Log in

View Full Version : Chinese DNA results by Province (HarappaWorld) (NE asian, SE asian, Siberian)



Thambi
10-16-2019, 08:30 PM
HarappaWorld averages by province in China. I couldnt find any results for Qinghai, Gansu, Hainan, and Ningxia so i left those blank. Arranged them in descending order for northeast asian in the chart. Also posted the maps of the major components among chinese (NE asian, SE asian, and Siberian)

https://i.imgur.com/DJWOh94.png

Northeast Asian
https://i.imgur.com/2p8mg6v.png

Southeast Asian
https://i.imgur.com/sLdaxM9.png

Siberian
https://i.imgur.com/aAR5XVp.png

Leto
10-16-2019, 08:49 PM
Good job, thank you!
So even the NE Han are not very Siberian.

Thambi
10-16-2019, 08:53 PM
Good job, thank you!
So even the NE Han are not very Siberian.

Np

and im surprised as well. I think the ethnic minorities there might be quite siberian shifted like the Daur, henzhen, etc. but the regular han folks are roughly the same in NE china and northern china plain. Han are the vast majority in northeast china. Northern china overall seems very homogenous in terms of NE asian from NE china to central china around shanghai. the differences occur with siberian and SE asian to an extent. southern china is the most diverse it seems cause i've seen results that range from korean like to se asian like in that region.

Leto
10-16-2019, 08:56 PM
Np

and im surprised as well. I think the ethnic minorties there might be like the Daur, henzhen, etc. but the regular han folks are roughly the same in NE china and northern china plain. Northern china overall seems very homogenous in terms of NE asian from Ne china to central china around shanghai. the differences occur with siberian and SE asian to a extent.
For reference, what would be the Vietnamese average? Maybe North vs South. I don't think we need a separate thread for Vietnam.

Leto
10-16-2019, 08:58 PM
Also, why is Tibet so Siberian and literally zero SE Asian?

Thambi
10-16-2019, 09:18 PM
For reference, what would be the Vietnamese average? Maybe North vs South. I don't think we need a separate thread for Vietnam.

Korean
North East Asian 75
South East Asian 14
Siberian 10
South Indian 0
Baloch 0
Caucasian 0
North East Euro 0
Papuan 0
American 0
Beringian 1
Mediterranean 0
South West Asian 0
San 0
East African 0
Pygmy 0
West African 0

Vietnamese
North East Asian 38%
South East Asian 58%
Siberian 0%
South Indian 1%
Baloch 0%
Caucasian 0%
North East Euro 0%
Papuan 1%
American 0%
Beringian 0%
Mediterranean 0%
South West Asian 0%
San 0%
East African 0%
Pygmy 0%
West African 0%

Laotian
North East Asian 51
South East Asian 45
Siberian 1
South Indian 1
Baloch 0
Caucasian 0
North East Euro 0
Papuan 1
American 0
Beringian 0
Mediterranean 0
South West Asian 1
San 0
East African 0
Pygmy 0
West African 0


Also, why is Tibet so Siberian and literally zero SE Asian?

Tibetans, along with nepali mongoloids, several northeast indian groups (Sikkim, arunachal, nagaland) get almost no SE asian. Tibetans never really came in contact with Se asians unlike the han chinese, koreans, japanese, etc. Tibetans get siberian given the slight mongol connection. Overall though Tibetans are very similar to northern han chinese, koreans with lower se asian and higher siberian/south indian. Actually koreans have roughy similar NE asian and Siberian and Tibetans. Difference is some Se asian among koreans and south asian among tibetans.