LOM Genetics report?

[Mortimer]

I placed my order on Friday 4 days ago. Didnt received any email back, how long does it usually take until the results are ready or at least a confirmation email?

[StevenTylerAerosmith]

ask peterski...i think he knows lm irl

[Vojnik]

I've been waiting for mine since Thursday or something. Still nothing. But this is my second time at doing it with different raw data from another company.

[karakartal]

I placed my order on Friday 4 days ago. Didnt received any email back, how long does it usually take until the results are ready or at least a confirmation email?

What is LOM Genetics?

[Mortimer]

What is LOM Genetics?

LM genetics report. LOM was a typo.

[karakartal]

My results came 1 day later.

I think Lukasz is busy, your results came max 2 days later.

[Lucas]

Hey
Today I will send both. Sorry but really I'm still swamped so it always takes few days since payment to sending report.

[Lucas]

I placed my order on Friday 4 days ago. Didnt received any email back, how long does it usually take until the results are ready or at least a confirmation email?

Here it is https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zGCpgt_NyU2To3IzC0sTxNL4cRE3qC69

[Mortimer]

Here it is https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zGCpgt_NyU2To3IzC0sTxNL4cRE3qC69

Thanks you uploaded my results to TA which is good

[Vojnik]

I'm guessing mine may be next then. :)

[Bogdan]

Took mine around 2 days. Fast service.

[StevenTylerAerosmith]

Here it is https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zGCpgt_NyU2To3IzC0sTxNL4cRE3qC69


Thanks you uploaded my results to TA which is good

its weird that the nmonte here seem to ignore his south asian input and plots him with bulgarians

[Lemgrant]

its weird that the nmonte here seem to ignore his south asian input and plots him with bulgarians

I think it's not weird. He looks totally Bulgarian.

[Kaspias]

Thanks you uploaded my results to TA which is good

Balkan_Turks, Pomak :D Welcome to the our crew.

[Mortimer]

Balkan_Turks, Pomak :D Welcome to the our crew.

Thanks

[Lucas]

its weird that the nmonte here seem to ignore his south asian input and plots him with bulgarians

Of course not. You wrote bullshit on purpose?

Bulgaria,51.6
Roma_BH,8
GR_Cyclades,3.6
Macedonia_FYROM,3.4
South_Romania,2.6
GR_Ipeiros,2.4
GR_Eubea,2
Albanians_FYROM,1.6
Montenegro,1.6
IT_Emilia-Romagna,1.2
IT_Lombardia,1
GR_Thrace,0.8
Punjabi_Khatri,0.8
Circassians,0.6
GR_Thessaly,0.6
IQ_Shabak,0.6
Kharia,0.6
Tajik_AFG,0.6
Brahmin_UP,0.4
Greek_Azov,0.4
Gujarati_D,0.4
IT_Lazio,0.4
IT_Tuscany,0.4
Jatt_Pahari,0.4
Kurd_Sulajmanijja_IQ,0.4
Meena,0.4
Muslim_UP,0.4
Nihali,0.4
Sakkili,0.4
Serbia,0.4
South_Albania,0.4
Tajik_Iskashim,0.4
Tamil_Nadu_Brahmin,0.4
Turkmen,0.4
Uzbek,0.4
Arain_Punjabi,0.2
Asur,0.2
Baining,0.2
Balkar,0.2
Baloch_IR,0.2
Bengali_1000genomes,0.2
Bhunjia,0.2
Bihari_Brahmin,0.2
Bosniaks,0.2
Chechens,0.2
Chitrali_PAK,0.2
Dhurwa,0.2
Georgia_East,0.2
GR_Peloponese,0.2
Hazara_AFG,0.2
Iranian_Kerman,0.2
Irula,0.2
Jammu_Brahmin,0.2
Jatt_Haryana,0.2
Jatt_Sikh,0.2
Kabardinians,0.2
Kannadi,0.2
Kapu,0.2
Kashmiri_Pandit,0.2
Kumyk,0.2
Kusunda_Nepal,0.2
Lambadi,0.2
Madiga,0.2
Mumbai_Jew,0.2
Nasioi,0.2
Osettians,0.2
Pashtun_AFG,0.2
Punjabi_1000genomes,0.2
Punjabi_IND,0.2
Punjabi_PAK,0.2
Santhal,0.2
Sathmarer_Schwaben,0.2
Scheduled_Caste_Tamil_Nadu,0.2
Scheduled_Caste_UP,0.2
Tajik,0.2
Tamil_Ceylon,0.2
Thakur,0.2
Tharus,0.2
Tibetan,0.2
TR_East,0.2
Uttaranchal_Brahmin,0.2
Uyghur,0.2
Velamas,0.2



nMonte3 with penalization=0 option (better for deeper / older / distant admixtures)

"distance%=0.6857"

Bulgaria,31.2
GR_Ipeiros,15.6
GR_Cyclades,14.6
Muslim_UP,9
Meghawal,8
IT_Lombardia,7.8
Ukraine_Volhyn,6.4
Chechens,5.4
Chitrali_PAK,0.8
Japanese,0.6
Papuan_Highland,0.4
Gujarati_D,0.2


In single distances he was too diluted to be considered pure Roma. I have academic samples form Bosnia-Hercegovina. They have on average 10-15% more South-Asian.

[lonewolfcypriot]

Is there a link?

[Lucas]

Is there a link?

Mortimer https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zGCpgt_NyU2To3IzC0sTxNL4cRE3qC69

[lonewolfcypriot]

Mortimer cool results bro. Balkans, Turkey, Iran, India.:thumb001:

[Vojnik]

Of course not. You wrote bullshit on purpose?

Bulgaria,51.6
Roma_BH,8
GR_Cyclades,3.6
Macedonia_FYROM,3.4
South_Romania,2.6
GR_Ipeiros,2.4
GR_Eubea,2
Albanians_FYROM,1.6
Montenegro,1.6
IT_Emilia-Romagna,1.2
IT_Lombardia,1
GR_Thrace,0.8
Punjabi_Khatri,0.8
Circassians,0.6
GR_Thessaly,0.6
IQ_Shabak,0.6
Kharia,0.6
Tajik_AFG,0.6
Brahmin_UP,0.4
Greek_Azov,0.4
Gujarati_D,0.4
IT_Lazio,0.4
IT_Tuscany,0.4
Jatt_Pahari,0.4
Kurd_Sulajmanijja_IQ,0.4
Meena,0.4
Muslim_UP,0.4
Nihali,0.4
Sakkili,0.4
Serbia,0.4
South_Albania,0.4
Tajik_Iskashim,0.4
Tamil_Nadu_Brahmin,0.4
Turkmen,0.4
Uzbek,0.4
Arain_Punjabi,0.2
Asur,0.2
Baining,0.2
Balkar,0.2
Baloch_IR,0.2
Bengali_1000genomes,0.2
Bhunjia,0.2
Bihari_Brahmin,0.2
Bosniaks,0.2
Chechens,0.2
Chitrali_PAK,0.2
Dhurwa,0.2
Georgia_East,0.2
GR_Peloponese,0.2
Hazara_AFG,0.2
Iranian_Kerman,0.2
Irula,0.2
Jammu_Brahmin,0.2
Jatt_Haryana,0.2
Jatt_Sikh,0.2
Kabardinians,0.2
Kannadi,0.2
Kapu,0.2
Kashmiri_Pandit,0.2
Kumyk,0.2
Kusunda_Nepal,0.2
Lambadi,0.2
Madiga,0.2
Mumbai_Jew,0.2
Nasioi,0.2
Osettians,0.2
Pashtun_AFG,0.2
Punjabi_1000genomes,0.2
Punjabi_IND,0.2
Punjabi_PAK,0.2
Santhal,0.2
Sathmarer_Schwaben,0.2
Scheduled_Caste_Tamil_Nadu,0.2
Scheduled_Caste_UP,0.2
Tajik,0.2
Tamil_Ceylon,0.2
Thakur,0.2
Tharus,0.2
Tibetan,0.2
TR_East,0.2
Uttaranchal_Brahmin,0.2
Uyghur,0.2
Velamas,0.2



nMonte3 with penalization=0 option (better for deeper / older / distant admixtures)

"distance%=0.6857"

Bulgaria,31.2
GR_Ipeiros,15.6
GR_Cyclades,14.6
Muslim_UP,9
Meghawal,8
IT_Lombardia,7.8
Ukraine_Volhyn,6.4
Chechens,5.4
Chitrali_PAK,0.8
Japanese,0.6
Papuan_Highland,0.4
Gujarati_D,0.2


In single distances he was too diluted to be considered pure Roma. I have academic samples form Bosnia-Hercegovina. They have on average 10-15% more South-Asian.


I get Roma_BH at 0.4. Is that negligible? Is it common for Balkanites? Or does it suggest very distant gypsy?

[FilhoV]

LM genetics report. LOM was a typo.

What did you use for Raw Data?

[StevenTylerAerosmith]

Of course not. You wrote bullshit on purpose?

Bulgaria,51.6
Roma_BH,8
GR_Cyclades,3.6
Macedonia_FYROM,3.4
South_Romania,2.6
GR_Ipeiros,2.4
GR_Eubea,2
Albanians_FYROM,1.6
Montenegro,1.6
IT_Emilia-Romagna,1.2
IT_Lombardia,1
GR_Thrace,0.8
Punjabi_Khatri,0.8
Circassians,0.6
GR_Thessaly,0.6
IQ_Shabak,0.6
Kharia,0.6
Tajik_AFG,0.6
Brahmin_UP,0.4
Greek_Azov,0.4
Gujarati_D,0.4
IT_Lazio,0.4
IT_Tuscany,0.4
Jatt_Pahari,0.4
Kurd_Sulajmanijja_IQ,0.4
Meena,0.4
Muslim_UP,0.4
Nihali,0.4
Sakkili,0.4
Serbia,0.4
South_Albania,0.4
Tajik_Iskashim,0.4
Tamil_Nadu_Brahmin,0.4
Turkmen,0.4
Uzbek,0.4
Arain_Punjabi,0.2
Asur,0.2
Baining,0.2
Balkar,0.2
Baloch_IR,0.2
Bengali_1000genomes,0.2
Bhunjia,0.2
Bihari_Brahmin,0.2
Bosniaks,0.2
Chechens,0.2
Chitrali_PAK,0.2
Dhurwa,0.2
Georgia_East,0.2
GR_Peloponese,0.2
Hazara_AFG,0.2
Iranian_Kerman,0.2
Irula,0.2
Jammu_Brahmin,0.2
Jatt_Haryana,0.2
Jatt_Sikh,0.2
Kabardinians,0.2
Kannadi,0.2
Kapu,0.2
Kashmiri_Pandit,0.2
Kumyk,0.2
Kusunda_Nepal,0.2
Lambadi,0.2
Madiga,0.2
Mumbai_Jew,0.2
Nasioi,0.2
Osettians,0.2
Pashtun_AFG,0.2
Punjabi_1000genomes,0.2
Punjabi_IND,0.2
Punjabi_PAK,0.2
Santhal,0.2
Sathmarer_Schwaben,0.2
Scheduled_Caste_Tamil_Nadu,0.2
Scheduled_Caste_UP,0.2
Tajik,0.2
Tamil_Ceylon,0.2
Thakur,0.2
Tharus,0.2
Tibetan,0.2
TR_East,0.2
Uttaranchal_Brahmin,0.2
Uyghur,0.2
Velamas,0.2



nMonte3 with penalization=0 option (better for deeper / older / distant admixtures)

"distance%=0.6857"

Bulgaria,31.2
GR_Ipeiros,15.6
GR_Cyclades,14.6
Muslim_UP,9
Meghawal,8
IT_Lombardia,7.8
Ukraine_Volhyn,6.4
Chechens,5.4
Chitrali_PAK,0.8
Japanese,0.6
Papuan_Highland,0.4
Gujarati_D,0.2


In single distances he was too diluted to be considered pure Roma. I have academic samples form Bosnia-Hercegovina. They have on average 10-15% more South-Asian.

because it said he was 8% roma when he's really 56%

[Lucas]

because it said he was 8% roma when he's really 56%

Roma isn't genetic component. There are highly mixed and variable. I have three Roma from Bosnia which makes average for them .There are quite abundant in South Asian component and SCA (about two time smore thna Mortimer level for both).

So part Romani with about 11% SA and 6% SCA like Mortimer is much below their level.

It is hard to make one estimate for Roma, as they live in different countries. And they are mixed with different Euro nations so they are quite different form each other.

BTW If someone will use some mixed Romani from Gedmatch and make average from them, then yes Mortimer will be much more Romani, but only because average was shitty...

[StevenTylerAerosmith]

Roma isn't genetic component. There are highly mixed and variable. I have three Roma from Bosnia which makes average for them .There are quite abundant in South Asian component and SCA (about two time smore thna Mortimer level for both).

So part Romani with about 11% SA and 6% SCA like Mortimer is much below their level.

It is hard to make one estimate for Roma, as they live in different countries. And they are mixed with different Euro nations so they are quite different form each other.

BTW If someone will use some mixed Romani from Gedmatch and make average from them, then yes Mortimer will be much more Romani, but only because average was shitty...

makes sense

why does he cluster with balkans slavs though if he is 15-20% south asian?

[Mortimer]

What did you use for Raw Data?

I use 23andme and send a screenshot of my K36 from gedmatch. On gedmatch i use 23andme raw data.

[Lucas]

makes sense

why does he cluster with balkans slavs though if he is 15-20% south asian?

As I said earlier Romani are mixed with host populations. In his case mostly Balkan. And this admix is in majority for him. So in single distances program seek closest pop with majority of similar ancestry, not minority.

I saw in MDLP spreadsheets academic Romani from other countries like Slovakia or Bulgaria. Maybe there will be more similar to Mortimer. I don't know from what source Vadim took them as only he has them. I have only those from Pagani paper which were freely available.