" Man Charged for Swedish Woman's 'Ruthless' Killing "

[Smaland]

http://politisktinkorrekt.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Elin-Krantz.jpg
Victim Elin Krantz. Image posted at politisktinkorrekt.info

http://politisktinkorrekt.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/21.jpg
Murder suspect Ephrem Tadele Yohannes. Image posted at politisktinkorrekt.info


A 23-year-old man was charged for the rape and murder of a 27-year-old woman he allegedly attacked after the two stepped off a Gothenburg tram one evening in September.

Full story (http://www.thelocal.se/32538/20110311)

[Oreka Bailoak]

What a waste of such a beautiful young girl.

Why import lots of ugly single men from third world countries into a country of beautiful people?

Criminal behavior is strongly correlated with inheritable genetics ("The Bell Curve", "G-Factor"). Why import people form countries where the average IQ is 70 or mentally retarded? They could at least have some sort of basic intelligence exam required prior to his visit or college studies.

Without a liberal immigration policy this and other events would never have happened.

[Eldritch]

Unfortunately Sweden must be approaching South African levels when it comes to brutality against women. Could anyone have imagined this as recently as 20 years ago?

[The Lawspeaker]

Unfortunately Sweden must be approaching South African levels when it comes to brutality against women. Could anyone have imagined this as recently as 20 years ago?
No. I couldn't have dreamed of it. Not even 10 years ago.

[Austin]

Well I just want to say god bless social leftism. It has given these men a chance to be free and be able to live a good life and raise children off our benevolent welfare systems.
If our welfare systems crash in a few years and a few hundred European women are raped here and there well then that's just the societal-price of a free system where everyone has the rights that took us our entire history to achieve.


Now remember America controls Europe and is evil and JEWS JEWS and capitalism is bad. Now go vote for the left and feel good and smug when you do it as you are defeating America with such a vote. (Don't mind the hordes of African blacks and Muslims we let in for cheap labor under social-leftism, it's America damnit!!!)

[The Lawspeaker]

Well I just want to say god bless social leftism. It has given these men a chance to be free and be able to live a good life and raise children off our benevolent welfare systems.
If our welfare systems crash in a few years and a few hundred European women are raped here and there well then that's just the societal-price of a free system where everyone has the rights that took us our entire history to achieve.
Well.. the social leftism worked very well until those immigrants were brought in. Suffice to say that in my own country it all began under right-wing cabinets but that's something you inept Americans never believe.

Our benevolent welfare systems should only exist for ourselves and should be kept intact or updated over time and this can only be done when the immigrants are deported. But who will benefit most from the tearing down of the welfare state ? The rich. As they will have a cheap immigrant workforce and then also have to pay naught for the upkeep of the welfare state.

It's not the left that brought us here. It is the left that was corrupted. But it was the right-wing that started all this. And it is those people that I hold responsible for every murder or rape, for every violent action, theft or fraud.

[Raskolnikov]

Well I just want to say god bless social leftism. It has given these men a chance to be free and be able to live a good life and raise children off our benevolent welfare systems.
If our welfare systems crash in a few years and a few hundred European women are raped here and there well then that's just the societal-price of a free system where everyone has the rights that took us our entire history to achieve.
And on the complimentary note, I would like to rant in the other direction--


Criminal behavior is strongly correlated with inheritable genetics ("The Bell Curve", "G-Factor"). Why import people form countries where the average IQ is 70 or mentally retarded? They could at least have some sort of basic intelligence exam required prior to his visit or college studies.

Same reason they "import" (economist's term) people at all - to be efficient, that is cheap. That is the reality of the profit motive and empowered employer giving visas away.

Statistical arguments are the tools of those negrise in the first place. No one needs numbers to see what is going on as to how one is unrelated to the unrelated.

[Adalwolf]

What can you expect when you let in 83,000 primal instinctive apes in one year.

I have cousins in Sweden, but I bet they're too PC to realize the detriments of what is going on. :(

[Austin]

Well.. the social leftism worked very well until those immigrants were brought in. Suffice to say that in my own country it all began under right-wing cabinets but that's something you inept Americans never believe.

Our benevolent welfare systems should only exist for ourselves and should be kept intact or updated over time and this can only be done when the immigrants are deported. But who will benefit most from the tearing down of the welfare state ? The rich. As they will have a cheap immigrant workforce and then also have to pay naught for the upkeep of the welfare state.

It's not the left that brought us here. It is the left that was corrupted. But it was the right-wing that started all this. And it is those people that I hold responsible for every murder or rape, for every violent action, theft or fraud.



"They" are the attorneys, bankers, small-business owners and they do not need cheap labor as they don't employ large masses of people but are privately/personally-rich via the tiered Western economies which allow upward momentum and positions of high yearly-pay such as a lawyer (average lawyer in U.S. earns 100k a year, not super-rich but rich nonetheless).

So there is a supreme difference between the 'rich' Westerner and the actual Capitalist who is mega-rich and has billions. It is the mega-rich Capitalist that is the 'corrupted-left' that you speak of. Just because the European Capitalist makes claims of social-leftism due to cultural beliefs of the average European doesn't make him/her any less corrupt or virtuous than the American Capitalist who makes claims of social-rightism for the same core reasons as the Euro Capitalist.

There is no 'right-wing' in either Europe or America politically and hasn't been for many years. There also is no left-wing yet this is the side that has been flaunted as the modern victor for it is left-wing ideology that is more friendly to the American and European Capitalist than right-wing ideology if you sit down and think about it.

Really hate Capitalists? Vote for the most far-right person you can. The leftist politicians you all vote for in Europe ARE bought and paid for by the capitalists to let in more immigrants under the banner of social leftism.


Obama is not a leftist he is a banner-leftist-corporate-representative.


As was Bush in the flavor of social-conservatism.

[Don]

The ancestors of the family and friends of this girl, in the past, when our societies were not so sick with this dramatic immunodeficiency, this hijo de puta would be already dead and all their relatives and friends already expelled from Sweden.

But sadly this world ours is a another one and this case is only one of the many to come.

Now her family and friends are crying and maintaining for a few years in their comfortable jails this invader and his allies in their streets.
That is the "Justice" these western societies ours have to offer us.

[Raskolnikov]

Really hate Capitalists? Vote for the most far-right person you can. The leftist politicians you all vote for in Europe ARE bought and paid for by the capitalists to let in more immigrants under the banner of social leftism.
I guess I'd agree with this since at least it's closer to getting a one-party system, since by default (at least in USA) the Republicans are the "white party" (and majority party) and can be pushed into responding in a traditional-strong way in some fantastical future.

But I don't give a shit about voterism anyway.
or pragmatism/compromising in general.

I also would repeat: small business owners that help aliens get visas or employ them illegally are also "rightwing voters", oft libertarian tards, treacherous selfish shits.

[Groenewolf]

[FONT="Georgia"]
Well.. the social leftism worked very well until those immigrants were brought in. Suffice to say that in my own country it all began under right-wing cabinets but that's something you inept Americans never believe.

And the deal struck then was that they would leave after the end of their contract. And under which prime-minister it was said that they will stay? (One hint it was not under Agt).

The left profits from them since they are for a much larger part depend on government handout and will therefor keep voting for left-wing parties. The rich, in so far they profited from it where those who run business that where no longer competitive and most of them failed in the end anyway.


I guess I'd agree with this since at least it's closer to getting a one-party system, since by default (at least in USA) the Republicans are the "white party" (and majority party) and can be pushed into responding in a traditional-strong way in some fantastical future.

The entire problem with the Republicans is that they hardly willing to acknowledge that fact since there response to the election of Obama as president was making a Negro the party leader. However if they do realize this fact and embrace it then could probably gain a lot of power. However this would also mean that they would have to kick out the economic liberals. Alto a (relative) free market economy makes the best use of the creative talent of the population, making it a goal in to itself also means one must abolish borders and immigration restrictions.

[Dario Argento]

Fucking violent animal nigger. That chick looked cute :(

I'm glad my country at least doesn't have niggers. The dumbest Indio is probably 10 times more intelligent than the most elite nigger rocket scientist.

[Debaser11]

These stories turn my stomach almost more than any other ones, I think. Women and children are a precious resource that should be guarded. Yet, conservative men are often mocked for obsessing about minorities around white women. But given how common such rape/murder dynamics are, is it any wonder?

So I ask anyone who has condescended toward such conservatives who address this subject like myself or Austin, do white men who have their eyes open really deserve ridicule because they can't get horrid thoughts like this young woman's suffering out of their minds? It's not like this incident is an aberration. Darkies do this to beautiful women like her all the time. That girl easily could have been a couple of my family members. It's a little hard to just watch Robot Chicken or listen to Lady Gaga carefree or engage in whatever frivolous activity you care to name or think of as more worthwhile considering the savagery Western women are being subjected to on a regular basis.

[Groenewolf]

It's a little hard to just watch Robot Chicken or listen to Lady Gaga carefree or engage in whatever frivolous activity you care to name or think of as more worthwhile considering the savagery Western women are being subjected to on a regular basis.

And that is probably what most people do who say that they got sick after reading this will do. Carry on like nothing has happened. And of course proclaim they have nothing against foreigners to proof they are not racists. Wonder how many of the Swedes that got sick when reading this will next election vote for (semi)nationalist parties. This question is rhetorical of course.

[Debaser11]

"Compassion" (even in a real sense as opposed to just tokenism) becomes a vice when it undermines loyalty and order.

All this "compassion" toward those who either wish us harm or are indifferent toward our very existence is inappropriate.

The problem is that denying "compassion" would force honest people to reevaluate the whole moral system (Marxism/soft Christianity) that we've collectively adopted over the last hundred or so years. It's easier for cowards to just let this poor woman die in vain than it is for them to reposition their morality so that it lines up with reality. Of course, there are no shortage of cowards anywhere. That's also why racism hysteria against people who want to save women like the one in this story won't be going away anytime soon.

[The Ripper]

Now remember America controls Europe and is evil and JEWS JEWS and capitalism is bad. Now go vote for the left and feel good and smug when you do it as you are defeating America with such a vote. (Don't mind the hordes of African blacks and Muslims we let in for cheap labor under social-leftism, it's America damnit!!!)

The world you live in does not exist. Posters on this forum do not vote for leftist parties. Swedish leftist parties, both the social democrats and the Left party, just voted for participation in American/NATO-led bombings in Libya. The "right" (=liberals) in Sweden is just as cultural marxist as the left is and voting for them won't make a difference.

In other news, on the Swedish forum Flashback they've linked to pictures, which are claimed to be of the crime scene, with the body of Elin. I can't be sure its her but the pictures were disturbing as hell. :(

[The Lawspeaker]

And the deal struck then was that they would leave after the end of their contract. And under which prime-minister it was said that they will stay? (One hint it was not under Agt).
That was indeed under Lubbers (CDA). As the new laws came into effect in 1985 (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijkswet_op_het_Nederlanderschap).


The left profits from them since they are for a much larger part depend on government handout and will therefor keep voting for left-wing parties. The rich, in so far they profited from it where those who run business that where no longer competitive and most of them failed in the end anyway.
And the right profits from them because it will get them votes from people that of course want them out. Votes to tear down whatever is social. Also profiting are the entrepreneurs: a cheap labour force and a chance to undermine the unions.

[Raskolnikov]

The entire problem with the Republicans is that they hardly willing to acknowledge that fact since there response to the election of Obama as president was making a Negro the party leader. However if they do realize this fact and embrace it then could probably gain a lot of power. However this would also mean that they would have to kick out the economic liberals. Alto a (relative) free market economy makes the best use of the creative talent of the population, making it a goal in to itself also means one must abolish borders and immigration restrictions.
I was merely giving Devil's advocacy to the perspective of a pseudopragmatic fantastical vote strategy where one could mobilise whites into one party (already numerically that has been the GOP) - that party would have to respond to these negrisations more directly. I speak of potential, but at the same time could care less what happens within US votocracy, and don't really see that potential.

You bring up an interesting point - that within classical economics are points to be made against immigrants; anyone who wants to see it, can see immigrants distort the 'local free market', lower wages, and so on. But of course that is moot since libertarians are not worth engaging.

Really the entire problem is anarchism, elections, the lack of accountability, no leaders in sight, just some mulato faggot reading off a teleprompter, and from that pseudo-elite to the bottom are just people pretending accountability while nothing, even having a machine do work for them. Every property owner in the USA is a 'plutocrat'/capitalist by himself. And I so I do seek voterist options, but social, elitist, excommunicationary ones.

So, finally, the problem with Republicans is that there are Republicans.

[Austin]

The world you live in does not exist. Posters on this forum do not vote for leftist parties. Swedish leftist parties, both the social democrats and the Left party, just voted for participation in American/NATO-led bombings in Libya. The "right" (=liberals) in Sweden is just as cultural marxist as the left is and voting for them won't make a difference.

In other news, on the Swedish forum Flashback they've linked to pictures, which are claimed to be of the crime scene, with the body of Elin. I can't be sure its her but the pictures were disturbing as hell. :(


No it does exist. I said that there is no right or left wing in Europe or America and in this my statements are true based on that reality.

Republicans in America are liberal-capitalists who pose as social conservatives. That is all. They are NOT right-wing. Who really considers the American Republican party to be a definable right-wing party? It is basically nothing more than a pure-liberal-capitalist party.

Bush was for open borders. He fought his own Texas and Southern senators on the issue and gave up his attempt to setup a worker program with Mexico because his own parties congress and senate wouldn't support him. Bush was/is a liberal Capitalist just as you Europeans leaders are liberal Capitalists. The difference is Bush played the social conservative capitalist and European leaders play the socialistic great-society capitalist. They are one in the same. Where is the so called right-wing among all this? It doesn't exist. Nor does the supposed left-wing. It is all liberal capitalists who care for nothing but proclaim to care for everything.