Europe from Lisbon to Vladivastok

[vorobuthek]

Russia is a European country, French President Emmanuel Macron has said following talks with President Vladimir Putin.

Macron hosted Putin in France on Monday, where the French leader played up efforts “to tie Russia and Europe back together” and underscored his belief that “Europe stretches from Lisbon to Vladivostok.”

What do you think about Macron's statement? In your opinion, is it possible to create a united white state from Lisbon to Vladivastok in the future? Can countries such as the United States, Canada, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand enter this hypothetical white country?


Translation of the tweet in the picture: the guys only have one thing on their mind, and this is awesome *_*
(Greater Europe from Lisbon to Vladivastok)

https://sun9-19.userapi.com/c850536/v850536459/19490a/gyTswz_XnK8.jpg

[Blondie]

If Vladivastok is european than i'm bantu :picard1:

[Dragoon]

Here is the positives of any such idea:

It would make the EU less leftist.
Perhaps the ideas might shift back into western Europe which have heavily been cucked in few last decades.
Europe is stronger (population, military, resources).

The negatives:

Its tough imagine most people trusting such a plan, because of remembering Communism (losses to people or economy), geopolitical differences (countries of middle Europe still see the threat from the East), and Western Europe is so liberal its nuts.
There might be problem of restributing money from Western Europe to East. If I put myself in Western Europe shoes, id hate what the EU has done in economic ways.
The Russians themselves have a lot of immigrants.

[Crn Volk]

If Vladivastok is european than i'm bantu :picard1:

Population-wise Vladivostok is more European than Marseilles for example, or some other West European towns. But yeah, geographically it's in Asia.

[Mingle]

Population-wise Vladivostok is more European than Marseilles for example, or some other West European towns. But yeah, geographically it's in Asia.

So basically its as European as Perth is.

[Crn Volk]

So basically its as European as Perth is.

Yes.

[Rob1992]

Greater Europe or nothing!

"1. Alain de Benoist’s Europe of a Hundred Flags

One of the few European geopolitical schools which has preserved an uninterrupted link with the ideas of the pre-war German continentalist geopoliticians is that of the “New Right.” This trend appeared in France in the late ’60’s and is associated with the philosopher and publicist Alain de Benoist, the leading figure of the movement.

The “New Right” sharply differs on practically all matters from the traditional French right consisting of monarchists, Catholics, Germanophobes, chauvinists, anti-communists, conservatives, etc. The “New Right” includes those who support “organic democracy,” pagans, Germanophiles, socialists, modernists, etc. At the beginning, the “left camp” so conventionally, extremely influential in France considered such to be a “tactical maneuver” by typical rightists, but with time the gravity of this evolution was proven and came to be recognized by all.

One of the fundamental principles of the “New Right’s” ideology, analogues of which soon appeared in other European countries, is the principal of “continental geopolitics.” In contrast to the “old right” and classical nationalists, de Benoist believed that the principle of the centralized Nation-State has been historically exhausted and that the future belongs only to “Great Spaces.” The basis of such “Large Spaces” are to be not so much associations of various states in a pragmatic political bloc, but the equal-footed conglomeration of ethnic groups of different scales into a “Federal Empire.” Such a “Federal Empire” is supposed to be strategically unified, yet ethnically differentiated. Moreover, such strategic unity is to be underpinned by the unity of primordial culture.

The “Large Space” which interested de Benoist most of all was Europe. The New Right believed that the peoples of Europe possess a common Indo-European heritage, a single origin, and the principle of a “common past.” The conditions of the modern epoch, in which tendencies of strategic and economic integration are actively essential for the possession of any real geopolitical sovereignty, dictate the necessity of uniting in even a purely pragmatic sense. Thus, the peoples of Europe are destined for a “common future,” and therein de Benoist draws the conclusion that the thesis of a “United Europe of a hundred flags” [16] must become Europeans’ fundamental geopolitical standard. In such a perspective, as in all the concepts of the New Right, a striving to combine “conservative” and “modernist” elements,i.e., “right” and “left” principles, is clearly visible. In recent years, the New Right has rejected such a label insofar as it considers itself to be “right” to the same extent that it is “left.”

De Benoist’s geopolitical theses are based on an affirmation of the “continental fate of Europe.” In this regard, he fully adheres to the conceptions of Haushofer’s school. From this follows the New Right’s characteristic juxtaposition of “Europe” and the “West.” For them, Europe is a continental, geopolitical formation founded on an ensemble of ethnicities with a common Indo-European origin and possessing common cultural roots. This concept is a traditional one. The “West,” on the contrary, is a geopolitical and historical concept of the modern world which denies ethnic and spiritual traditions, instead putting forth purely material and quantitative criteria of existence, i.e., an essentially utilitarian and rationalist, mechanistic bourgeois civilization. Accordingly, the USA is understood as the most complete incarnation of the West and its “civilization.” "

[Adamastor]

South Africa and Chile :lol:

Maybe Zimbabwe can join this ''white'' league as well.

[vorobuthek]

South Africa and Chile :lol:

Maybe Zimbabwe can join this ''white'' league as well.

In chile, the majority of the population is white. And I am sure there is still an opportunity to fix the situation in South Africa.

[Ülev]

trust me, that's better idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_for_the_Mediterranean
same oil and gas resources etc.

[PAGANE]

No, and it's not necessary Globalism is destructive, it personifies peoples and cultures

[vorobuthek]

trust me, that's better idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_for_the_Mediterranean
same oil and gas resources etc.

Seriously? Do you think that Arabs are more Europeans than Slavs?

[Duffmannn]

In chile, the majority of the population is white. And I am sure there is still an opportunity to fix the situation in South Africa.

No.

[Root]

Horsecrap! Let's think outside the box! Europe starts from Longyearbyen and ends in Ushuaia

[Adamastor]

In chile, the majority of the population is white. And I am sure there is still an opportunity to fix the situation in South Africa.

No Latin American country is majority ''white'' (i.e. genetically European) though some of them are predominantly European. I don't know why people in this forum are so obsessed with South Africa being anything remotely white, it's a black majority country.

[Duffmannn]

No Latin American country is majority ''white'' (i.e. genetically European) though some of them are predominantly European. I don't know why people in this forum are so obsessed with South Africa being anything remotely white, it's a black majority country.

Uruguay is both mayority white and majority european.

But has only 3 million people.

[Adamastor]

Uruguay is both mayority white and majority european.

But has only 3 million people.

I mean white as 99-100% European genetically. Most Uruguyans score some non-Euro, even if minor. If we include people who are over 70% or 80% European as white then even Brazil or Cuba are ''majority white''.

[vorobuthek]

No Latin American country is majority ''white'' (i.e. genetically European) though some of them are predominantly European. I don't know why people in this forum are so obsessed with South Africa being anything remotely white, it's a black majority country.

85% of Argentines are white, 50% of Chileans are white, 88% of Uruguayans are white. As for South Africa, this is historically the land of whites (almost all blacks came to this land later than whites) and whites are still a significant minority in the country, so in the future it will be necessary to resolve this issue.

[Adamastor]

85% of Argentines are white, 50% of Chileans are white, 88% of Uruguayans are white. As for South Africa, this is historically the land of whites (almost all blacks came to this land later than whites) and whites are still a significant minority in the country, so in the future it will be necessary to resolve this issue.

LOL

You're clearly don't know what you're talking about.

[Duffmannn]

I mean white as 99-100% European genetically. Most Uruguyans score some non-Euro, even if minor. If we include people who are over 70% or 80% European as white then even Brazil or Cuba are ''majority white''.

35% of uruguayans are 98-100% euro. 50% of uruguayans are 90% euro. 65% of uruguayans are 85% euro. The rest is amerindian, not SSA at all.

I think that for anybody, even for stormfront posters, Uruguay is a majority euro country in any sense.

If we apply the 70% euro rule, 90% of uruguayans would be european.

[Duffmannn]

85% of Argentines are white, 50% of Chileans are white, 88% of Uruguayans are white. As for South Africa, this is historically the land of whites (almost all blacks came to this land later than whites) and whites are still a significant minority in the country, so in the future it will be necessary to resolve this issue.

Concept of whiteness in Latin America is very very lax.

When you see such numbers, divide them between 2 or even 3 to get a more approximated number to the reality.

[Adamastor]

Concept of whiteness in Latin America is very very lax.

When you see such numbers, divide them between 2 or even 3 to get a more approximated number to the reality.

Not only that, but most of this information is based on internet guesses based on nothing. According to Argentinian users here Argentina never had a racial census; the same for Chile and most of Latin America. The only countries in Latin America with racial census are Brazil and Cuba and I think they are relatively accurate.

[Duffmannn]

Not only that, but most of this information is based on internet guesses based on nothing. According to Argentinian users here Argentina never had a racial census; the same for Chile and most of Latin America. The only countries in Latin America with racial census are Brazil and Cuba and I think they are relatively accurate.

There´s no a 65% of whites in Cuba or a 50% in Brazil. Those censuses are not accurate at all, you have to mix the census information with genetical studies to make yourself a true idea.

There are more countries with racial censuses: Venezuela and Peru (I think this is the single of the four that has really accurate numbers regarding the different racial groups). And almost all the rest count the amerindian and black minorities, but do not distinguish between mestizo and white.

[Ülev]

trust me, that's better idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_for_the_Mediterranean
same oil and gas resources etc.


Seriously? Do you think that Arabs are more Europeans than Slavs?

How many Slavs in Russia? 40%? I do watch Russian tv, YT channels etc. and see many Buryats, Tuvans, Kalmyks, "Komids" etc.
and Slavs in Union for the Mediterranean - Poland, Czech R., Slovakia, Bulgaaria, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosniaks and hope Serbs could join too that project

[Art23]

Macron est très naïf. Putin would support this idea to turn the area into the new USSR.
No, thanks. I am fine with Europe ending on the eastern border of Ukraine.

[Adamastor]

There´s no a 65% of whites in Cuba or a 50% in Brazil. Those censuses are not accurate at all, you have to mix the census information with genetical studies to make yourself a true idea.


Not sure about Cuba, but Brazilian census says Brazil is 47% White and that's not an amazing difference to what genetic studies show us. 35-40% of people above 80% European is reasonable to Brazil.

Way more unreasonable is the information saying Chile is 50, 60 or even 80% White and that Argentina is 85% White. The problem of using genetic studies as information regarding whiteness is that some people above 80% may not look White.

Defining White as ''80%+ European'' then I think Latin American countries can be ranked like that according to most genetic studies:

Uruguay: 80-85% of the population
Argentina: 50% of the population
Brazil, Cuba: 35-40% of the population (in the case of these two I think 85-90% Euro would be a better threshold, since SSA blood is stronger than Indian)
Puerto Rico: 20% of the population

All other Latin American countries have less than 20% of the population above 80% European.

[vorobuthek]

How many Slavs in Russia? 40%? I do watch Russian tv, YT channels etc. and see many Buryats, Tuvans, Kalmyks, "Komids" etc.
and Slavs in Union for the Mediterranean - Poland, Czech R., Slovakia, Bulgaaria, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosniaks and hope Serbs could join too that project

There are more Slavs in Russia than there are French people in France or Swedes in Sweden. I am not even talking about the attitude of Arabs and Negroes towards European culture and values.

https://s00.yaplakal.com/pics/pics_original/8/4/8/12958848.jpg

[Ülev]

European culture and values? what Soviet Union (people from there) did with all those westerns factory buildings and western owner's possessions?

[Ülev]

Russia Offers 2.5 Million Acres Of Farmland To China
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?256099-Russia-Offers-2-5-Million-Acres-Of-Farmland-To-China

[vorobuthek]

European culture and values? what Soviet Union (people from there) did with all those westerns factory buildings and western owner's possessions?

The Soviet Union has not been around for almost 30 years, the Russians are no longer even trying to capture Europe, but are offering peace and cooperation. Why not? Muslim Arabs who have been enemies of Europe for centuries and who openly spit on European history and rape white women, are better than Russians who have always been a part of Europe?

[Ülev]

interesting reportage about South African Boers, wars between Dutch colonists and the British Empire, Russian (Imperial) help etc, only in Russian language


source: Россия 24 YT channel

https://youtu.be/nKM2qt2G2N8

8:06
and there is (among other words): 8:55 "we are white also (Russian reportage crew), but they give us interview with pleasure and invite us on protest, because we came from the country of Ilich Lenin, the main ideologist of expatriate (nationalisation) another's property

[PaleoEuropean]

interesting reportage about South African Boers, wars between Dutch colonists and the British Empire, Russian (Imperial) help etc, only in Russian language


source: Россия 24 YT channel

https://youtu.be/nKM2qt2G2N8

8:06
and there is (among other words): 8:55 "we are white also (Russian reportage crew), but they give us interview with pleasure and invite us on protest, because we came from the country of Ilich Lenin, the main ideologist of expatriate (nationalisation) another's property

If only we all got along, we Europeans would be ruling the rest of the world

[Rob1992]

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-spMHh-Fb054/Tk81tccOBUI/AAAAAAAAABo/GnUDVTdCLe4/s1600/eurosiberia1.jpg



Guillaume Faye Speaks in Moscow

The following talk was given in Moscow on May 17, 2006.

Not since the fall of the Roman Empire has Europe experienced such a dramatic situation. It faces a danger unparalleled in its history and doesn’t even know it — or rather refuses to see it.

It’s been invaded, occupied, and colonized by peoples from the South and by Islam. It’s dominated by the United States, which wages a merciless economic war on it. It’s collapsing demographically, as its population ages and it ceases to reproduce itself. It’s been emasculated by decadent, nihilist ideologies cloaked in a facile optimism, and it’s been subjected to an unprecedented regression of culture and education, to primitivism and materialism. Europe is the sick man of the world. And its political classes, along with its intellectual elites, are actively collaborating in this race suicide. The argument I’m making is not, though, just about immigration, but also about a colonization and an invasion that is transforming Europe’s biological and ethno-cultural stock; it’s about not giving way to despair; about seeing that the struggle is only just beginning; and knowing that the closely related peoples of Europe have no alternative but to unite in their common defense.

THE DESTRUCTION OF EUROPE’S ETHNO-BIOLOGICAL STOCK
The demographics of the non-White invasion of France and Europe is terrifying. In a recent work, “France africaine” (African France), a well known demographer predicts that if present trends continue, more than 40 percent of the French population will be Black or Arab by 2040. Twenty-five percent of school children in France and Belgium today and more than 30 percent of infants are already of non-European origin. Of France’s present population of 61 million, more than 10 million are non-European and have a far higher birth rate than Whites. Every year 100,000 non-Europeans are naturalized as French citizens and another 300,000, most illegal, cross our undefended borders. The situation is not much different in the rest of Europe and signals the virtual end of our civilization, though the political classes have apparently yet to notice it.

Worldwide, including the United States, the White race is in steep numerical decline. It’s often said that our technological superiority will compensate for this disparity, but I don’t think so: The only meaningful forms of wealth and power are in human beings. For a civilization is based primarily on what the Romans called “germen,” that is, on the ethno-biological stock, the roots, that nourish a civilization and culture.

The non-European invasion of Europe that began in the 1960s was largely self-engendered, provoked: By left and right-wing politicians contaminated with Marxist and Trotskyist ideas; by an employer class greedy for cheap labor; by Jewish intellectuals demanding a multiracial society; by the ideology of human rights that had sprung from the secularization of certain Christian principles.

In France and in Europe, the collaborators abetting the invasion have established a system of preferences for the invaders that native Whites are obliged to pay for. Illegal immigrants are thus not only rarely repatriated when caught, they continue to receive the lavish social welfare benefits handed out to them by the anti-White forces in control of the state. At the same time, “anti-racists” have introduced a host of discriminatory laws that protect immigrants from normal social restraints, even though they are largely responsible for the on-going explosion of criminality (more than a thousand percent in the last 50 years).

The invasion is taking place as much in the maternity wards as it is along our porous borders. Combined with the demographic decline of the White population, immigration has become an economic disaster for Western Europe. It’s estimated to cost $180 billion per year (if the growing insecurity, as well as the innumerable forms of social assistance benefiting immigrants, including illegals, is figured in). This, in turn, creates new lures for the invaders: It is simply far more interesting to be unemployed in Europe than to work in the Third World. While the educated and creative segments of our population are beginning to flee, mainly to the United States, they are being replaced by Africa’s refuse, which has to be fed and supported by us and hasn’t anything in the way of skills or intelligence to offer.

All these facts suggest that the 21st-century European economy will be a depressed, Third-World one.

ISLAM’S THIRD MAJOR OFFENSIVE
In addition to this mass, non-White invasion, Islam is again on the offensive. With single-minded persistence, its totalitarian and aggressive religion/ideology seeks the conquest of Europe. We’ve already suffered three great assaults by Islam, which today stretches from Gibraltar to Indonesia. The first of these offensives was halted at Portiers in 732 by Charles Martel; the second in 1683, during the Ottoman siege of Vienna; the third [in the form of the present invasion and colonization] is now underway [and virtually unopposed]. Islam has a long memory and its objective is to establish on our continent what [the leader of Iran’s Islamic Revolution, the ayattolla] Khomeiny called the “universal Caliphate.”

The invasion of Europe has begun and the figures [testifying to its extent] are alarming. The continent, including Russia, is now occupied by 55 million Muslims, a number that increases at a 6 percent annual rate. In France, there are at least 6 million. Like those in Belgium and Britain, these French Muslims are starting to demand a share of political power. The government, for its part, simply refuses to take seriously their objective of transforming France into an Islamic Republic by the year 2020, when the demographic weight of the Arab/Muslim population will have become determinant. Meanwhile, it is financing the construction of Mosques throughout the country in the hope of buying social peace; there are already more than 2,000 in France, nearly double the number in Morocco. Islam is at present the second largest religion in France, behind Catholicism, but the largest in the numbers of practitioners. [The republic’s president] Jacques Chirac has even declared that “France is now an Islamic power.” Everywhere in the West there prevails the unfounded belief that there’s a difference between Islam and “Islamism,” and that a Western, secularized, that is, moderate, Islam is possible. There’s no such thing. Every Muslim is potentially a jihadist. For Islam is a theocracy that confuses the spiritual with the temporal, faith with law, and seeks to impose its Shari’a [Islamic law] on a Europe whose civilizational precepts are absolutely incompatible with it.

THE ADVENT OF RACE WAR
The criminality and delinquency in Western Europe caused by mass immigration and the collapse of civic values have reached insupportable levels. In France in 2004, more than a 100,00 cars were torched and 80 policemen killed. Every week race riots erupt in the banlieues [the “suburbs” housing the immigrants masses]. In the public schools, violence is endemic and educational levels have almost collapsed. Among youth under 20, nearly 20 percent are illiterate. While racist assaults on Whites are steadily rising, they are routinely ignored in the name of the anti-racist vulgate, which holds that only Whites can be racists. At the same time, an arsenal of repressive legislation, worthy of Soviet communism, has imposed “laws” whose purely ideological and subjective intent make no pretence to fairness, let alone objectivity. All criticism of immigration or Islam is prohibited. I myself have been tried several time and levied with an enormous fine for having written “La colonisation de l’Europe” [The Colonization of Europe].

A race war is foreseeable now in several European countries, a subterranean war that will be far more destructive than “terrorism.” The White population is being displaced, a sort of genocide is being carried out against it with the complicity or the abstention of the ruling class, the media, and the politicians, for the ideology these collaborating elites uphold is infused with a pathological hatred of their own people and a morbid passion for miscegenation.

The state’s utopian plan for “republican integration” has nevertheless failed because it assumed peaceful coexistence between foreigners and natives, non-Whites and Whites, was possible in a single territory. Our rulers haven’t read Aristotle, who taught that no city can possibly be democratic and orderly if it isn’t ethnically homogenous… European societies today are devolving into an unmanageable ethnic chaos.

I’m a native of Southwest France, of the area along the Atlantic coast [a Gascon?], and speak not a word of Russian, but I feel infinitely closer to a Russian than to a French-speaking Arab or African, even if they happen to be “French” citizens.

THE MORAL CRISIS AND ARCHEOFUTURISM
The present situation can be explained, almost clinically, as a sort of “mental AIDS.” Our present afflictions come from the virus of nihilism, which Nietzsche foresaw, and which has weakened all our natural defenses. Thus infected, Europeans have succumbed to a feverish self-extinction. They have voluntarily opened the city gates.

The primary symptom of this disease is “xenophilia:” a systematic preference for the Other rather than for the Same. A second symptom is “ethnomasochism,” a hatred of one’s own civilization and origins. A third is emasculation [dévirilisation], or what might be called the cult of weakness and a preference for male homosexuality. Historically proven values associated with the use of force and a people’s survival — values associated with honor, loyalty, family, fertility, patriotism, the will to survive, etc. — are treated today as ridiculous shortcomings. This sort of decadence owes a good deal to the secularization of Christian charity and its egalitarian offshoot, human rights.

Europeans may take inspiration from certain values still upheld in Russia: For example, the consciousness of belonging to a superior civilization and of maintaining a “right to distance” from other peoples. We need to break with all forms of “ethnopluralism,” which is simply another kind of egalitarianism, and reclaim the right to “ethnocentrism,” the right to live in our own lands without the Other. We also have to reclaim the principle: “To each his own.” Besides, only Westerners believe race-mixing is a virtue or envisage the future as a melting pot. They alone believe in cosmopolitanism. But the 21st century will be dominated by a resurgence of ethno-religious blocs, especially in the South and the East. Francis Fukuyama’s “end of history” will never happen. Instead, we’re going to experience an acceleration of history with the “clash of civilizations.” Europeans also need to break with the “presentism” in which they are sunk and learn to see themselves again (as do Muslims, Chinese, and Indians) as a “long-living people,” bearers of a future. The mental revolution needed to bring about this change in European attitudes is, though, only possible through a gigantic crisis, a violent shock, which is already on its way and which I will say a few words about below.

THE NEW AMERICAN IMPERIALISM
Europeans also have to come to terms with what I called in my last book “the new American imperialism,” an imperialism more heavy-handed than that of the Cold War era, but one that is also more blundering. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, American administrations seem to have lost all sense of measure, becoming even more hubristic, as they embark on a fantastic quest for world domination, dressed up in the simulacre of a new Roman empire. Much of this, of course, is explainable in terms of neoconservative ideology, linked with Zionism, but it’s also driven by a messianic, almost pathological, sense of having a “divine mission.”

What are the goals of this new American imperialism? To encircle and neutralize Russia, preventing any meaningful alliance between her and Europe (the Pentagon’s worse nightmare); to deflect Europe’s challenge to its hegemony by making Islam and Muslim Turkey a part of it; to subjugate the Eastern and Central European parts of the former Soviet empire; to wage a relentless economic war on the European Union and do so in such a way that the latter doesn’t dream of resisting. Everywhere, the crusading spirit of this new American imperialism endeavors to impose “democracy”, especially on Russia’s periphery. “Democracy” has come to mean “pro-American regime.”

But we shouldn’t complain of these American ambitions, which accord with the country’s geopolitical and thalassocratic desire for domination. In history, everyone is responsible only for oneself.

That’s why I oppose the “obsessional and hysterical anti-Americanism” so prevalent in France, for it is counter-productive, self-victimizing, and irresponsible.

A people or nation must learn to distinguish between its “principal adversary” and its “principal enemy.” The first tries to dominate and undermine, the second to kill. We shouldn’t forget Carl Schmitt’s formula: “It’s not only you who chooses your enemy, it’s more often your enemy who chooses you.” America, specifically its ruling class, is Europe’s and Russia’s “principal adversary” at the level of geopolitics, economics, and culture. Europe’s “principal enemy” is the peoples of the South, increasingly assembled under the banner of Islam, whose invasion of the continent is already well underway, facilitated by a political class and an intelligentsia who have opened the gates (to Washington’s delight) and who seek a miscegenated, non-European Europe.

Like Atlanticists, the hysterical anti-Americans overestimate the United States, without understanding that it is only as strong as we are weak. The Americans’ catastrophic and counter-productive occupation of little Iraq, to which they have brought nothing but chaos, makes this all indisputably evident. In the 21st century, the U.S. will cease to be the premier world power. That will be China — or, if we have the will, what I call “Euro-Siberia” — a federated alliance between the peoples of the European peninsular and Russia.

THE CONVERGENCE OF CATASTROPHES
I’ve postulated the hypothesis that the present global system, founded on a belief in miracles, a belief in the myth of indefinite progress, is on the verge of collapse. For the first time in history, humanity as a whole is threatened by a cataclysmic crisis that is likely to occur sometime between 2010 and 2020 — a crisis provoked by the on-going degradation of the ecosystem and climatic disruptions, by the exhaustion of fossil fuel sources and food producing capacity, by the increased fragility of an international economic order based on speculation and massive indebtedness, by the return of epidemics, by the rise of nationalism, terrorism, and nuclear proliferation, by the growing aggressiveness of Islam’s world offense, and by the dramatic aging of the West’s population.

We need to prepare for these converging catastrophes, which will mark the transition from one era to another, as their cataclysmic effects sweep away liberal modernity and bring about a New Middle Age. With such a convergence, there will also come an opportunity for rebirth, for every major historical regeneration emerges from chaos. This is especially the case with a civilization like our own, whose very nature is “metamorphic.”

EUROSIBERIA
The Europe of the future must no longer be envisaged in the mushy, ungovernable forms of the present European Union, which is a powerless Medusa, unable to control its borders, dominated by the mania of free-trade, and subject to American domination. We need to imagine a federal, imperial Grande Europe, ethnically homogenous (that is, European), based on a single autonomous area, and inseparably linked to Russia. I call this enormous continental bloc “Euro-Siberia.” Having no need to be aggressive toward its neighbors because it would be inattackable, such a bloc would become the premier world power (in a world partitioned into large blocs), self-centered, and opposed to all the dangerous dogmas now associated with globalism. It would have the capacity to practice the “autarky of great spaces,” whose principles have already been worked out by the Noble Prize winning economist, Maurice Allais. The destiny of the European peninsular cannot be separated from continental Russia, for both ethno-cultural and geopolitical reasons. It’s absolutely imperative for America’s mercantile thalassocracy to prevent the birth of a Euro-Siberian federation.

This is not the place to speak of the Israeli state. Only a word: For essentially demographic reasons, I believe the Zionist utopia conceived by Hertzl and Buber and realized since 1948 will not survive any longer than Soviet communism did; indeed, its end is already in sight. I’m presently writing a book on “The New Jewish Question,” which I hope will be translated into Russian.

CONCLUSION
Fatalism is never appropriate. History is always open-ended and presents innumerable unexpected caprices and turns. Let’s not forget the formula of William of Orange: “Where there’s a will, there’s a way.” The period we are presently living through is a one of resistance and of preparation for the even more threatening events to come, such as might follow the juncture of a race war and a massive economic downturn. We need to start thinking in post-chaos terms and organize accordingly. In closing, let me leave you with a favorite watchword of mine: “From Resistance to Reconquest, From Reconquest to Renaissance.”

[vorobuthek]

interesting reportage about South African Boers, wars between Dutch colonists and the British Empire, Russian (Imperial) help etc, only in Russian language


source: Россия 24 YT channel

https://youtu.be/nKM2qt2G2N8

8:06
and there is (among other words): 8:55 "we are white also (Russian reportage crew), but they give us interview with pleasure and invite us on protest, because we came from the country of Ilich Lenin, the main ideologist of expatriate (nationalisation) another's property

and what does it say?

[WinterCrusader]

Macron est très naïf. Putin would support this idea to turn the area into the new USSR.
No, thanks. I am fine with Europe ending on the eastern border of Ukraine.

Europe ends at Austria.

[vorobuthek]

Europe ends at Austria.

Europe ends at Normandy.

[WinterCrusader]

Europe ends at Normandy.

Normans were/are french.