Do you guys consider Basal Eurasian as a "White/Caucasoid" component?

[AphroditeWorshiper]

Or only WHG and ANE can be? :confused:

[AphroditeWorshiper]

bump :valknut

[AphroditeWorshiper]

bump aaaaaaaaaa :mad:

[Sockorer]

Insofar as it contributes to the White/Caucasoid genotype and phenotype.

[Zuh]

Anything west eurosian is white to me.

[AphroditeWorshiper]

Insofar as it contributes to the White/Caucasoid genotype and phenotype.

Varg Disagree

[AphroditeWorshiper]

Anything west eurosian is white to me.

But they was the western version of Eastern non African

[Zuh]

But they was the western version of Eastern non African

Neh Europeans are 99% west eurosian when you run their DNA gedmatch on gedrosida k3. That's when you know it's a white people component.

[Token]

But they was the western version of Eastern non African

This is a dumb analogy. Basal Eurasians were their own weird thing - neither West nor East Eurasian, in the base of the Eurasian tree.

[Figaro]

Weird conclusion. I imagine them as mostly looking like a cross between an Arab and a Levantine person, potentially moreso the latter.

[AphroditeWorshiper]

This is a dumb analogy. Basal Eurasians were their own weird thing - neither West nor East Eurasian, in the base of the Eurasian tree.

that's what I mean, like:

NEA was the first inhabitants of East and BE was the first inhabitants of West

[XenophobicPrussian]

Of course not. If you don't consider Arabs white but you consider Basal Eurasian European you probably have no idea what Basal Eurasian is. Also, only 75% of ANE can be considered European/white.

They are Caucasoids though, but that's really a useless term. They're Caucasoids in the same way Onge are Mongoloids.

[Token]

Of course not. If you don't consider Arabs white but you consider Basal Eurasian European you probably have no idea what Basal Eurasian is. Also, only 75% of ANE can be considered European/white.

They are Caucasoids though, but that's really a useless term. They're Caucasoids in the same way Onge are Mongoloids.
What is the logic of labelling a 45K years old component as European or non-European when Europeans are a mix of basically everything, including a lot of Basal Eurasian and non-WE portion of ANE?

[XenophobicPrussian]

What is the logic of labelling a 45K years old component as European or non-European when Europeans are a mix of basically everything, including a lot of Basal Eurasian and non-WE portion of ANE?
I mean, you can ask what's the point but the logic is there. I don't claim pure Europeans exist anymore, but the populations in Europe with the highest amount of native European WHG are the most outlying in terms of phenotype, while the intermediary populations look what they are, intermediary, mixes(even though yes, everyone is a mix, some are just less mixed than others), etc. What other conclusion would there to be to only consider WHG admixture European?

Anything else is considering geography, not genetics, because evolution takes a long time. Great Plains Amerindians and Amazonian Karitiana must be seperated by atleast 10-15k years and inhabit completely different climates, yet they look nearly identical when comparing them in a global sense. Another good example would be Taiwanese Aborigines and Siberians, again, they have to had be seperated for an extremely long time, atleast 5-10k years if not more, and yet the Ami still retain Mongoloid features despite this and their completely different climate. WHGs and other Caucasoids have been seperated for 20-30k years. Race is old. Ethiopians think they're some ancient extremely special diverged race, no, they're a simple mix of southern Caucasoids and Congoids, you mix an Arab and a Ghanaian and you get kids who look like Somalis. I've seen white/Australian Aboriginal mixes look exactly like Indians despite Indians being mixed a long ass time ago, N. European and Arab mixes look exactly like Italians, etc.

Also, Basal Eurasian isn't 45k years old. Mainstream researchers have confused actual Basal Eurasian with proto-South Caucasoid/West Asian. Actual Basal Eurasian, that is, the ancestral human group to all Eurasians, is just Ust-Ishim man. They were stupid to call the unknown non-WHG ancestry of Anatolian farmers "Basal Eurasian", I'm just going with the name most people know it for, the main ancestral component of West Asians.

[Sockorer]

Varg Disagree


Varg is a snownigger.