (henn2011) 49.81
3 san-nb (henn2011) 65.47
4 san (hgdp) 68.47
5 biakapygmy (hgdp) 71.12
6 xhosa (henn2012) 76.9
7 sandawe (henn2011) 76.97
8 sotho-tswana (xing) 78.73
9 hadza (henn2011) 79.09
10 uzbek (behar) 81.56
11 uyghur (hgdp) 82.44
12 puerto-rican (bryc) 82.5
13 hazara (hgdp) 82.87
14 romanian-b (behar) 82.93
15 turkmen (yunusbayev) 83.13
16 tajik (yunusbayev) 83.43
17 puerto-rican (1000genomes) 83.58
18 pashtun (harappa) 83.76
19 turk-aydin (hodoglugil) 84.11
20 kazakh (harappa) 84.34

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 66.6% san (henn2011) + 33.4% pygmy (xing) @ 4.82
2 66.6% san (henn2011) + 33.4% mbutipygmy (hgdp) @ 4.82
3 60.4% san-nb (henn2011) + 39.6% mbutipygmy (hgdp) @ 10.77
4 60.4% san-nb (henn2011) + 39.6% pygmy (xing) @ 10.77
5 68.5% !kung (xing) + 31.5% pygmy (xing) @ 12.94
6 68.5% !kung (xing) + 31.5% mbutipygmy (hgdp) @ 12.94
7 52.2% san-nb (henn2011) + 47.8% biakapygmy (hgdp) @ 18.01
8 60.1% san (henn2011) + 39.9% biakapygmy (hgdp) @ 20.96
9 63.2% !kung (xing) + 36.8% biakapygmy (hgdp) @ 27.32
10 70.8% san (henn2011) + 29.2% alur (xing) @ 38.68
11 59.1% san-nb (henn2011) + 40.9% alur (xing) @ 38.83
12 73.2% !kung (xing) + 26.8% uzbek (behar) @ 39.03
13 73.5% !kung (xing) + 26.5% uyghur (hgdp) @ 39.1
14 73.8% !kung (xing) + 26.2% hazara (hgdp) @ 39.22
15 74.3% !kung (xing) + 25.7% kazakh (harappa) @ 39.31
16 74% !kung (xing) + 26% romanian-b (behar) @ 39.38
17 74.8% !kung (xing) + 25.2% romanian-a (behar) @ 39.39
18 74.6% !kung (xing) + 25.4% kyrgyz (xing) @ 39.42
19 74.2% !kung (xing) + 25.8% tajik (yunusbayev) @ 39.43
20 74.1% !kung (xing) + 25.9% turkmen (yunusbayev) @ 39.45

Using 1 population approximation:
1 !kung_xing @ 41.404854
2 san_henn2011 @ 42.858768
3 san-nb_henn2011 @ 55.681122
4 san_hgdp @ 58.181767
5 biakapygmy_hgdp @ 62.435680
6 sandawe_henn2011 @ 71.841629
7 xhosa_henn2012 @ 71.995018
8 uzbek_behar @ 72.701035
9 puerto-rican_bryc @ 73.340668
10 uyghur_hgdp @ 73.761925
11 sotho-tswana_xing @ 73.951080
12 mexican_hapmap @ 74.260643
13 hazara_hgdp @ 74.288994
14 puerto-rican_1000genomes @ 74.941109
15 romanian-b_behar @ 75.004570
16 hadza_henn2011 @ 75.075035
17 turkmen_yunusbayev @ 75.357880
18 dominican_bryc @ 75.418121
19 tajik_yunusbayev @ 75.658066
20 kazakh_harappa @ 75.790268

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% biakapygmy_hgdp +50% san_hgdp @ 16.954174

Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% !kung_xing +25% pygmy_xing +25% san_henn2011 @ 13.318574

Using 4 populations approximation:
1 biakapygmy_hgdp + pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san_hgdp @ 10.284496
2 biakapygmy_hgdp + mbutipygmy_hgdp + san_hgdp + san_hgdp @ 10.284704
3 biakapygmy_hgdp + pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 @ 10.753709
4 biakapygmy_hgdp + mbutipygmy_hgdp + san_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 @ 10.753938
5 biakapygmy_hgdp + pygmy_xing + san-nb_henn2011 + san-nb_henn2011 @ 11.273330
6 biakapygmy_hgdp + mbutipygmy_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 + san-nb_henn2011 @ 11.273598
7 pygmy_xing + san_henn2011 + san_henn2011 + san_henn2011 @ 11.830832
8 mbutipygmy_hgdp + san_henn2011 + san_henn2011 + san_henn2011 @ 11.831529
9 puerto-rican_bryc + pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san_hgdp @ 12.038617
10 mbutipygmy_hgdp + puerto-rican_bryc + san_hgdp + san_hgdp @ 12.039285
11 !kung_xing + pygmy_xing + san_henn2011 + san_henn2011 @ 12.048934
12 !kung_xing + mbutipygmy_hgdp + san_henn2011 + san_henn2011 @ 12.049832
13 puerto-rican_bryc + pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 @ 12.301361
14 mbutipygmy_hgdp + puerto-rican_bryc + san_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 @ 12.302051
15 pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san_hgdp + uzbek_behar @ 12.448059
16 mbutipygmy_hgdp + san_hgdp + san_hgdp + uzbek_behar @ 12.448294
17 pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 + uzbek_behar @ 12.526220
18 mbutipygmy_hgdp + san_hgdp + san-nb_henn2011 + uzbek_behar @ 12.526483
19 puerto-rican_1000genomes + pygmy_xing + san_hgdp + san_hgdp @ 12.552834
20 mbutipygmy_hgdp + puerto-rican_1000genomes + san_hgdp + san_hgdp @ 12.553329

Leto
06-11-2018, 06:40 PM
Oh lawd, the quality is amazingly high!

Ajeje Brazorf
06-11-2018, 07:20 PM
Oh lawd, the quality is amazingly high!

How accurate can it be in your opinion? This individual seems to be very similar to Altai Neanderthal.

Leto
06-11-2018, 07:34 PM
How accurate can it be in your opinion? This individual seems to be very similar to Altai Neanderthal.
Well, he is certainly not suitable for GM calculators. I don't know anything about the Neanderthals.

Wrong
06-11-2018, 07:39 PM
Not for modern calculators.

Scandal
06-11-2018, 07:42 PM
You are not supposed to run a neandearthal result in gedmatch calculators. It's made for modern humans.