View Full Version : Guys, how caucasoid admixed are Siberian peoples?
AphroditeWorshiper
07-28-2019, 07:35 PM
I mean, not just recent Slavic but ancient Scythian and ANE
alos, which groups are more caucasoid and wich ones are the least?
https://www.eupedia.com/images/design/Siberia_regional_DNA_project.png
West Siberian Turkics such as Altaians and Khakas are like 65-75% East Eurasian, Tuvans are 80-85% EE, Buryats are 85-90% EE, Tungusic peoples and Yakuts are 90-100% EE.
sailormoon
07-29-2019, 07:27 AM
The Kets derive roughly 30–40% of their ancestry from Ancient North Eurasians (ANE). The Kets have the third highest value of ANE genetic contribution among all Siberian ethnic groups, preceded only by Chukchi and Koryaks. The Altai region was inhabited by a genetically West Eurasian population of the Afanasievo archaeological culture in the early Bronze Age, with about 50% of ANE ancestry.
In this study, we found that: (1) Kets and Selkups constitute a clade closely related to Nganasans; (2) Nganasans, Kets, Selkups, and Yukaghirs form a cluster of populations most closely related to Paleo-Eskimos in Siberia (not considering indigenous populations of Chukotka and Kamchatka); (3) unlike Nganasans, Kets derive roughly 30–40% of their ancestry from ancient North Eurasians; (4) Kets show genetic continuity with the hypothetical homeland of Yeniseian languages, as they are closely related to the ancient individuals of the Karasuk culture and to the later Iron Age individuals from the Altai.
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep20768
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.