Log in

View Full Version : Non-mongoloid admixture of Turkic people? Does it come from Iranics?



cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 09:37 AM
https://image.ibb.co/kq6eud/mHUkWzF.png

itilvolga
06-19-2018, 09:41 AM
You are pretty obsessed about the relationship between Iranics and Turkics

Jana
06-19-2018, 09:43 AM
In Central Asia yes, but Anatolian Turks have lot of caucasoid non Iranic admixture.
Turkic groups in Russia have some Slavic and Finnic as well

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 09:45 AM
In Central Asia yes, but Anatolian Turks have lot of caucasoid non Iranic admixture.
Turkic groups in Russia have some Slavic and Finnic as well

Anatolian Turks have a lot of Caucasian admixture.

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 09:46 AM
You are pretty obsessed about the relationship between Iranics and Turkics

"Yeter" (name) :D

Jana
06-19-2018, 09:47 AM
Anatolian Turks have a lot of Caucasian admixture.

yes, and Balkan, Armenian too

Loki
06-19-2018, 09:48 AM
Yeah... and Scythian.

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 09:54 AM
yes, and Balkan, Armenian too

Of course. I also wonder whether types and admixtures are related. For example, Turanid type is a transition type betweeen Lappoid and Iranid. Lappoid is mostly related with Northwest Asians and Northeast Europeans. Whereas, Iranid is mostly realted with Iranians. Also, Anatolid type is a transition type from Dinarid to Armenoid. Dinarid is more related with Balkans and Armenoid is more related with Armenians.

Jana
06-19-2018, 09:56 AM
Of course. I also wonder whether types and admixtures are related. For example, Turanid type is a transition type betweeen Lappoid and Iranid. Lappoid is mostly related with Northwest Asians and Northeast Europeans. Whereas, Iranid is mostly realted with Iranians. Also, Anatolid type is a transition type from Dinarid to Armenoid. Dinarid is more related with Balkans and Armenoid is more related with Armenians.

But Anatolid is mix of Capaddocian med and armenoid. According to anthro literature

And I don't think Turanid is Lappish + Iranid mix, that's not true! It is mix of eastern European Cro Magnon and some mongoloid type, probably tungid

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 09:58 AM
But Anatolid is mix of Capaddocian med and armenoid. Accpording to anthro literature

And I don't thik Turanid is Lappish + Iranid mix, that's not true! It is mix of eastern European Cro Magnon and some mongoloid type, probably tungid

Hmmm. Actually Cappodocid type looks like dolicocephal Dinarid :D

Why do I always associate Turanid type with Iranid? I have to ask myself :D

Böri
06-19-2018, 10:13 AM
No.
Afanesovo (white Europoid) + Okunevo (South Siberid) interaction happened 5500 years ago in Yenisei-Lena axis.
There was no Iranians back then.

This is a reason why Anatolian Turks have higher north-European like admixture compared to their neighbors (Armenians, Kartvelians, Pontic Greeks, Assyrians, Cappadocian Greeks).

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 10:21 AM
But Anatolid is mix of Capaddocian med and armenoid. According to anthro literature

And I don't think Turanid is Lappish + Iranid mix, that's not true! It is mix of eastern European Cro Magnon and some mongoloid type, probably tungid

As far as I know, Cappadocid type is a transition type from Iranid to West Mediterranid.

As for Turanid, then is it a combination of those types?:

http://humanphenotypes.net/Ladogan.html
http://humanphenotypes.net/ladoganm.jpghttp://humanphenotypes.net/ladoganf.jpg

http://humanphenotypes.net/basic/Tungid.html
http://humanphenotypes.net/basic/tungidm.jpghttp://humanphenotypes.net/basic/tungidf.jpg

Jana
06-19-2018, 10:27 AM
As far as I know, Cappadocid type is a transition type from Iranid to West Mediterranid.

As for Turanid, then is it a combination of those types?:

http://humanphenotypes.net/Ladogan.html
http://humanphenotypes.net/ladoganm.jpghttp://humanphenotypes.net/ladoganf.jpg

http://humanphenotypes.net/basic/Tungid.html
http://humanphenotypes.net/basic/tungidm.jpghttp://humanphenotypes.net/basic/tungidf.jpg

Ladogan is special type and probably aclimatisation to northeastern European climate + Saami like admixture.

Caucasoid in central asia that formed Turanid was not Lappid, it was non borealized type, most likely robust Nordic/Cro-Magnon (EHG)

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 10:35 AM
Most likely robust Nordic/Cro-Magnon (EHG)

Sounds like Dalofaelid :)

Jana
06-19-2018, 10:36 AM
Sounds like Dalofaelid :)

That's fantasy type...

Yaglakar
06-19-2018, 11:20 AM
Various layers encompassing different time periods. Assimilation of nomadic Indo-Europeans before the turn of the first millenia + the presence of large Sogdian (settled East Iranic) communities of merchants and craftsmen as far as Orkhon/Mongolia from 5th century AD + assimilation of local settled/semi-nomadic Indo-Europeans in Central Asia proper.

Sora
06-19-2018, 02:46 PM
No. It comes from the mixing of Mongoloids and Caucasoids when Turks are during creating. But unfortunately, the ancestors of Turks mixed imbalanced :(

Pahli
06-19-2018, 03:02 PM
No.
Afanesovo (white Europoid) + Okunevo (South Siberid) interaction happened 5500 years ago in Yenisei-Lena axis.
There was no Iranians back then.

This is a reason why Anatolian Turks have higher north-European like admixture compared to their neighbors (Armenians, Kartvelians, Pontic Greeks, Assyrians, Cappadocian Greeks).

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA xD

Afanasevo has nothing to do with Proto-Turks you moron, they were the ancestors of Tocharians, Turks have NE_Euro because they assimilated East Iranian populations of Central Asia, Oghuz Turks themselves barely had any NE_Euro admixture prior to their migrations to Central Asia, you also assimilated most of the Greek populations of West Turkey, I've seen the results; 50/50 South European and Turkmen. Again trying to portray Turks as whiter than everyone else, you suffer from heavy OWD :)


No. It comes from the mixing of Mongoloids and Caucasoids when Turks are during creating. But unfortunately, the ancestors of Turks mixed imbalanced :(

Why are both you and Böri so autistic? Your people were originally Mongoloid, you are so obsessed with being White it fucking hurts laughing every time I read this cringy shit, jesus fucking christ xD


Various layers encompassing different time periods. Assimilation of nomadic Indo-Europeans before the turn of the first millenia + the presence of large Sogdian (settled East Iranic) communities of merchants and craftsmen as far as Orkhon/Mongolia from 5th century AD + assimilation of local settled/semi-nomadic Indo-Europeans in Central Asia proper.

This

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 03:09 PM
No. It comes from the mixing of Mongoloids and Caucasoids when Turks are during creating. But unfortunately, the ancestors of Turks mixed imbalanced :(

Actually Turan type is basically Cromagnid plus Tungid. Aralid subtype is shifted more towards Tungid. Pamirid is shifted more towards Cromagnid.

Sora
06-19-2018, 03:11 PM
Why are both you and Böri so autistic? Your people were originally Mongoloid, you are so obsessed with being White it fucking hurts laughing every time I read this cringy shit, jesus fucking christ

You are more autistic than mentally ill children! When that's so, saying this is ironic! And you butthurt Iranian, why this hurts you so much when we say the truth? Also stop being butthurt! Or Böri and I will hurt you so much! Already truths hurts you but anyway... Turks were never originally Mongoloid as Iranics were originally blacks! Turks were already mixture of Caucasoids and Mongoloids. But your mentally ill brain can't get this...

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 03:14 PM
.

As I learned recently, most Central Asians have Turanid type and Turanid type is basically Cromagnid plus Tungid. Aralid subtype is shifted more towards Tungid. Pamirid is shifted more towards Cromagnid.

Bobby Martnen
06-19-2018, 03:30 PM
Probably from native Anatolians

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 03:44 PM
—-

Pahli
06-19-2018, 03:50 PM
You are more autistic than mentally ill children! When that's so, saying this is ironic! And you butthurt Iranian, why this hurts you so much when we say the truth? Also stop being butthurt! Or Böri and I will hurt you so much! Already truths hurts you but anyway... Turks were never originally Mongoloid as Iranics were originally blacks! Turks were already mixture of Caucasoids and Mongoloids. But your mentally ill brain can't get this...

Ok White Turks made everyone White, and Iranics were black, sure :)

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 03:51 PM
—-

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 03:52 PM
Probably from native Anatolians

Actually I could not solve where the non-mongoloid component of Central Asians come from.

Pahli
06-19-2018, 03:58 PM
Actually I could not solve where the non-mongoloid component of Central Asians come from.

Neolithic Iranian farmers and Steppe people

Leto
06-19-2018, 04:41 PM
Central Asia is basically a giant mix of people like me, Pahli, zhaoyun and Thambi in varying proportions.

Böri
06-19-2018, 07:39 PM
What what? I couldn't hear!
Repeat.
Did a Middle Eastern farmer in baggy trouser said something?
I thought İ heard something in IE Iranic language spelled with a Semitic style!
That must be hallucinations.
It must be a wrong perception.

cyberlorian
06-19-2018, 07:42 PM
Neolithic Iranian farmers and Steppe people

Are Neolithic Iranian farmers mostly ENF?

Gangrel
06-19-2018, 07:43 PM
loool this thread gonna b gud

Pahli
06-19-2018, 10:25 PM
loool this thread gonna b gud

All the autists gathered around for the occasional OWD kardesh

Pahli
06-19-2018, 10:43 PM
Are Neolithic Iranian farmers mostly ENF?

Namazga sample from Turkmenistan is basically Neolithic_Iranian + EHG / ANE, there's also a sample from Uzbekistan (Dzhakurtan Bronze Age) which shows some West Siberian_HG admixture;

Bronze age Namazga:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 70.33
2 NE_Europe 9.93
3 South_Asia 9.69
4 SW_Europe 6.69
5 SW_Asia 3.36

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Brahui 25.95
2 Balochi 26.3
3 Makrani 26.51
4 Iranian 27.91
5 Dagestan_Azeri 28.59

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 61.8% Brahui + 38.2% Abkhasian @ 23.65
2 59.3% Makrani + 40.7% Abkhasian @ 23.77
3 61.1% Balochi + 38.9% Abkhasian @ 24.04
4 61.3% Brahui + 38.7% Dagestan_Azeri @ 24.05
5 66.5% Brahui + 33.5% Adygei @ 24.08


Bronze Age Uzbekistan;

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 40.1
2 SW_Europe 19.32
3 NE_Europe 15.31
4 SW_Asia 8.2
5 South_Asia 4.97
6 NE_Asia 4.46
7 Siberia 4.12
8 West_Africa 1.88
9 Americas 0.83
10 Oceania 0.4
11 East_Africa 0.28
12 SE_Asia 0.14

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Dagestan_Azeri 5.44
2 Kumyk 5.86
3 Ossetian 6.6
4 Balkar 6.61
5 Adygei 7.82

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 74.4% Dagestan_Azeri + 25.6% Nogay @ 2.89
2 79.8% Dagestan_Azeri + 20.2% Afghan_Uzbeki @ 3.04
3 88.1% Dagestan_Azeri + 11.9% Afghan_Hazara @ 3.17
4 62.7% Abkhasian + 37.3% Afghan_Uzbeki @ 3.36
5 94.6% Dagestan_Azeri + 5.4% Xibo @ 3.44


The reason why they have Mongoloid admixture is because West_Siberian HG is has some Mongoloid too.

Leto
06-19-2018, 10:46 PM
Namazga sample from Turkmenistan is basically Neolithic_Iranian + EHG / ANE, there's also a sample from Uzbekistan (Dzhakurtan Bronze Age) which shows some West Siberian_HG admixture;

Bronze age Namazga:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 70.33
2 NE_Europe 9.93
3 South_Asia 9.69
4 SW_Europe 6.69
5 SW_Asia 3.36

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Brahui 25.95
2 Balochi 26.3
3 Makrani 26.51
4 Iranian 27.91
5 Dagestan_Azeri 28.59

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 61.8% Brahui + 38.2% Abkhasian @ 23.65
2 59.3% Makrani + 40.7% Abkhasian @ 23.77
3 61.1% Balochi + 38.9% Abkhasian @ 24.04
4 61.3% Brahui + 38.7% Dagestan_Azeri @ 24.05
5 66.5% Brahui + 33.5% Adygei @ 24.08


Bronze Age Uzbekistan;

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 West_Asia 40.1
2 SW_Europe 19.32
3 NE_Europe 15.31
4 SW_Asia 8.2
5 South_Asia 4.97
6 NE_Asia 4.46
7 Siberia 4.12
8 West_Africa 1.88
9 Americas 0.83
10 Oceania 0.4
11 East_Africa 0.28
12 SE_Asia 0.14

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Dagestan_Azeri 5.44
2 Kumyk 5.86
3 Ossetian 6.6
4 Balkar 6.61
5 Adygei 7.82

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 74.4% Dagestan_Azeri + 25.6% Nogay @ 2.89
2 79.8% Dagestan_Azeri + 20.2% Afghan_Uzbeki @ 3.04
3 88.1% Dagestan_Azeri + 11.9% Afghan_Hazara @ 3.17
4 62.7% Abkhasian + 37.3% Afghan_Uzbeki @ 3.36
5 94.6% Dagestan_Azeri + 5.4% Xibo @ 3.44


The reason why they have Mongoloid admixture is because West_Siberian HG is has some Mongoloid too.
The West Sib HGs are said to have been 50% ANE-like, 30% EHG and 20% East Asian.

Pahli
06-19-2018, 10:48 PM
The West Sib HGs are said to have been 50% ANE-like, 30% EHG and 20% East Asian.

Something like that. Samples from Pre-Steppe Central Asia shows both ANE and West Sb HG migrations and admixture with the Iranian like farmers

Leto
06-19-2018, 10:48 PM
By the way, use Harappa, Dod K12b and puntDNAL K15.