PDA

View Full Version : Iceland rejects payback deal



Loki
04-10-2011, 06:45 AM
Iceland rejects Icesave repayment deal (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13022524)

Icelanders have rejected the latest plan to repay the UK and Netherlands some 4bn euros lost when the country's banking system collapsed in 2008.

Partial referendum results show 58% voting no, and 42% supporting the plan.

"The worst option was chosen. The vote has split the nation in two," Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir said on state TV.

It is the second time a referendum has rejected a repayment deal, and the case will now go to an international court.

Landsbanki ran savings accounts in the UK and Netherlands under the name Icesave and investors there lost 4bn euros (£3.5bn; $5.8bn).

When it collapsed in 2008, the British and Dutch governments had to reimburse 400,000 citizens - and Iceland had to decide how to repay that money.

'Such a revulsion'

"The Icelandic nation has been put in a terrible situation," Reykjavik voter Helgi Sigurdsson told the Associated Press news agency.

"It has two choices - both are bad. Probably a lot of people stood for a long time holding the ballot slip."

Parliament had backed this deal, but President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson refused to sign it, leading to the referendum.

A previous deal, imposing a tougher repayment regime, was rejected in a March 2010 referendum by 93% of voters.

Finance Minister Steingrimur Sigfusson appeared to rule out a third attempt to persuade voters to accept a repayment deal.

"One cannot really ask a whole nation to agree to such a revulsion," he said.

"I think we're getting a very clear sign from this referendum, that further negotiations are ruled out. No use in trying that again."

The issue will now be referred to an international court, the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority. a process which could take several years.

Backers of a "yes" vote had argued the repayment deal was the best way to resolve the issue in terms of cost and risk to Iceland.

The "no" camp said the Icelandic taxpayer was under no legal obligation to pay for a private bank's losses and that the deal would put a heavy burden on the nation.

Longer period, lower interest

Under the terms of the rejected deal, Iceland would have paid the money back with 3.3% interest to the UK, and 3% to the Netherlands, over 30 years between 2016 and 2046.

Under the previous proposal, the money was to be paid back with 5.5% interest between 2016 and 2024.


The actual cost to the state is expected to be much less than the 4bn euros owed, as the government says most of the repayment will come from selling the assets of Landsbanki.

The government has said it does not expect the cost to exceed 50bn kronur (£168m).

Analysts say a resolution of the issue is vital to Iceland's prospects for recovery because it would allow the country to return to the financial markets to fund itself.

Solving the dispute is also seen as key to Iceland's chances of joining the EU.

Iceland's three main banks collapsed within days of each other in October 2008.

The government compensated Icelandic savers, but overseas customers faced losing all of their money.

The issue sparked a diplomatic row between Iceland and the UK, and created uncertainty over Iceland's economic recovery.

Loki
04-10-2011, 06:46 AM
The "no" camp said the Icelandic taxpayer was under no legal obligation to pay for a private bank's losses and that the deal would put a heavy burden on the nation.


I absolutely agree! Icelanders are smart. :)

Breedingvariety
04-10-2011, 07:08 AM
Nothing to the bankers! Otherwise- guillotine.

Agrippa
04-10-2011, 10:39 AM
Well, that is why they don't want direct Democracy, even while talking about "dictators and regimes" in the Arabic world, while in the end many Europeans have not much more to say in their own homelands if it is about major decisions.

The Icelanders and Swiss are two glorious PARTIAL exceptions, no solution, because a much more complete change is needed in the West, but at least a small healthy spark.

Now that should be reason enough to change the system, even in a small country like Iceland, to the worse, just to make an example of it.

So I just wonder what they will do to the people of Iceland - next - just to put them down.

Good decision that was however, don't bow before the bankers and Plutocracy!

Loki
04-10-2011, 11:36 AM
So I just wonder what they will do to the people of Iceland - next - just to put them down.


I wouldn't be surprised if David Cameron ordered a bombing campaign on Reykjavik.

The Lawspeaker
04-10-2011, 11:39 AM
Hear hear, Iceland ! :thumb001: Democracy has proven to be the best weapon against banksters. To those that lost their money because they put it on Icesave: I don't feel sorry for you at all. You could have put your money on a more financially conservative bank (like I do) but you choose to gamble by putting it on that bank because you preferred potentially high interest rates over financial certainty. Now.. lick your wounds and get over it.

I am just outraged that some of our municipal and provincial governments also had accounts there and it's them that have succeeded in pissing away Dutch taxpayer's money. It's their heads that should be on the Dutch government's chopping block -- instead of the Icelanders (that were effed over even worse then the account holders were).