Post MDLP K23b East Eurasian Admixture

[Kaspias]

Title.


Amerindian 0.87
Arctic 1.22
East_Siberian 3.79
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian 1.01
Tungus-Altaic 2.45
Austronesian -

= 9,34

with SCA and AA:

Ancestral_Altaic 4.07
South_Central_Asian 6.50

= 19,91

[Leto]

AA is not EE. Austronesian is though.

[Leto]

Population
Amerindian 0.49
Arctic 1.81
Austronesian -
East_Siberian 2.82
Paleo_Siberian 0.18
South_East_Asian 0.16
Tungus-Altaic 0.44

[Luke35]

Mr.G
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 35.63
2 Caucasian 25.7
3 European_Early_Farmers 23.87
4 South_Central_Asian 6.11
5 Near_East 2.15
6 Ancestral_Altaic 2.08
7 North_African 1.41
8 South_Indian 1.01
9 East_Siberian 0.52
10 Amerindian 0.51
11 Paleo_Siberian 0.47
12 Khoisan 0.22
13 Subsaharian 0.2
14 Melano_Polynesian 0.08
15 African_Pygmy 0.04

=9.69

[Kaspias]

AA is not EE. Austronesian is though.

AA is both caucasoid and EE. I preferred to take it as EE. Actually same case with SCA. I know it's detailed description.

[Leto]

Korean reference

Tungus-Altaic 41.53
South_East_Asian 41.16
Austronesian 16.67

Han reference

South_East_Asian 50.37
Austronesian 32.72
Tungus-Altaic 16.41

[Leto]

AA is both caucasoid and EE. I preferred to take it as EE. Actually same case with SCA. I know it's detailed description.
Come on, white people from Western Europe get 3-4% AA. It's not Mongoloid, it's Steppe-related.

[Kaspias]

Come on, white people from Western Europe get 3-4% AA. It's not Mongoloid, it's Steppe-related.

Mongoloid people from Siberia get 50-60% AA. Our referance point still both caucasid and mongolid.

[Coastal Elite]

Population
Amerindian 0.15
Ancestral_Altaic 4.42
South_Central_Asian 6.35
Arctic -
South_Indian 1.12
Australoid -
Austronesian -
Caucasian 27.36
Archaic_Human 0.17
East_African -
East_Siberian -
European_Early_Farmers 26.17
Khoisan -
Melano_Polynesian -
Archaic_African 0.16
Near_East 1.25
North_African 0.06
Paleo_Siberian -
African_Pygmy -
South_East_Asian 0.41
Subsaharian -
Tungus-Altaic 0.91
European_Hunters_Gatherers 31.47

Total = 5.89
Total with South Central Asian = 12.24

[Kriptc06]

Amerindian 13.95
Ancestral_Altaic 1.08
Arctic -
East_Siberian -
Paleo_Siberian -
Austronesian -
South_East_Asian 0.57
Tungus-Altaic -
------------------
15.6

W/ South_Central_Asian 1.15
--------
16.75

[Kaspias]

Come on, white people from Western Europe get 3-4% AA. It's not Mongoloid, it's Steppe-related.

I edited the post. I believe it is correct form now.

[Leto]

Mongoloid people from Siberia get 50-60% AA. Our referance point still both caucasid and mongolid.
Evenk 0.00
Yakut 0.18
Dolgan 0.24
Even 1.54
Buryat 4.71
Tuvan 9.87
Altaian 15.03

The more WE admixed a group is, the higher is the percentage of AA.

[Ayetooey]

Ancestral_Altaic 4.24 Pct
South_Central_Asian 5.56 Pct
South_Indian 0.52 Pct
Austronesian 0.66 Pct
Melano_Polynesian 0.88 Pct

[Mingle]

SC Asian and Ancestral Altaic are West Eurasian components. The Amerindian component is probably mixed as well and not fully EE. Melano_Polynesian is some sort of Negrito-related component (South Eurasian) rather than a Mongoloid-related one, so technically it can fall under the East Eurasian umbrella, but its not really 'East Eurasian proper'. I get over 6% AA and over 35% SC Asian, and these are way too high for me for it to be an East Eurasian component.

Arctic 0.88
Austronesian 0.44
East_Siberian 0.36
Amerindian 0.24
South_East_Asian 0.06

= 1.98

[Leto]

SC Asian is definitely not East Eurasian at all. The Ancestral Altaic is a fully West Eurasian component. The Amerindian component is probably mixed as well and not fully EE. Melano_Polynesian is some sort of Negrito-related component (South Eurasian) rather than a Mongoloid-related one, so technically it can fall under the East Eurasian umbrella, but its not really 'East Eurasian proper'. I get over 6% AA and over 35% SC Asian, and these are way too high for me for it to be an East Eurasian component.

Arctic 0.88
Austronesian 0.44
East_Siberian 0.36
Amerindian 0.24
South_East_Asian 0.06

= 1.98
Spot on.

[Kaspias]

Evenk 0.00
Yakut 0.18
Dolgan 0.24
Even 1.54
Buryat 4.71
Tuvan 9.87
Altaian 15.03

The more WE admixed a group is, the higher is the percentage of AA.

Tubalar 40.55
Mansi 39.68
Ket 36.34

[Leto]

Welsh

Ancestral_Altaic 4.60
South_Central_Asian 6.51

Austrian

Ancestral_Altaic 2.58
South_Central_Asian 3.01

[Leto]

Tubalar 40.55
Mansi 39.68
Ket 36.34
Must be mixed. Mansi and Khants are like 50% EE only if I remember correctly. They are Ugric people living east of the Urals.

[Kaspias]

SC Asian and Ancestral Altaic are West Eurasian components. The Amerindian component is probably mixed as well and not fully EE. Melano_Polynesian is some sort of Negrito-related component (South Eurasian) rather than a Mongoloid-related one, so technically it can fall under the East Eurasian umbrella, but its not really 'East Eurasian proper'. I get over 6% AA and over 35% SC Asian, and these are way too high for me for it to be an East Eurasian component.

Arctic 0.88
Austronesian 0.44
East_Siberian 0.36
Amerindian 0.24
South_East_Asian 0.06

= 1.98

Well the reason why you got high SCA is already clear. SCA is good proxy for Turkic variety ancestry so i wanted to put it in this thread. Since you're Iranian, i should agree with your statements. I already added it as a different component than other Mongolic elements. Referance of AA both Caucasid and Mongolic, it is interesting how you can put certain claims about it. Same case with SCA, as i said.

[Thambi]

Amerindian 0.19
Arctic -
Austronesian 0.43
East_Siberian -
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian 1.75
Tungus-Altaic 0.90

Total = 3.27

Ancestral_Altaic 1.02

with AA = 4.29

[Kaspias]

Must be mixed. Mansi and Khants are like 50% EE only if I remember correctly. They are Ugric people living east of the Urals.

Mansi

Ancestral Altaic 39.68
East Siberian 39.89
EHG 11.49

[Leto]

Title.


Amerindian 0.87
Arctic 1.22
East_Siberian 3.79
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian 1.01
Tungus-Altaic 2.45
Austronesian -

= 9,34

with SCA and AA:

Ancestral_Altaic 4.07
South_Central_Asian 6.50

= 19,91
And you get around 9% total on most other calculators.

[Leto]

Anyway, even Davidski himself said values below 1% should be disregarded as noise. Probably adding up all the minor values would not necessarily give you an accurate figure.

[Kaspias]

Anyway, even Davidski himself said values below 1% should be disregarded as noise. Probably adding up all the minor values would not necessarily give you an accurate figure.

Wrong. If you insistly score same values in every calculator then they are probably not noise.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Amerindian 1.09 Pct

I consistenly score minimal Amerindian on gedmatch, never other kind of mongoloid. What's up with that ?

[Mingle]

Well the reason why you got high SCA is already clear. SCA is good proxy for Turkic variety ancestry so i wanted to put it in this thread. Since you're Iranian, i should agree with your statements. I already added it as a different component than other Mongolic elements. Referance of AA both Caucasid and Mongolic, it is interesting how you can put certain claims about it. Same case with SCA, as i said.

SC Asian is Steppe-related not Turkic-related. Some Indian groups get slightly more of it than I do. It peaks in the Kalash.

The ethnic groups you're posting with a large amount of AA are from the area where Caucasoids and Mongoloids are most mixed with one other. "Purer" East Asian groups get little to no AA whereas all West Eurasians (except those with little to no Steppe/Proto-IE ancestry) have some of it. When the AA is included as part of EE, I'm around 9% or so EE which is way higher than what I get on most other calcs.

[Mingle]

Amerindian 1.09 Pct

I consistenly score minimal Amerindian on gedmatch, never other kind of mongoloid. What's up with that ?

I think its just Steppe-related ANE ancestry.

[Kaspias]

Amerindian 1.09 Pct

I consistenly score minimal Amerindian on gedmatch, never other kind of mongoloid. What's up with that ?

If you don't score any other EE, it should be taken as proxy for your Slavic ancestry. They usually score very small amounts of kind of these components, Siberian and Amerindian etc.

[Thambi]

SC Asian is Steppe-related not Turkic-related. Some Indian groups get slightly more of it than I do. It peaks in the Kalash.

I think SC asian is basically baloch/gedrosian. I dont think its steppe. I get zero steppe/euro on most calcs but i get 33.63% sc asian on this, which is similar to my baloch/gedrosian of 37%.

# Population Percent
1 South_Indian 57.2
2 South_Central_Asian 33.63
3 South_East_Asian 1.75
4 Near_East 1.65
5 Caucasian 1.48
6 Ancestral_Altaic 1.02
7 Tungus-Altaic 0.9
8 Melano_Polynesian 0.86
9 Austronesian 0.43
10 Subsaharian 0.27
11 Australoid 0.23
12 Archaic_African 0.19
13 Amerindian 0.19
14 Archaic_Human 0.16
15 African_Pygmy 0.02

[Kaspias]

SC Asian is Steppe-related not Turkic-related. Some Indian groups get slightly more of it than I do. It peaks in the Kalash.

The ethnic groups you're posting with a large amount of AA are from the area where Caucasoids and Mongoloids are most mixed with one other. "Purer" East Asian groups get little to no AA whereas all West Eurasians (except those with little to no Steppe/Proto-IE ancestry) have some of it. When the AA is included as part of EE, I'm around 9% or so EE which is way higher than what I get on most other calcs.

I haven't said SCA is Turkic-related. I said it is good proxy for Turkic(Central Asian in general) variety so i want to put it on this thread. Both SCA and AA steppe-related, but reference of AA both is Caucasid and Mongolic, as i stated hundred times. Turko-Mongol populations usually score it - some with high amounts - Even if i agree with you there are clues to trace it's caucasid origin at the end of the day it is still mixed and result is not very clear. I evaluate it as steppe-related with Mongolic touches, so it would be good to see it in this thread.

[Thambi]

...

[Lemgrant]

Amerindian 1.04 Pct
Ancestral_Altaic 2.92 Pct
South_Central_Asian -
Arctic 0.58 Pct
South_Indian 1.64 Pct
Australoid -
Austronesian 0.60 Pct
Caucasian 28.02 Pct
Archaic_Human -
East_African -
East_Siberian 1.54 Pct
European_Early_Farmers 13.81 Pct
Khoisan -
Melano_Polynesian 0.29 Pct
Archaic_African -
Near_East 0.46 Pct
North_African -
Paleo_Siberian -
African_Pygmy 0.07 Pct
South_East_Asian -
Subsaharian -
Tungus-Altaic -
European_Hunters_Gatherers 49.04 Pct
*****************

6.68

[Ritz06]

Amerindian -
Ancestral_Altaic 4.14
Arctic - 1.68
East_Siberian -
Paleo_Siberian -
Austronesian - 1.01
South_East_Asian 2.00
Tungus-Altaic - 0.08

= 9.92

With South_Central_Asian - 14.28

= 24.2

[Egyvalaki]

1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 33.53
2 Caucasian 26.41
3 European_Early_Farmers 24.12
4 South_Central_Asian 5.08
5 Ancestral_Altaic 4.04
6 Near_East 2.75
7 Melano_Polynesian 1.46
8 North_African 0.9
9 East_African 0.73
10 South_Indian 0.64
11 Amerindian 0.34

[Rgvgjhvv]

MyHeritage raw data:

Amerindian -
Arctic -
East_Siberian 0.17
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian -
Tungus-Altaic 0.18
Austronesian -
Ancestral_Altaic 1.27
South_Central_Asian 6.63

----------

= 8.25

AncestryDNA raw data:

Amerindian 0.32 Pct
Arctic -
East_Siberian -
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian -
Tungus-Altaic -
Austronesian -
Ancestral_Altaic 1.39 Pct
South_Central_Asian 6.93 Pc

----------

= 8.64

T00R4NID G0D

[Cumansky]

55.7% Balt ( ) + 44.3% Serb_Serbia ( ) @ 2.23

1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 49.04
2 Caucasian 28.56
3 European_Early_Farmers 11.91
4 Ancestral_Altaic 4.03-
5 Near_East 1.55
6 South_Central_Asian 1.17-
7 South_Indian 1
8 Amerindian 0.98-
9 Khoisan 0.43
10 East_Siberian 0.31-
11 Subsaharian 0.3
12 East_African 0.26
13 Melano_Polynesian 0.17-
14 African_Pygmy 0.12
15 Archaic_African 0.07
16 Archaic_Human 0.05
17 South_East_Asian 0.04-

= 6.68

[Stefanos.tasidis]

south central asian definitely is not mongoloid lol. i think it is really high for caucasian(caucasus) populations.

[oszkar07]

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 38.79
2 Caucasian 26.26
3 European_Early_Farmers 23.31
4 South_Central_Asian 3.71
5 Ancestral_Altaic 3.15
6 Near_East 2.03
7 Melano_Polynesian 1.04
8 Paleo_Siberian 0.82
9 North_African 0.49
10 Austronesian 0.27
11 East_Siberian 0.14

= 8.09


# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 54.8% Croat ( ) + 45.2% British ( ) @ 1.38
2 59.4% Serb_Serbia ( ) + 40.6% Norwegian_West ( )@ 1.4
3 54.1% Montenegrian ( )+ 45.9%Norwegian_West ( ) @ 1.42
4 53.9% Croat ( ) + 46.1% CEU ( ) @ 1.45
5 59.1% Belgian ( ) + 40.9% Croat ( ) @ 1.48
6 50.6% Norwegian_West ( ) + 49.4%Macedonian ( ) @ 1.51
7 61.6% Belgian ( ) + 38.4% Croat_BH ( ) @ 1.52
8 54.7% Croat ( ) + 45.3% Welsh ( ) @ 1.54
9 60.1% Belgian ( ) + 39.9% Bosnian ( ) @ 1.57
10 59.3% Belgian ( ) + 40.7% Serb_BH ( ) @ 1.58

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Croat_BH_ +50% English_Cornwall_GBR_ @ 1.428073


does anyone know what sample is used for the south central asian on this ?

[Norka]

Ancestral_Altaic 7.21
South_Central_Asian 3.82
Austronesian 0.15
East_Siberian 5.07
Paleo_Siberian 1.91
Tungus-Altaic 2.02
South_East_Asian -
Arctic -
Amerindian -

Overall 20.18

[Kaspias]

south central asian definitely is not mongoloid lol. i think it is really high for caucasian(caucasus) populations.

Ok. Who claimed it is mongolic?


# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 38.79
2 Caucasian 26.26
3 European_Early_Farmers 23.31
4 South_Central_Asian 3.71
5 Ancestral_Altaic 3.15
6 Near_East 2.03
7 Melano_Polynesian 1.04
8 Paleo_Siberian 0.82
9 North_African 0.49
10 Austronesian 0.27
11 East_Siberian 0.14

= 8.09


# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 54.8% Croat ( ) + 45.2% British ( ) @ 1.38
2 59.4% Serb_Serbia ( ) + 40.6% Norwegian_West ( )@ 1.4
3 54.1% Montenegrian ( )+ 45.9%Norwegian_West ( ) @ 1.42
4 53.9% Croat ( ) + 46.1% CEU ( ) @ 1.45
5 59.1% Belgian ( ) + 40.9% Croat ( ) @ 1.48
6 50.6% Norwegian_West ( ) + 49.4%Macedonian ( ) @ 1.51
7 61.6% Belgian ( ) + 38.4% Croat_BH ( ) @ 1.52
8 54.7% Croat ( ) + 45.3% Welsh ( ) @ 1.54
9 60.1% Belgian ( ) + 39.9% Bosnian ( ) @ 1.57
10 59.3% Belgian ( ) + 40.7% Serb_BH ( ) @ 1.58

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Croat_BH_ +50% English_Cornwall_GBR_ @ 1.428073


does anyone know what sample is used for the south central asian on this ?

I don't know it's exact reference point. South Central Asia isn't really an "official" term like South Asia or Central Asia and usually refers to everything between Central Asia and Balochistan pretty much. Gedrosian/Baloch in admixture calculators like Eurogenes K36 (along with all the HGDP Pakistan populations) is labeled "South Central" Asian.

It's basically that part of South and Central Asia (http://www.state.gov/p/sca/ci/) which is between Central Asia (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/102288/Central-Asia) and the Indian subcontinent (since this entire area is usually labeled South Asia (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/wfbExt/region_sas.html), but there are two components in this region, so the one to the west (usually Balochistan) is termed South Central Asian as the Indian one gets "South Asian").

The reason why added it in this thread, most of Turks carry high amount of SCA so it is a good indicator, just like ancestral altaic.

[Stefanos.tasidis]

Ok. Who claimed it is mongolic?



I don't know it's exact reference point. South Central Asia isn't really an "official" term like South Asia or Central Asia and usually refers to everything between Central Asia and Balochistan pretty much. Gedrosian/Baloch in admixture calculators like Eurogenes K36 (along with all the HGDP Pakistan populations) is labeled "South Central" Asian.

It's basically that part of South and Central Asia (http://www.state.gov/p/sca/ci/) which is between Central Asia (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/102288/Central-Asia) and the Indian subcontinent (since this entire area is usually labeled South Asia (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/wfbExt/region_sas.html), but there are two components in this region, so the one to the west (usually Balochistan) is termed South Central Asian as the Indian one gets "South Asian").

The reason why added it in this thread, most of Turks carry high amount of SCA so it is a good indicator, just like ancestral altaic.

noone. subtle impression here.
which ones are east asian / central asian / mongolic though ?

[Gangrel]

Amerindian -
Arctic 0.26
East_Siberian 2.13
Paleo_Siberian 0.16
South_East_Asian 1.04
Tungus-Altaic 3.31
Austronesian 1.35

= 8.25

with SCA and AA:

Ancestral_Altaic 3.59
South_Central_Asian 21.83

= 33.67

[Leto]

which ones are east asian / central asian / mongolic though ?
Amerindian
Arctic
Austronesian
East_Siberian
Paleo_Siberian
South_East_Asian
Tungus-Altaic

[Leto]

Ancestral_Altaic 7.21
South_Central_Asian 3.82
Austronesian 0.15
East_Siberian 5.07
Paleo_Siberian 1.91
Tungus-Altaic 2.02
South_East_Asian -
Arctic -
Amerindian -

Overall 20.18
My mom's

Amerindian 0.10
Arctic 1.87
Austronesian 0.12
East_Siberian 4.19
Paleo_Siberian 0.12
South_East_Asian -
Tungus-Altaic -

Ancestral_Altaic 7.85
South_Central_Asian -

[Stefanos.tasidis]

Amerindian
Arctic
Austronesian
East_Siberian
Paleo_Siberian
South_East_Asian
Tungus-Altaic

thanks buddy

BUT then what IS South Central Asian really ? This goes to that western thrace Turk guy if he sees my question lol.

[Kaspias]

thanks buddy

BUT then what IS South Central Asian really ? This goes to that western thrace Turk guy if he sees my question lol.

I think i already explained in #40 ?

[Voskos]

Sca seems to be iranic.

[Kaspias]

Sca seems to be iranic.

Yeah i think so. Still Steppe influence though. But some people claims it is more like Indian.

[paradox]

Amerindian 0.17

Arctic-

East_Siberian 0.32

Paleo_Siberian-

South_East_Asian-

Tungus-Altaic 0.34

Austronesian-

= 0.83

with SCA and AA

Ancestral_Altaic 1.54

South_Central_Asian 6.26

= 8.63

Father's

Amerindian-

Arctic-

East_Siberian-

Paleo_Siberian 0.10

South_East_Asian-

Tungus-Altaic 0.80

Austronesian-

= 0.90

with SCA and AA

Ancestral_Altaic 1.71

South_Central_Asian 4.32

= 6.93

[Norka]

My mom's

Amerindian 0.10
Arctic 1.87
Austronesian 0.12
East_Siberian 4.19
Paleo_Siberian 0.12
South_East_Asian -
Tungus-Altaic -

Ancestral_Altaic 7.85
South_Central_Asian -

Very north Russian results and very similar to mine.

[Leto]

Very north Russian results and very similar to mine.
North Russian yes but not very similar to you in this particular case. You have no arctic, she has no Tungus-Altaic and almost no Paleo-Siberian. Also no South-Central Asian which you have.

[Norka]

North Russian yes but not very similar to you in this particular case. You have no arctic, she has no Tungus-Altaic and almost no Paleo-Siberian. Also no South-Central Asian which you have.

Well it's understandable as she has no eastern ancestry like I do. Which is why on plots I cluster more east with Erzyans.

[Kaspias]

Amerindian 0.17

Arctic-

East_Siberian 0.32

Paleo_Siberian-

South_East_Asian-

Tungus-Altaic 0.34

Austronesian-

= 0.83

with SCA and AA

Ancestral_Altaic 1.54

South_Central_Asian 6.26

= 8.63

Father's

Amerindian-

Arctic-

East_Siberian-

Paleo_Siberian 0.10

South_East_Asian-

Tungus-Altaic 0.80

Austronesian-

= 0.90

with SCA and AA

Ancestral_Altaic 1.71

South_Central_Asian 4.32

= 6.93

If you don't score any East Eurasian in other calculators it is just a noise. But if you insistly score it in other calculators as well in your case it is most probably a heritage from Slavic Migration. Other option is less possible. I don't think scoring East Eurasian - despite it is less than 1% - is very typical for your country.

[Luarev]

1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 30.89
2 Caucasian 30.24
3 European_Early_Farmers 24.77
4 South_Central_Asian 5.77
5 Near_East 2.68
6 Melano_Polynesian 2.37
7 Ancestral_Altaic 0.87
8 South_East_Asian 0.65
9 Arctic 0.47
10 Amerindian 0.37
11 Australoid 0.33
12 East_Siberian 0.32
13 Tungus-Altaic 0.28

[paradox]

If you don't score any East Eurasian in other calculators it is just a noise. But if you insistly score it in other calculators as well in your case it is most probably a heritage from Slavic Migration. Other option is less possible. I don't think scoring East Eurasian - despite it is less than 1% - is very typical for your country.Do you mean there is the possibility of Slavic migration on my mothers side?

[Kaspias]

Do you mean there is the possibility of Slavic migration on my mothers side?

No. It is the fact that Crete took Slavic migration. But it shouldn't be high amounts so most probably there is no any east eurasian trace in your mother. With this sense i don't think your admixture came from your mother. Obviously your father have 0.90 east eurasian and you have 0.83.

[frankhammer]

1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 38.03
2 European_Early_Farmers 27.13
3 Caucasian 21.41
4 South_Central_Asian 6.3
5 Ancestral_Altaic 3.86
6 Near_East 2.21
7 Melano_Polynesian 0.4
8 Amerindian 0.37
9 East_African 0.2
10 Archaic_Human 0.05
11 North_African 0.02

Total 10.53

[Leto]

Some interesting examples I've found on Anthrogenica

Taiwanese (I guess Southern Han originally)

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 South_East_Asian 47.24
2 Austronesian 32.06
3 Tungus-Altaic 20.6
4 Melano_Polynesian 0.06
5 Near_East 0.04

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Hakka ( ) 2.4
2 Chinese_Taiwan ( ) 3.47
3 Han_Singapore ( ) 3.49
4 Han ( ) 4.82
5 Tujia ( ) 7.35
6 Jinuo ( ) 8.39
7 Hmong_Miao ( ) 8.71
8 Cantonese ( ) 8.78
9 She ( ) 8.85
10 Han-Mandarin ( ) 9.37
11 Yao ( ) 10.13
12 Lawa ( ) 10.45
13 Hmong ( ) 10.96
14 Miao ( ) 11.13
15 Paluang ( ) 11.92
16 Wa ( ) 12.86
17 Karen ( ) 13.64
18 Plang ( ) 14.6
19 Tai_Yuan ( ) 15.04
20 Tai_Khuen ( ) 15.86

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 66.3% Naga ( ) + 33.7% Atayal_Coriell ( ) @ 0.88
2 67.9% Naga ( ) + 32.1% Igorot ( ) @ 0.97
3 67.7% Naga ( ) + 32.3% Ami ( ) @ 1.13
4 68.7% Naga ( ) + 31.3% Ami_Taiwan ( ) @ 1.14
5 68.1% Naga ( ) + 31.9% Ami_Coriell ( ) @ 1.23
6 63.9% Naga ( ) + 36.1% Atayal ( ) @ 1.38
7 87.2% Han ( ) + 12.8% Japanese ( ) @ 1.43
8 79.5% Hakka ( ) + 20.5% Tujia ( ) @ 1.52
9 85.6% Han ( ) + 14.4% Ryukyuan ( ) @ 1.56
10 95.4% Hakka ( ) + 4.6% Aonaga ( ) @ 1.59
11 93.3% Hakka ( ) + 6.7% Yi ( ) @ 1.61
12 95.2% Hakka ( ) + 4.8% Naga ( ) @ 1.61
13 53.8% Kinh_Vietnam_KHV ( ) + 46.2% Korean ( ) @ 1.62
14 93.4% Hakka ( ) + 6.6% Naxi ( ) @ 1.63
15 70.2% Chinese_Taiwan ( ) + 29.8% Tujia ( ) @ 1.65
16 95.3% Hakka ( ) + 4.7% Nysha ( ) @ 1.67
17 85% Han ( ) + 15% Japanese_ML ( ) @ 1.72
18 92.6% Chinese_Taiwan ( ) + 7.4% Aonaga ( ) @ 1.76
19 89.3% Chinese_Taiwan ( ) + 10.7% Yi ( ) @ 1.78
20 73.5% Hmong_Miao ( ) + 26.5% Korean ( ) @ 1.8


Turk from Afyonkarahisar

# Population Percent
1 Caucasian 34.93
2 South_Central_Asian 12.96
3 European_Early_Farmers 11.39
4 Near_East 10.1
5 European_Hunters_Gatherers 8.89
6 Tungus-Altaic 7.33
7 East_Siberian 3.83
8 North_African 3.2
9 Ancestral_Altaic 3.2
10 South_East_Asian 1.48
11 Amerindian 1.05
12 Subsaharian 0.65
13 East_African 0.39
14 African_Pygmy 0.34
15 Melano_Polynesian 0.2
16 Australoid 0.08

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Turk_Aydin ( ) 7.94
2 Turk_Balikesir ( ) 8.64
3 Turk_Adana ( ) 11
4 Crimean_Tatar_Mountain ( ) 12.84
5 Turk_Istanbul ( ) 13.53
6 Turk ( ) 13.65
7 Iraki ( ) 13.85
8 Nogai ( ) 14.12
9 Syrian_Jew ( ) 14.7
10 Turk_Kayseri ( ) 14.95
11 Bulgarian ( ) 15.12
12 Croat_BH ( ) 15.41
13 Macedonian ( ) 15.42
14 Bosnian ( ) 15.55
15 Muslim_Arabs_Israel ( ) 15.64
16 Romanian ( ) 15.87
17 Montenegrian ( ) 15.94
18 Serb_BH ( ) 15.95
19 Lebanese ( ) 16.05
20 Azeri ( ) 16.12

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 60.4% Cypriot ( ) + 39.6% Turkmen_Afghan ( ) @ 3.11
2 54% Cypriot ( ) + 46% Turkmen_Uzbekistan ( ) @ 3.18
3 78.8% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 21.2% Turkmen_Uzbekistan ( ) @ 3.62
4 83.2% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 16.8% Turkmen_Afghan ( ) @ 3.96
5 87.2% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 12.8% Hazara ( ) @ 4.04
6 90.7% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 9.3% Hakas ( ) @ 4.07
7 69.8% Turk_Adana ( ) + 30.2% Tatar-Lithuanian ( ) @ 4.08
8 86.7% Turk_Adana ( ) + 13.3% Altaian ( ) @ 4.09
9 77.5% Turk_Balikesir ( ) + 22.5% Turkmen_Uzbekistan ( ) @ 4.09
10 87.5% Turk_Adana ( ) + 12.5% Tuvinian ( ) @ 4.11
11 88.1% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 11.9% Kazahs ( ) @ 4.17
12 90.8% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 9.2% Altaian ( ) @ 4.2
13 84% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 16% Uzbek ( ) @ 4.24
14 87.7% Turk_Adana ( ) + 12.3% Buryat ( ) @ 4.25
15 87.2% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 12.8% Uygur ( ) @ 4.26
16 82% Turk_Balikesir ( ) + 18% Turkmen_Afghan ( ) @ 4.27
17 83.1% Turk_Adana ( ) + 16.9% Kazakh ( ) @ 4.31
18 61.4% Cypriot ( ) + 38.6% Uzbek ( ) @ 4.31
19 87.2% Turk_Aydin ( ) + 12.8% Tatar-Siberian ( ) @ 4.34
20 87% Turk_Adana ( ) + 13% Mongolian ( ) @ 4.34

[Kaspias]

.

There are different components for represent different types of East Eurasian. What is the exact difference between East_Siberian and Tungus-Altaic? I mean can we understand the type of East Eurasian ancestry by looking these components? Like more East Siberian = Possibility of Mongol admixture or more Tungus Altaic = Turkic admixture. Just wanted to give an example and not necessarily correct. I suspect they distributed randomly btw.

[Leto]

There are different components for represent different types of East Eurasian. What is the exact difference between East_Siberian and Tungus-Altaic? I mean can we understand the type of East Eurasian ancestry by looking these components? Like more East Siberian = Possibility of Mongol admixture or more Tungus Altaic = Turkic admixture. Just wanted to give an example and not necessarily correct. I suspect they distributed randomly btw.
Well, I think Tungus-Altaic is something more Southern Siberian and Mongol whereas East Siberian is more like Northern Siberian. I don't know I'm just guessing. For example Northern Russians usually get East Siberian and Arctic rather than Tungus-Altaic which suggests a Finno-Ugric/Uralic source (see the Nenets, Khants/Mansi, etc.).
This is the Mongolian I posted a couple of months ago:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Tungus-Altaic 49.11
2 South_East_Asian 18.12
3 East_Siberian 16.86
4 Ancestral_Altaic 5.02
5 Caucasian 4.19
6 European_Hunters_Gatherers 1.8
7 Amerindian 1.66
8 Austronesian 1.45
9 South_Central_Asian 0.96
10 Melano_Polynesian 0.4
11 Paleo_Siberian 0.23
12 Archaic_Human 0.13
13 European_Early_Farmers 0.05
14 Khoisan 0.02

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Kalmyk ( ) 6.17
2 Mongolian ( ) 6.65
3 Mongol_Khalkha ( ) 8.5
4 Buryat ( ) 11.17
5 Daur ( ) 12.04
6 Oroqen ( ) 12.95
7 Hezhen ( ) 13.46
8 Mongolian_QH ( ) 14.08
9 Kyrgyz ( ) 15.19
10 Tuvinian ( ) 16.52
11 Altaian ( ) 16.91
12 Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) 17.6
13 Mongola_China ( ) 17.85
14 Xibo ( ) 20.28
15 Kazakh ( ) 21.82
16 Ulchi ( ) 23.47
17 Kazahs ( ) 24.36
18 Hakas ( ) 24.72
19 Japanese ( ) 26.19
20 Ryukyuan ( ) 26.32

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 63.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 36.9% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.51
2 59.6% Mongolian ( ) + 40.4% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.52
3 73.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 26.9% Daur ( ) @ 4.61
4 70.4% Mongolian ( ) + 29.6% Daur ( ) @ 4.77
5 76.7% Kalmyk ( ) + 23.3% Hezhen ( ) @ 4.85
6 59.2% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) + 40.8% Buryat ( ) @ 5
7 74.1% Mongolian ( ) + 25.9% Hezhen ( ) @ 5.03
8 85.6% Kalmyk ( ) + 14.4% Xibo ( ) @ 5.21
9 80.4% Kalmyk ( ) + 19.6% Mongolian_QH ( ) @ 5.29
10 94.7% Kalmyk ( ) + 5.3% Naga ( ) @ 5.36
11 84.9% Kalmyk ( ) + 15.1% Mongola_China ( ) @ 5.37
12 89.6% Kalmyk ( ) + 10.4% Japanese ( ) @ 5.4
13 94.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 5.9% Tibetian_Madou ( ) @ 5.42
14 94.3% Kalmyk ( ) + 5.7% Tibetian_TTR ( ) @ 5.44
15 95.3% Kalmyk ( ) + 4.7% Aonaga ( ) @ 5.44
16 91.4% Kalmyk ( ) + 8.6% Korean ( ) @ 5.44
17 83.6% Mongolian ( ) + 16.4% Xibo ( ) @ 5.44
18 95.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 4.9% Nysha ( ) @ 5.46
19 77.4% Mongolian ( ) + 22.6% Mongolian_QH ( ) @ 5.46
20 93.6% Mongolian ( ) + 6.4% Naga ( ) @ 5.52


And this is a Yakut. Notice the much larger East Siberian percentage. Yakuts are a much more Northern population than Mongolians.

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Siberian 45.49
2 Tungus-Altaic 39.3
3 South_East_Asian 5.32
4 Austronesian 2.81
5 South_Central_Asian 1.34
6 European_Hunters_Gatherers 1.27
7 Caucasian 1.23
8 Ancestral_Altaic 1.21
9 Amerindian 0.92
10 Arctic 0.61
11 Australoid 0.51

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Yakut ( ) 6.16
2 Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) 6.52
3 Dolgan ( ) 11.42
4 Tuvinian ( ) 17.21
5 Evenk ( ) 17.26
6 Buryat ( ) 20.77
7 Oroqen ( ) 21.25
8 Even ( ) 22.23
9 Altaian ( ) 25.72
10 Kalmyk ( ) 27.81
11 Mongolian ( ) 28.59
12 Hakas ( ) 29.02
13 Yukagir_Tundra ( ) 31.97
14 Kyrgyz ( ) 32.3
15 Ulchi ( ) 33.11
16 Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) 33.8
17 Mongol_Khalkha ( ) 34.32
18 Kazakh ( ) 35.34
19 Kazahs ( ) 35.9
20 Daur ( ) 37.02

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 91.3% Yakut ( ) + 8.7% Han_North ( ) @ 1.98
2 90.8% Yakut ( ) + 9.2% Han-Mandarin ( ) @ 2
3 90% Yakut ( ) + 10% Korean_KR ( ) @ 2.01
4 92.1% Yakut ( ) + 7.9% Tujia ( ) @ 2.07
5 90.3% Yakut ( ) + 9.7% Korean ( ) @ 2.11
6 91.6% Yakut ( ) + 8.4% Hakka ( ) @ 2.15
7 76.7% Dolgan ( ) + 23.3% Daur ( ) @ 2.16
8 92.1% Yakut ( ) + 7.9% Han ( ) @ 2.16
9 91.6% Yakut ( ) + 8.4% Chinese_Taiwan ( ) @ 2.2
10 75.4% Dolgan ( ) + 24.6% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 2.21
11 91.8% Yakut ( ) + 8.2% Han_Singapore ( ) @ 2.22
12 92.6% Yakut ( ) + 7.4% Miao ( ) @ 2.25
13 91.9% Yakut ( ) + 8.1% Jinuo ( ) @ 2.26
14 92.5% Yakut ( ) + 7.5% She ( ) @ 2.26
15 89.7% Yakut ( ) + 10.3% Japanese_ML ( ) @ 2.26
16 77.1% Dolgan ( ) + 22.9% Hezhen ( ) @ 2.27
17 91.1% Yakut ( ) + 8.9% Tu ( ) @ 2.3
18 92.5% Yakut ( ) + 7.5% Yi ( ) @ 2.34
19 92.5% Yakut ( ) + 7.5% Naxi ( ) @ 2.35
20 92.4% Yakut ( ) + 7.6% Hmong_Miao ( ) @ 2.4

[Leto]

Some Nenets results (don't know why they are so different)

Kit TK9081389

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Siberian 61.38
2 Ancestral_Altaic 36.3
3 Paleo_Siberian 1.36
4 Amerindian 0.96

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Nenets ( ) 9.15
2 Nenets_Tundra ( ) 9.53
3 Nenets_Forest ( ) 9.96
4 Ket ( ) 12.34
5 Khant ( ) 15.85
6 Mansi ( ) 19.47
7 Selkup ( ) 19.97
8 Saami ( ) 42.53
9 Nganasan ( ) 42.77
10 Evenk ( ) 43.74
11 Dolgan ( ) 44.34
12 Even ( ) 46.02
13 Yukagir_Tundra ( ) 47
14 Mari ( ) 47.46
15 Saami_Finland ( ) 47.47
16 Yakut ( ) 48.29
17 Hakas ( ) 48.91
18 Udmurd ( ) 50.65
19 Tatar-Siberian ( ) 51.39
20 Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) 51.53

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 61.6% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 38.4% Khant ( ) @ 1.46
2 62.8% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 37.2% Khant ( ) @ 1.92
3 73.1% Khant ( ) + 26.9% Nganasan ( ) @ 2.11
4 67.7% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 32.3% Mansi ( ) @ 4.05
5 69.4% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 30.6% Mansi ( ) @ 4.61
6 56.5% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 43.5% Ket ( ) @ 4.71
7 58.3% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 41.7% Ket ( ) @ 5.12
8 68.1% Nenets ( ) + 31.9% Khant ( ) @ 6.05
9 72.4% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 27.6% Selkup ( ) @ 6.95
10 89.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 10.8% Tubalar ( ) @ 7
11 90.3% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 9.7% Tubalar ( ) @ 7.18
12 75.2% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 24.8% Selkup ( ) @ 7.29
13 65.9% Nenets ( ) + 34.1% Ket ( ) @ 7.66
14 89% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 11% Udmurd ( ) @ 7.83
15 81.6% Ket ( ) + 18.4% Nganasan ( ) @ 7.92
16 90.7% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 9.3% Udmurd ( ) @ 8.01
17 87.9% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 12.1% Saami ( ) @ 8.13
18 70.4% Mansi ( ) + 29.6% Nganasan ( ) @ 8.22
19 81.9% Nenets ( ) + 18.1% Mansi ( ) @ 8.28
20 90% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 10% Saami ( ) @ 8.32

Kit TK4380339

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Siberian 55.74
2 Ancestral_Altaic 22.94
3 Tungus-Altaic 7.72
4 European_Hunters_Gatherers 5.41
5 Paleo_Siberian 3.46
6 South_East_Asian 1.86
7 Arctic 0.84
8 Amerindian 0.75
9 East_African 0.5
10 Caucasian 0.47
11 South_Indian 0.3
12 Archaic_African 0.02

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Nenets ( ) 9.39
2 Ket ( ) 13.3
3 Selkup ( ) 13.78
4 Nenets_Tundra ( ) 14.1
5 Nenets_Forest ( ) 15.27
6 Mansi ( ) 21.18
7 Khant ( ) 23.19
8 Dolgan ( ) 31.56
9 Evenk ( ) 31.75
10 Even ( ) 33.04
11 Yukagir_Tundra ( ) 34.27
12 Yakut ( ) 35.25
13 Saami ( ) 35.39
14 Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) 38.69
15 Hakas ( ) 38.99
16 Saami_Finland ( ) 40
17 Tuvinian ( ) 40.09
18 Mari ( ) 40.39
19 Nganasan ( ) 41
20 Tatar-Siberian ( ) 41.89

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 87.6% Nenets ( ) + 12.4% Ulchi ( ) @ 3.29
2 75.4% Selkup ( ) + 24.6% Nganasan ( ) @ 3.52
3 76.1% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 23.9% Altaian ( ) @ 3.93
4 85.4% Nenets ( ) + 14.6% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.99
5 79.3% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 20.7% Kyrgyz ( ) @ 4.07
6 79.6% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 20.4% Mongolian ( ) @ 4.08
7 85.2% Nenets ( ) + 14.8% Buryat ( ) @ 4.16
8 79.4% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 20.6% Kalmyk ( ) @ 4.17
9 82.6% Nenets ( ) + 17.4% Tuvinian ( ) @ 4.2
10 74.2% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 25.8% Hakas ( ) @ 4.24
11 79.1% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 20.9% Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) @ 4.32
12 88.5% Nenets ( ) + 11.5% Hezhen ( ) @ 4.55
13 74.7% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 25.3% Altaian ( ) @ 4.55
14 78.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 21.9% Kyrgyz ( ) @ 4.58
15 88.5% Nenets ( ) + 11.5% Daur ( ) @ 4.63
16 75% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 25% Tuvinian ( ) @ 4.66
17 79.2% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 20.8% Kazakh ( ) @ 4.69
18 82.5% Nenets ( ) + 17.5% Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) @ 4.7
19 86.5% Nenets ( ) + 13.5% Kalmyk ( ) @ 4.7
20 78.3% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 21.7% Mongolian ( ) @ 4.71


Kit KZ5042117

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Siberian 70.59
2 Ancestral_Altaic 26.81
3 South_East_Asian 1.79
4 Tungus-Altaic 0.59
5 Arctic 0.21

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Nenets_Forest ( ) 2.25
2 Nenets_Tundra ( ) 2.63
3 Nenets ( ) 9.47
4 Ket ( ) 21.38
5 Selkup ( ) 26.62
6 Khant ( ) 27.22
7 Mansi ( ) 29.4
8 Nganasan ( ) 31.33
9 Evenk ( ) 38.57
10 Dolgan ( ) 40.51
11 Yakut ( ) 45.79
12 Even ( ) 46.15
13 Yukagir_Tundra ( ) 47.48
14 Saami ( ) 47.98
15 Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) 49.46
16 Saami_Finland ( ) 51.99
17 Mari ( ) 52.03
18 Hakas ( ) 53.42
19 Tuvinian ( ) 53.72
20 Yukagir_Forest ( ) 54.32

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 93.7% Nenets_Tundra ( ) + 6.3% Nganasan ( ) @ 1.58
2 95.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 4.9% Nganasan ( ) @ 1.59
3 53.5% Khant ( ) + 46.5% Nganasan ( ) @ 1.86
4 97.4% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 2.6% Evenk ( ) @ 2
5 99% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 1% Aonaga ( ) @ 2.05
6 99% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 1% Nysha ( ) @ 2.06
7 99.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.9% Naga ( ) @ 2.06
8 97.9% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 2.1% Dolgan ( ) @ 2.07
9 99.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.9% Yi ( ) @ 2.08
10 99.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.9% Tibetian_TTR ( ) @ 2.09
11 99.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.9% Naxi ( ) @ 2.09
12 99.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.9% Tibetian_Madou ( ) @ 2.09
13 99.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.8% Lahu ( ) @ 2.13
14 99.1% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.9% Tu ( ) @ 2.13
15 99.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.8% Han_North ( ) @ 2.13
16 98.4% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 1.6% Yakut ( ) @ 2.13
17 99.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.8% Miao ( ) @ 2.14
18 99.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.8% Tujia ( ) @ 2.14
19 99.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.8% Paluang ( ) @ 2.15
20 99.2% Nenets_Forest ( ) + 0.8% Jinuo ( ) @ 2.15


Chukchi (they are indigenous to the Northeastern corner (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Map_of_Russia_-_Chukotka_Autonomous_Okrug.svg) of Russia)

Kit Z872166

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Arctic 54.79
2 Paleo_Siberian 33.65
3 Amerindian 4.06
4 Tungus-Altaic 3.93
5 East_Siberian 3.57

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Chukchi ( ) 8.72
2 Chukchi_Sir ( ) 11.21
3 Eskimo_Sireniki ( ) 32.18
4 West_Greenland ( ) 37.09
5 Tlingit ( ) 42.85
6 Eskimo_Chaplin ( ) 43.15
7 Eskimo_Naukan ( ) 46.3
8 Aleut ( ) 50.63
9 Yukagir_Tundra ( ) 51.71
10 Haida ( ) 57.17
11 Tsimsian ( ) 59.5
12 Saami ( ) 61.48
13 Saami_Finland ( ) 62.22
14 Athabask ( ) 62.62
15 Bashkir ( ) 63.43
16 Kazahs ( ) 63.72
17 Yukagir_Forest ( ) 63.8
18 Uygur-Han ( ) 63.86
19 Tatar-Siberian ( ) 64.16
20 Mari ( ) 64.44

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 90% Chukchi ( ) + 10% Athabask ( ) @ 5.25
2 61.3% Eskimo_Naukan ( ) + 38.7% Itelmen ( ) @ 5.62
3 92.1% Chukchi ( ) + 7.9% Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) @ 5.66
4 89.6% Chukchi ( ) + 10.4% Haida ( ) @ 5.71
5 92.1% Chukchi ( ) + 7.9% Yakut ( ) @ 5.74
6 91.4% Chukchi ( ) + 8.6% Tuvinian ( ) @ 5.76
7 90.9% Chukchi ( ) + 9.1% Cree ( ) @ 5.77
8 91.7% Chukchi ( ) + 8.3% Buryat ( ) @ 5.79
9 92.3% Chukchi ( ) + 7.7% Dolgan ( ) @ 5.81
10 91% Chukchi ( ) + 9% Algonquin ( ) @ 5.83
11 92.3% Chukchi ( ) + 7.7% Navajo ( ) @ 5.83
12 91.9% Chukchi ( ) + 8.1% Oroqen ( ) @ 5.9
13 92.8% Chukchi ( ) + 7.2% Evenk ( ) @ 5.96
14 91.4% Chukchi ( ) + 8.6% Altaian ( ) @ 5.96
15 91.2% Chukchi ( ) + 8.8% Hakas ( ) @ 5.98
16 91.7% Chukchi ( ) + 8.3% Kalmyk ( ) @ 6
17 91.7% Chukchi ( ) + 8.3% Mongolian ( ) @ 6.01
18 91.3% Chukchi ( ) + 8.7% Ojibwa ( ) @ 6.01
19 93.1% Chukchi ( ) + 6.9% Apache ( ) @ 6.02
20 87.2% Chukchi ( ) + 12.8% Tlingit ( ) @ 6.09

[Leto]

This is the Mongolian I posted a couple of months ago:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Tungus-Altaic 49.11
2 South_East_Asian 18.12
3 East_Siberian 16.86
4 Ancestral_Altaic 5.02
5 Caucasian 4.19
6 European_Hunters_Gatherers 1.8
7 Amerindian 1.66
8 Austronesian 1.45
9 South_Central_Asian 0.96
10 Melano_Polynesian 0.4
11 Paleo_Siberian 0.23
12 Archaic_Human 0.13
13 European_Early_Farmers 0.05
14 Khoisan 0.02

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Kalmyk ( ) 6.17
2 Mongolian ( ) 6.65
3 Mongol_Khalkha ( ) 8.5
4 Buryat ( ) 11.17
5 Daur ( ) 12.04
6 Oroqen ( ) 12.95
7 Hezhen ( ) 13.46
8 Mongolian_QH ( ) 14.08
9 Kyrgyz ( ) 15.19
10 Tuvinian ( ) 16.52
11 Altaian ( ) 16.91
12 Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) 17.6
13 Mongola_China ( ) 17.85
14 Xibo ( ) 20.28
15 Kazakh ( ) 21.82
16 Ulchi ( ) 23.47
17 Kazahs ( ) 24.36
18 Hakas ( ) 24.72
19 Japanese ( ) 26.19
20 Ryukyuan ( ) 26.32

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 63.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 36.9% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.51
2 59.6% Mongolian ( ) + 40.4% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.52
3 73.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 26.9% Daur ( ) @ 4.61
4 70.4% Mongolian ( ) + 29.6% Daur ( ) @ 4.77
5 76.7% Kalmyk ( ) + 23.3% Hezhen ( ) @ 4.85
6 59.2% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) + 40.8% Buryat ( ) @ 5
7 74.1% Mongolian ( ) + 25.9% Hezhen ( ) @ 5.03
8 85.6% Kalmyk ( ) + 14.4% Xibo ( ) @ 5.21
9 80.4% Kalmyk ( ) + 19.6% Mongolian_QH ( ) @ 5.29
10 94.7% Kalmyk ( ) + 5.3% Naga ( ) @ 5.36
11 84.9% Kalmyk ( ) + 15.1% Mongola_China ( ) @ 5.37
12 89.6% Kalmyk ( ) + 10.4% Japanese ( ) @ 5.4
13 94.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 5.9% Tibetian_Madou ( ) @ 5.42
14 94.3% Kalmyk ( ) + 5.7% Tibetian_TTR ( ) @ 5.44
15 95.3% Kalmyk ( ) + 4.7% Aonaga ( ) @ 5.44
16 91.4% Kalmyk ( ) + 8.6% Korean ( ) @ 5.44
17 83.6% Mongolian ( ) + 16.4% Xibo ( ) @ 5.44
18 95.1% Kalmyk ( ) + 4.9% Nysha ( ) @ 5.46
19 77.4% Mongolian ( ) + 22.6% Mongolian_QH ( ) @ 5.46
20 93.6% Mongolian ( ) + 6.4% Naga ( ) @ 5.52

And a Buryat. As expected, more Northern-shifted than the Mongolian (who is from Central Mongolia by the way)

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Tungus-Altaic 49.21
2 East_Siberian 24.29
3 South_East_Asian 13.72
4 Ancestral_Altaic 4.29
5 European_Hunters_Gatherers 2.43
6 South_Central_Asian 1.88
7 Caucasian 1.82
8 South_Indian 1.04
9 Paleo_Siberian 0.44
10 East_African 0.44
11 Khoisan 0.27
12 Arctic 0.18

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Buryat ( ) 3.58
2 Oroqen ( ) 8.01
3 Kalmyk ( ) 8.2
4 Mongolian ( ) 8.95
5 Tuvinian ( ) 10.7
6 Mongol_Khalkha ( ) 14.66
7 Altaian ( ) 15.05
8 Daur ( ) 17.07
9 Kyrgyz ( ) 18.26
10 Hezhen ( ) 18.26
11 Mongolian_QH ( ) 20.23
12 Ulchi ( ) 20.39
13 Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) 21.22
14 Hakas ( ) 22.93
15 Mongola_China ( ) 23.56
16 Yakut_Anabarsky_ulus ( ) 24.58
17 Kazakh ( ) 24.99
18 Xibo ( ) 26.85
19 Yakut ( ) 26.93
20 Kazahs ( ) 27.18

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 96.1% Buryat ( ) + 3.9% Naga ( ) @ 2.6
2 85.5% Buryat ( ) + 14.5% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 2.62
3 95.5% Buryat ( ) + 4.5% Tibetian_Madou ( ) @ 2.62
4 95.7% Buryat ( ) + 4.3% Tibetian_TTR ( ) @ 2.63
5 96.2% Buryat ( ) + 3.8% Nysha ( ) @ 2.64
6 96.4% Buryat ( ) + 3.6% Aonaga ( ) @ 2.65
7 87.5% Buryat ( ) + 12.5% Daur ( ) @ 2.66
8 89.6% Buryat ( ) + 10.4% Mongolian_QH ( ) @ 2.72
9 88.8% Buryat ( ) + 11.2% Hezhen ( ) @ 2.76
10 92.4% Buryat ( ) + 7.6% Xibo ( ) @ 2.83
11 96.4% Buryat ( ) + 3.6% Naxi ( ) @ 2.85
12 95.4% Buryat ( ) + 4.6% Tu ( ) @ 2.86
13 96.5% Buryat ( ) + 3.5% Yi ( ) @ 2.87
14 91.7% Buryat ( ) + 8.3% Mongola_China ( ) @ 2.89
15 94.9% Buryat ( ) + 5.1% Korean ( ) @ 2.95
16 96% Buryat ( ) + 4% Han_North ( ) @ 2.96
17 94.5% Buryat ( ) + 5.5% Japanese ( ) @ 3.05
18 95% Buryat ( ) + 5% Japanese_ML ( ) @ 3.12
19 95.5% Buryat ( ) + 4.5% Korean_KR ( ) @ 3.12
20 97% Buryat ( ) + 3% Kusunda ( ) @ 3.15

[Kaspias]

.


Yeah i got it. Then it is not random. In this sense i want to ask something. Although i'm half Turk i have shitload of EE and i don't know my father's exact ancestry. Balkan and Anatolian Turks score much more Tungus-Altaic than East_Siberia but as opposite i have more East Siberian and Arctic. Is this an indicator for non-Turkmen Turkic ancestry like Tatar or something? Or just coincidence?

[Leto]

Yeah i got it. Then it is not random. In this sense i want to ask something. Although i'm half Turk i have shitload of EE and i don't know my father's exact ancestry. Balkan and Anatolian Turks score much more Tungus-Altaic than East_Siberia but as opposite i have more East Siberian and Arctic. Is this an indicator for non-Turkmen Turkic ancestry like Tatar or something? Or just coincidence?
Well, as you probably know these calculators are far from 100% accurate and I think at low levels some of the similar components may be interchangeable. For example one Turk may get more Tungus-Altaic and another more East Siberian. I'm talking about small amounts, of course Yakuts, Chinese and other pred. East Eurasian people would get much less random percentages.

According to the spreadsheet Tungus-Altaic peaks in Northeast China (Daur, Oroqen, Ulchi) and East Siberian in Nganassans, Nenets, Mansi and Selkups (Western, Northwestern Siberia). Arctic peaks in Eskimo and Greenlanders, Paleo-Siberian in Itelmens and Koryaks (Chukotka). South-East Asian is basically Tibet and Southern China, Austronesian is Taiwan and the Northern Philippines.

[Leto]

Title.


Amerindian 0.87
Arctic 1.22
East_Siberian 3.79
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian 1.01
Tungus-Altaic 2.45
Austronesian -

= 9,34

I think it's Turkic. 2.45% TA and 1% SE Asian.

[Leto]

Some more interesting results. This is a family - Kalmyk father, Russian mother, their daughter and grandson. There are no grandson's father's results but he appears to be Ukrainian or even Polish, i.e. a bit more Western than most Russians.

Kalmyk

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Tungus-Altaic 39.4
2 East_Siberian 17.52
3 South_East_Asian 16.19
4 Caucasian 5.75
5 European_Hunters_Gatherers 5.4
6 Ancestral_Altaic 4.4
7 South_Central_Asian 4.07
8 Austronesian 4
9 South_Indian 1.05
10 Paleo_Siberian 0.77
11 Arctic 0.74
12 Amerindian 0.65
13 North_African 0.07

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Kalmyk ( ) 8.16
2 Mongolian ( ) 8.78
3 Kyrgyz ( ) 9.37
4 Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) 10.27
5 Mongol_Khalkha ( ) 12.86
6 Altaian ( ) 13.91
7 Buryat ( ) 13.91
8 Kazakh ( ) 14.34
9 Tuvinian ( ) 15.03
10 Kazahs ( ) 15.39
11 Mongolian_QH ( ) 15.66
12 Oroqen ( ) 15.76
13 Daur ( ) 18.22
14 Mongola_China ( ) 19.08
15 Hezhen ( ) 19.13
16 Hakas ( ) 20.31
17 Xibo ( ) 22.1
18 Hazara ( ) 24.39
19 Karakalpak ( ) 24.87
20 Uygur ( ) 25.18

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 61.3% Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) + 38.7% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.31
2 61.6% Oroqen ( ) + 38.4% Karakalpak ( ) @ 3.7
3 59% Daur ( ) + 41% Tatar-Siberian ( ) @ 4.14
4 52.6% Kazakh ( ) + 47.4% Oroqen ( ) @ 4.21
5 62.1% Oroqen ( ) + 37.9% Uygur ( ) @ 4.3
6 73.8% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) + 26.2% Yukagir_Forest ( ) @ 4.56
7 57.8% Hezhen ( ) + 42.2% Tatar-Siberian ( ) @ 4.6
8 67.9% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) + 32.1% Tatar-Siberian ( ) @ 4.62
9 50.7% Kazahs ( ) + 49.3% Oroqen ( ) @ 4.71
10 67.9% Oroqen ( ) + 32.1% Uzbek ( ) @ 4.72
11 69.5% Oroqen ( ) + 30.5% Tajik_Tajikistan ( ) @ 4.8
12 53.1% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) + 46.9% Kazakh ( ) @ 4.88
13 56.9% Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) + 43.1% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.93
14 69.2% Kalmyk ( ) + 30.8% Kazahs ( ) @ 4.93
15 81.7% Kalmyk ( ) + 18.3% Uygur-Han ( ) @ 4.96
16 65.4% Kyrgyz ( ) + 34.6% Oroqen ( ) @ 5.07
17 85.9% Kalmyk ( ) + 14.1% Tatar_Lithuania ( ) @ 5.08
18 61.5% Oroqen ( ) + 38.5% Hazara ( ) @ 5.09
19 69.3% Daur ( ) + 30.7% Mari ( ) @ 5.1
20 69.1% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) + 30.9% Even ( ) @ 5.1

Russian

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 53.53
2 Caucasian 27.67
3 European_Early_Farmers 7.24
4 North_African 2.77
5 South_Central_Asian 2.51
6 Ancestral_Altaic 2.3
7 South_East_Asian 1.39
8 East_Siberian 1.29
9 Tungus-Altaic 0.91
10 Amerindian 0.34
11 Melano_Polynesian 0.07

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Belarusian-East ( ) 2.91
2 Russian_South ( ) 2.95
3 Russian_North ( ) 3.26
4 Russian-West ( ) 3.26
5 Don_cossack ( ) 3.76
6 Belarusian_South ( ) 3.95
7 Belarusian_West ( ) 4.07
8 Ukrainian ( ) 4.21
9 Ukrainian_East ( ) 4.35
10 Russian-North-West ( ) 4.44
11 Belarusian ( ) 4.75
12 Ukrainian_Center ( ) 4.77
13 Russian_Meshtchyora ( ) 4.85
14 Pole ( ) 5.15
15 Sorb ( ) 5.23
16 Russian_Center ( ) 5.28
17 Balt ( ) 5.31
18 Lithuanian ( ) 5.69
19 Moksha ( ) 5.9
20 Ukrainian_West ( ) 5.94

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 97.7% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.3% Mozabite ( ) @ 2.16
2 55.8% Russian_North ( ) + 44.2% Don_cossack ( ) @ 2.19
3 95.2% Don_cossack ( ) + 4.8% Morocco_South ( ) @ 2.24
4 97.8% Russian_South ( ) + 2.2% Mozabite ( ) @ 2.25
5 95.7% Don_cossack ( ) + 4.3% Berber_WGA ( ) @ 2.29
6 97.6% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.4% Tu ( ) @ 2.3
7 97.8% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.2% Tibetian_TTR ( ) @ 2.31
8 97.8% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.2% Tibetian_Madou ( ) @ 2.31
9 98% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2% Naga ( ) @ 2.31
10 97.6% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.4% Saharawi ( ) @ 2.31
11 98% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2% Nysha ( ) @ 2.32
12 97.4% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.6% Berber_WGA ( ) @ 2.32
13 98% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2% Aonaga ( ) @ 2.32
14 97.9% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.1% Naxi ( ) @ 2.33
15 90.7% Belarusian-East ( ) + 9.3% Tatar_Lithuania ( ) @ 2.33
16 97.9% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.1% Yi ( ) @ 2.33
17 97.5% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.5% Mongola_China ( ) @ 2.33
18 97.7% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.3% Han_North ( ) @ 2.33
19 97.4% Belarusian-East ( ) + 2.6% Mongolian_QH ( ) @ 2.33
20 94.4% Don_cossack ( ) + 5.6% Algerian ( ) @ 2.34

Half Kalmyk, half Russian

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 26.92
2 Tungus-Altaic 20.09
3 Caucasian 17.63
4 East_Siberian 10.4
5 South_East_Asian 8.91
6 European_Early_Farmers 5.13
7 Ancestral_Altaic 3.56
8 South_Central_Asian 2.77
9 Austronesian 1.52
10 North_African 1.38
11 Arctic 0.84
12 Amerindian 0.67
13 Archaic_Human 0.09
14 Melano_Polynesian 0.09

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Karakalpak ( ) 11.38
2 Tatar_Lithuania ( ) 11.84
3 Crimean_Tatar_Step ( ) 13.28
4 Uzbek ( ) 15.01
5 Turkmen_Afghan ( ) 15.66
6 Tatar-Lithuanian ( ) 16.18
7 Tatar-Siberian ( ) 16.53
8 Tatar-Mishar ( ) 16.65
9 Bashkir ( ) 16.88
10 Tatar-Kazan ( ) 17.16
11 Kazakh ( ) 17.28
12 Tatar ( ) 17.32
13 Kazahs ( ) 17.37
14 Chuvashs ( ) 17.92
15 Uygur-Han ( ) 18.17
16 Tajik_Tajikistan ( ) 18.46
17 Yukagir_Forest ( ) 18.52
18 Tatar_Kryashen ( ) 19.11
19 Uygur ( ) 19.46
20 Turkmen_Uzbekistan ( ) 19.5

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 54.8% Don_cossack ( ) + 45.2% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.5
2 53.9% Ukrainian_East ( ) + 46.1% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.57
3 60.2% Belarusian-East ( ) + 39.8% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.65
4 73% Tatar-Lithuanian ( ) + 27% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.7
5 53.8% Ukrainian_Center ( ) + 46.2% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.78
6 55.1% Belarusian-East ( ) + 44.9% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.78
7 58.9% Ukrainian_Center ( ) + 41.1% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.79
8 59.1% Ukrainian_East ( ) + 40.9% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.81
9 54.3% Ukrainian ( ) + 45.7% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.85
10 55.3% Russian_South ( ) + 44.7% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.88
11 60.4% Russian_South ( ) + 39.6% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.89
12 57.1% Russian_North ( ) + 42.9% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.92
13 54.8% Don_cossack ( ) + 45.2% Mongolian ( ) @ 3.97
14 72.6% Tatar-Kazan ( ) + 27.4% Daur ( ) @ 4.02
15 59.9% Don_cossack ( ) + 40.1% Oroqen ( ) @ 4.07
16 53.9% Ukrainian_East ( ) + 46.1% Mongolian ( ) @ 4.1
17 53.8% Pole ( ) + 46.2% Kalmyk ( ) @ 4.1
18 62% Russian-West ( ) + 38% Oroqen ( ) @ 4.11
19 60% Belarusian_West ( ) + 40% Oroqen ( ) @ 4.12
20 70% Tatar-Kazan ( ) + 30% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.12

1/4 Kalmyk, 3/4 Russian/Ukrainian and possibly Polish

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 38.35
2 Caucasian 20.54
3 European_Early_Farmers 10.84
4 Tungus-Altaic 10.45
5 Ancestral_Altaic 4.71
6 East_Siberian 4.57
7 South_East_Asian 4.26
8 North_African 2.06
9 Austronesian 1.56
10 South_Central_Asian 1.18
11 Near_East 0.61
12 Paleo_Siberian 0.3
13 Amerindian 0.29
14 Archaic_Human 0.29

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Tatar-Lithuanian ( ) 6.97
2 Tatar-Mishar ( ) 8.14
3 Tatar-Kazan ( ) 9.5
4 Tatar_Lithuania ( ) 10.19
5 Finn_West ( ) 10.72
6 Finnish_FIN ( ) 10.79
7 Finnish-East ( ) 10.83
8 Finn_East ( ) 10.95
9 Russian-Ural ( ) 11.12
10 Erzya ( ) 11.54
11 Tatar ( ) 11.77
12 Finn ( ) 11.81
13 Russian-North ( ) 12.58
14 Tatar_Kryashen ( ) 12.74
15 Karelian ( ) 13.33
16 Russian-Upper-Volga ( ) 13.46
17 Estonian ( ) 13.78
18 Russian-North-West ( ) 13.93
19 German ( ) 13.95
20 Russian_Meshtchyora ( ) 13.97

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 74.8% Kashub ( ) + 25.2% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.51
2 74.7% Kashub ( ) + 25.3% Mongolian ( ) @ 3.57
3 73.8% Kashub ( ) + 26.2% Altaian ( ) @ 3.69
4 73.4% Slovak ( ) + 26.6% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.73
5 72.4% Slovak ( ) + 27.6% Altaian ( ) @ 3.74
6 73.4% Slovak ( ) + 26.6% Mongolian ( ) @ 3.79
7 74.8% Sorb ( ) + 25.2% Kalmyk ( ) @ 3.85
8 73.8% Sorb ( ) + 26.2% Altaian ( ) @ 3.86
9 75.9% Kashub ( ) + 24.1% Tuvinian ( ) @ 3.89
10 74.7% Sorb ( ) + 25.3% Mongolian ( ) @ 3.89
11 77.8% Kashub ( ) + 22.2% Oroqen ( ) @ 3.9
12 76.6% Kashub ( ) + 23.4% Buryat ( ) @ 3.92
13 71.4% Czech ( ) + 28.6% Altaian ( ) @ 3.94
14 76.5% Kashub ( ) + 23.5% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4
15 68.5% German ( ) + 31.5% Kazakh ( ) @ 4.02
16 71.4% German ( ) + 28.6% Kyrgyz_Bishkek ( ) @ 4.02
17 74.5% Slovak ( ) + 25.5% Tuvinian ( ) @ 4.02
18 77.7% German ( ) + 22.3% Kalmyk ( ) @ 4.06
19 77.6% German ( ) + 22.4% Mongolian ( ) @ 4.1
20 79.2% German ( ) + 20.8% Mongol_Khalkha ( ) @ 4.1

[Kaspias]

Well, as you probably know these calculators are far from 100% accurate and I think at low levels some of the similar components may be interchangeable. For example one Turk may get more Tungus-Altaic and another more East Siberian. I'm talking about small amounts, of course Yakuts, Chinese and other pred. East Eurasian people would get much less random percentages.

According to the spreadsheet Tungus-Altaic peaks in Northeast China (Daur, Oroqen, Ulchi) and East Siberian in Nganassans, Nenets, Mansi and Selkups (Western, Northwestern Siberia). Arctic peaks in Eskimo and Greenlanders, Paleo-Siberian in Itelmens and Koryaks (Chukotka). South-East Asian is basically Tibet and Southern China, Austronesian is Taiwan and the Northern Philippines.


"Well, as you probably know these calculators are far from 100% accurate and I think at low levels some of the similar components may be interchangeable. For example one Turk may get more Tungus-Altaic and another more East Siberian. I'm talking about small amounts, of course Yakuts, Chinese and other pred. East Eurasian people would get much less random percentages."

I was thinking same with you but after collect some Turkish kits and check TurkishDNA's data i saw there is no any single Anatolian Turk who score more East_Siberian than Tungus-Altaic. (24 Sample in my archive - more than 100 sample in TurkishDNA) After check Balkan Turks (41 sample) yes there are some people - 8 Person - scored more East Siberian and they are mostly from Northern Bulgaria, around Dobrudja. So i suspected something is wrong in me.

[Leto]

"Well, as you probably know these calculators are far from 100% accurate and I think at low levels some of the similar components may be interchangeable. For example one Turk may get more Tungus-Altaic and another more East Siberian. I'm talking about small amounts, of course Yakuts, Chinese and other pred. East Eurasian people would get much less random percentages."

I was thinking same with you but after collect some Turkish kits and check TurkishDNA's data i saw there is no any single Anatolian Turk who score more East_Siberian than Tungus-Altaic. (24 Sample in my archive - more than 100 sample in TurkishDNA) After check Balkan Turks (41 sample) yes there are some people - 8 Person - scored more East Siberian and they are mostly from Northern Bulgaria, around Dobrudja. So i suspected something is wrong in me.
Maybe your EE is more Northern for some reason, who knows.