Log in

View Full Version : Which one is the best GEDmatch calculator?



Adamastor
09-24-2019, 07:14 PM
I mean the one with more accurate results and a better Oracle. I think MDLP K16 is by far the better.

MercifulServant
09-24-2019, 07:18 PM
Eurogenes K13

MercifulServant
09-24-2019, 07:19 PM
I think MDLP K16 is by far the better.

This oracle is very innacurate actually. They plot all europeans very close to eachother, I got Northwest French as the top even though im 100% South Slavic.

Adamastor
09-24-2019, 07:20 PM
This oracle is very innacurate actually. They plot all europeans very close to eachother, I got Northwest French as the top even though im 100% South Slavic.

But they have more samples, no? It seems they have samples lacking in Eurogenes K13.

MercifulServant
09-24-2019, 07:23 PM
But they have more samples, no? It seems they have samples lacking in Eurogenes K13.

Just the components in general are kinda bullshit. and how can a Serb plot with Northwest French, When on every other calculator I get Serbian and South Slavic results.

Kyp
09-24-2019, 07:26 PM
I mean the one with more accurate results and a better Oracle. I think MDLP K16 is by far the better.

Very inaccurate for me (of mixed heritage):

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Avar_Dagestan +50% Kosovar_Kosovo @ 3.059547

Rocinante
09-24-2019, 07:27 PM
1-Eurogenes k15
2-Eurogenes k13
3-EU Test

Bakha
09-24-2019, 07:32 PM
Very inaccurate for me i am half Uzbek not some Azeri

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:


<tbody>
#

Primary Population (source)
Secondary Population (source)
Distance


1

51.6%
Azerbaijani_Khachmaz (Azerbaijan_Khachmaz)
+
48.4%
Russian (NorthRussia)
@
2.79


2

52.7%
Turkmens (Turkmenistan)
+
47.3%
Pole (Poland)
@
2.85


3

61.9%
Mishar-Tatar (Mordovia)
+
38.1%
Azerbaijani_Khachmaz (Azerbaijan_Khachmaz)
@
2.94


4

64.1%
Mishar-Tatar (Mordovia)
+
35.9%
Azerbaijani_Dagestan (Azerbaijan_Dagestan)
@
3.02


5

52.1%
Azerbaijani_Khachmaz (Azerbaijan_Khachmaz)
+
47.9%
Russian (Pinega)
@
3.04


6

53.1%
Azerbaijani_Khachmaz (Azerbaijan_Khachmaz)
+
46.9%
Vepsa (Russia)
@
3.07

</tbody>

Kyp
09-24-2019, 07:38 PM
I think k13 and k15 are pretty solid

k13:
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Azeri +50% Hungarian @ 4.933661

k15
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Austrian +50% Azeri @ 6.361952

Dodecad k12b
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% German_Dodecad +50% Turks_Behar @ 4.926353

Thracian
09-24-2019, 08:10 PM
K16's oracles are really joke for me.

I don't know but I don't think MDLP's are good calculators. I prefer Eurogenes K13 and K15 and PuntDNAL k15.

Rocinante
09-24-2019, 08:31 PM
I mean the one with more accurate results and a better Oracle. I think MDLP K16 is by far the better.

Using 1 population approximation:
1 Corsican_Corsica @ 4.263836

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Greek_Peloponnes +50% Spanish_Extremadura @ 2.355079

Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Maltese_Malta +25% Scottish_Borders +25% Spanish_Castilla_la_Mancha @ 1.202264

Using 4 populations approximation:
1 Maltese_Malta + Maltese_Malta + Scottish_Borders + Spanish_Castilla_la_Mancha @ 1.202264

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
1 77.4% Spanish (Galicia) + 22.6% Jew (Georgia) @ 1.88

Nah... not my favorite

Kaspias
09-24-2019, 10:17 PM
PuntDNAL for Balkans. Strikingly accurate in my case.

Bakha
09-25-2019, 05:17 AM
I find dodecadk12 very good. Obviously bukharans are closer to turkmens than to more mongoloid uzbeks:

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:


<tbody>
#

Primary Population (source)
Secondary Population (source)
Distance


1

52.4%
Turkmens (Yunusbayev)
+
47.6%
Polish (Dodecad)
@
5.36


2

52.2%
Turkmens (Yunusbayev)
+
47.8%
Mixed_Slav (Dodecad)
@
6.14


3

50.5%
Turkmens (Yunusbayev)
+
49.5%
Ukranians (Yunusbayev)
@
6.36


4

57.8%
Hungarians (Behar)
+
42.2%
Turkmens (Yunusbayev)
@
6.36


5

54.9%
Turkmens (Yunusbayev)
+
45.1%
Belorussian (Behar)
@
6.86


6

53.4%
Turkmens (Yunusbayev)
+
46.6%
Russian (Dodecad)
@
6.96


7

59.3%
Nogais (Yunusbayev)
+
40.7%
Swedish (Dodecad)
@
7

</tbody>

Kyp
09-25-2019, 06:14 AM
I find dodecadk12 very good. Obviously bukharans are closer to turkmens than to more mongoloid uzbeks:

[

agree. But unfortunately it lacks a lot of samples.