Log in

View Full Version : Which one is more accurate for matching, Genesis or Classic Gedmatch?


Kaspias
12-13-2018, 07:36 PM
...
Lucas
12-13-2018, 09:17 PM
...

I don't know. I see some 0.01 differences in my results but in what direction?

EDIT: you mean matches, not calcs. Hmm I'm stick with old version,
Dick
12-13-2018, 09:22 PM
I don't know. I see some 0.01 differences in my results but in what direction?

your co-ordinates seemed accurate for me. Good job.
JosephK
12-20-2018, 08:17 PM
Anyone have opinions about the new Genesis Q-matching????
Impaler
12-20-2018, 08:21 PM
I've heard that regular GEDmatch is better for matching segments.
Kaspias
12-20-2018, 08:25 PM
Anyone have opinions about the new Genesis Q-matching????

I have first time heard it.


I've heard that regular GEDmatch is better for matching segments.

Then why Gedmatch claim genesis is better for matches?
Impaler
12-20-2018, 08:27 PM
I have first time heard it.



Then why Gedmatch claim genesis is better for matches?

I really do not know. But you've seen that Genesis matched weird Ancient segments, hahaha.
JosephK
12-20-2018, 08:29 PM
Q-matching is a new "Tier 1" (i.e., paid) option on Genesis...

While it seems to be better in some ways, including a quality of match indicator, it has given me sometimes odd results, like I match 25.71cm (at >5cm) with my wife, which I find disturbing...

But it still seems quirky, and still depends on a lot of other variable like what company processed the kit, whether it's been converted etc. So I don't know how valuable any of this ends up being...