PDA

View Full Version : Things "good" parents do that screw up their kids



Grumpy Cat
04-18-2011, 08:05 PM
It seems like it's close to impossible to raise a normal child these days, what with the violent video games and the 4chan and the childhood obesity. But if the latest research is to be believed, even the good stuff we thought we were doing for our kids is ruining them.

Yes, as it turns out the most innocent things we do to our kids every day can fuck them up worse than having the Joker shoot their parents in front of them.

Giving Your Kids a Creative Name

You'd Think...

You want your kid to be special. There are a few million Daves, Bobs and Johns running around NOT being totally awesome and obviously it's all because of their boring-ass names. So you decide to name your son something original, like Malcolm, Ivan or Dicksmash McIroncock.

But in Reality...

You have just sent your flesh and blood straight into the middle of a massive man-rape in the prison shower. According to a study at the Shippensburg University, kids growing up with ordinary, popular names have a higher chance to become law abiding citizens, while all the unusually named ones should start deciding what state they want to commit their first felony in (friendly tip, skip Texas). The study lists the top 10 bad boy names in America as: Alec, Ernest, Garland, Ivan, Kareem, Luke, Malcolm, Preston, Tyrell and Walter, which we must point out are not the names of any serial killer or presidential assassin that has ever existed, so we're assuming the research is skewed in a certain direction.

The theory is that the additional attention garnered by odd and unusual names can cause peer ridicule and discrimination in the workforce, which tends to result in a few thousand Alecs and Prestons stealing toilet paper from the gas station. So do your kid a favor and give him a typical law-abiding, mentally stable name, like Michael.

Teaching Them To Be Themselves

You'd Think...

Peer pressure is the thing that makes kids smoke cigarettes, do drugs and read pornographic magazines by the time they reach middle school. As countless PSAs and after-school specials taught us, we must teach our kids to be themselves and never give two halves of a fuck about what their "friends" think.

But in Reality...

Remember that smelly kid in school, who never washed his hair, had no friends and once pissed in the sink at that party he wasn't invited to? That's your kid, without peer pressure. A study conducted at the University of Virginia showed that kids who were exposed to peer pressure around the ages of 12 and 13 turned out to be way more well-adjusted than the ones who weren't. They better understood the need to accommodate and make compromises when confronted with social pressure, rather than the "I'll just take my ball and go home" attitude they adopt otherwise.

The kids who were taught to be themselves no matter what didn't become walking clones of James Dean. They actually turned out less engaged, socially challenged and statistically less intelligent, their GPAs dropping almost an entire letter grade.

Maybe more importantly, when you actually give a damn about how people view you, it develops a skill of reading the most subtle changes in people's emotional states, leading ultimately to a heightened sense of empathy. In this socially awkward age of the Internet, it turns out peer pressure at the right time can basically give you superpowers.

Making Them Play Sports

You'd Think...

Nobody wants their child to grow up a dateless nerd, so as soon as his bones harden up, it's off to football practice. There, the guy who used to steal your lunch money and punched a girl at recess in fourth grade will teach your children important life lessons about fair play and sportsmanship, which will naturally transform them into honest, hard working adults.

But in Reality...

Remember your school days, when Steve the quarterback managed to keep passing his classes despite firmly believing that the first president of the United States was George Washington Carver? If you suspected he was cheating somehow, a study of over 5000 students from the Los Angeles-based Josephson Institute seems to confirm it. According to the study, athletes are some of the most dishonest kids in school, with football players turning out the worst with over 72 percent admitting to having cheated during various examinations. Where does this attitude come from? The study suggests it might be the coaches.

But let's face it, you're not sending your kid off to practice so he can have a good time and make friends. You want some goddamn trophies, so coaches are not above teaching kids how to cut corners, feign injuries and do whatever humiliating damage they can to their opponents, because hey, nothing else matters but winning, right?

Starting Them In School Early

You'd Think...

Education must not wait. Your parents waited until you were seven before sending you to school and look at how fucking sad you turned out. You'll be damned if your child suffers the same ill-fate. Is six-months old too early to start attending school? Come on, what's the worst that could happen?

But in Reality...

We hope you didn't have any plans to remodel your basement, because your kid will be living there for a very long time. A study by the National Foundation for Educational Research in the UK has concluded that children who start schooling before the age of six are more likely to drop out from higher education facilities, smoke weed and play guitar badly.

Researchers say sending kids to school before they've developed even the basic little-kid skills of a six-year-old can cause them to suffer from anxiety attacks and develop low self-esteem issues, giving them a bad attitude about the whole "going to school" thing that follows them throughout their education.

This does introduce children to the hopeless, bitter disappointment that is life and prepares them for their soul crushing future office workplace, but even those places want at least a high school diploma.

Warning Them About Strangers

You'd Think...

When it comes to child molestation, there is no such thing as too careful. It is important that your children understand to never do anything a stranger tells them to, and to realize the entire world is out there just waiting to murder the shit out of them for no reason.

But in Reality...

As it turns out, an overblown emphasis on "Stranger Danger" can apparently transform your children into xenophobic bigots, at least that's what professor Sue Scott from the University of Durham is saying. According to Scott, children should certainly be taught to be cautious of strangers, but what most parents are teaching their kids today causes children worldwide to freak out at the mere sight of anything out of the ordinary.

Statistically children are far, far more likely to be abducted/molested by someone the family knows than a roving child molestation gang. Teaching children to fear anyone strange or different from themselves manifests itself later as a fear of pretty much the entire outside world. By adulthood, they're locking their doors every time a Mexican walks by.

Heaping Praise On Them

You'd Think...

Your parents never told you that you were special, even after that kidnapping story you made up to hide the report card with all the Fs. Your kid will have it better. "Great job on the test, son! I loved it how you blocked the ball with your face, son! Got your girlfriend pregnant? High five, up top!"

But in Reality...

We have previously mentioned how the whole self-esteem movement turned a whole lot of people into dicks, because they emotionally can't handle anyone who doesn't boost their ego. We further theorized that this gave birth to the modern douchebag movement.

But it turns out there are effects beyond simply making people unbearable to be around. A study published in 2007 by researches from Columbia and Stanford University found that frequently-praised kids eventually came to believe that intelligence and talent were things they were born with, things which under no possible circumstances could be improved. Consequently, they avoided academic situations that presented any kind of challenge and refused to see the value in any activity that required effort, because if they were so freaking amazing, nothing worth doing should be hard, right?

As a result, their grades dropped and they developed motivation and, ironically, self-esteem issues. So the lesson here is, make your kid realize the value of hard work and honest effort before they self-tan themselves orange and pop their collars. By then, it will be too late.

Showing Them Educational Videos

You'd Think...

We've all heard of those Baby Einstein educational videos, claiming you can park your one-year-old in front of them and have him transform into a Mozart-playing, Shakespeare-quoting nuclear physicist. Makes sense, children soak up knowledge like little kid-shaped ShamWows. The more info you give them during this crucial soaking stage, the better!

But in Reality...

You may have heard that Disney is offering refunds on its Baby Einstein line of educational DVDs. This came after a research team led by Frederick Zimmerman and Dr. Dimitri Christakis from the University of Washington showed that babies watching the popular educational videos around the age of one learn six to eight less words per hour than children who spent their afternoons putting dirt in their mouths. It's because, despite what you have been telling yourself for years, virtual interaction is never as good the real thing.

If you really want your children to learn from an early age, you need to read to them and supply the buggers with as much human-on-human interaction as possible, not park their adorable little butts in front of the fucking television. TV programs and Infant Education videos use a series of rapidly changing scenes and constantly bombard your kids with new words. With time, their itsy bitsy minds start to filter out most of the information just to help manage the constant barrage, and voila! The kids develop shorter attention spans, and eventually the food service industry claims another life.

Read more: 7 Things 'Good Parents' Do (That Screw Up Kids For Life) | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article/195_7-things-good-parents-do-that-screw-up-kids-life_p2/#ixzz1JuGUrRJs

Magister Eckhart
04-18-2011, 08:41 PM
There is only one thing "good" parents do that screws up their kids, really, and that is to treat parenting like some kind of science. All of the above listed things really come from this formula of child-rearing that has become standard since the 1950s and the rise of the suburban bourgeois as the dominant social group. The reality is that thinking formulaically about something as organic as raising a child will only produce failure, because the way a child relates to his parents depends entirely on his genetics, his family background, the specific attitudes and dynamics between his parents and between himself and each individual parent, and while there are many people with similar backgrounds in this regard, there is no universal child-parent rule.

Furthermore, the above "problems" are in reality all rather subjective-- especially the "xenophobic bigot" thing. There's nothing unhealthy about trusting one's own before trusting the unknown; in fact, it's perfectly natural and normal.

Likewise, telling children to conform to the pressures and ideals of their peers might avoid making them solipsistic but it likewise creates little more than herd animals, a particularly dangerous thing for children born for higher callings who then are reduced to living the social life of peasants. Rather than choosing between telling a child to "be yourself" and teaching a child to blindly conform, perhaps the better middle ground is to teach your child to educate himself and think for himself.

The real failure of the "be yourself" approach, and all of the failures listed in this article, is the fact that parents use it as a place-holder for actual parenting; especially since the 1970s, women feel the need to be their sons' or daughters' "friends" and men are increasing uninvolved in the home-- this uninvolvement is the real cause of social maladjustment; parents have ceased to be parents, they merely apply the formula and hope it works out-- as if a child were a computer program that you could just plug in a formula and watch it run.

I would like to note the following as a sort of post-script:
Especially disturbing is the suggestion that a child should not be educated until late. The article gives the impression that educating a child itself will lead to social maladjustment--the reality is, as said above, uninvolvement. If you treat pre-school, kindergarten, etc. all like some kind of daycare center and expect the school to start "educating" the child, then of course your son is going to turn into a failure. If you actively engage yourself in your child's education, however, by exposing them to learning in the home, encouraging them to read and appreciate literature, etc. then your child can only benefit. Indeed, the approaches of public schooling tend to create apathetic, self-obsessed, leftist lay-abouts, so it makes sense that exposing the child to schooling earlier will increase the chances that the child will be a failure-- but this can only be shown to apply to formal schooling, not education itself.

Curtis24
04-18-2011, 09:08 PM
This article confuses causation with correlation. For instance, if someone is predisposed to be anti-social, they'd probably teach their kids not to respond to peer pressure, not to go along with the group, etc. But do the kids then turn out to be anti-social, becaue of what they taught, or because they inherited the same genes from their parents that compelled the parents to teach them to be antisocial in the first place?

I'm deeply skeptical about the ability of parents to effect how their kids turn out - barring just protecting them from being physically or sexually abused.

SwordoftheVistula
04-18-2011, 10:33 PM
The 'weird names' causing crime is largely 'black' names like Kareem, Malcolm, and Tyrell. These other names I don't know much about, possibly related to class differences amongst whites, or the type of person who gives unusual names to their children.

Magister Eckhart
04-18-2011, 10:37 PM
The 'weird names' causing crime is largely 'black' names like Kareem, Malcolm, and Tyrell. These other names I don't know much about, possibly related to class differences amongst whites, or the type of person who gives unusual names to their children.

It could have more to do with the fact that the researcher doesn't want to admit that Negroes are just more likely to be criminals than Euros.

Osweo
04-18-2011, 11:10 PM
I always planned on deliberately teaching my son AEthelfrith how best to go about screwing the law and the state for all they're worth. :shrug: (In the even we haven't had our nationalist revolution yet, of course. In that case, he'll be groomed as a good and noble Folkskommisar.)

Malcolm is actually a fairly ordinary name here, by the way. And I'm from the same region as the localities of Preston and Tyrrell! :p

Anyway, to paraphrase it all yet again, it's the idiotic naivety in the face of novel 'authority' that's fucked a lot of people over. Centuries of experience are readily ditched in favour of what the latest Dr. Spock/Ruth/Liebschitz comes up with. :tsk: Is rampant statism to blame for people's refusal to take responsibility for their own lives here?

Curtis24
04-19-2011, 06:04 AM
Yeah, this article is mostly bullshit.

shortskirtlongjacket
04-22-2011, 12:37 AM
I have had a few great conversations with my BF about time travel (he has interesting theories on the subject), and in one of them, he mentioned that if it ever did become economically feasible and reliable, a whole bunch of people should go back in time and beat the crap out of Dr. Benjamin Spock. I tend to agree.

Honestly, there is something to the whole "too much cheap self-esteem" point behind part of the article. The best people I've ever known possessed humility as one of their shining qualities, with a strong helping of gratitude to boot. I don't meet so many of this type, though, and they're increasingly older.

I do think parents have a strong influence on how their kids turn out, but it has more to do with values than superficial, external things such as names, sports, etc. Kids learn from how their parents live their own lives, much more than from the things parents tell them about how to behave. That's why hypocritical parents are always the ones that wonder "where did Johnny go wrong?"

Yes, teaching children to be responsible and giving them opportunities to succeed (or fail and learn from it) on their own and EARN things is better for the kids - but a lot of (US, anyway) parents are weak and want to be their kids' BFF, or at least be known as "the cool dad/mom." God bless my parents for telling me "I'm not your friend, I'm your parent." Saved me from a bucketload of failure, as far as I can tell from looking at the children of my peers...

Sikeliot
04-22-2011, 12:42 AM
The 'weird names' causing crime is largely 'black' names like Kareem, Malcolm, and Tyrell. These other names I don't know much about, possibly related to class differences amongst whites, or the type of person who gives unusual names to their children.


Kareem is an Arabic name is it not? And Malcolm is Celtic! Funny how we call them "black" names. :lol:

The black names that really are ridiculous are all the -ita, -isha, and -iqua names. Like Shaquita, Shaniqua, LaRhonda, Shantavia, etc. lmao

jerney
04-22-2011, 12:55 AM
Kareem is an Arabic name is it not? And Malcolm is Celtic! Funny how we call them "black" names. :lol:

The black names that really are ridiculous are all the -ita, -isha, and -iqua names. Like Shaquita, Shaniqua, LaRhonda, Shantavia, etc. lmao

pCdmiZyyGjQ

The Journeyman
04-22-2011, 01:22 AM
Another important one to add I think is projecting insecurities/shortcomings onto your kids and constantly sharing worrisome or depressing information.

Grumpy Cat
04-22-2011, 01:29 AM
I have had a few great conversations with my BF about time travel (he has interesting theories on the subject), and in one of them, he mentioned that if it ever did become economically feasible and reliable, a whole bunch of people should go back in time and beat the crap out of Dr. Benjamin Spock. I tend to agree.

Honestly, there is something to the whole "too much cheap self-esteem" point behind part of the article. The best people I've ever known possessed humility as one of their shining qualities, with a strong helping of gratitude to boot. I don't meet so many of this type, though, and they're increasingly older.


Yes. I think the whole self-esteem movement is the cause of all the arrogant little pricks coming up these days. Seriously, I want to snap their necks.

Loki
04-22-2011, 01:33 AM
When I grow up I'm going to be the best parent ever.

Pallantides
04-22-2011, 01:38 AM
When I grew up I want to be like Charlie Sheen and of course the best parent ever.

larali
09-15-2011, 01:37 AM
First kid: You spend all your waking moments entertaining it. Because if you don't, you feel like a neglectful parent. Then the kid needs to be entertained constantly and develops a very annoying personality.

Second kid: You realize that if you spend every waking moment entertaining your kid, house doesn't get clean, food doesn't get cooked and you are tired and cranky towards the kid. So you "neglect" the kid and he/she does just fine (in fact, better).

Curtis24
09-15-2011, 01:48 AM
Nobody wants their child to grow up a dateless nerd, so as soon as his bones harden up, it's off to football practice

well, that explains everything :P

Boudica
09-15-2011, 02:02 AM
People who baby their boy children, especially boys.. The outcome is horrific... It's one thing to baby them when they are actually BABIES, and to have a kind/sensitive nature towards them. It's a completely different thing to baby them until they are almost adults.. Ugh